Similar Datasets
Project description:Gene expression data from mouse conventional dendritic cells (cDC) [IRF4,IRF8 DKO]
| PRJNA589831 | ENA
Project description:We used microarrays to understand roles of BATF proteins in the regulation of cDC-specific gene expression.
2020-08-13 | GSE140452 | GEO
Project description:Upon antigen recognition B cells undertake a bifurcated response in which some cells rapidly differentiate into plasmablasts while others undergo affinity maturation in germinal centers (GC). We uncover a double negative feedback loop between interferon regulatory factors IRF4 and IRF8, which regulates the initial bifurcation of activated B cells as well as the GC response. IRF8 dampens BCR signaling, facilitates antigen specific interaction with helper T cells, and promotes selection of high affinity clones while antagonizing IRF4 driven plasmablast differentiation. Genomic analysis reveals concentration dependent action of IRF4 and IRF8 in regulating distinctive gene expression programs. Stochastic modeling suggests that the double negative feedback is sufficient to initiate bifurcating B cell developmental trajectories. Naïve B cells were isolated from wild type (WT) mice spleen and activated in vitro with 10μg/ml LPS (Sigma). ChIP was performed by using anti-IRF4, -IRF8 antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotech). For massively parallel sequencing, 10-20 μg of chromatin fragments from indicated samples were immunoprecipitated by using anti-IRF-4 and anti-IRF8 antibodies, and DNA libraries were prepared with Illumina Kit. DNA was sequenced by using the Illumina HiSeq2500. Reads were aligned to the mouse genome (mm9) by using Taphat2 and peak calling were performed by homer 2. GC B cells were sorted from WT mice on dpi 13 post NP-KLH immunization. Cells were flash frozen immediately and process by Active Motif for IRF8 ChIP-Seq. Reads were aligned to mm9 by using BAM and peak calling were performed by using MACS. More details are provided in the manuscript.
2015-08-25 | E-GEOD-70710 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Upon antigen recognition B cells undertake a bifurcated response in which some cells rapidly differentiate into plasmablasts while others undergo affinity maturation in germinal centers (GC). We uncover a double negative feedback loop between interferon regulatory factors IRF4 and IRF8, which regulates the initial bifurcation of activated B cells as well as the GC response. IRF8 dampens BCR signaling, facilitates antigen specific interaction with helper T cells, and promotes selection of high affinity clones while antagonizing IRF4 driven plasmablast differentiation. Genomic analysis reveals concentration dependent action of IRF4 and IRF8 in regulating distinctive gene expression programs. Stochastic modeling suggests that the double negative feedback is sufficient to initiate bifurcating B cell developmental trajectories. Naïve B cells were isolated from Irf8+/+ (wild type, WT) mice spleen and activated in vitro with 10μg/ml LPS (Sigma). CD138hi IgMhi (IRF4hi*) cells and CD138lo IgMlo (IRF8hi*) cells were sorted by flow cytometry at 72 hours. Total RNA was prepared by using Rneasy Mini kit (Qiagen) and sequenced with Illumina HiSeq2500. Alignment was performed with Taphat2, and transcript abundance quantification using Cuffdiff function from Cufflinks. GC B cells were sorted from CD19cre/+ Irf8+/+ (Ctrl) or CD19cre/+ Irf8flox/flox (Irf8 cKO) mice on dpi 13 post NP-KLH immunization. Total RNA was prepared by using Rneasy Mini kit (Qiagen) and amplified with with Ovation RNA-Seq System v2 (NuGEN). The data were analyzed by Wardrobe. More details are provided in the manuscript.
2015-08-25 | E-GEOD-70711 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Upon antigen recognition B cells undertake a bifurcated response in which some cells rapidly differentiate into plasmablasts while others undergo affinity maturation in germinal centers (GC). We uncover a double negative feedback loop between interferon regulatory factors IRF4 and IRF8, which regulates the initial bifurcation of activated B cells as well as the GC response. IRF8 dampens BCR signaling, facilitates antigen specific interaction with helper T cells, and promotes selection of high affinity clones while antagonizing IRF4 driven plasmablast differentiation. Genomic analysis reveals concentration dependent action of IRF4 and IRF8 in regulating distinctive gene expression programs. Stochastic modeling suggests that the double negative feedback is sufficient to initiate bifurcating B cell developmental trajectories.
2015-08-25 | GSE70711 | GEO
Project description:Upon antigen recognition B cells undertake a bifurcated response in which some cells rapidly differentiate into plasmablasts while others undergo affinity maturation in germinal centers (GC). We uncover a double negative feedback loop between interferon regulatory factors IRF4 and IRF8, which regulates the initial bifurcation of activated B cells as well as the GC response. IRF8 dampens BCR signaling, facilitates antigen specific interaction with helper T cells, and promotes selection of high affinity clones while antagonizing IRF4 driven plasmablast differentiation. Genomic analysis reveals concentration dependent action of IRF4 and IRF8 in regulating distinctive gene expression programs. Stochastic modeling suggests that the double negative feedback is sufficient to initiate bifurcating B cell developmental trajectories.
2015-08-25 | GSE70710 | GEO
Project description:Lymphocyte activation and effector state differentiation critically depend on integration of multiple signals, including those from antigen, co-stimulatory ligand and cytokine receptors. Thus, discovery of molecular components and mechanisms underlying signal integration is vital for the understanding and control of adaptive immune responses. Stimulation of antigen receptors in lymphocytes leads to the activation of NFAT family transcription factors (TFs) as well as the inducible expression of the immune-selective IRFs, IRF4 and IRF8; the latter are differentially controlled by co-stimulatory ligand and cytokine receptor signaling. Despite their major overlapping functions in lymphocyte activation and differentiation, it has remained enigmatic if NFATs can perform signal integration with IRF4 and IRF8, via their cooperative assembly on composite genomic regulatory elements. Composite elements (CEs) provide a powerful means of signal integration by inducible TFs and despite their clear importance, CEs arguably remain the least explored elements within cis-regulomes. To test the above hypothesis, we deployed a generalizable computational strategy, which revealed a stereospecific NFAT-IRF composite element (NICE) motif that was enriched within active chromatin regions (H3K27Ac) of activated B and T lymphocytes. NICE containing DNA sequences promoted cooperative binding of NFATs with IRF4 or IRF8. Genomic analyses in activated B cells revealed co-dependent genes that undergo activation or repression and contain NICE motifs in their regulatory regions. Notably, NFATc2 and IRF8 form a positive feedforward loop and coordinately repress the Prdm1 gene by binding a NICE motif in a phylogenetically conserved region, thereby inhibiting extrafollicular plasma cell differentiation and promoting the germinal center fate of activated B cells. The NICE motif is also enriched in DNA sequences located in accessible chromatin of human lymphocytes, suggesting evolutionary conservation of its function. The cooperative assembly of NFAT family members with IRF4 and IRF8 on NICE motifs reveals a new genomic control mechanism that enables signal integration during lymphocyte activation and differentiation.
2018-10-06 | GSE104921 | GEO
Project description:Classic dendritic cells (cDCs) play a central role in the immune system and consist of two major subsets: CD141+ cDC (cDC1) and CD1c+ cDC (cDC2). The pre-cDCs is the immediate precursors to both cDC subsets. Previous studies showed that there were two pre-committed pre-cDC subpopulations. However, the key molecular drivers of pre-commitment in human pre-cDCs were not investigated. To address this question, we performed both single cell and bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of two cDC subsets and pre-cDCs. We inferred a list of sixteen candidate master regulator transcriptional factors (TFs) that can indeed separate pre-cDCs into two sub-populations, with one close to cDC1 and the other close to cDC2. More importantly, these two pre-cDC sub-populations are correlated with ratio of IRF8 to IRF4 expression level more than their individual expression level. Our results suggest the concept that the ratio of antagonistic TFs and their competition determine cDC subset differentiation fate.
2019-07-16 | GSE89322 | GEO
Project description:The transcription factors Batf3 and IRF8 are required for development of CD8α+ conventional dendritic cells (cDCs), but the basis for their actions was unclear. Here, we identify two novel Zbtb46+ progenitors that separately generate CD8α+ and CD4+ cDCs and arise directly from the common DC progenitor (CDP). Irf8 expression in the CDP depends on prior PU.1-dependent autoactivation, and specification of pre-CD8 DC progenitors requires IRF8 but not Batf3. However, upon pre-CD8 DC specification, Irf8 autoactivation becomes Batf3-dependent at a CD8α+ cDC-specific enhancer containing multiple AP1-IRF composite elements (AICEs) within the Irf8 superenhancer. CDPs from Batf3-/- mice that specify toward pre-CD8 DCs fail to complete CD8α+ cDC development due to decay of Irf8 autoactivation, and divert to the CD4+ cDC lineage. Examination of histone modifications (H3K27ac and H3K4me1) and 2 transcription factors (Batf3 and Irf8) and the p300 co-factor binding in 3 different dendritic cell subsets
2015-06-08 | E-GEOD-66899 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Conventional dendritic cells (cDC) consist of two functionally and phenotypically distinct subsets, cDC1 and cDC2, whose development is dependent on distinct sets of transcription factors. Interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) is required at multiple stages of cDC1 development, but its role in mature cDC1 remains unclear. Here we used XCR1-cre to delete Irf8 in committed cDC1 and demonstrate that Irf8 is required for maintaining the identify of cDC1 but not their survival. In the absence of Irf8, committed cDC1 (“ex-cDC1”) acquired the transcriptional, functional and chromatin accessibility properties of cDC2. This conversion was independent on Irf4 and was associated with decreased accessibility in putative IRF8, Batf3 and composite AP-1-IRF (AICE) binding elements, together with increased accessibility of cDC2 associated transcription factor binding elements. Thus, IRF8 expression by committed cDC1 is required for preventing their conversion into cDC2.
2022-06-21 | GSE168477 | GEO