Capybara: A tool to measure cell identity and fate transitions
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
PROVIDER: GSE145251 | GEO | 2020/02/14
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Capybara: A tool to measure cell identity and fate transitions
| PRJNA606516 | ENA
Project description:We and others have suggested that pioneer activity–a transcription factor’s (TF’s) ability to bind and open inaccessible loci–is not a qualitative trait limited to a select class of pioneer TFs. We hypothesize that most TFs display pioneering activity that depends on the TF concentration and the motif content at their target loci. Here we present a quantitative measure of pioneer activity that captures the relative difference in a TF’s ability to bind accessible versus inaccessible DNA. The metric is based on experiments that use CUT&Tag to measure binding of doxycycline (dox) inducible TFs. For each location across the genome we determine a “dox50,” the concentration of dox required for a TF to reach half-maximal occupancy. We propose that the ratio of a TF’s average dox50 between ATAC-seq labeled inaccessible and accessible binding sites, its Δdox50, is a measure of its pioneer activity. We measured Δdox50’s for the endodermal TFs FOXA1 and HNF4A and show that HNF4A has a smaller Δdox50 than FOXA1, suggesting that HNF4A has stronger pioneer activity than FOXA1. We further show that FOXA1 binding sites with more copies of its motif have a lower Δdox50, suggesting that strong motif content may compensate for weak pioneer activity. Our results suggest that Δdox50s, or other similar measures that assess the difference in TF affinity for inaccessible and accessible DNA, are reasonable measures of pioneer activity.
2022-05-27 | GSE204726 | GEO
Project description:The Pioneer Factor Hypothesis (PFH) states that pioneer factors (PFs) are a subclass of transcription factors (TFs) that bind to and open inaccessible sites and then recruit non-pioneer factors (nonPFs) that activate batteries of silent genes. We tested the PFH by expressing the endodermal PF FoxA1 and nonPF Hnf4a in K562 lymphoblast cells. While co-expression of FoxA1 and Hnf4a activated a burst of endoderm-specific gene expression, we found no evidence for functional distinction between these two TFs. When expressed independently, both TFs bound and opened inaccessible sites, activated endodermal genes, and “pioneered” for each other, although FoxA1 required fewer copies of its motif to bind at inaccessible sites. A subset of targets required both TFs, but the mode of action at these targets did not conform to the sequential activity predicted by the PFH. From these results we propose an alternative to the PFH where “pioneer activity” depends not on the existence of discrete TF subclasses, but on TF binding affinity and genomic context.
2021-11-18 | GSE189020 | GEO
Project description:The Pioneer Factor Hypothesis (PFH) states that pioneer factors (PFs) are a subclass of transcription factors (TFs) that bind to and open inaccessible sites and then recruit non-pioneer factors (nonPFs) that activate batteries of silent genes. We tested the PFH by expressing the endodermal PF FoxA1 and nonPF Hnf4a in K562 lymphoblast cells. While co-expression of FoxA1 and Hnf4a activated a burst of endoderm-specific gene expression, we found no evidence for functional distinction between these two TFs. When expressed independently, both TFs bound and opened inaccessible sites, activated endodermal genes, and “pioneered” for each other, although FoxA1 required fewer copies of its motif to bind at inaccessible sites. A subset of targets required both TFs, but the mode of action at these targets did not conform to the sequential activity predicted by the PFH. From these results we propose an alternative to the PFH where “pioneer activity” depends not on the existence of discrete TF subclasses, but on TF binding affinity and genomic context.
2021-11-18 | GSE189006 | GEO
Project description:The Pioneer Factor Hypothesis (PFH) states that pioneer factors (PFs) are a subclass of transcription factors (TFs) that bind to and open inaccessible sites and then recruit non-pioneer factors (nonPFs) that activate batteries of silent genes. We tested the PFH by expressing the endodermal PF FoxA1 and nonPF Hnf4a in K562 lymphoblast cells. While co-expression of FoxA1 and Hnf4a activated a burst of endoderm-specific gene expression, we found no evidence for functional distinction between these two TFs. When expressed independently, both TFs bound and opened inaccessible sites, activated endodermal genes, and “pioneered” for each other, although FoxA1 required fewer copies of its motif to bind at inaccessible sites. A subset of targets required both TFs, but the mode of action at these targets did not conform to the sequential activity predicted by the PFH. From these results we propose an alternative to the PFH where “pioneer activity” depends not on the existence of discrete TF subclasses, but on TF binding affinity and genomic context.
2021-08-18 | GSE182190 | GEO
Project description:The Pioneer Factor Hypothesis (PFH) states that pioneer factors (PFs) are a subclass of transcription factors (TFs) that bind to and open inaccessible sites and then recruit non-pioneer factors (nonPFs) that activate batteries of silent genes. We tested the PFH by expressing the endodermal PF FoxA1 and nonPF Hnf4a in K562 lymphoblast cells. While co-expression of FoxA1 and Hnf4a activated a burst of endoderm-specific gene expression, we found no evidence for functional distinction between these two TFs. When expressed independently, both TFs bound and opened inaccessible sites, activated endodermal genes, and “pioneered” for each other, although FoxA1 required fewer copies of its motif to bind at inaccessible sites. A subset of targets required both TFs, but the mode of action at these targets did not conform to the sequential activity predicted by the PFH. From these results we propose an alternative to the PFH where “pioneer activity” depends not on the existence of discrete TF subclasses, but on TF binding affinity and genomic context.
2021-08-18 | GSE182189 | GEO
Project description:The Pioneer Factor Hypothesis (PFH) states that pioneer factors (PFs) are a subclass of transcription factors (TFs) that bind to and open inaccessible sites and then recruit non-pioneer factors (nonPFs) that activate batteries of silent genes. We tested the PFH by expressing the endodermal PF FoxA1 and nonPF Hnf4a in K562 lymphoblast cells. While co-expression of FoxA1 and Hnf4a activated a burst of endoderm-specific gene expression, we found no evidence for functional distinction between these two TFs. When expressed independently, both TFs bound and opened inaccessible sites, activated endodermal genes, and “pioneered” for each other, although FoxA1 required fewer copies of its motif to bind at inaccessible sites. A subset of targets required both TFs, but the mode of action at these targets did not conform to the sequential activity predicted by the PFH. From these results we propose an alternative to the PFH where “pioneer activity” depends not on the existence of discrete TF subclasses, but on TF binding affinity and genomic context.
2021-08-18 | GSE182188 | GEO
Project description:We profiled the genome-wide occupancy of three tissue-specific transcription factors, HNF4A, CEBPA and FOXA1, as well as the genome-wide occurrence of the histone mark, H3K4me3 in the livers of two inbred parental mouse strains (C57BL/6J and CAST/EiJ) and their F1 crosses. We also included H3K27ac data generated from F1 hybrids as well as the profiling of HNF4A, CEBPA and FOXA1 in both CEBPA and HNF4a heterozygous knock-outs.
2016-06-30 | E-MTAB-4089 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Chip-exo and Chip-nexus for FOXA1, HNF4A, KLF5, MYC, and TCF7L2 in colorectal cancer cell lines LoVo, GP5D, COLO320DM
| EGAD00001004099 | EGA
Project description:We report the in vivo androgen receptor (AR) binding sites in murine prostate, epididymis and kidney in response to physiological androgen testosterone using ChIP-sequencing and gene expression profiling by microarray. From AR cistrome analysis, we identified tissue-specific collaborating factors i.e. FoxA1 in prostate, Hnf4a in kidney and AP2a in epididymis and validated by ChIP-seq. The ChIP experiments have been performed using antibodies specific to AR, FoxA1, Hnf4a, AP-2a and IgG non-specific antibody as a negative control.
2014-01-21 | GSE47192 | GEO