Recapitulation of Prostate Tissue Cell Type-specific Transcriptomes by an in vivo Primary Prostate Tissue Xenograft Model
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE145641 | GEO | 2020/05/30
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Purpose: Examine the cell type specific (Epithelial, Endothelial, and Stromal) transcriptome profile between prostate primary tissue xenografts of prostate tissue tumor tissue and uninvolved tissue (named non-tumor hereafter) in response testosterone (T) deprivation. Additional cell type specific untreated fresh tissue from both tumor and non-tumor samples is included for additional validation. Related samples previously uploaded to GEO are found under accession number GSE145641. Method: Nude-Fox1nu mice were castrated and silastic tubing containing dry T was inserted providing “humanized” levels of circulating T. 5-8 pieces of fresh human prostate tissue was then inserted subcutaneously along the flank of the animal. For samples not subjected to T-deprivation, after 30 days the animal was euthanized, and tissue was harvested. For samples undergoing T-deprivation, after 30 days with humanized circulating T levels, T-deprivation was performed by surgical removal of silastic tubing after which serum T levels dropped below the level of detection within 24 hours. Samples were then harvested at Pre T-deprivation time point, an early T-deprivation time point (3-days) or late T-deprivation timepoint (15-17 days) post-surgery. Tissue from fresh human prostate or tissue from xenograft and was then enriched into endothelial, epithelial and the remaining stromal compartments using magnetic bead enrichment. RNA-Seq was then preformed on cell types from both origins and the results compared to determine the cell type specific effects of T-deprivation on the human prostate transcriptome.
2024-03-03 | GSE168292 | GEO
Project description:The prostate represents a complex mix of cell types and there is a need to analyze distinct cell populations to better understand their potential interactions. This study of cell-type specific gene expression patterns will contribute to understanding of how tumor epithelial cells may be affected by adjacent interstitial stromal cells within the tumor microenvirnonment. LCM and microarray analysis were used to identify gene expression patterns in prostate cancer epithelial and interstitial stromal cell populations. More than 500 genes whose expression levels were significantly different in epithelial cells versus adjacent stromal tissue were identified. Several chemokines and growth factors were more highly expressed in prostate cancer stromal cells while several transcription factors and receptors were more highly expressed in epithelial cells. Five micron serial sections from three different intermediate grade prostate tumors were provided. One section from each had been stained by hematoxylin and eosin and the tumor areas marked for identification. To obtain RNA from 2 different tissue types (glandular epithelium and interstitial stroma) tumor areas observed to have abundant cells of interest were identified. Tumor epithelium and adjacent stromal tissue were collected separately from each slide. We sought to obtain similar populations of cells of each tissue type, so to that end, we examined each slide and and marked areas to direct the laser capture. Approximately 1,000 cells were captured per cap and RNA was extracted and hybridized to Affymetrix microarrays as recommended by manufacturer.
2010-04-10 | E-GEOD-20758 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The prostate represents a complex mix of cell types and there is a need to analyze distinct cell populations to better understand their potential interactions. This study of cell-type specific gene expression patterns will contribute to understanding of how tumor epithelial cells may be affected by adjacent interstitial stromal cells within the tumor microenvirnonment. LCM and microarray analysis were used to identify gene expression patterns in prostate cancer epithelial and interstitial stromal cell populations. More than 500 genes whose expression levels were significantly different in epithelial cells versus adjacent stromal tissue were identified. Several chemokines and growth factors were more highly expressed in prostate cancer stromal cells while several transcription factors and receptors were more highly expressed in epithelial cells.
2010-04-10 | GSE20758 | GEO
Project description:The primary goal of this study was to assess differences in gene expression between prostate cancer cell lines and normal prostate epithelial and stromal cells in primary culture. Experiment Overall Design: 9 samples were analyzed with 1 replicate each. Samples included 6 prostate cancer cell lines, 1 normal prostate epithelial cell system in primary culture, and 2 normal prostate stromal cell systems in primary culture.
2008-11-13 | E-GEOD-12348 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The microenvironment of solid tumors is dynamic and frequently contain pockets of low oxygen levels (hypoxia) surrounded by regions of normal oxygen levels. Indeed, a compromised vascular is a is hallmark of the tumor microenvironment, creating gradients of hypoxia. Notably, hypoxia associates with increased metastasis and poor survival in patients. Therefore, to aid therapeutic decisions and better understand hypoxia's role in cancer progression, it is critical to identify endogenous biomarkers of hypoxia to spatially phenotype oncogenic lesions in human tissue, whether precancerous, benign, or malignant. Here, we characterize the glucose transporter GLUT3/SLC2A3 as a biomarker of hypoxia prostate epithelial cells and prostate tumors. Transcriptomic analyses of hypoxic immortalized prostate epithelial cells revealed a highly significant increase in GLUT3 expression. GLUT3 upregulation was also detected by immunostaining in hypoxic prostate epithelial cells and prostate cancer cell lines. Additionally, GLUT3 dramatically co-localized with the hypoxia-marker pimonidazole in xenograft tumors formed from prostate cancer cells and showed distinct concentration gradients within patient-derived xenograft tumors from primary and metastatic prostate cancer. Compared to established hypoxia-response genes, GLUT1 and CA9, GLUT3 shows a higher degree of hypoxia labeling within tumor tissue and may serve as a alternative endogenous biomarker of hypoxia.
2022-02-16 | GSE196634 | GEO
Project description:Prostate primary epithelial and stromal cells were isolated from normal donorhuman prostate tissue and patient prostate tumors (>Gleason 8) using in vitroselective media conditions and differential substrate adhesion properties.Tumor cells specific to the prostate epithelial cell component attached tomatrigel while epithelial cells from donors preferentially attached to gelatinsubstrate. The prostate tumor cells did not proliferate over time in culturebut cells of normal epithelial phenotype in comparison to the donor tissueeventually emerged from this cell compartment. The epithelial componentof both donor and tumor specimens produced stem cell colonies thatexpressed OCT4 in growth factor reduced media but subsequently formedembryoid bodies in hanging drop cultures which differentiated into multiplegerm line lineages under the influence of growth factors. To determineif prostate tumor-derived stem cells were capable of forming tumors invivo, we compared the behavior of the donor and tumor stem cells aftertransplantation as tissue recombinants under the renal capsule of SCID micein the presence of rat urogenital mesenchyme (rUGM). Stem cells from bothdonor and tumor sources produced glandular structures that secreted prostatespecific antigen (PSA) while no glandular structures were formed from tissue recombinants of normal epithelial or tumor epithelial cells plus rUGM or fromrUGM alone. Serial transplantation of the stem cell recombinants from tumor specimens yielded subrenal structures reflecting an abundance of glandswith morphological features typical of Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia(PIN). In order to determine whether intrinsic differences existed amongthe donor-derived and tumor-derived stem cells, array based microRNAexpression profiling was performed on all cell types obtained after in vitro isolation. Sample Labeling Key: PC-Prostate Cancer PD-Prostate Donor (Normal Tissue) DNE-Donor Normal Epithelial NS-Donor Normal Stem TNE-Tumor Normal Epithelial TE-Tumor Epithelial (TNE and TE samples with corresponding numbers are matched pairs) TS-Tumor Stem Cell S-Stromal PC 73 TNE was run in all 6 batches as a control for batch effect. The number in parentheses corresponds with the batch the sample was run in.
2015-07-01 | E-GEOD-17323 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Prostate primary epithelial and stromal cells were isolated from normal donorhuman prostate tissue and patient prostate tumors (>Gleason 8) using in vitroselective media conditions and differential substrate adhesion properties.Tumor cells specific to the prostate epithelial cell component attached tomatrigel while epithelial cells from donors preferentially attached to gelatinsubstrate. The prostate tumor cells did not proliferate over time in culturebut cells of normal epithelial phenotype in comparison to the donor tissueeventually emerged from this cell compartment. The epithelial componentof both donor and tumor specimens produced stem cell colonies thatexpressed OCT4 in growth factor reduced media but subsequently formedembryoid bodies in hanging drop cultures which differentiated into multiplegerm line lineages under the influence of growth factors. To determineif prostate tumor-derived stem cells were capable of forming tumors invivo, we compared the behavior of the donor and tumor stem cells aftertransplantation as tissue recombinants under the renal capsule of SCID micein the presence of rat urogenital mesenchyme (rUGM). Stem cells from bothdonor and tumor sources produced glandular structures that secreted prostatespecific antigen (PSA) while no glandular structures were formed from tissuerecombinants of normal epithelial or tumor epithelial cells plus rUGM or fromrUGM alone. Serial transplantation of the stem cell recombinants from tumorspecimens yielded subrenal structures reflecting an abundance of glands with morphological features typical of Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia(PIN). In order to determine whether intrinsic differences existed amongthe donor-derived and tumor-derived stem cells, array based microRNAexpression profiling was performed on all cell types obtained after in vitro isolation. Sample Labeling Key: PC-Prostate Cancer PD-Prostate Donor (Normal Tissue) DNE-Donor Normal Epithelial NS-Donor Normal Stem TNE-Tumor Normal Epithelial TE-Tumor Epithelial (TNE and TE samples with corresponding numbers are matched pairs) TS-Tumor Stem Cell S-Stromal PC 73 TNE was run in all 6 batches as a control for batch effect. The number in parentheses corresponds with the batch the sample was run in.
2015-07-01 | E-GEOD-17321 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:BPH-1 prostate epithelial cells when cultured in Matrigel form 3D acini which closely recapitulate the tissue architecture of the prostate. The presence of primary stroma increases epithelial adhesions and causes changes in morphology. To identify the stromal signals which control actin/cadherin dynamics in epithelial cells we performed a microarray analysis on the stroma using Affymetrix U133 plus 2.0 arrays. Primary stroma from 7 different patients were cultured with (PSE) or without (PS) 3D BPH-1 epithelial acini to determine the gene expression changes within the stroma. The RNA from the Primary epithelia and stromal cultures were used at passages 1 or 1-3, respectively.
2010-06-09 | E-MEXP-2657 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Cell-cell communication is an important process in healthy tissue but also gains enhanced attention regarding pathological tissue. To date, the tumor microenvironment is gradually brought into focus when studying tumorigenesis. In the prostate gland, stromal and epithelial cells greatly interact to maintain homeostasis or tissue integrity. This study focuses on an indirect communication via soluble factors. For this approach, the prostate carcinoma cell line LNCaP and the stromal primary cells p21 were co-cultured without direct contact and RNA was isolated at defined time points (one, three and seven days). RNA sequencing finally revealed a time-depending differential expression profile.
2022-08-14 | GSE210988 | GEO
Project description:The primary goal of this study was to assess differences in gene expression between prostate cancer cell lines and normal prostate epithelial and stromal cells in primary culture.
2008-11-01 | GSE12348 | GEO