Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

A transcriptome comparison between pao5 vs NIP, ACC-treatment vs Mock (NIP) and H2O2-treatment vs Mock (NIP)

ABSTRACT: OsPAO5 mainly functions to oxidize spermine and produce H2O2,which finally affects mesocotyl elongation in rice. Meanwhile ethylene and polyamines synthesis crosstalk has been reported in competing the common substrate. To further confirm the relationship between H2O2 and ethylene in contributing to the mesocotyl length, we conducted a transcriptome comparison between pao5-1 vs NIP, ACC-treatment vs Mock (NIP) and H2O2-treatment vs Mock (NIP).

ORGANISM(S): Oryza sativa

PROVIDER: GSE153423 | GEO | 2023/06/26

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other
	GSE153423_ACC_VS_NIP_Gene_differential_expression.xlsx	Xlsx
	GSE153423_H2O2_VS_NIP_Gene_differential_expression.xlsx	Xlsx
	GSE153423_pao5_VS_NIP_Gene_differential_expression.xlsx	Xlsx

Items per page:

1 - 4 of 4

Similar Datasets

A transcriptome comparison between pao5 vs NIP, ACC-treatment vs Mock (NIP) and H2O2-treatment vs Mock (NIP)

Project description:A transcriptome comparison between pao5 vs NIP, ACC-treatment vs Mock (NIP) and H2O2-treatment vs Mock (NIP)

| PRJNA642632 | ENA

miRNA arrays: Ago2 transfected vs. Mock, Ago2 IP vs. total RNA

Project description:miRNAs were enriched from HEK293T cells using the ambion FLASHPAGE fractionater after mock transfection, Ago2 transfection, and FLAG-Ago2 IP. miRNAs were labeled and hybridized: Ago2 transfected vs. mock transfection and Ago2 transfected vs. Ago2 IPs. Set of arrays that are part of repeated experiments Keywords: Biological Replicate

2008-04-08 | GSE11081 | GEO

Murine MDSCs: Mock vs Epigenetic drug treated

Project description:Murine MDSCs: Mock vs Epigenetic drug treated

| PRJNA512458 | ENA

Porcine macrophages: ASFV-infected vs. mock-infected

Project description:Porcine macrophages: ASFV-infected vs. mock-infected

| PRJNA549440 | ENA

2091 mock vs. 2091 E2F4 IP - Human 13K

Project description:2091 mock vs. 2091 E2F4 IP - Human 13K promoter microarray 2091 cells were serum starved for 72hours and fixed with formaldehyde. Keywords: repeat sample

2005-01-01 | GSE1861 | GEO

HeLa/16E6 Cells (Wild-type E2-infected vs. Mock-infected)

Project description:Senescent HeLa/16E6 cells compared to proliferating HeLa/16E6 cells Keywords: Wild-type E2 Infection vs. Mock Infection

2007-01-24 | GSE6758 | GEO

LC-MS of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) secreted by mock- vs. Zika virus (ZIKV)-infected JEG-3 cells

Project description:Proteomics profiling of small extracellular vesicles secreted by mock- vs. ZIKV (PRVABC59)-infected JEG-3 cells.

2023-09-12 | PXD041807 | Pride

CYGB+ expressing vs non cytoglobin expressing cells (NCE) (MOCK)

Project description:CYGB+ expressing vs non cytoglobin expressing cells (NCE) (MOCK)

| PRJNA540265 | ENA

A study on the impact of the absence of the NIP or NrpR gene on gene expression of Streptococcus salivarius K12 (SAL)

Project description:NIP and NrpR forms a pair for the transcriptional regulator in Streptococcus salivarius K12 (SAL). To explore the target genes regulated by the NIP-NrpR pair in Streptococcus salivarius K12 (SAL), we generated mutants in which the NIP or NrpR gene has been knocked down through complement recombination. Comparative transcriptome profiling of WT, ▲nrpR, and nip* mutant strains revealed that the sar BGC is the major regulatory target controlled by the NIP signaling pathway in SAL.

2023-11-18 | GSE247581 | GEO

Sclerotinia infected vs Mock infected controls in B. napus (Westar)

Project description:The fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infects a broad range of dicotyledonous plant species and is the causative agent of stem rot in Brassica napus. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the defense response, we studied the patterns of gene expression in a partially resistant variety of ZhongYou 821 (ZY821) and a susceptible line from Westar over five time points, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-inoculation (hpi) using a B. napus oligonucleotide microarray. Maximum differential gene expression was observed at 48 hpi in both genotypes with ZY821 responding more quickly than Westar. Specific sets of genes exhibited higher levels of expression at the earlier stages of the infection (6-12 hpi), including genes encoding defense-associated proteins such as chitinases, glucanases, osmotins and lectins and genes encoding transcription factors belonging to the zinc finger, WRKY, AP2, and MYB classes. Genes encoding enzymes involved in JA, ethylene, and auxin synthesis were induced in both genotypes, as were those for gibberellin degradation. Changes in metabolic pathways affecting carbohydrate and energy metabolism appeared to be directed toward shuttling carbon reserves to the TCA cycle. Genes involved in glucosinolate and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis were highly up-regulated suggesting that secondary metabolites are also important components of the response to S. sclerotiorum in B. napus. Keywords: Time course, and infected vs mock infected

2009-02-01 | GSE13254 | GEO