RNA-seq of human induced pluripotent stem cell differentiation into cardiomyocytes using Wnt inhibition
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE158578 | GEO | 2020/11/10
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:In recent years, several small molecule cytotoxic drugs have been identified as potential inhibitors of ribosome biogenesis (Drygin et al., 2011; Peltonen et al., 2014a; Peltonen et al., 2014b). CX-5461 is one such drug that has also demonstrated anticancer potential for a wide range of malignancies (Bywater et al., 2012; Cornelison et al., 2017; Devlin et al., 2015; Drygin et al., 2011; Hald et al., 2019; Hein et al., 2017; Ismael et al., 2019; Lawrence et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2017; Negi and Brown, 2015; Taylor et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2017; Yan et al., 2017) (Haddach et al., 2012), and is presently under phase I trials for the treatment of both hematological cancers and solid tumours (Group, 2016; Khot et al., 2019). CX-5461 was initially characterized as an inhibitor of RNA Polymerase I (RPI/PolR1/PolI) that is responsible for the synthesis of the major ribosomal RNAs and the initial step in ribosome biogenesis (Drygin et al., 2011). Since RPI and its corresponding core transcription factors are dedicated to this task alone, they present ideal molecular targets by which to modulate ribosome biogenesis. However, the specificity of CX-5461 has been questioned and it has been suggested that this drug may also act by stabilizing DNA G-quadruplexes or by “poisoning” topoisomerase II (Topo II). Thus, the primary target of this drug and its mode of action are still in doubt. Here we used Deconvolution-ChIP-Seq in NIH3T3 and HEK293T cells treated for different times with CX-5461. The data show that the primary target of CX5461 is the initiation of ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) transcription. CX-5461 blocks transcription initiation in vitro and in vivo by arresting RNA polymerase I (RPI/Pol1) within the preinitiation complex. In contrast to previous suggestions, CX-5461 does not effect recruitment of the TBP-TAF complex SL1 to the rDNA promoter, the recruitment of the initiation competent RPI-Rrn3 complex or ongoing transcription elongation, arguing against a role for G-quadruplex stabilization or topoisomerase II poisoning. Inhibition of transcription by CX-5461 is not reversible, the RPI-Rrn3 complex remains arrested in the preinitiation complex even after drug removal. This leads to nucleolar stress, extensive DNA damage and cell senescence. Our data show that the cytotoxicity of CX-5461 is the downstream result of the highly specific inhibition of rDNA transcription. The observation that this inhibition is irreversible will be important for the future design of chemotherapeutic strategies and the avoidance of drug resistance.
2021-04-07 | E-MTAB-9242 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:While DNA methylation is an important gene regulatory mechanism in mammals (Razin and Riggs 1980; Moore, Le, and Fan 2013), its function in arthropods remains poorly understood. Studies in eusocial insects have argued for its role in caste development by regulating gene expression and splicing (Elango et al. 2009; Lyko et al. 2010; Bonasio et al. 2012; Flores et al. 2012; Foret et al. 2012; Li-Byarlay et al. 2013; Marshall, Lonsdale, and Mallon 2019; Shi et al. 2013)(Alvarado et al. 2015; Kucharski et al. 2008). However, such findings are not always consistent across studies, and have therefore remained controversial (Arsenault, Hunt, and Rehan 2018; Cardoso-Junior et al. 2021; Harris et al. 2019; Herb et al. 2012; Libbrecht et al. 2016; Oldroyd and Yagound 2021b; Patalano et al. 2015). Here we use CRISPR/Cas9 to mutate the maintenance DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 in the clonal raider ant, Ooceraea biroi. Mutants have greatly reduced DNA methylation but no obvious developmental phenotypes, demonstrating that, unlike mammals (Brown and Robertson 2007; En Li, Bestor, and Jaenisch 1992; Jackson-Grusby et al. 2001; Panning and Jaenisch 1996), ants can undergo normal development without DNMT1 or DNA methylation. Additionally, we find no evidence of DNA methylation regulating caste development. However, mutants are sterile, while in wildtypes, DNMT1 is localized to the ovaries and maternally provisioned into nascent oocytes. This supports the idea that DNMT1 plays a crucial but unknown role in the insect germline (Amukamara et al. 2020; Arsala et al. 2021; Bewick et al. 2019; Schulz et al. 2018; Ventós-Alfonso et al. 2020; Washington et al. 2020).
2023-03-23 | GSE182212 | GEO
Project description:CD47 is a transmembrane glycoprotein that is ubiquitously expressed in different organs and tissues (Barclay and Van den Berg 2014; Liu, et al. 2017). In the human immune system, CD47 interacts with some integrins, two counter-receptor signal regulator protein (SIRP) family members, and the secreted thrombospondin-1 (TSP1) (Barclay and Van den Berg 2014; Gao, et al. 2016; Kaur, et al. 2013; Oldenborg, et al. 2000). CD47 has two established roles in the immune system. The CD47-SIRPα interaction was identified as a critical innate immune checkpoint, which delivers an antiphagocytic signal to macrophages and inhibits neutrophil cytotoxicity (Martínez- Sanz, et al. 2021). Its interaction with inhibitory SIRPα is a physiological anti-phagocytic “don’t eat me” signal on circulating red blood cells that is co-opted by cancer cells (Matlung, et al. 2017). Many malignant cells overexpress CD47 (Betancur, et al. 2017; Chao, et al. 2011; Jaiswal, et al. 2009; Majeti, et al. 2009; Oronsky, et al. 2020; Petrova, et al. 2017). CD47/SIRPα-targeted therapeutics have been developed to overcome this immune checkpoint for cancer treatment (Kaur, et al. 2020; Matlung, et al. 2017). Secondly, engagement of CD47 on T cells by TSP1 regulates their differentiation and survival (Grimbert, et al. 2006; Lamy, et al. 2007) and inhibits T cell receptor signaling and antigen presentation by dendritic cells (DCs) (Kaur, et al. 2014; Li, et al. 2002; Liu, et al. 2015; Miller, et al. 2013; Soto-Pantoja, et al. 2014; Weng, et al. 2014). TSP1/CD47 signaling has similar inhibitory functions to limit NK cell activation (Kim, et al. 2008; Nath, et al. 2018; Nath, et al. 2019; Schwartz, et al. 2019) and IL1β production by macrophages (Stein, et al. 2016). CD47 is therefore a checkpoint that regulates both innate and adaptive immunity. The recent understanding of CD47 antagonism associated with increased antigen presentation by DCs (Liu, et al. 2016) and natural killer cell cytotoxicity (Nath, et al. 2019) contributes to the heightened interest in CD47 as a therapeutic target (Kaur, et al. 2020).
2022-09-21 | GSE198820 | GEO
Project description:A previous study has shown that PML-dependent recruitment of HIRA to ISG promoters contributes to the up-regulation of gene expression as a result of cytokine release in response to HSV infection (McFarlane et al., 2019). Although carried out in non-neuronal cells, this study and others (Ulbricht et al., 2012, Kim and Ahn, 2015, Scherer et al., 2016, Chen et al., 2015) suggest that PML itself may contribute to ISG upregulation, so to determine whether PML was indeed required for ISG stimulation in SCG neurons, we carried out RNA sequence analysis in IFNα-treated neurons depleted of PML.
2021-06-21 | GSE166738 | GEO
Project description:DNA damage can promote altered RNA splicing and decreased gene expression (Gregersen and Svejstrup, 2018; Milek et al., 2017; Munoz et al., 2009; Shkreta and Chabot, 2015), and aberrant splicing is implicated in neurodegenerative diseases including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Fragile X syndrome and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) (Conlon et al., 2016; Jia et al., 2012; Loomis et al., 2014; Qiu et al., 2014; Scotti and Swanson, 2016). Therefore, we used RNA-seq data to assess RNA-splicing in double-mutant brain tissue using multivariate analysis of transcriptional splicing (rMATS) (Shen et al., 2014) and a splicing deficiency score algorithm (Bai et al., 2013) to assess intron retention.
2021-12-14 | GSE174841 | GEO
Project description:Genomic DNA from 191 asy1/+ Col x Ler F2 individuals was extracted using CTAB and used to generate sequencing libraries as described (Lawrence et al, 2019 Current Biology). Sequencing data was analysed to identify crossovers using the TIGER pipeline as previously described (Rowan et al, 2015 G3 (Bethesda); Yelina et al, 2015 Genes & Dev; Lawrence et al, 2019 Current Biology).
2020-05-18 | E-MTAB-8725 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Genomic DNA from 187 wild type and 169 asy1 Col-0 x Ws-4 F2 individuals was extracted using CTAB and used to generate sequencing libraries as described (Lawrence et al, 2019 Current Biology). Sequencing data was analysed to identify crossovers using the TIGER pipeline as previously described (Rowan et al, 2015 G3 (Bethesda); Yelina et al, 2015 Genes & Dev; Lawrence et al, 2019 Current Biology).
2020-05-18 | E-MTAB-8715 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Germinal centers (GCs) are the sites of affinity maturation, the process by which antibodies improve their affinity for antigen over time (Cyster and Allen, 2019; De Silva and Klein, 2015; Eisen, 2014; Mesin et al., 2016; Rajewsky, 1996; Shlomchik et al., 2019; Victora and Nussenzweig, 2012). For efficient affinity maturation, GC B cells must cycle between two major transcriptional states, associated with localization of B cells to each of the two microanatomical “zones” of the GC. When in the dark zone (DZ), B cells proliferate vigorously while they mutate their immunoglobulin genes by somatic hypermutation (SHM). After transition to the light zone (LZ), B cells bearing advantageous mutations are selectively driven to clonally expand, based at least in part on their ability to bind and present antigen to GC-resident T follicular helper (Tfh) cells (Victora et al., 2010). Successive cycles of somatic hypermutation and affinity-based selection ultimately enrich for higher-affinity cells in among the GC B cell population, in a process known as cyclic re-entry (MacLennan, 1994; Victora and Nussenzweig, 2012).
2020-12-10 | GSE162182 | GEO
Project description:Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been applied in experimental and clinical settings for more than twenty years and may facilitate rehabilitation after stroke as suggested by clinical data (Hummel et al. 2005, Sparing et al. 2009). Intriguingly, tDCS evokes various cellular effects exceeding its primary neurophysiological actions: We previously described subacute effects of tDCS on immune- and stem cells in the rat brain (Rueger et al. 2012, Keuters et al. 2015, Pikhovych et al. 2016, Braun et al. 2016). However, the effects of tDCS on immune-mediating genes have not yet been investigated. To investigate the more immediate effects of tDCS regulating those cellular responses, we treated rats with a single session of either anodal or cathodal tDCS, and analyzed the gene expression by microarray; sham-stimulated rats served as control. We confirmed the effects of gene upregulation by immunohistochemistry at the protein level. We here report for the first time that acute anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhanced the expression of several genes coding for MHC-I, affecting inflammation and synaptic plasticity (Neumann et al. 1995, Shatz et al. 2009). Moreover, cathodal tDCS increased expression of the gene encoding for the immunoregulatory protein Osteopontin. Osteopontin has beneficial effects on neural stem cells and microglia after brain damage such as stroke (Rabenstein et al. 2015, Rabenstein et al. 2016, Ladwig et al. 2017, Rogall et al. 2017). Overall, our data indicate that a specific modulation of neuroinflammatory processes by non-invasive brain stimulation constitutes a promising therapeutic option with immediate translational relevance.
2019-10-31 | E-MTAB-8318 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Genomic DNA from 180 Col/Bur F2 individuals, and 186 taf4b/Bur F2 individuals, was extracted by CTAB and used to generate sequencing libraries as previously described (Ziolkowski et al, 2017 Genes & Dev). Sequencing data was analysed to identify crossovers using the TIGER pipeline as previously described (Rowan et al, 2015 G3 (Bethesda); Yelina et al, 2015 Genes & Dev).
2019-12-31 | E-MTAB-8099 | biostudies-arrayexpress