Project description:Background Neuroendcrine carcinoma (NEC) of lung consists of small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Although long-term outcomes of SCLC patients are usually poor, a few patients achieve long-term survivals. Prognostic factors in SCLC have not been fully elucidated. microRNAs (miRNAs) are known to negatively regulate gene expression and to be relevant to tumorigenesis, tumor classification and prognosis. Methods 63 samples (46 neuroendocrine carcinoma including 35 SCLC and 11 LCNEC, 4 adenocarcinoma, 5 squamous cell carcinoma and 8 normal lung) were obtained through surgical resection. miRNA expression in each sample was comprehensively investigated using miRNA microarray. Results Unsupervised hierarchial clustering classified the all NEC into two subgroups, group 1 and 2. Group 1 was felt into an independent branch that consisted of only NEC, whereas group 2 was included in a branch that contained both NEC and non-NEC. Compared with SCLC of group 1 (SCLC 1), SCLC of group 2 (SCLC 2) was a distinct subgroup with surprisingly good prognosis (0% v 79% survived for 5 years; p=0.007). Serum proGRP level was significantly lower in SCLC 2 than in SCLC 1 despite of similar tumor stages between the two groups. Among 12 cases treated by presurgical chemotherapy, PR:NC ratio was 6:3 in SCLC 1 and 2:1 in SCLC 2, suggesting no apparent difference of chemosensitivity. Histologically, distinction between both groups was difficult. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that three miRNA signature was correlated with survival of SCLC patients. These prognostic miRNAs were differentially expressed between SCLC 1 and 2, which were validated by quantitative real time RT-PCR. Bioinformatics analysis predicted that these miRNAs targeted not only genes involving with tumorigenesis but also genes associated with neuroendocrine function. Conclusion miRNA expression profiling identified a distinct subgroup of SCLC with favorable prognosis. This subgroup might have less neuroendocrine character than usual SCLC. All samples were tissue samples obtained by surgical resection. 35 samples of small-cell lung cancer were investigated. 11 samples of larege cell neuroendocrine cancer, 4 samples of adenocarcinoma, 5 samples of squamous cell carcinoma and 8 samples of normal lung were also included as reference.

Project description:Background Neuroendcrine carcinoma (NEC) of lung consists of small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Although long-term outcomes of SCLC patients are usually poor, a few patients achieve long-term survivals. Prognostic factors in SCLC have not been fully elucidated. microRNAs (miRNAs) are known to negatively regulate gene expression and to be relevant to tumorigenesis, tumor classification and prognosis. Methods 63 samples (46 neuroendocrine carcinoma including 35 SCLC and 11 LCNEC, 4 adenocarcinoma, 5 squamous cell carcinoma and 8 normal lung) were obtained through surgical resection. miRNA expression in each sample was comprehensively investigated using miRNA microarray. Results Unsupervised hierarchial clustering classified the all NEC into two subgroups, group 1 and 2. Group 1 was felt into an independent branch that consisted of only NEC, whereas group 2 was included in a branch that contained both NEC and non-NEC. Compared with SCLC of group 1 (SCLC 1), SCLC of group 2 (SCLC 2) was a distinct subgroup with surprisingly good prognosis (0% v 79% survived for 5 years; p=0.007). Serum proGRP level was significantly lower in SCLC 2 than in SCLC 1 despite of similar tumor stages between the two groups. Among 12 cases treated by presurgical chemotherapy, PR:NC ratio was 6:3 in SCLC 1 and 2:1 in SCLC 2, suggesting no apparent difference of chemosensitivity. Histologically, distinction between both groups was difficult. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that three miRNA signature was correlated with survival of SCLC patients. These prognostic miRNAs were differentially expressed between SCLC 1 and 2, which were validated by quantitative real time RT-PCR. Bioinformatics analysis predicted that these miRNAs targeted not only genes involving with tumorigenesis but also genes associated with neuroendocrine function. Conclusion miRNA expression profiling identified a distinct subgroup of SCLC with favorable prognosis. This subgroup might have less neuroendocrine character than usual SCLC.

Project description:We analyzed 28 fresh frozen samples from pure SCLC patients and 13 noncancerous lung tissues, using the Illumina Infinium 27k Human DNA methylation Beadchip v1.2 Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 13-15% of new lung cancer cases in worldwide and has the poor therapeutic outcomes with a median survival of just over one year. A CpG island methylate phenotype (CIMP) is well known as a methylator phenotype with characteristic promoter DNA methylation alterations, in colorectal cancers, glioblastoma and breast cancers, although there has been no report about any CIMP of SCLC. We investigated whether DNA methylation profiles can provide useful molecular subtyping of SCLC in terms of etiology and prognosis of SCLC. Results: We selected a total of 1741 most differentially methylated CpG sites (s.d. > 0.20) across the 28 SCLC tumor tissues in each DNA methylation platform, after an elimination of the probes related with the X- and Y- chromosome. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of methylation data from SCLC samples reveals two major subgroups with different prognosis: the 5 years disease-free interval (DFI) rate of patients in cluster 1 (11.1%) was lower than that of patients in cluster 2 (61.57%) (p = 0.001). By multivariate analysis for DFI, both postoperative chemotherapy and cluster 1 were a significant prognostic factor (p = 0.002 and 0.002; respectively). Next, among 1220 genes with methylation and expression data both available, the CpG sites were ranked on the basis of the spearman’s correlation coefficient between cluster 1 and cluster 2 into an ascending order. Finally, we identified that fifty-five CpG sites were nagetively correlated and found that apoptosis pathway was a most differentially expressed. Conclusion: By comprehensive DNA methylation profiling, two distinct subgroups with different molecular and clinical phenotype were identified to evoke a CIMP of SCLC. We found some promoter markers in the apoptosis pathway could make a difference between the two groups, and we hope that our data can contribute to provide a useful resource for the construction of therapeutic strategy and the development of a new chemotherapeutic agent. After genomic DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite, bisulfite-converted genomic DNA was analyzed using Illumina’s Infinium HumanMethylation27 BeadChip.

Dataset Information

Mechanisms of drugs-resistance in small cell lung cancer

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure