Dataset Information

Gene Expression Profiling of Host Response in Models of Acute HIV infection

ABSTRACT: Experiment Design 1) Experiment Type normal vs diseased comparison, time course 2) Experimental Factor response to viral infection - SHIV89.6P 3) Number of hybridizations 60 4) Common Reference No 5) Quality Control Steps 4 technical replicate hybridizations per animal (3 replicate hybridizations for C89115M, C95067F) dual spotting of gene per array multiple spotting of select genes per array 2 biological replicates (2 different animals) per time point dye swaps 6) Experiment Description 4 cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were infected with TCID50 of SHIV89.6P. Whole blood RNA was collected at 0, 1, 2, 4 and 5 weeks post-infection. Post-infection samples were competitively hybridized with pre-infected samples for each individual animal. Unpublished Data 7) Qualifier, value, source 2.2. Samples: samples used, extract preparation and labeling 2.2.1. Biosource properties 1) Organism (NCBI taxonomy) Macaca fascicularis 2) Contact details for sample Dr Erling W Rud Animal Resources Division, Health Canada. Sir Frederick Banting Research Centre Building 22, Room C308, postal locator 2203E Tunneys' Pasture Ottawa,Ontario, Canada K1A 0L2 Tel:(613) 957-8049 FAX:(613) 941-6625 erling_rud@hc-sc.gc.ca 3) Cell Type not applicable 4) Sex C88015F - female C89115M - male C94071M - male C95067F - female 5) Age C88015F - 13 years C89115M - 12 years C94071M - 7 years C95067F - 6 years 6) Developmental Stage adult 7) Organism Part peripheral whole blood 8) Strain or line not applicable 9) Genetic variation not applicable 10) Individual number C88015F, C89115M, C94071M & C95067F 11) Individual genetic characteristics not applicable 12) Disease state normal, AIDS 13) Targeted cell type blood 14) Cell line not applicable 2.2.2. Biomaterial manipulation 1) Growth conditions not applicable 2) In vivo treatments description - 4 cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were infected intravenously with TCID50 of SHIV89.6P. 10 ml of peripheral blood was drawn at -2, 0, 1, 2, 4 and 5 weeks post-infection. 3) In vitro treatment not applicable 4) Treatment type infection 5) Compound not applicable 6) Separation technique not applicable 2.2.3. Hybridization extract preparation 1) Extraction method PAXgene peripheral blood RNA preparation 10 ml of peripheral blood was drawn from each animal directly into 4 PAXgene Blood RNA Tubes (QIAGEN #762125) according to manufacturer's protocol (http://www.qiagen.com/literature/Handbooks/PDF/DNA_RNA_isolation_clinical/INT/PAXgene_Blood_RNA/PaxgeneBloodRNAtube.pdf) Total RNA was purified using PAXgene Blood RNA kit (QIAGEN # 762134) according to manufacturer's protocol http://www.qiagen.com/literature/Handbooks/PDF/DNA_RNA_isolation_clinical/INT/PAXgene_Blood_RNA/1017455PAXgeneBloodRNA_prot.pdf) 2) Nucleic acid type total RNA 3) Amplification Method Total RNA was amplified using the Ambion MessageAmp aRNA kit (#1750), an Eberwine based method, with slight modifications to the manufacturer's protocol (http://www.transnet.ca/Amplification%20Protocol.htm). 2.2.3. Sample labeling 1) Amount of nucleic acid labeled 6 micrograms of aRNA was labeled with Cy3/Cy5 for hybridization 2) Label used Cy5 & Cy3 3) Label incorporation method aRNA was labelled by reverse transcription using the standard protocol of the Ontario Cancer Institute with slight modifications (http://www.transnet.ca/Hybridization%20Protocol_2.htm) 2.2.5. Spiking controls 1) Spiking control feature OCI Human 19k3-part1 OCI Human 19k3-part2 2) Spike type and qualifier not applicable 3) Qualifier, value, source not applicable 2.3. Hybridization procedure and parameters 2) Hybridization Protocol Protocol - (http://www.transnet.ca/Hybridization%20Protocol_2.htm) Solution Hybridization buffer: DIG solution (Roche cat.#1603558) supplemented with 0.45 ug/ul yeast tRNA, 0.45 ug/ul salmon sperm DNA Blocking agent not applicable Slide blocking not applicable Probe blocking: 0.45 ug/ul yeast tRNA, 0.45 ug/ul salmon sperm DNA during hybridization Wash procedure 3x15 min with 1xSSC, 0.1% SDS at 50 degrees Celsius, 3 fast washes in 1xSSC at 50 degrees Celsius Quantity of labelled target used all material generated from 6 ug amplified RNA per sample Time 18 hr (overnight) hybridization Concentration 0.2 ug/ul of aRNA per hybridization Volume 60 ul Temperature 30 degrees Celsius Description of the hybridization chamber hybridizations were incubated in a microscope slide box stored within a tissue culture incubator Qualifier, value, source not applicable 2.4. Measurements 2.4.1. Raw data Scanning protocol Scanning hardware: Scanarray Express Microarray Scanner, Packard Biosciences Scanning software: Scanarray Express Microarray Analysis System v1.1 Build #9 Scan Parameters Laser power: see individual image files in section 2.4.1 Spatial resolution:10 microns PMT gain: 60% 2.4.2. Image analysis and quantitation Image analysis software: Quantarray v.3.0, Packard BioSciences Availability: No longer commercially available Quantitation Parameters: Array Pattern: Spot rows: 25 Spot columns: 24 Spot spacing (vertical): 170 microns Spot spacing (horizontal): 170 microns Interstitial spacing: Off Array rows: 8 Array columns: 4 Array spacing (vertical): 4500 microns Array spacing (horizontal): 4500 microns Auto-adjustable Grid: Grid elasticity: 50/100 Spot elasticity: 50/100 Quantitation: Method: Fixed Circle Crosstalk correction: No Normalized to brightest: No Background subtraction: No Gene database file: for OCI Human 19k3-part1- H19k3a.qa (attached) for OCI Human 19k3-part2- H19k3b.qa (attached) Fixed circle quantitation parameters: Spot diameter: 60 microns Inner background diameter: 180 microns Outer background diameter: 200 microns Signal low percentile: 45 Signal high percentile: 95 Background low percentile: 5 Background high percentile: 55 Quantification output: Mean Intensity Quality Criteria Confidence calculation: Minimum Tolerance and weight: None selected Replicates: Combine replicates: no 2.4.3. Normalized and summarized data Data processing protocol Background subtraction and normalization Background subtraction and normalization was performed using the Quantarray Normalization Excel macro on individual quantitation output files. Each channel was background subtracted using the equation: ch Bkg. Subtr. Intensity = ch intensity - ch Bkg. Normalization strategy: total array Normalization algorithm: log ratio median centering Median log ratio = median(log2(ch1 Bkg. Subtr. Intensity) - log2(ch2 Bkg. Subtr. Intensity)) Normalization factor = 2^ median log ratio Normalized ch2 intensity = ch2 intensity*Normalization factor Statistical Analysis The background subtracted normalized intensities were used for statistical analysis. All spot intensities for within-chip, repeat hybridization, fluor-flip hybridization and biological replicates for each time point post-infection were compiled and tested for significance testing using the software package ArrayStat v.1.0, Imaging Research. ArrayStat parameters: Model selection: Manual Model selected: Proportional model with offsets Outlier detection: yes Threshold detection: Manual Threshold detected: p<0.01 Minimum No. of replicates: 12 (for 1 & 5 wks PI), 11 (for 2 & 4 wks PI) Conditions: Dependent Random Error Estimation Method: Small Sample Test: t-test Normalization: By median Nominal alpha: 0.05 Multiple Test correction: False Discovery Rate Keywords = SHIV89.6P Keywords = HIV Keywords = nonhuman primate Keywords = cDNA microarray Keywords = time course Keywords: time-course

ORGANISM(S): Macaca fascicularis Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE1854 | GEO | 2004/11/03

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA90475

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:MicroPoly(A)Pure kits (Ambion) were used to prepare mRNA from P. salmonis-infected and control Atlantic salmon head kidney. Head kidney mRNA samples were prepared from pooled (n = 10) infected or control kidney. Approximately 200 ng of infected or control head kidney mRNA was used as template in aRNA synthesis reactions. Two infected head kidney samples were pooled to yield 8.9 ug of aRNA, and a single control head kidney sample contained 8.4 ug of aRNA. Infected and control head kidney aRNA samples were visualized on agarose gels to check quality and quantity (data not shown). Except for the amounts of aRNA and reverse transcription (RT) primer used, head kidney target labeling reactions and microarray hybridizations were identical. Head kidney target syntheses used 2 ug of aRNA and 2 ug of random primers (Roche). RT primers were mixed with aRNA samples, and nuclease-free H2O (Invitrogen) was added to make 10 ul total volume. Samples were incubated at 70 degrees C for 4 min, then placed on ice. RT reactions included 50 mM Tris HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, 0.5 mM each dATP, dCTP, and dGTP, 0.2 mM dTTP, 0.05 mM Cy3-dUTP or Cy5-dUTP (Amersham), 40U RNAguard ribonuclease inhibitor (Amersham), and 400U Superscript II Rnase H- reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). RT reactions were incubated at 42 degrees C for 2.5 h, followed by addition of 0.025U RNase A (Sigma) and 1.5U RNase H (New England BioLabs) and incubation at 37 degrees C for 30 min. Labeled targets were cleaned using the Qiaquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and precipitated, with 300 mM sodium acetate, 1 ul of 20 ug/ul glycogen (Invitrogen), and 2.5 volumes of 100% ethanol, at -20 degrees C overnight. Each labeled target was recovered by centrifugation (14,000 rpm, 4 degrees C, 1 h), washed in 70% ethanol, air-dried, and resuspended in 60 ul of hybridization buffer: 50% deionized formamide, 5X SSC, 0.1% SDS, 5 ul of 5 ug/ul oligo dT (5’T18[Q-N]3’), 5 ul of 2 ug/ul BSA (Pierce), and 2 ul of 10 ug/ul sonicated human placental DNA (Sigma). Targets were incubated at 96 degrees C for 3 min, and then at 65 degrees C until applied to microarrays. Microarrays were prepared for hybridization by washing 2 X 5 min in 0.1% SDS, washing 5 X 1 min in MilliQ H2O, immersing 3 min in 95 degrees C MilliQ H2O, and drying by centrifugation (2000 rpm, 5 min, in 50 ml conical tube). Microarray hybridizations were run in the dark under HybriSlips hybridization covers (Grace Biolabs) in slide hybridization chambers (Corning) submerged in a 45 degrees C water bath for 16 h. Coverslips were floated off in 45 degrees C (1X SSC, 0.2% SDS), and arrays were washed 1 X 10 min in 45 degrees C (1X SSC, 0.2% SDS), 3 X 4 min in room temperature (0.1X SSC, 0.1% SDS), and 4 X 4 min in room temperature 0.1X SSC. Slides were dried by centrifugation as before. Fluorescent images of hybridized arrays were acquired immediately at 10 um resolution using ScanArray Express (PerkinElmer). The Cy3 and Cy5 cyanine fluors were excited at 543 nm and 633 nm respectively, and the same laser power (90%) and photomultiplier tube (PMT) settings were used for all slides in a study (PMT 75 Cy3, PMT 63 or 64 Cy5 for head kidney study). Fluorescent intensity data were extracted from TIF images using Imagene 5.5 software (Biodiscovery). Keywords: other

Project description:MicroPoly(A)Pure kits (Ambion) were used to prepare mRNA from P. salmonis-infected and control Atlantic salmon macrophages. Infected and control (24 h incubation) macrophage mRNA samples were subjected to two rounds of amplification using the MessageAmp aRNA kit (Ambion) and manufacturer's instructions. Approximately 400 ng of macrophage mRNA was used as template in the first round of amplification, yielding 8.1 ug of infected macrophage aRNA and 7.8 ug of control macrophage aRNA. Approximately 1 ug of first-round macrophage aRNA was used as template in the second round of amplification, yielding 81.2 ug of infected macrophage aRNA and 83.3 ug of control macrophage aRNA. Infected and control macrophage aRNA samples were visualized on agarose gels to check quality and quantity. Except for the amounts of aRNA and reverse transcription (RT) primer used, macrophage target labeling reactions and microarray hybridizations were identical. Macrophage target syntheses used 5 ug of second-round aRNA and 5 ug of random primers (Roche). RT primers were mixed with aRNA samples, and nuclease-free H2O (Invitrogen) was added to make 10 ul total volume. Samples were incubated at 70 degrees C 4 min, then placed on ice. RT reactions included 50 mM Tris HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM DTT, 0.5 mM each dATP, dCTP, and dGTP, 0.2 mM dTTP, 0.05 mM Cy3-dUTP or Cy5-dUTP (Amersham), 40U RNAguard ribonuclease inhibitor (Amersham), and 400U Superscript II Rnase H- reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). RT reactions were incubated at 42 degrees C for 2.5 h, followed by addition of 0.025U RNase A (Sigma) and 1.5U RNase H (New England BioLabs) and incubation at 37 degrees C for 30 min. Labeled targets were cleaned using the Qiaquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and precipitated, with 300 mM sodium acetate, 1 ul of 20 ug/ul glycogen (Invitrogen), and 2.5 volumes of 100% ethanol, at -20 degrees C overnight. Each labeled target was recovered by centrifugation (14,000 rpm, 4 degrees C, 1 h), washed in 70% ethanol, air-dried, and resuspended in 60 ul of hybridization buffer: 50% deionized formamide, 5X SSC, 0.1% SDS, 5 ul of 5 ug/ul oligo dT (5'T18[Q-N]3'), 5 ul of 2 ug/ul BSA (Pierce), and 2 ul of 10 ug/ul sonicated human placental DNA (Sigma). Targets were incubated at 96 degrees C for 3 min, and then at 65 degrees C until applied to microarrays. Microarrays were prepared for hybridization by washing 2 X 5 min in 0.1% SDS, washing 5 X 1 min in MilliQ H2O, immersing 3 min in 95 degrees C MilliQ H2O, and drying by centrifugation (2000 rpm, 5 min, in 50 ml conical tube). Microarray hybridizations were run in the dark under HybriSlips hybridization covers (Grace Biolabs) in slide hybridization chambers (Corning) submerged in a 45 degrees C water bath for 16 h. Coverslips were floated off in 45 degrees C (1X SSC, 0.2% SDS), and arrays were washed 1 X 10 min in 45 degrees C (1X SSC, 0.2% SDS), 3 X 4 min in room temperature (0.1X SSC, 0.1% SDS), and 4 X 4 min in room temperature 0.1X SSC. Slides were dried by centrifugation as before. Fluorescent images of hybridized arrays were acquired immediately at 10 um resolution using ScanArray Express (PerkinElmer). The Cy3 and Cy5 cyanine fluors were excited at 543 nm and 633 nm respectively, and the same laser power (90%) and photomultiplier tube (PMT) settings were used for all slides in a study (PMT 72 Cy3, PMT 63 or 64 Cy5 for macrophage study). Fluorescent intensity data were extracted from TIF images using Imagene 5.5 software (Biodiscovery). Keywords: other

Project description:Two independent chemostat cultivations were performed for both wild type and trxB1 over-expression strain, NZ7602. Three hybridization experiments, all with the same hybridization scheme (see overall design), were performed with samples obtained from these chemostats before and after treatment with hydrogen peroxide (30 minutes 2.5 mM peroxide). Two of these experiments used samples obtained from the same fermentation. In each experiment three arrays were used. Per array two cDNA labeled targets were hybridized on custom designed L. plantarum WCFS1 11K Agilent oligo microarrays (GEO Acc. Nr. GPL4318) using the Agilent 60-mer oligo microarray processing protocol version 4.1. These microarrays contained an average of 3 probes per gene. Dried slides were scanned in the Scan Array Express (PerkinElmer Life Sciences; Packard Bioscience) at 10 microns. Spot intensity data was quantified (average intensity) in ImaGene version 5.0 (BioDiscovery, Inc., El Segundo, CA). Signal intensities of all probes were corrected against background and normalized by fitting a plot of M (= 2log [cy5 intensity/cy3 intensity]) against A (= 0.5 • 2log [cy5 intensity • cy3 intensity]) using the lowess algorithm in BASE [32]. The fold change (FC) is defined as 2M. For the statistical analysis we used microarray analysis of variation (R/maanova) [33] In this maanova test we used three variables: fermentation, treatment, and genotype. We tested the model taking into consideration the interaction between genotype and treatment. Significantly regulated genes were defined as genes whose nominal adjusted pvalues were less than 10% and a FC>1.5. The maanova test resulted only in two sets of interesting data because the interaction effect did not reveal significant changes in transcript levels. One dataset representing the transcripts affected as a result of the overproduction of TR and another set representing the transcripts affected due to oxidative stress. These two datasets were denominated genotype and hydrogen peroxide datasets respectively. Keywords: hydrogen peroxide stress response

Project description:Two Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) inbred lines, Chiifu (smaple A) and Kenshin (Smaple B), were grown for approximately 4 weeks in a growth chamber at 22degreesC under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod with a photon flux density of 140 umol m-2 s-1. For microarray analysis, plants were exposed to a temperature of -4degreesC for 4 h, and shoots were sampled. Total RNA was isolated from the samples using an Easy-BLUETM Total RNA Extraction Kit (Invitrogen, NY, U.S.A.) and was then purified using an RNeasy MinEluteTM Cleanup Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Mircroarray experiments were carried out using Brassica 24K Oligo Microarray. RNA were prepared from each plant sample and 10 ug of total RNA were used for cDNA synthesis by using Superscript Double-Stranded cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, NY, U.S.A.). Following cDNA synthesis, remaining RNA was removed by the addition of RNaseA and the cDNA was precipitated following phenol/chloroform extraction. The cDNA pellet was rehydrated and used for Cy3-labelling. For the synthesis of Cy3-labeled target DNA fragments, 1 ug of double strand cDNA was mixed with 40 ul (1 OD) of Cy3-9 mer primers (Sigma-Aldrich) and the total volume was adjusted to 80 ul with deionized water. After heating at 98degreesC for 10 min, 10 uL of dNTP mix (10 mM each) and 2 ul of Klenow fragment (NEB; 50 units/ul) were added and the reaction was incubated at 37degreesC for 2 h. Finally, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 10 ul of 0.5 M EDTA. Labeled DNA fragments were precipitated with isopropanol and rehydrated with water. The concentration of each sample was determined using spectrophotometer. For hybridization, 13 ug of the labeled DNA fragment was mixed with hybridization buffer (NimbleGen) and then hybridized with the microarray using a MAUI hybridization chamber (Biomicro) at 42degreesC for 16 h. Following hybridization, the microarray was washed with wash solution I, II, and III (NimbleGen), and then dried in a dark desiccator. The microarray slide was scanned using GenePix scanner 4000B (Axon) and the spot intensities were analyzed using a NimbleScan (NimbleGen). The normal distribution of Cy3 intensities was tested by qqline. The data was normalized and processed with cubic spline normalization using quantiles to adjust signal variations between chips and with Rubust Multi-Chip Analysis (RMA) using a median polish algorithm implemented in NimbleScan software (NimbleGen). Two biological replicates were carried out.

Dataset Information

Gene Expression Profiling of Host Response in Models of Acute HIV infection

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure