Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

RNase H2 degrades toxic RNA:DNA hybrids behind stalled forks to promote replication restart

ABSTRACT: R-loops represent a major source of replication stress but the mechanism by which these structures impede fork progression remains unclear. To address this question, we monitored fork progression, arrest and restart in S. cerevisiae cells lacking RNase H1 and H2, two enzymes responsible for degrading RNA:DNA hybrids. We found that while RNase H-deficient cells could replicate normally their chromosomes under unchallenged growth conditions, their replication was impaired when exposed to hydroxyurea (HU) or methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Indeed, these cells exhibited increased levels of RNA:DNA hybrids at stalled forks and were unable to generate RPA-coated single-stranded (ssDNA), an important postreplicative step in resuming replication. Similar impairments in nascent DNA resection at HU-arrested forks were observed in human cells lacking RNase H2. However, the addition of triptolide, an inhibitor of transcription that induces RNA polymerase degradation, fully restored fork resection. Taken together, these data indicate that RNA:DNA hybrids not only act as barriers to replication forks, but also interfere with postreplicative fork repair mechanisms if not promptly degraded by RNase H.

ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae

PROVIDER: GSE215896 | GEO | 2023/10/14

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Replication forks proteomics reveals ATM-dependent rewiring of broken forks to promote restart

Project description:The fidelity of DNA replication is governed by a network of DNA repair mechanisms. Defects in replication fork protection can fuel genome instability in cancer, while also creating cancer-specific vulnerabilities. Here, we provide a comprehensive proteomic characterization of the replication fork response to topoisomerase 1 inhibition, a widely used mainstay chemotherapy. We reveal profound changes in the fork proteome and chromatin environment in response to seDSBs and topological stress, and classify fork repair factors according to their specificity for broken and stalled forks. These distinct fork responses also oppositely affect nucleosome occupancy and nuclear membrane interactions. ATM inhibition dramatically rewired the fork breakage response, revealing that ATM promotes HR-dependent fork restart by concomitantly promoting DNA-end resection and suppressing DSB associated protein ubiquitination and NHEJ. Together, this collection of damaged fork proteomes provides an ample resource to understand fork repair mechanisms and identify druggable targets and novel cancer vulnerabilities.

2021-01-15 | PXD018092 | Pride

DNA sequencing coverage in wild type and RNase H deficient Bacillus subtilis cells [1]

Project description:RNA-DNA hybrids form throughout the chromosome during normal cell growth and under stress conditions. When left unresolved, RNA-DNA hybrids can slow replication fork progression, cause DNA breaks, increase mutagenesis, and reduce gene expression. To remove hybrids, all organisms use ribonuclease H (RNase H) to specifically degrade the RNA portion of RNA-DNA hybrids. Here we show that, in addition to chromosomally encoded RNase HII and RNase HIII, Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610 encodes a previously uncharacterized RNase HI protein, RnhP, on the endogenous plasmid pBS32. Like other RNase HI enzymes, RnhP incises Okazaki fragments, ribopatches, and a complementary RNA-DNA hybrid. We show that while chromosomally encoded RNase HIII is required for pBS32 hyper-replication, RnhP compensates for loss of RNase HIII activity on the chromosome. Consequently, loss of RnhP and RNase HIII impairs bacterial growth. We show that the decreased growth rate can be explained by laggard replication fork progression near the terminus region of the right replichore resulting in SOS-dependent inhibition of cell division. We conclude that B. subtilis NCIB 3610 encodes functional RNase HI, HII, and HIII, and pBS32-encoded RNase HI contributes to replication fork progression and chromosome stability while RNase HIII is important for chromosome stability and plasmid hyper-replication.

2020-04-30 | GSE149552 | GEO

DNA sequencing coverage in wild type and RNase H deficient Bacillus subtilis cells [2]

2020-07-16 | GSE154585 | GEO

The Bloom Syndrome Complex Senses RPA-Coated Single-Stranded DNA to Restart Stalled Replication Forks

Project description:The Bloom syndrome helicase BLM interacts with topoisomerase IIIa (TOP3A), RMI1 and RMI2 to form the BTR complex, which dissolves double Holliday junctions to produce non-crossover products during homologous recombination (HR). BLM also promotes DNA-end resection and stalled replication fork restart. However, it is still unclear how the activities of the BTR complex are regulated in cells. Here, we identify multiple highly conserved short linear peptide motifs within the BTR complex that interact cooperatively with RPA. Furthermore, we demonstrate that RPA-binding is essential for stable recruitment of BLM to DNA damage sites and for stalled fork restart, but not for its roles in HR. Disruption of RPA-binding thus constitutes a novel separation-of-function mutation of the BTR complex, and suggest a model in which BTR contains the intrinsic ability to measure levels of RPA-ssDNA at replication forks, which controls its recruitment and activation in response to replication stress.

2021-01-05 | PXD018322 | Pride

Dormant origins and fork protection mechanisms rescue sister forks arrested by transcription

Project description:Yeast Sen1Senataxin is a RNA/DNA helicase that preserves replication forks across RNA Polymerase II-transcribed genes by counteracting RNA:DNA hybrids accumulation. We show that in Sen1-depleted cells early forks clashing head-on with transcription halt, and impair progression of sister forks within the same replicon. Unsolved replication-transcription collisions trigger the local firing of dormant origins that rescue arrested forks. In sen1 mutants the MRX and Mrc1/Ctf4-complexes protect those forks clashing with transcription by preventing genotoxic fork-resection events mediated by the Exo1 nuclease. Hence, sister forks within the same replicon remain coupled when one of the two forks halts. This is different when forks encounter double strand breaks. Moreover, the local firing of dormant origins is not prevented by checkpoint activation but depends on delayed adjacent forks. Furthermore, a productive head-on clash between replication and transcription requires the tuning of origin firing and coordination between Sen1, the MRX and Mrc1/Ctf4-complexes and Exo1.

2017-10-11 | GSE97046 | GEO

Checkpoint-mediated DNA polymerase e exonuclease activity curbing counteracts resection-driven fork collapse

Project description:DNA polymerase epsilon (Pole) carries out leading strand synthesis with high fidelity owing to its exonuclease activity. Pole polymerase and exonuclease activities are in balance, due to partitioning of nascent strands between catalytic sites, so that net end resection occurs when synthesis is impaired. Stalling of chromosomal DNA synthesis activates replication checkpoint kinases, required to preserve the functional integrity of replication forks. We found that Pole is phosphorylated in a Rad53CHK1-dependent manner upon fork stalling, likely to limit Pole-driven nascent strand resection that causes replication fork collapse. In stress conditions Pole phosphorylation occurs on serine 430 of the Pol2 catalytic subunit. A S430 phosphomimic limits strand partitioning and exonucleolytic processivity, while non-phosphorylatable Pol2-S430A bypasses checkpoint regulation causing stalled fork resection and collapse. We propose that checkpoint kinases switch Pole to an exonuclease-safe mode by curbing active site partitioning thus preventing nascent strand resection and stabilizing stalled replication forks.

2021-04-30 | GSE156480 | GEO

Replication dynamics of recombination-dependent replication forks: leading and lagging strand synthesis are not coupled

Project description:DNA replication fidelity is essential for maintaining genetic stability. Forks arrested at replication fork barriers can be stabilised by the intra-S phase checkpoint, subsequently being rescued by a converging fork, or resuming when the barrier is removed. However, some arrested forks cannot be stabilised and fork convergence cannot rescue in all situations. Thus, cells have developed homologous recombination-dependent mechanisms to restart persistently inactive forks. To understand the dynamics of HR-restart, we visualized in vivo replication dynamics at an S. pombe replication barrier, RTS1, using polymerase usage sequencing and model replication dynamics by Monte Carlo simulation. We confirm that HR-restarted forks synthesise both strands with Pol d and that Pol a is not used significantly on either strand: the lagging strand template remains as a gap that is filled in later. We further demonstrate that HR-restarted forks progress for >30 kb kilobases without maturing to a d/e configuration and can progress through a fork barrier that arrests canonical forks. Finally, by manipulating lagging strand resection during HR-restart by deleting pku70, we show that the leading strand initiates replication at the same position, demonstrating the stability of the 3' single strand in the context of increased resection.

2020-07-03 | GSE153731 | GEO

Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication

Project description:ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes have been shown to participate in DNA replication in addition to transcription and DNA repair. However, the mechanisms of their involvement in DNA replication remain unclear. Here, we reveal a specific function of the yeast INO80 chromatin remodeling complex in the DNA damage tolerance pathways. Whereas INO80 is necessary for the resumption of replication at forks stalled by methyl methane sulfonate (MMS), it is not required for replication fork collapse after treatment with hydroxyurea (HU). Mechanistically, INO80 regulates DNA damage tolerance during replication through modulation of PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) ubiquitination and Rad51-mediated processing of recombination intermediates at impeded replication forks. Our findings establish a mechanistic link between INO80 and DNA damage tolerance pathways, indicating that chromatin remodeling is important for accurate DNA replication. INO80 distribution in WT cells was measured.

2010-06-20 | E-GEOD-18570 | biostudies-arrayexpress

RNA-seq analysis of gene expression during and after exposure to hydroxyurea in WT and mec1 cells in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Project description:We previously demonstrated that inactivation of the replication checkpoint via a mec1 mutation led to chromosome breakage at replication forks initiated from virtually all origins of replication, after transient exposure to hydroxyurea (HU), an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase. Furthermore, we have shown that chromosomes break at replication forks that have suffered single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) formation. Here we sought to determine whether all replication forks containing ssDNA gaps have equal probability of producing double strand breaks (DSBs) when cells attempt to recover from HU exposure. We devised a new methodology, Break-Seq, that combines our previously described DSB labeling with NextGen sequencing to map chromosome breaks with improved sensitivity and resolution. We show that DSBs preferentially occur at genes transcriptionally induced by HU. Notably, different subsets of the HU-induced genes produced DSBs in MEC1 and mec1 cells as replication forks traversed greater distance in MEC1 cells than in mec1 cells during the recovery from HU. Specifically, while MEC1 cells exhibited chromosome breakage at stress-response transcription factors, mec1 cells predominantly suffered chromosome breakage at transporter genes, many of which are the substrates of the said transcription factors. We propose that HU-induced chromosome fragility arises at higher frequency near HU-induced genes as a result of destabilized replication forks encountering transcription factor binding and/or the act of transcription. Our model provides an explanation for a long-standing problem in chromosome biology: why different replication inhibitors produce different spectra of chromosome breakage? We propose that different inhibitors elicit different transcription responses as well as destabilize replication forks, and, when the two processes collide, ssDNA at the replication fork suffers further strand breakage, causing DSBs.

2015-01-12 | GSE63516 | GEO

Break-Seq of DNA double stranded breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae WT and mec1 cells after exposure to hydroxyurea

2015-01-12 | GSE58808 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data