Affymetrix Arrays Interrogated with Tumor/Normal Pancreatic Samples
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE22780 | GEO | 2011/07/01
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA128089
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:To identify genes in the chromosome 3p12 pathway to tumorigenesis in pancreatic cancer, we screened two expression platforms and then as a third platform interrogated pancreatic cancer tumor/normal samples for differential expression. Data from the third expression platform experiments are shown herein. Frozen tumor and adjacent normal tissue were obtained from untreated, retrospective pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples available from the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center tumor bank and our collaborator (MLF). Total RNA from matched tumor/adjacent normal samples (8 paired samples) was utilized to interrogate the GeneChip U133 plus 2.0 array and resultant bioinformatic analysis performed to identify differentially expressed sequences across all three platforms.
2011-07-01 | E-GEOD-22780 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:It has long been hypothesized that knowledge of allele-specific modification (ASM; "modification" is used to denote various types of epigenetic cytosine marks, not only methylation) can supplement and inform GWAS of complex diseases and traits. To explore the relationship between GWAS subthreshold SNPs and ASM, we identified brain ASM-SNPs from Caucasian control individuals (n=76) and Caucasian patients affected by schizophrenia (n=65) or bipolar (n=67) using the Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarray, one of the most common GWAS platforms which has also been thoroughlyt validated for ASM mapping. The brain samples (N=230, all ethnicities) were interrogated twice on Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarrays. First, regular SNP genotyping was performed following the manufacturer's protocol. Second, we investigated allelic differences in DNA methylation by enriching the unmodified DNA fraction using DNA methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes.
2015-07-29 | E-GEOD-71443 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The goals of the study were to assess array platform performance and analysis algorithm performance. The most widely used method for detecting genome-wide protein-DNA interactions is chromatin immunoprecipitation on tiling microarrays, commonly known as ChIP-chip. Here, we conducted the first objective analysis of tiling array platforms, amplification procedures, and signal detection algorithms in a simulated ChIP-chip experiment. Mixtures of human genomic DNA and "spike-ins" comprised of nearly 100 human sequences at various concentrations were hybridized to four tiling array platforms by eight independent groups. Blind to the number of spike-ins, their locations, and the range of concentrations, each group made predictions of the spike-in locations. We found that microarray platform choice is not the primary determinant of overall performance. In fact, variation in performance between labs, protocols and algorithms within the same array platform was greater than the variation in performance between array platforms. However, each array platform had unique performance characteristics that varied with tiling resolution and the number of replicates, which have implications for cost versus detection power. Long oligonucleotide arrays were slightly more sensitive at detecting very low enrichment. On all platforms, simple sequence repeats and genome redundancy tended to result in false positives. LM-PCR and WGA, the most popular sample amplification techniques, reproduced relative enrichment levels with high fidelity. Performance among signal detection algorithms was heavily dependent on array platform. The spike-in DNA samples and the data presented here provide a stable benchmark against which future ChIP platforms, protocol improvements, and analysis methods can be evaluated. Keywords: ChIP-chip, competition For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODEDataReleasePolicyFinal2008.pdf
2008-01-09 | GSE10090 | GEO
Project description:The goals of the study were to assess array platform performance and analysis algorithm performance. The most widely used method for detecting genome-wide protein-DNA interactions is chromatin immunoprecipitation on tiling microarrays, commonly known as ChIP-chip. Here, we conducted the first objective analysis of tiling array platforms, amplification procedures, and signal detection algorithms in a simulated ChIP-chip experiment. Mixtures of human genomic DNA and "spike-ins" comprised of nearly 100 human sequences at various concentrations were hybridized to four tiling array platforms by eight independent groups. Blind to the number of spike-ins, their locations, and the range of concentrations, each group made predictions of the spike-in locations. We found that microarray platform choice is not the primary determinant of overall performance. In fact, variation in performance between labs, protocols and algorithms within the same array platform was greater than the variation in performance between array platforms. However, each array platform had unique performance characteristics that varied with tiling resolution and the number of replicates, which have implications for cost versus detection power. Long oligonucleotide arrays were slightly more sensitive at detecting very low enrichment. On all platforms, simple sequence repeats and genome redundancy tended to result in false positives. LM-PCR and WGA, the most popular sample amplification techniques, reproduced relative enrichment levels with high fidelity. Performance among signal detection algorithms was heavily dependent on array platform. The spike-in DNA samples and the data presented here provide a stable benchmark against which future ChIP platforms, protocol improvements, and analysis methods can be evaluated. Keywords: ChIP-chip, competition, artificial DNA For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODEDataReleasePolicyFinal2008.pdf
2008-01-09 | GSE10076 | GEO
Project description:Gene expression microarrays have made a profound impact in biomedical research. The diversity of platforms and analytical methods has made comparison of data from multiple platforms very challenging. In this study, we describe a framework for comparisons across platforms and laboratories. We have attempted to include nearly all the available commercial and “in-house” platforms. Using probe sequences matched at the exon level improved consistency of measurements across the different microarray platforms compared to annotation-based matches. Generally, consistency was good for highly expressed genes, and variable for genes with lower expression values as confirmed by QRT-PCR. Concordance of measurements was higher between laboratories on the same platform than across platforms. We demonstrate that, after stringent pre-processing, commercial arrays were more consistent than “in-house” arrays, and by most measures, one-dye platforms were more consistent than two-dye platforms. Keywords: cross platform microarrays
2006-06-01 | GSE4830 | GEO
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC2639301 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC2216046 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The growth in popularity of RNA expression microarrays has been accompanied by concerns about the reliability of the data especially when comparing between different platforms. Here we present an evaluation of the reproducibility of microarray results using two platforms, Affymetrix GeneChips and Illumina BeadArrays. The study design is based on a dilution series of two human tissues (blood and placenta), tested in duplicate on each platform. By a variety of measures the two platforms yielded data of similar quality and properties. The results of a comparison between the platforms indicate very high agreement, particularly for genes which are predicted to be differentially expressed between the two tissues. Agreement was strongly correlated with the level of expression of a gene. Concordance was also improved when probes on the two platforms could be identified as being likely to target the same set of transcripts of a given gene. These results shed light on the causes or failures of agreement across microarray platforms. The set of probes we found to be most highly reproducible can be used by others to help increase confidence in analyses of other data sets using these platforms. Keywords: Dilution series, platform comparison, Affymetrix, Illumina
2005-11-08 | GSE3077 | GEO
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5086940 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC2323405 | biostudies-literature