Comparison of the transcriptional response to ethanol in laboratory and wild yeast strains
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Saccharomyces cerevisiae
PROVIDER: GSE22904 | GEO | 2010/12/17
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA127955
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:An S288c-derived lab strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has lower ethanol resistance than either the vineyard strain M22 or the oak strain YPS163. We performed a 60 minute time-course experiment in the presence of 5% ethanol and compared the transcriptional response to ethanol between strains. We additionally analyzed the time-point of maximal response (30 min.) in wild type cells, YPS163 msn2D, and YPS163 hap1D cells. The genomic expression response to 5% ethanol stress was measured in 3 different strain backgrounds, and 2 different mutant backgrounds. Basal gene expression was also compared in two non-lab strains to the S288c reference. A single replicate was performed for the time-course experiment. All of the single time-point experiments were performed using biological triplicates.
2010-12-17 | E-GEOD-22904 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In a previous study, we identified extensive natural variation in the response to acute ethanol treatment in three yeast strains: a lab strain derived from the commonly used S288c (DBY8268), vineyard isolate M22, and oak soil strain YPS163. Many expression differences persisted across several modules of co-regulated genes, implicating trans-acting systemic differences in ethanol sensing and/or response. To understand the genetic basis for these expression differences, we performed eQTL mapping analysis of the response to acute ethanol stress in ~100 F2 strains from two crosses: DBY8268x M22 and DBY8268 x YPS163.
2014-10-02 | GSE54196 | GEO
Project description:In a previous study, we identified extensive natural variation in the response to acute ethanol treatment in three yeast strains: a lab strain derived from the commonly used S288c (DBY8268), vineyard isolate M22, and oak soil strain YPS163. Many expression differences persisted across several modules of co-regulated genes, implicating trans-acting systemic differences in ethanol sensing and/or response. To understand the genetic basis for these expression differences, we performed eQTL mapping analysis of the response to acute ethanol stress in ~100 F2 strains from two crosses: DBY8268x M22 and DBY8268 x YPS163. We measured the gene expression response to acute ethanol stress (5% for 30 min) in 6 replicates for the parental strains, and in biological duplicate for the eQTL mapping population. Dye swaps were performed in the replicates to control for dye-specific effects.
2014-10-02 | E-GEOD-54196 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The environmental stresses and inhibitors encounted by Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains are main limiting factors in bioethanol fermentation. Investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying the stresses-related phenotypes diversities within and between S. cerevisiae populations could guide the construction of yeast strains with improved stresses tolerance and fermentation performances. Here, we explored the genetic characteristics of the bioethanol S. cerevisiae strains, and elucidated the genetic variations correlated with its advantaged traits (higher ethanol yield under sever conditions and better tolerance to multiple stresses compared to an S288c derived laboratory strain BYZ1). Firstly, pulse-field gel electrophoresis combined with array-comparative genomic hybridization was used to compare the genome structure of industrial strains and the laboratory strain BYZ1.
2011-09-15 | GSE31872 | GEO
Project description:Here we report the massively parallel cDNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis performed using high throughput sequencing of four vineyard yeast strains collected from the vineyards of the “Prosecco di Conegliano-Valdobbiadene” (P283 and P301 strains) and Piave AO (Appellation of origin) (R008 and R103 strains) regions in North East of Italy. Results were compared with RNA-seq performed on a commercial yeast strain (EC1118) and a laboratory strain (S288c). Yeast cells were collected at two different steps of the fermentation curve: at the beginning of the process, when the CO2 produced by the cells was 6 g/l (middle exponential growth phase), and in the middle of fermentation, at 45 g/l (early stationary phase). Three biological replicates of the fermentations were performed for each strain and samples for RNA-seq were gathered at the beginning of the process. The aim of this experiment was the comparison of the transcriptomes of the six yeast strains to identify the genes characterizing wild type yeast isolates, "commercial" and laboratory strains.
2014-03-31 | GSE44845 | GEO
Project description:Here we report the massively parallel cDNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis performed using high throughput sequencing of four vineyard yeast strains collected from the vineyards of the M-bM-^@M-^\Prosecco di Conegliano-ValdobbiadeneM-bM-^@M-^] (P283 and P301 strains) and Piave AO (Appellation of origin) (R008 and R103 strains) regions in North East of Italy. Results were compared with RNA-seq performed on a commercial yeast strain (EC1118) and a laboratory strain (S288c). Yeast cells were collected at two different steps of the fermentation curve: at the beginning of the process, when the CO2 produced by the cells was 6 g/l (middle exponential growth phase), and in the middle of fermentation, at 45 g/l (early stationary phase). Three biological replicates of the fermentations were performed for each strain and samples for RNA-seq were gathered at the beginning of the process. The aim of this experiment was the comparison of the transcriptomes of the six yeast strains to identify the genes characterizing wild type yeast isolates, "commercial" and laboratory strains. Twelve samples were analyzed: S288c strain at middle exponential growth phase (6 g/l CO2 produced), S288c strain in the middle of fermentation (45 g/l CO2 produced), EC1118 strain at middle exponential growth phase (6 g/l CO2 produced), EC1118 strain in the middle of fermentation (45 g/l CO2 produced), P283 strain at middle exponential growth phase (6 g/l CO2 produced), P283 strain in the middle of fermentation (45 g/l CO2 produced), R008 strain at middle exponential growth phase (6 g/l CO2 produced), R008 strain in the middle of fermentation (45 g/l CO2 produced), R103 strain at middle exponential growth phase (6 g/l CO2 produced), R103 strain in the middle of fermentation (45 g/l CO2 produced), P301 strain at middle exponential growth phase (6 g/l CO2 produced), P301 strain in the middle of fermentation (45 g/l CO2 produced).
2014-03-31 | E-GEOD-44845 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In this study, using DNA microarray analysis, we compared the comprehensive expression profiles of two yeast trains, i.e, the previously obtained ethanol-adapted yeast strain and the parental strain as control (FY834), under the ethanol stress condition (YPD medium contained 10% ethanol). As a result, we identified certain genes and functional categories of the genes that are possible involved in growth under the ethanol stress condition.
2008-11-29 | GSE13757 | GEO
Project description:Distilled spirits production using S. cerevisiae requires understanding the mechanisms of yeast cell response to the alcohol stress. Reportedly, specific mutations in genes of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, e.g. RPN4, may result in strains exhibiting either hyper-resistance or increased sensitivity to different alcohols. In this work, we studied Rpn4-dependent response of different yeast strains to short-term ethanol exposure. Three S. cerevisiae strains were used: wild-type (WT), mutant strain with RPN4 gene deletion (rpn4-delta), and mutant strain with decreased proteasome activity due to PRE1 deregulation (YPL). The resistance tests demonstrated an increased sensitivity of mutant strains to ethanol compared with WT. Comparative proteomics analysis revealed significant differences in molecular responses to ethanol between different strains. GO analysis of proteins upregulated in WT showed enrichments represented by oxidative and heat responses, protein folding/unfolding and protein degradation. Enrichment of at least one of these responses was not observed in mutant strains. At the same time, trehalose synthesis and accumulation of stress granules were enhanced in the mutant strains. We suggest that these pathways could partially compensate for the failure of ubiquitin-proteasome system to cope with the ethanol stress. Also, we suggest impaired compensatory activation of autophagic degradation system in rpn4-delta strain and propose that Rpn4 can be a regulator for autophagy upon ethanol stress. These findings can be a basis for creating genetically modified yeast strains resistant to high levels of alcohol, being further used for fermentation in ethanol production.
2020-04-22 | PXD014236 | Pride
Project description:The molecular mechanisms of ethanol toxicity and tolerance in bacteria, while important for biotechnology and bioenergy applications, remain incompletely understood. Genetic studies have identified potential cellular targets for ethanol and revealed multiple mechanisms of tolerance, but it remains difficult to separate direct and indirect effects of ethanol. We used adaptive evolution to generate spontaneous ethanol-tolerant strains of Escherichia coli, then characterized the mechanisms of toxicity and resistance associated with select mutations. Evolved alleles of metJ, rho, and rpsQ were sufficient to recapitulate much of the observed ethanol tolerance, implicating translation and transcription as key processes affected by ethanol. We found that ethanol induces mistranslation errors during protein synthesis, and that the evolved rpsQ allele protects cells by rendering the ribosome hyper-accurate. Ribosome profiling and RNAseq analyses of the ethanol-tolerant strain versus the wild type established that ethanol negatively affects transcriptional and translational processivity. Ethanol-stressed cells exhibited ribosomal stalling at internal AUG codons, which may be ameliorated by the adaptive inactivation of the MetJ repressor of methionine biosynthesis genes. Ethanol also caused aberrant intragenic transcription termination for mRNAs with low ribosome density, which was reduced in a strain with the adaptive rho mutation. Furthermore, ethanol inhibited transcript elongation by RNA polymerase in vitro. We propose that ethanol-induced inhibition and uncoupling of mRNA and protein synthesis are major contributors to ethanol toxicity in E. coli, and that adaptive mutations in metJ, rho, and rpsQ protect central dogma processes in the presence of ethanol.
2014-06-18 | GSE56372 | GEO
Project description:The molecular mechanisms of ethanol toxicity and tolerance in bacteria, while important for biotechnology and bioenergy applications, remain incompletely understood. Genetic studies have identified potential cellular targets for ethanol and revealed multiple mechanisms of tolerance, but it remains difficult to separate direct and indirect effects of ethanol. We used adaptive evolution to generate spontaneous ethanol-tolerant strains of Escherichia coli, then characterized the mechanisms of toxicity and resistance associated with select mutations. Evolved alleles of metJ, rho, and rpsQ were sufficient to recapitulate much of the observed ethanol tolerance, implicating translation and transcription as key processes affected by ethanol. We found that ethanol induces mistranslation errors during protein synthesis, and that the evolved rpsQ allele protects cells by rendering the ribosome hyper-accurate. Ribosome profiling and RNAseq analyses of the ethanol-tolerant strain versus the wild type established that ethanol negatively affects transcriptional and translational processivity. Ethanol-stressed cells exhibited ribosomal stalling at internal AUG codons, which may be ameliorated by the adaptive inactivation of the MetJ repressor of methionine biosynthesis genes. Ethanol also caused aberrant intragenic transcription termination for mRNAs with low ribosome density, which was reduced in a strain with the adaptive rho mutation. Furthermore, ethanol inhibited transcript elongation by RNA polymerase in vitro. We propose that ethanol-induced inhibition and uncoupling of mRNA and protein synthesis are major contributors to ethanol toxicity in E. coli, and that adaptive mutations in metJ, rho, and rpsQ protect central dogma processes in the presence of ethanol.
2014-06-18 | GSE56407 | GEO