Homologous recombination between nonhomologous chromosomes – Recurrent chromosomal translocations mediated by interchromosomal NAHR
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE23587 | GEO | 2010/08/17
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA129971
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Four unrelated families with the same unbalanced translocation der(4)t(4;11)(p16.2;p15.4) were identified. Both of the breakpoint regions in 4p16.2 and 11p15.4 were narrowed to large ~359-kb and ~215-kb low-copy repeat (LCR) clusters, respectively, by aCGH and SNP array analyses. DNA sequencing enabled mapping the breakpoints of one translocation to 24-bp within interchromosomal paralogous LCRs of ~130-kb in length and 94.7% DNA sequence identity located in olfactory receptor gene clusters, indicating nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) as the mechanism for translocation. To investigate the potential involvement of interchromosomal LCRs in recurrent chromosomal translocation formation, we performed computational genome-wide analyses and identified 5292 interchromosomal LCR substrate pairs, > 5-kb in size and sharing > 94% sequence identity that can potentially mediate chromosomal translocations. Additional proof for interchromosomal NAHR mediated translocation formation was provided by sequencing the breakpoints of another recurrent translocation, der(8)t(8;12)(p23.1;p13.31). The NAHR sites were mapped within 55-bp in ~7.8-kb paralogous subunits of 95.3% sequence identity located in the ~579-kb (chr8) and ~287-kb (chr12) LCR clusters. We demonstrate that NAHR mediates recurrent constitutional translocations throughout the human genome and provide a computationally determined genome-wide “recurrent translocation map”. Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP Array 6.0 arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, California) were employed to define the breakpoints on chromosomes 4, 8, 11, and 12. Analysis was performed according to the Genome-Wide Human SNP Nsp/Sty Assay Kit 5.0/6.0 protocol provided by the supplier. The arrays were scanned using a GeneChip® Scanner 3000 7G (Affymetrix, Inc.) and results were analyzed using Genotyping Console version 2.1 software. patient 1: Version 5 BAC array contained 853 BAC/PAC clones designed to cover genomic regions of 75 known genomic disorders, all 41 subtelomeric regions, and 43 pericentromeric regions. For each patient sample, two experiments were performed with reversal of the dye labels for the control and test samples. patient 2: Version 5.1 BAC array contained 853 BAC/PAC clones designed to cover genomic regions of 75 known genomic disorders, all 41 subtelomeric regions, and 43 pericentromeric regions. For each patient sample, two experiments were performed with reversal of the dye labels for the control and test samples. patient 3: The BAC emulated Version 6.1 OLIGO array was comprised of approximately 42,460 oligonucleotides representing 1400 BAC clones, covering ~150 genomic disorders, all 41 subtelomeric regions up to 12 Mb and 43 pericentromeric regions with backbone coverage of every chromosome at the 650-band level of cytogenetic resolution (http://www.bcm.edu/geneticlabs/cma/tables.html). The 42.46K oligonucleotides (oligos) were selected from initial testing of 105,000 oligos derived from the Agilent eArray library with strict selection criteria and removal of repetitive sequences to ensure optimal performance with greater dynamic range. This targeted 42.46 K OLIGO array (V6 OLIGO) corresponds to genomic regions covered by the V6 BAC arrays and was manufactured in a 4 x 44K format with an average of 28-30 oligos per region previously covered by a single BAC clone. patient 5: The BAC emulated Version 6.3 OLIGO array was comprised of approximately 43,580 oligonucleotides representing 1400 BAC clones, covering ~150 genomic disorders, all 41 subtelomeric regions up to 12 Mb and 43 pericentromeric regions with backbone coverage of every chromosome at the 650-band level of cytogenetic resolution (http://www.bcm.edu/geneticlabs/cma/tables.html). This targeted OLIGO array corresponds to genomic regions covered by the V6 BAC arrays and was manufactured in a 4 x 44K format with an average of 28-30 oligos per region previously covered by a single BAC clone. patient 6: The BAC emulated Version 6.4 OLIGO array was comprised of approximately 43,700 oligonucleotides representing 1400 BAC clones, covering ~150 genomic disorders, all 41 subtelomeric regions up to 12 Mb and 43 pericentromeric regions with backbone coverage of every chromosome at the 650-band level of cytogenetic resolution (http://www.bcm.edu/geneticlabs/cma/tables.html). This targeted OLIGO array corresponds to genomic regions covered by the V6 BAC arrays and was manufactured in a 4 x 44K format with an average of 28-30 oligos per region previously covered by a single BAC clone. Patient 4 was a known t(4;11) translocation patient form previous report and only ran on Affymetrix array.
2010-08-17 | E-GEOD-23587 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Many loci in the human genome harbor complex genomic structures that can result in susceptibility to genomic rearrangements leading to various genomic disorders. Nephronophthisis 1 (NPHP1, MIM# 256100) is an autosomal recessive disorder that can be caused by defects of NPHP1; the gene maps within the human 2q13 region where low copy repeats (LCRs) are abundant. Loss of function of NPHP1 is responsible for approximately 85% of the NPHP1 cases - about 80% of such individuals carry a large recurrent homozygous NPHP1 deletion that occurs via non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between two flanking directly oriented ~45 kb LCRs. Published data revealed a non-pathogenic inversion polymorphism involving the NPHP1 gene flanked by two inverted ~358 kb LCRs. Using optical mapping and array-comparative genomic hybridization, we identified three potential novel structural variant (SV) haplotypes at the NPHP1 locus that may protect a haploid genome from genomic instability and NPHP1 deletion. Inter-species comparative genomic analyses among primate genomes revealed massive genomic changes during evolution. The aggregated data suggest that dynamic genomic rearrangements occurred historically within the NPHP1 locus and generated SV haplotypes observed in the human population today, which may have differential susceptibility to the NPHP1 deletion within a personal genome. Our study documents diverse SV haplotypes at a complex LCR-laden human genomic region. Comparative analyses provide a model for how this complex region arose during primate evolution, and studies among humans reflect the possibility that intra-species polymorphism may potentially modulate an individual’s susceptibility to acquiring disease-associated alleles.
2015-11-30 | GSE73962 | GEO
Project description:Large scale analysis of balanced chromosomal translocation breakpoints has shown nonhomologous end joining and microhomology-mediated repair to be the main drivers of interchromosomal structural aberrations. Breakpoint sequences of de novo unbalanced translocations have not yet been investigated systematically. We analyzed 12 de novo translocations and mapped the breakpoints in 9. Surprisingly, in contrast to balanced translocations, we identify non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between (retro)transposable elements and especially long interspersed elements (LINEs) as the main mutational mechanism. This finding implicates (retro)transposons to be a major driver of genomic rearrangements and exposes a profoundly different mutational mechanism compared to balanced chromosomal translocations. Furthermore, we show the existence of compound maternal/paternal derivative chromosomes, reinforcing the hypothesis that human cleavage stage embryogenesis is a cradle of chromosomal rearrangements. In total 36 non-amplified genomic DNA samples (12 patients plus parents) extracted from blood or amniocytes were analyzed by 250K Nsp I SNP arrays (GEO accession number GPL3718).
2012-07-12 | E-GEOD-39303 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Large scale analysis of balanced chromosomal translocation breakpoints has shown nonhomologous end joining and microhomology-mediated repair to be the main drivers of interchromosomal structural aberrations. Breakpoint sequences of de novo unbalanced translocations have not yet been investigated systematically. We analyzed 12 de novo translocations and mapped the breakpoints in 9. Surprisingly, in contrast to balanced translocations, we identify non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between (retro)transposable elements and especially long interspersed elements (LINEs) as the main mutational mechanism. This finding implicates (retro)transposons to be a major driver of genomic rearrangements and exposes a profoundly different mutational mechanism compared to balanced chromosomal translocations. Furthermore, we show the existence of compound maternal/paternal derivative chromosomes, reinforcing the hypothesis that human cleavage stage embryogenesis is a cradle of chromosomal rearrangements.
2012-07-13 | GSE39303 | GEO
Project description:Homologous recombination between nonhomologous chromosomes – Recurrent chromosomal translocations mediated by interchromosomal NAHR
| PRJNA129971 | ENA
Project description:Genomic rearrangements may cause both Mendelian and complex disorders. Currently, several major mechanisms causing genomic rearrangements have been proposed such as non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), fork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS) and microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (MMBIR). However, to what extent these mechanisms contribute to gene-specific pathogenic copy-number changes (CNCs) remains understudied. Furthermore, only few studies resolved these pathogenic alterations at nucleotide-level resolution. Accordingly, our aim is to explore which mechanisms contribute to a large, unique set of locus-specific non-recurrent genomic rearrangements causing the genetic neurocutaneous disorder neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Through breakpoint-spanning PCR as well as array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH), we have identified the breakpoints and characterized the likely rearrangement mechanism of the NF1 intragenic CNCs in 78 unrelated patients. Unlike the most typical recurrent rearrangements mediated by flanking low copy repeats (LCRs), NF1 intragenic CNCs have diverse breakpoint locations, and are characterized by different rearrangement mechanisms. We propose the DNA replication-based mechanisms comprising FoSTeS/MMBIR and serial replication stalling to be the predominant mechanism leading to NF1 intragenic CNCs. In addition to the loop of a 197-bp palindrome located in intron 40, four Alu elements located in intron 1, 2, 3 and 50 were also identified as significant intragenic rearrangement hotspots within the NF1 gene. However, no clear genotype-phenotype correlations could be identified among the NF1 patients carrying NF1 intragenic CNCs.
2015-07-30 | GSE64869 | GEO
Project description:Low abundance mRNAs are more difficult to examine using microarrays than high abundance mRNAs due to the effect of concentration on hybridization kinetics, signal-to-noise ratios, and interference between signals from mRNA isoforms. Individual sequences in LCRs are more highly represented than in the mRNA population from which they are derived, leading to favorable hybridization kinetics. LCR targets permit the measurement of abundance changes that are difficult to measure using oligo dT priming for target synthesis. An oligo dT-primed target and three LCRs detect twice as many differentially regulated genes as could be detected by the oligo dT-primed target alone, as serum-starved fibroblasts responded to the reintroduction of serum. Thus, this target preparation strategy considerably increases the sensitivity of spotted cDNA microarrays.
2010-06-10 | E-GEOD-2655 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Genomic rearrangements may cause both Mendelian and complex disorders. Currently, several major mechanisms causing genomic rearrangements have been proposed such as non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), fork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS) and microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (MMBIR). However, to what extent these mechanisms contribute to gene-specific pathogenic copy-number changes (CNCs) remains understudied. Furthermore, only few studies resolved these pathogenic alterations at nucleotide-level resolution. Accordingly, our aim is to explore which mechanisms contribute to a large, unique set of locus-specific non-recurrent genomic rearrangements causing the genetic neurocutaneous disorder neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Through breakpoint-spanning PCR as well as array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH), we have identified the breakpoints and characterized the likely rearrangement mechanism of the NF1 intragenic CNCs in 78 unrelated patients. Unlike the most typical recurrent rearrangements mediated by flanking low copy repeats (LCRs), NF1 intragenic CNCs have diverse breakpoint locations, and are characterized by different rearrangement mechanisms. We propose the DNA replication-based mechanisms comprising FoSTeS/MMBIR and serial replication stalling to be the predominant mechanism leading to NF1 intragenic CNCs. In addition to the loop of a 197-bp palindrome located in intron 40, four Alu elements located in intron 1, 2, 3 and 50 were also identified as significant intragenic rearrangement hotspots within the NF1 gene. However, no clear genotype-phenotype correlations could be identified among the NF1 patients carrying NF1 intragenic CNCs. Patient DNA samples with non-overlapping CNCs, as estimated by MLPA, were labeled with Cy3 and Cy5 fluorophores respectively, and hybridized onto the microarray. Alternatively, patient DNA was hybridized versus unrelated individual blood DNA. No hybridizations using biological replicates were performed. In total 6 samples were included. Please note that our experimental setup included a hybridization in which two DNA samples with non-overlapping deletions, from two NF1 patients, were hybridized in one experiment (sample codes: 1253 and 1403). In this specific case, assigning test or reference function to the samples was a matter of arbitrary choice. However, if needed, sample 1253 can be denoted as test, and sample 1403 can be denoted as reference in this experiment.
2015-07-30 | E-GEOD-64869 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Unbalanced translocations are a relatively common type of copy number variation and are a major contributor to neurodevelopmental disorders. We analyzed the breakpoints of 57 unique unbalanced translocations to investigate the mechanisms of how they form. 51 are simple unbalanced translocations between two different chromosome ends, and six rearrangements have more than three breakpoints involving two to five chromosomes. Sequencing 37 breakpoint junctions revealed that simple translocations have between zero and four basepairs (bp) of microhomology (n=26), short inserted sequences (n=8), or paralogous repeats (n=3) at the junctions, indicating that translocations do not arise primarily from non-allelic homologous recombination, but instead form most often via non-homologous end joining or microhomology-mediated break-induced replication. Three simple translocations fuse genes that are predicted to produce in-frame transcripts of SIRPG-WWOX, SMOC2-PROX1, and PIEZO2-MTA1, which may lead to gain of function. Three complex translocations have inversions, insertions, and multiple breakpoint junctions between only two chromosomes. Whole- genome sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two de novo translocations revealed at least 18 and 33 breakpoints involving five different chromosomes. Breakpoint sequencing of one inherited translocation involving four chromosomes uncovered multiple breakpoints with inversions and insertions. All of these breakpoint junctions had zero to four bp of microhomology consistent with germline chromothripsis, and both de novo events occurred on paternal alleles. Breakpoint sequencing of our large collection of chromosome rearrangements offers a comprehensive analysis of the molecular mechanisms behind germline translocation formation. High resolution array CGH; two-color experiment, clinical patient vs. normal control gDNA; sex mis-matched
2015-04-22 | E-GEOD-68019 | biostudies-arrayexpress