Basal gene expression in dam, dam mutS, and mutS mutant E. coli strains
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Escherichia coli K-12 Escherichia coli
PROVIDER: GSE2928 | GEO | 2005/07/14
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA92623
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:We used Affymetrix microarrays to determine the cisplatin-induced gene expression changes in E. coli deficient in dam and mismatch repair (dam, dam mutS, and mutS mutant strains). E. coli deficient in dam are hypersensitive to cisplatin. However introducing an additional mutation in mismatch repair (i.e., a mutation in mutS or mutL) abrogates this sensitivity and essentially restores wildtype levels of resistance. Keywords: Drug-induced expression
2005-07-27 | GSE2999 | GEO
Project description:We used Affymetrix microarrays to determine the cisplatin-induced gene expression changes in E. coli deficient in dam and mismatch repair (dam, dam mutS, and mutS mutant strains). E. coli deficient in dam are hypersensitive to cisplatin. However introducing an additional mutation in mismatch repair (i.e., a mutation in mutS or mutL) abrogates this sensitivity and essentially restores wildtype levels of resistance. Experiment Overall Design: Overnight cultures were diluted 1000-fold and grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium until the cells reached exponential growth as determined by OD600. The exponentially growing cells were resuspended in M9 minimal medium at a cell density of 2 X 108 cells/ml in a volume of 15 ml and treated with 150 uM cisplatin for 2 hours at 37°C. Following treatment cultures were resuspended in 15 ml LB and allowed to recover for 90 minutes at 37°C. OD600 readings were taken after the recovery period, when RNA isolation began. Total RNA was isolated from cells by extraction using the MasterPure RNA Purification Kit (Epicentre Technologies) according to the manufactureâs protocol. The isolated total RNA was quantitated by absorption at 260 nm (typical yield from a 15 ml culture was 250-500 µg of total RNA), and the purity was determined by the ratio of absorption values at 260/280nm. RNA quality was determined by formaldehyde agarose gel electrophoresis (1.2% agarose in FA Buffer pH 7.0 (20mM 3-[N-morpholino]propanesulfonic acid, 5mM sodium acetate, 1mM ethylenadiaminetetraacetic acide (EDTA)) or by analysis on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. All samples visualized by gel electrophoresis or by the bioanalyzer electropherogram showed clear distinct bands correlating to 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA, indicating that no detectable RNA degradation occurred and that RNA integrity was maintained throughout the RNA isolation procedure.
2007-07-19 | E-GEOD-2999 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We determined the global gene expression profiles of wildtype, dam, dam mutS, and mutS mutant E. coli strains. Experiment Overall Design: Overnight cultures were diluted 1000-fold with fresh LB medium and cultured further. Log phase cultures were diluted to a cell density of 2 X 108 cells/ml in M9 salts and incubated at 37°C for two hours, after which they were resuspended in LB broth for 90 minutes. This treatment served as a mock treatment for cultures incubated with a chemical (cisplatin) in a parallel study (Robbins et al., unpublished results). Total RNA was isolated from cells by extraction using the MasterPure RNA Purification Kit (Epicentre Technologies) followed by DNAse digestion according to the manufacturerâs protocol. The isolated total RNA was quantitated by absorption at 260 nm (typical yield from a 15 ml culture was 250-500 µg of total RNA), and the purity was determined by the ratio of absorption values at 260/280nm. RNA quality was determined by formaldehyde agarose gel electrophoresis (1.2% agarose in FA Buffer pH 7.0 (20 mM 3-[N-morpholino]propanesulfonic acid, 5 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM ethylenadiaminetetraacetic acide (EDTA))) or by analysis on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. All samples visualized by gel electrophoresis or by the bioanalyzer electropherogram showed clear distinct bands correlating to 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA, indicating that no detectable RNA degradation occurred and that RNA integrity was maintained throughout the RNA isolation procedure. mRNA was enriched from total RNA as described in the Affymetrix GeneChip Expression Analysis Technical Manual for GeneChip E. coli Sense Genome Arrays.
2007-07-20 | E-GEOD-2928 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Basal gene expression in dam, dam mutS, and mutS mutant E. coli strains
| PRJNA92623 | ENA
Project description:Adaptive laboratory evolution of mutS Knock-out E. coli
| PRJEB32586 | ENA
Project description:Raw .m data files of LC/MS data of quantitative measurement of the changes in DNA methylation in response to nutrient limitation in WT and dam(-) E coli.
2016-11-03 | MSV000080312 | MassIVE
Project description:We analyzed the expression profile of mutS deletion mutant strain of Thermus thermophils HB8 during the exponential growth phase. Keywords: cell type comparison
2011-06-02 | GSE22350 | GEO
Project description:We analyzed the expression profile of mutS, mutL, or mutS2 deletion mutant strain of Thermus thermophils HB8 during the exponential growth phase. When compared with wild type using t-test (P < 0.01), 8, 111, and 18 genes were over 2-fold up-regulated in mutS, mutL, and mutS2-lacking strains, respectively. Keywords: cell type comparison This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.
2011-06-02 | GSE22567 | GEO
Project description:To determine the transcription start site and the abundance of dam mRNA, we conducted mRNA-specific RNA-Seq experiments. Essentially two strategies were tested. First strategy: We obtained the cDNA with a specific RT-PCR in order to get the mRNA from our dam construct (see DNA-seq of DamID reporter cassette). An enrichment, in which we used a Biotinylated dam oligo and Streptavidin magnetic beads, was needed. Then, similar to SHAPE-seq, the ssDNA ligation was performed with CircLigase. The last step was the PCR reaction in order to prepare the cDNA libraries to be sequenced. Second strategy: Similar to the first one, but the specificity was introduced at the PCR, not at the RT. Thereby, busk cDNA was prepared with random hexamers. The enrichment step was not needed.
2018-03-22 | E-MTAB-5363 | biostudies-arrayexpress