Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

EsBAF and INO80 fine-tune subcompartments and differentially regulate enhancer-promoter interactions [HiC]

ABSTRACT: The genome is compacted in the nucleus through a hierarchical chromatin organization, ranging from chromosome territories to compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs), and individual nucleosomes. Nucleosome remodeling complexes hydrolyze ATP to translocate DNA and therefore mobilize histone proteins. While nucleosome remodeling complexes have been extensively studied for their roles in regulating nucleosome positioning and accessibility, their contributions to higher-order chromatin architecture remain less well understood. Here, we investigate the roles of two key nucleosome remodelers, esBAF and INO80, in shaping 3D genome organization in mouse embryonic stem cells. Using Hi-C, we find that loss of either remodeler has minimal effects on global compartment or TAD structures. In contrast, subcompartment organization is notably altered, suggesting that esBAF and INO80 contribute to finer-scale chromatin topology. To overcome the limited resolution of Hi-C for detecting regulatory loops, we employed promoter capture Micro-C, which revealed that the loss of esBAF or INO80 alters a subset of promoter anchored looping interactions. Although these changes occur at distinct genomic loci for each remodeler, the affected sites are commonly enriched for bivalent chromatin regions bound by OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG, as well as BRG1 and INO80 themselves. Together, our findings reveal that esBAF and INO80 selectively influence subcompartment identity and enhancer–promoter communication at key regulatory loci, highlighting a previously underappreciated role for nucleosome remodelers in higher-order chromatin organization.

ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus

PROVIDER: GSE305726 | GEO | 2026/02/02

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

esBAF and INO80 fine-tune subcompartments and differentially regulate enhancer-promoter interactions [microC]

Project description:The genome is compacted in the nucleus through a hierarchical chromatin organization, ranging from chromosome territories to compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs), and individual nucleosomes. Nucleosome remodeling complexes hydrolyze ATP to translocate DNA and therefore mobilize histone proteins. While nucleosome remodeling complexes have been extensively studied for their roles in regulating nucleosome positioning and accessibility, their contributions to higher-order chromatin architecture remain less well understood. Here, we investigate the roles of two key nucleosome remodelers, esBAF and INO80, in shaping 3D genome organization in mouse embryonic stem cells. Using Hi-C, we find that loss of either remodeler has minimal effects on global compartment or TAD structures. In contrast, subcompartment organization is notably altered, suggesting that esBAF and INO80 contribute to finer-scale chromatin topology. To overcome the limited resolution of Hi-C for detecting regulatory loops, we employed promoter capture Micro-C, which revealed that the loss of esBAF or INO80 alters a subset of promoter anchored looping interactions. Although these changes occur at distinct genomic loci for each remodeler, the affected sites are commonly enriched for bivalent chromatin regions bound by OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG, as well as BRG1 and INO80 themselves. Together, our findings reveal that esBAF and INO80 selectively influence subcompartment identity and enhancer–promoter communication at key regulatory loci, highlighting a previously underappreciated role for nucleosome remodelers in higher-order chromatin organization.

2026-02-02 | GSE305728 | GEO

Remodelers organize cellular chromatin by counteracting intrinsic histone-DNA sequence preferences in a class-specific manner

Project description:We assessed the interplay between DNA sequences and ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in defining the nucleosomal organization of the eukaryotic genome. We compared the genome-wide distribution and impact on chromatin of NURD, (P)BAP, INO80 and ISWI representing four major families of Drosophila remodelers. Each remodeler has a unique set of genomic targets, and generates distinct chromatin signatures. Remodeler loci have characteristic DNA sequence features, predicted to influence nucleosome formation. Strikingly, remodelers counteract DNA sequence-driven nucleosome distribution in two ways: NURD, (P)BAP and INO80 increase histone density at their target sequences, which disfavor positioned nucleosome formation. In contrast, ISWI promotes open chromatin at sites that are propitious for precise nucleosome placement. Thus, both selective targeting and distinct mechanisms of remodeling underlie the functional differentiation of remodelers. We conclude that chromatin organization involves a class-specific antagonism between remodeler activity and DNA sequence-driven nucleosome placement. The supplementary bed files (P)BAP_sites.bed, NURD_sites.bed, INO80_sites.bed, ISWI_sites.bed contain high quality binding sites for each remodeler obtained by intersecting the sets of significant ChIP-chip peaks for each antibody.

2011-12-12 | GSE32404 | GEO

The Arp5-Ies6 module is essential for INO80-mediated nucleosome organization

Project description:ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelers of the INO80 family regulate chromatin by sliding, spacing and positioning nucleosomes. The INO80 remodeler is organized into structural modules that regulate its remodeling activity. Here, we investigate the role of the essential Arp5-Ies6 module towards nucleosome positioning and spacing in S. cerevisiae. We show that the Arp5-Ies6 module is critical for establishing genome-wide nucleosome organization. Deletion of IES6 reduces nucleosome spacing by 3 bp and disrupts regular nucleosome arrays across most genes. Surprisingly, deletion of IES6 is synthetic lethal with the deletion of ISW2, a remodeler from the ISWI family, indicating functional redundancy in nucleosome organization. Notably, INO80 binding directly predicts the role of Arp5-Ies6 in nucleosome organization, whereas changes in gene expression do not correlate with altered nucleosome spacing or array regularity. Together, our results highlight the essential role of the Arp5-Ies6 module in INO80-mediated chromatin organization.

2026-02-10 | GSE310175 | GEO

Stepwise reconstitution of genomic nucleosome organization with pure proteins

Project description:Nucleosome arrays begin at nucleosome-free promoter regions (NFRs) and regulate gene expression. Reconstituting such organization throughout a genome with purified proteins is a critical challenge in establishing biochemical mechanisms for chromosome assembly. Here we establish a four-step hierarchical building plan for yeast genomic nucleosome organization using only purified components: genomic DNA, histones, site-specific organizing factors Abf1 and Reb1, and the chromatin remodelers RSC, ISW2, INO80, and ISW1a. First, RSC makes NFRs by translating promoter poly(dA:dT) tracts into directional nucleosome removal. Second, +1 nucleosomes are positioned by INO80 at most genes potentially involving DNA shape, or by ISW2 using gene-specific Abf1 and Reb1. Third, INO80 or ISW2 create arrays with wide spacing. Fourth, ISW1a tightens the spacing and creates properly positioned arrays. We conclude that entire genomes use a simple set of rules and proteins, without transcription, to build a common chromatin architecture. In this study, nucleosomes were assembled using Salt Gradient Dialysis (SGD) on yeast genomic DNA library. Assembled nucleosomes were either left untreated (labelled as "SGD", control), treated with whole cell extract (WCE), mutant extracts (rsc3ts WCE, isw1 isw2 chd1 WCE), purified remodelers; singly or in combinations (RSC, ISW1a, ISW1b, ISW2, INO80, CHD1, SWI/SNF), combinations of mutant extracts and chromatin remodelers or combination of General Regulatory Factors (Abf1, Reb1) and chromatin remodelers. The resulting nucleosome positions were mapped genome-wide using MNase-(anti-H3-ChIP)-Seq.

2016-08-14 | E-GEOD-72106 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Genome information processing by the INO80 chromatin remodeler positions nucleosomes

Project description:The mechanistics by which ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers process (epi)genetic information to generate hallmark features of chromatin are fundamental for genome regulation. Here, we advance whole-genome reconstitutions into a fully definable, recombinant approach for probing how remodelers determine nucleosome positioning. Using wild type and structure-guided mutant versions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 15-subunit INO80 remodeler, we show that INO80-intrinsic nucleosome positioning relies on direct DNA shape read-out. This requires especially the interplay between the INO80 nuclear actin and core modules, to a lesser extent the HMG-box Nhp10 module and not histone modifications/variants or the Rvb1/2 AAA+-ATPase activity. Extrinsically, nucleosome positioning is guided by the barrier Reb1 via Ino80 ATPase activity modulation or by mere DNA double strand breaks. Taken together, we present a defined and unbiased approach to understand remodeler-mediated nucleosome positioning and delineate how INO80 processes genomic information into nucleosome positioning.

2020-04-30 | GSE145093 | GEO

Genomic nucleosome organization reconstituted with pure proteins

Project description:Chromatin remodelers regulate genes by organizing nucleosomes around promoters, but their individual contributions are obfuscated by the complex in vivo milieu of factor redundancy and indirect effects. Genome-wide reconstitution of promoter nucleosome organization with purified proteins resolves this problem and is therefore a critical goal. Here we reconstitute four stages of nucleosome architecture using purified components: Yeast genomic DNA, histones, sequence-specific Abf1/Reb1, and remodelers RSC, ISW2, INO80, and ISW1a. We identify direct, specific and sufficient contributions that in vivo observations validate. First, RSC clears promoters by translating poly(dA:dT) into directional nucleosome removal. Second, partial redundancy is recapitulated where INO80 alone, or ISW2 at Abf1/Reb1sites, positions +1 nucleosomes. Third, INO80 and ISW2 each align downstream nucleosomal arrays. Fourth, ISW1a tightens the spacing to canonical repeat lengths. Such a minimal set of rules and proteins establishes core mechanisms by which promoter chromatin architecture arises through a blend of redundancy and specialization.

2016-08-14 | GSE72106 | GEO

Chromatin Remodeler Ino80C acts independently of H2A.Z to evict promoter nucleosomes and stimulate transcription of highly expressed genes in yeast

Project description:The chromatin remodelers (CRs) SWI/SNF and RSC function in evicting promoter nucleosomes at highly expressed yeast genes, particularly those activated by transcription factor Gcn4. Ino80 remodeling complex (Ino80C) can establish nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs) in reconstituted chromatin, and was implicated in removing histone variant H2A.Z from the -1 and +1 nucleosomes flanking NDRs; however, Ino80C’s function in transcriptional activation in vivo is not well understood. Analyzing the cohort of Gcn4-induced genes in ino80Δ mutants has uncovered a role for Ino80C on par with SWI/SNF in evicting promoter nucleosomes and transcriptional activation. Compared to SWI/SNF, Ino80C generally functions over a wider region, spanning the -1 and +1 nucleosomes, NDR, and proximal genic nucleosomes, at genes highly dependent on its function. Defects in nucleosome eviction in ino80Δ cells are frequently accompanied by reduced promoter occupancies of TBP, and diminished transcription; and Ino80 is enriched at genes requiring its remodeler activity. Importantly, nuclear depletion of Ino80 impairs promoter nucleosome eviction even in a mutant lacking H2A.Z. Thus, Ino80C acts widely in the yeast genome together with RSC and SWI/SNF in evicting promoter nucleosomes and enhancing transcription, all in a manner at least partly independent of H2A.Z editing.

2019-12-24 | GSE142273 | GEO

Dynamics of yeast ISWI and CHD chromatin remodeler genomic association (part 1)

Project description:Chromatin remodelers influence genetic processes by altering nucleosome occupancy, positioning, and composition. In vitro, yeast ISWI and CHD remodelers require > 20 bp of extranucleosomal DNA for remodeling, but linker DNA in S. cerevisiae averages < 20 bp. To resolve this paradox, we have mapped the genomic distributions of the yeast Isw1, Isw2, and Chd1 remodelers at base-pair resolution. Surprisingly, remodelers are highly enriched at promoter nucleosome depleted regions (5' NDRs), where they bind to regions of extended linker DNA. Remodelers are also enriched in the bodies of genes displaying high nucleosome turnover. We hypothesize that remodelers bind but do not act at 5' NDRs, remaining in physical proximity to gene bodies, where they act on regions of transient nucleosome depletion following transcriptional elongation. We have analyzed the dynamics of yeast ISWI and CHD chromatin remodeler genomic association at base-pair resolution using native chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (N-ChIP-seq).

2013-03-01 | E-GEOD-39430 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Dynamics of yeast ISWI and CHD chromatin remodeler genomic association (part 2)

2013-03-01 | E-GEOD-39431 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Nucleosome recognition and DNA distortion by the Chd1 remodeler revealed at 2.6 Å resolution

Project description:Chromatin remodelers are ATP-dependent enzymes that reorganize nucleosomes within all eukaryotic genomes. The Chd1 remodeler specializes in shifting nucleosomes into evenly spaced arrays, a defining characteristic of chromatin in gene bodies that blocks spurious transcription initiation. Linked to some forms of autism and commonly mutated in prostate cancer, Chd1 is essential for maintaining pluripotency in stem cells. Here we report a complex of yeast Chd1 bound to a nucleosome in a nucleotide-free state, determined by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to 2.6 Å resolution. The structure shows a bulge of the DNA tracking strand where the ATPase motor engages the nucleosome, consistent with an initial stage in DNA translocation. Unlike other remodeler-nucleosome complexes, nucleosomal DNA compensates for the remodeler-induced bulge with a bulge of the complementary DNA strand one helical turn downstream from the ATPase motor. Unexpectedly, the structure also reveals an N-terminal binding motif, called ChEx, which binds on the exit-side acidic patch of the nucleosome. The ChEx motif can displace a LANA-based peptide from the acidic patch, which suggests a means by which Chd1 remodelers may block competing chromatin remodelers from acting on the opposite side of the nucleosome.

2022-02-23 | PXD025287 | Pride

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data