Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

L. monocytogenes ctsR mutant 2-1 cells response to pressure

ABSTRACT: transcriptional profiling of L. monocytogenes ctsR mutant under pressure treatment SUBMITTER_CITATION: Liu, Y., Huang, L., Joerger, R.D., Gunther, N.W. 2012. Genes that are involved in high hydrostatic pressure treatments in a Listeria monocytogenes Scott A ctsR deletion mutant. Journal of Microbial and Biochemical Technology. 4:050-056.

ORGANISM(S): Listeria monocytogenes Listeria monocytogenes str. Scott A

PROVIDER: GSE32172 | GEO | 2013/02/14

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA147427

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Gene expression profiling of a nisin-sensitive Listeria monocytogenes Scott A ctsR deletion mutant

Project description:Transcriptional profling of a Listeria monocytogenes under nisin treatment comparing ctsR mutant and wild type one condition (nisin treament 20ug/ml, 24 hours) experiment, ctsR mutant vs. wild type Listeria monocytogenes Scott A, 2 biological replicates, 4 technical replicates

2013-02-14 | E-GEOD-41891 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Gene expression profiling of a pressure-tolerant Listeria monocytogenes Scott A ctsR deletion mutant

Project description:Transcriptional profling of a Listeria monocytogenes under pressure comparing ctsR mutant and wild type

2011-06-10 | GSE22819 | GEO

L. monocytogenes ctsR mutant 2-1 cells response to pressure

Project description:transcriptional profiling of L. monocytogenes ctsR mutant under pressure treatment Two-condition experiment: mutant under pressure (450Mpa, 3min) vs. normal condition, two biological replicates.

2013-02-14 | E-GEOD-32172 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Gene expression profiling of a pressure-tolerant Listeria monocytogenes Scott A ctsR deletion mutant

Project description:Transcriptional profling of a Listeria monocytogenes under pressure comparing ctsR mutant and wild type one condition (pressure 450 Moa, 3min) experiment, mutant vs. wild type, 2 biological replicates, two technical replicates

2011-06-10 | E-GEOD-22819 | biostudies-arrayexpress

CtsR Regulon in Listeria monocytogenes

Project description:The foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes uses a number of transcriptional regulators, including the negative regulator CtsR, to control gene expression under different environmental conditions and in response to stress. Gene expression patterns of DctsR log phase cells were compared to both wt and ictsR-mcsA log phase cells grown with 0.5mM IPTG to identify CtsR-dependent genes.We identified 62 CtsR-dependent genes that showed significant expression ratios (adj. P < 0.05), with ≥ 1.5-fold differential expression either between ΔctsR and wt or between ΔctsR and ictsR-mcsA. Keywords: Listeria monocytogenes, CtsR regulon, log phase

2007-10-14 | GSE7514 | GEO

Gene expression profiling of a nisin-sensitive Listeria monocytogenes Scott A ctsR deletion mutant

Project description:Transcriptional profling of a Listeria monocytogenes under nisin treatment comparing ctsR mutant and wild type

2013-02-14 | GSE41891 | GEO

Listeria monocytogenes

Project description:Gene expression profiling of a pressure-tolerant Listeria monocytogenes Scott A ctsR deletion mutant

| PRJNA128099 | ENA

Induction of CtsR-regulated chaperones improves Xylanase production in Bacillus subtilis

Project description:We examined the effect of high-level expression of the commercially important endo-1,4-β-xylanase XynA on the B. subtilis transcriptome using RNA-seq. Rather unexpectedly, we found a reduced expression of several protein chaperones, including ClpC, ClpE and ClpX, was downregulated when XynA was overproduced. Expression of these proteins is controlled by the transcriptional repressor CtsR. CtsR levels are directly controlled by regulated proteolysis, involving ClpC and its cognate protease ClpP. Preventing this downregulation by knocking out the involved transcriptional repressor CtsR resulted in increased XynA production by more than 25 %.

2023-02-21 | GSE217916 | GEO

Role of a GntR-family response regulator LbrA in Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation

Project description:The formation of Listeria monocytogenes biofilms contributes to persistent contamination in food processing facilities. A microarray comparison of L. monocytogenes between the transcriptome of the strong biofilm forming strain (Bfms) Scott A and the weak biofilm forming (Bfmw) strain F2365 was conducted to identify genes potentially involved in biofilm formation. Among 951 genes with significant difference in expression between the two strains, a GntR-family response regulator encoding gene (LMOf2365_0414), designated lbrA, was found to be highly expressed in Scott A relative to F2365. A Scott A lbrA-deletion mutant, designated AW3, formed biofilm to a much lesser extent as compared to the parent strain by a rapid attachment assay and scanning electron microscopy. Complementation with lbrA from Scott A restored the Bfms phenotype in the AW3 derivative. A second microarray assessment using the lbrA deletion mutant AW3 and the wild type Scott A revealed a total of 304 genes with expression significantly different between the two strains, indicating the potential regulatory role of LbrA in L. monocytogenes. A cloned copy of Scott A lbrA was unable to confer enhanced biofilm forming potential in F2365, suggesting that additional factors contributed to weak biofilm formation by F2365. Findings from the study may lead to new strategies to modulate biofilm formation. Two comparisons were performed between 1) strong biofilm former Listeria monocytogenes strain ScottA versus weak biofilm former Listeria monocytogenes strain F2365; 2) Listeria monocytogenes ScottA LbrA deletion mutant strain versus Listeria monocytogenes ScottA. Four replicates were loaded for the first comparison and two replicates were loaded for the second comparison.

2012-09-06 | E-GEOD-40598 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Recovery from 30 MPa 25 C

Project description:Hydrostatic pressure is one of the physical factors affecting cellular physiology. Hydrostatic pressure of a few hundred MPa decreases the viability of yeast cells, and pressure of a few tens MPa decreases the growth rate. To understand the effect of hydrostatic pressure, we employed yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DNA microarrays and analyzed genome-wide mRNA expression profiles under hydrostatic pressures. In this experiment, we selected a hydrostatic pressure of 30 MPa at 25 degrees C because yeast cells are able to grow with this condition. Keywords: stress response

2007-11-01 | GSE9403 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data