Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Base editors provoke non-predictable chromosomal translocations and off-target editing (rhAmp part2)

ABSTRACT: Base editing has emerged as a promising alternative to CRISPR-Cas nuclease-based genome editing, in part because of its promise of reduced genotoxicity. Here, we performed a comprehensive genome-wide analysis of base editing-induced off-target effects. Primary human T cells were edited at three genomic loci (CCR5, EMX1, FANCF) using either CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease, an adenine base editor (ABE8e), one of three cytosine base editors (CBEs), or Cas9 nickase. We used CAST-Seq to identify gross chromosomal aberrations and off-target sites (OTs), followed by rhAmp-Seq to evaluate on-target activity (44-84% modified alleles) and mutagenic effects at >100 putative OTs. On-target CAST-Seq reads showed large (>200 bp) aberrations ranging from 45% for Cas9 to 5% for ABE, 2-7% for CBEs, and 0% for nickase-edited cells. While ABE8e editing induced few translocations, more than 10% of the alleles were modified in 17 of the 40 identified OTs. In contrast, chromosomal translocation events in some CBE-treated cells exceeded that found in Cas9-edited T cells by 3-fold. Furthermore, extensive C-to-T conversion (≤99% of alleles) and mutagenesis (≤7% of alleles) were detected in T cells edited with a hyperactive CBE, whereas recently developed CBE variants (TadCBEd or CBE-T1.52) showed only marginal OT activity. In conclusion, our study revealed the genotoxic potential of ABE8e and the hyperactive evoCDA1-BE4max. These base editors induced mutagenic OT editing at sites that were not altered by CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases complexed with the same gRNA, suggesting that the mechanism of gRNA-dependent OT activity of base editors is different from that of CRISPR-Cas nucleases.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE329615 | GEO | 2026/09/28

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Base editors provoke non-predictable chromosomal translocations and off-target editing [CAST-Seq]

Project description:Base editing has emerged as a promising alternative to CRISPR-Cas nuclease-based genome editing, in part because of its promise of reduced genotoxicity. Here, we performed a comprehensive genome-wide analysis of base editing-induced off-target effects. Primary human T cells were edited at three genomic loci (CCR5, EMX1, FANCF) using either CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease, an adenine base editor (ABE8e), one of three cytosine base editors (CBEs), or Cas9 nickase. We used CAST-Seq to identify gross chromosomal aberrations and off-target sites (OTs), followed by rhAmp-Seq to evaluate on-target activity (44-84% modified alleles) and mutagenic effects at >100 putative OTs. On-target CAST-Seq reads showed large (>200 bp) aberrations ranging from 45% for Cas9 to 5% for ABE, 2-7% for CBEs, and 0% for nickase-edited cells. While ABE8e editing induced few translocations, more than 10% of the alleles were modified in 17 of the 40 identified OTs. In contrast, chromosomal translocation events in some CBE-treated cells exceeded that found in Cas9-edited T cells by 3-fold. Furthermore, extensive C-to-T conversion (≤99% of alleles) and mutagenesis (≤7% of alleles) were detected in T cells edited with a hyperactive CBE, whereas recently developed CBE variants (TadCBEd or CBE-T1.52) showed only marginal OT activity. In conclusion, our study revealed the genotoxic potential of ABE8e and the hyperactive evoCDA1-BE4max. These base editors induced mutagenic OT editing at sites that were not altered by CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases complexed with the same gRNA, suggesting that the mechanism of gRNA-dependent OT activity of base editors is different from that of CRISPR-Cas nucleases.

2026-09-28 | GSE255084 | GEO

Base editors provoke non-predictable chromosomal translocations and off-target editing (CAST-seq part2)

2026-09-28 | GSE328964 | GEO

Base editors provoke non-predictable chromosomal translocations and off-target editing - rhAmp

2026-09-28 | GSE255315 | GEO

Genotoxicity profiling reveals distinct platform- and cell type–specific effects in therapeutic gene editing for genetic hyperinflammation

Project description:Base editors enable precise correction of point mutations without requiring DNA double-strand breaks, yet platform– and cell type–specific genotoxicities remain incompletely characterized. Here, we applied cytosine base editing (CBE) to disrupt a cryptic splice-site mutation in the Unc13d locus of Jinx mice, a model of familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis type 3 (FHL3). Efficient editing (62–89%) in fibroblasts, T cells, and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) restored Unc13d splicing, reconstituted cytotoxic T cell function, and protected mice from virus-triggered hyperinflammation after transplantation of edited HSCs. Comparative genotoxicity profiling revealed distinct platform- and cell type–specific patterns: hyperactive CBE induced broader off-target activity and more structural variants than CRISPR–Cas9. While off-target sequence edits persisted, the stability of CBE-induced chromosomal translocations differed between cell types. These findings establish therapeutic base editing for a genetically predisposed hyperinflammatory syndrome and underscore the importance of context-specific safety profiling to guide clinical translation of genome editors.

2026-04-03 | GSE326932 | GEO

Identification of novel HPFH-like mutations by CRISPR base editing that elevate the expression of fetal hemoglobin

Project description:CRISPR-Cas base editors are preferred tool for genome editing as they generate desired editing without any double strand break in the genome, as double stand break is detrimental to the cells. In our study we have demonstrated the significance of base editors in editing the highly homologous HBG promoter (HBG1 and HBG2) region to introduce novel HPFH-like mutation to elevate HbF for therapeutical applications. Previous studies revealed that the base editors can cause unintended Cas-independent edits at transcriptome level. To validate off-target at RNA level, we performed a transcriptome wide analysis. The frequency of unintended edits in the HUDEP-2 stable cell lines expressing the base editors with the gRNA were not significant compared to the control. We determined the ABE mediated A to I conversion and CBE mediated C to U conversion across the base edited samples. The RNA off-target analysis was carried out with the help of REDItools v 2 tool. This data suggests that despite high on-target editing in DNA, the Cas-independent RNA off-target were not at detectable range compared to control. The differential expression of 34 selected genes which necessitate globin regulation were compared between the unedited HUDEP WT, CBE control, ABE control, and edited ABE (with gRNA 2/11) and edited CBE (with gRNA 2/11). We observed that there is no significant differential gene expression between the edited and control cells except the gamma and delta globin genes. These results suggest that base editors are preferred tools to edit highly homologous HBG promoter region to created HPFH-like mutations inducing HbF levels without causing double strand breaks, larger deletions and no significant RNA off-targets which are detrimental to the gene edited cells.

2022-01-02 | GSE192801 | GEO

CRISPR adenine and cytosine base editors with reduced RNA off-target activities [CBE]

Project description:CRISPR-guided DNA base editors enable the efficient installation of targeted single-nucleotide changes. Cytosine or adenine base editors (CBEs or ABEs), which are fusions of cytidine or adenosine deaminases to CRISPR-Cas nickases, can efficiently induce DNA C-to-T or A-to-G alterations in DNA, respectively. We recently demonstrated that both the widely used CBE BE3 (harboring a rat APOBEC1 cytidine deaminase) and the optimized ABEmax editor can induce tens of thousands of guide RNA-independent, transcriptome-wide RNA base edits in human cells with high efficiencies. In addition, we showed the feasibility of creating SElective Curbing of Unwanted RNA Editing (SECURE)-BE3 variants that exhibit substantially reduced unwanted RNA editing activities while retaining robust and more precise on-target DNA editing. Here we describe structure-guided engineering of SECURE-ABE variants that not only possess reduced off-target RNA editing with comparable on-target DNA activities but are also the smallest Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) base editors described to date. In addition, we tested CBEs composed of cytidine deaminases other than APOBEC1 and found that human APOBEC3A (hA3A) cytidine deaminase CBE induces substantial transcriptome-wide RNA base edits with high efficiencies. By contrast, a previously described “enhanced” A3A (eA3A) cytidine deaminase CBE or a human activation-induced cytidine deaminase (hAID) CBE induce substantially reduced or near background levels of RNA edits. In sum, our work describes broadly useful SECURE-ABE and -CBE base editors and reinforces the importance of minimizing RNA editing activities of DNA base editors for research and therapeutic applications.

2019-07-11 | GSE129893 | GEO

CRISPR adenine and cytosine base editors with reduced RNA off-target activities [ABE]

2019-07-11 | GSE129889 | GEO

Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors [P2A-EGFP control]

Project description:Base Editing has been touted the most intelligent and precise application of the CRISPR platform so far, merging the simplicity of RNA-guided nucleases with deaminases that allow for the programmable generation of single base substitutions - without introduction of double-strand breaks. Even though the two-component system has been expected to cause off-target substitutions, studies involving cytosine base editors (CBEs) showed that in most cases, relatively few single base off-targets could be detected on DNA. We introduce the concept of multi-dimensional off-targeting, presenting an extensive amount of RNA cytidines being edited by DNA base editors. Epitranscriptomic off-target effects affected different cell lines and were independent of the guide RNAs used, suggesting Cas9-independent activity of the cytidine deaminase rAPOBEC1 on single-stranded RNA. With the help of protein engineering, we developed CBE variants with massively reduced inadvertent mutation of RNA that preserve and enhance DNA base editing capabilities.

2019-04-01 | GSE129131 | GEO

Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors [Modifications - screen]

2019-03-31 | GSE121666 | GEO

Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors [BaseEditors - RNA]

2019-03-31 | GSE121665 | GEO