Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Ketogulonigenium vulgare cells: co-culture mode vs. mono-culture mode

ABSTRACT: Transcriptional profiling of K. vulgare cells co-cultured with Bacillus megaterium compared to K. vulgare mono-cultured cells. Differentially expressed genes in co-cultured and mono-cultured K. vulgare cells were analyzed. The aim was to investigate the mechanisms of B. megaterium stimulating K. vulgare propagation on global gene expression.

ORGANISM(S): Ketogulonicigenium vulgare WSH-001 Priestia megaterium

PROVIDER: GSE37594 | GEO | 2012/04/26

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA162307

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Ketogulonigenium vulgare cells: co-culture mode vs. mono-culture mode

Project description:Transcriptional profiling of K. vulgare cells co-cultured with Bacillus megaterium compared to K. vulgare mono-cultured cells. Differentially expressed genes in co-cultured and mono-cultured K. vulgare cells were analyzed. The aim was to investigate the mechanisms of B. megaterium stimulating K. vulgare propagation on global gene expression. Two-condition experiment: co-cultured K. vulgare and B. megaterium cells vs. mono-cultured K. vulgare cells. Biological replicates: 3 co-cultured replicates, 3 mono-cultured replicates.

2012-04-25 | E-GEOD-37594 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Ketogulonicigenium vulgare cells: Acid-stressed vs. Control

Project description:Transcriptional profiling of K. vulgare cells, co-cultured with Bacillus megaterium, comparing control untreated cells with cells treated with pH 4.0 for 2 h. Differentially expressed genes in acid-stressed cells were analyzed. The aim was to investigate the mechanisms of K. vulgare in response to acid stress on global gene expression.

2014-10-23 | GSE33105 | GEO

Ketogulonicigenium vulgare cells: Acid-stressed vs. Control

2014-10-23 | E-GEOD-33105 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Ketogulonigenium vulgare cells: co-culture mode vs. mono-culture mode

Project description:Ketogulonigenium vulgare cells: co-culture mode vs. mono-culture mode

| PRJNA162307 | ENA

Next Generation Sequencing Facilitates Quantitative Analysis of LSEC and Hepa1-6 mono- and co-cultured

Project description:Purpose: investigating paracrine effects of mono- and/or co-cultured LSEC and Hepa1-6 Method: mRNA profiles of mono- and co-cultured LSEC and Hepa1-6 were generated by deep sequencing. Results: The RNA-seq data confirmed that extracellular matrix-encoding genes were up-regulated by co-cultured LSEC with Hepa1-6.

2023-01-31 | GSE202457 | GEO

A comparison of mono-culture and co-culture model containing fibroblasts

Project description:Organotypic three dimensional cultures of epithelial cells are grown at the air–liquid interface (ALI) and resemble the in vivo counterparts. Although the complexity of in vivo cellular responses could be better manifested in co-culture models in which additional cell-types such as fibroblasts were incorporated, the presence of another cell-type could mask the response of the other. This study reports the impact of whole combustible cigarette smoke (CS) on organotypic mono- and co-culture models to evaluate the relevancy of organotypic models for toxicological assessment of aerosols. Two organotypic bronchial models were directly exposed to low and high concentrations of CS of the reference research cigarette 3R4F: mono-culture of bronchial epithelial cells without fibroblasts (BR) and co-culture with fibroblasts (BRF) models. Adenylate kinase-based cytotoxicity, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1/1B1 activity, tissue histology, and concentrations of secreted mediators in the basolateral media, as well as transcriptomes were evaluated following the CS exposure. The results demonstrated similar impact of CS on the AK-based cytotoxicity, CYP1A1/1B1 activity, and tissue histology in both models. However, a greater number of secreted mediators were found in the basolateral media of the mono-culture than in the co-culture models. Furthermore, annotation analysis and network-based systems biology analysis of the transcriptomic profiles indicated a more prominent cellular stress and tissue damage following CS in the mono-culture epithelium model without fibroblasts. Finally, our results indicated that the in vivo smoking-induced xenobiotic metabolism response in the bronchial epithelial cells was better reflected on the in vitro co-culture model upon CS exposure.

2015-06-12 | E-MTAB-3462 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Surfaceome and exoproteome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa mono- and co-culture biofilms

Project description:Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are bacterial pathogens that have been shown to co-exist in biofilms related to numerous infections. Although the interaction between these two species is competitive, both partially benefit from the coexistence. In this study, we exhaustively characterized the interaction between Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa by utilizing a proteomics approach, individually targeting the surface-associated proteins (surfaceome), and proteins secreted or otherwise liberated to the extracellular space (exoproteome). To that end, the conditions to co-culture S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in vitro were optimized and a high-resolution proteomics approach was applied to compare surface-associated and extracellular protein profiles between mono- and co-cultured biofilms.

2021-09-09 | PXD023445 | Pride

RNA-sequencing of Clostridioides difficile WT and luxS mutant both during mono-culture biofilms and co-culture biofilms with Bacteroides fragilis

Project description:5 conditions for RNA-sequencing: Mono-culture biofilms of C. difficile WT, C. difficile luxS mutant (insertional ClosTron mutant as described in DOI: 10.1128/JB.01980-12), B. fragilis (PRJEB29695), and co-cultures biofilms of C. difficile WT and luxS mutant with B. fragilis. These were used to compare differences between C. difficile WT and luxS during mono-culture biofilms, as well transcriptomic differences for both C. difficile and B. fragilis during co-culture.

2018-12-16 | E-MTAB-7523 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Human carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAF): co-culture with cancer cells vs. CAF only

Project description:Gene expression profiling of CAF co-cultured with human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells compared with mono-cultured CAF. To identify key molecular regulators expressed by carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAF) that promote cancer cell invasion, microarrays were performed by comparing co-cultured OSCC cells and CAF with monoculture controls. comparison 1: CAF co-cultured with OSCC vs. mono-cultured CAF comparison 2: OSCC co-cultured with CAF vs. mono-cultured OSCC 1.7X10(5) YD-10B OSCC cells and 1.7X10(5) CAF were seeded in the upper chamber and lower chamber, respectively, of 6-transwell plates containing collagen-coated 1 micrometer pore transmembrane filters (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Monoculture control samples were generated by culturing only CAF or OSCC on the same side of the filter as in the co-culture design.

2010-06-21 | E-GEOD-18532 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Human carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAF): co-culture with cancer cells vs. CAF only

2009-10-14 | GSE18532 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data