ChIP-chip from Kc cells with Su(H) antibodies after 30 minutes Notch activation
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Drosophila melanogaster
PROVIDER: GSE43132 | GEO | 2013/03/08
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA185417
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:During hematopoiesis, Notch regulates both the emergence of stem and progenitor cells and the subsequent cell fate choices and differentiation. To investigate how Notch drives cells to differentiate we have used a genome-wide approach to identify direct Notch targets in Drosophila Kc cells. These data are the results from Su(H) ChIP-Chip experiments to identify genomic regions occupied by Su(H) after Notch activation in Kc cells. 3 replicates of Su(H) ChIP after 30 min. Notch activation..
2013-03-08 | E-GEOD-43132 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Several co-repressors interact directly with the DNA-binding protein CSL [Su(H) in Drosophila] and are proposed to keep target genes silenced in the absence of Notch activity. To investigate co-repressor activity in the context of this well defined signalling pathway, we analysed the genome-wide binding profile of the best-characterized CSL co-repressor in Drosophila, Hairless, in Kc cells and in wing imaginal discs. The binding profile in wing discs of a second CSL interacting repressor, SMRTER, was also analysed. There was significant overlap between Hairless and Su(H), both in Kc cells and in wing discs, where they were predominantly found in chromatin with active enhancer marks. The Hairless complex was widely present at some Notch regulated enhancers in the wing disc,but no binding was detected at others, indicating that it is not essential for silencing per se. Analysis of target enhancers confirmed differential requirements for Hairless. SMRTER binding significantly overlapped with Hairless, rather than complementing it, and many enhancers were apparently co-bound by both factors. Our analysis indicates that the actions of Hairless and SMRTER gate the enhancers to Notch activity and to Ecdysone signalling respectively, to ensure that the appropriate levels and timing of target gene expression are achieved.
2017-12-31 | GSE97601 | GEO
Project description:Su(Hw) and Shep RIP-seq in Kc and BG3 cell lines
2014-07-29 | GSE55894 | GEO
Project description:The conserved Notch pathway functions in diverse developmental and disease-related processes, requiring mechanisms to ensure appropriate target-selection and gene activation in each context. To investigate, we partitioned Drosophila chromatin into different states, based on histone modifications, establishing the preferred chromatin conditions for binding of CSL, the Notch pathway transcription factor. While most histone modifications were unchanged by CSL binding or Notch activation, rapid changes in H3K56 acetylation occurred at Notch regulated-enhancers. This modification extended over large regions, required the histone acetyl-transferase CBP and was independent of transcription. Such rapid changes in H3K56 acetylation are a conserved indicator of enhancer activation, also occurring at mammalian Notch-regulated Hey1 and at Drosophila ecdysone-regulated genes. This core histone modification may therefore underpin the changes in chromatin accessibility needed to promote transcription following signaling activation. Su(H) profile of Kc cells transfected with GFP-Su(H). In total 6 samples, 3 replicates of anti-GFP ChIP and corresponding total input samples in Kc cells.
2015-07-01 | E-GEOD-66226 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Several co-repressors interact directly with the DNA-binding protein CSL [Su(H) in Drosophila] and are proposed to keep target genes silenced in the absence of Notch activity. To investigate co-repressor activity in the context of this well defined signalling pathway, we analysed the genome-wide binding profile of the best-characterized CSL co-repressor in Drosophila, Hairless, in Kc cells and in wing imaginal discs. The binding profile in wing discs of a second CSL interacting repressor, SMRTER, was also analysed. There was significant overlap between Hairless and Su(H), both in Kc cells and in wing discs, where they were predominantly found in chromatin with active enhancer marks. The Hairless complex was widely present at some Notch regulated enhancers in the wing disc,but no binding was detected at others, indicating that it is not essential for silencing per se. Analysis of target enhancers confirmed differential requirements for Hairless. SMRTER binding significantly overlapped with Hairless, rather than complementing it, and many enhancers were apparently co-bound by both factors. Our analysis indicates that the actions of Hairless and SMRTER gate the enhancers to Notch activity and to Ecdysone signalling respectively, to ensure that the appropriate levels and timing of target gene expression are achieved.
2017-12-31 | GSE97597 | GEO
Project description:Su(Hw) and Shep RIP-seq in Kc and BG3 cell lines RIP-seq with multiple antibodies to two proteins in two Drosophila cell lines, at least 2 replicates for each IP and input
2014-07-29 | E-GEOD-55894 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Several co-repressors interact directly with the DNA-binding protein CSL [Su(H) in Drosophila] and are proposed to keep target genes silenced in the absence of Notch activity. To investigate co-repressor activity in the context of this well defined signalling pathway, we analysed the genome-wide binding profile of the best-characterized CSL co-repressor in Drosophila, Hairless, in Kc cells and in wing imaginal discs. The binding profile in wing discs of a second CSL interacting repressor, SMRTER, was also analysed. There was significant overlap between Hairless and Su(H), both in Kc cells and in wing discs, where they were predominantly found in chromatin with active enhancer marks. The Hairless complex was widely present at some Notch regulated enhancers in the wing disc,but no binding was detected at others, indicating that it is not essential for silencing per se. Analysis of target enhancers confirmed differential requirements for Hairless. SMRTER binding significantly overlapped with Hairless, rather than complementing it, and many enhancers were apparently co-bound by both factors. Our analysis indicates that the actions of Hairless and SMRTER gate the enhancers to Notch activity and to Ecdysone signalling respectively, to ensure that the appropriate levels and timing of target gene expression are achieved.
2017-12-31 | GSE97599 | GEO
Project description:The transcription factor Twist is a critical cooperating factor that confers transcriptional specificity to the Notch pathway in muscle progenitor cells (DmD8) ChIP analysis of Twi show that Twist binding is significantly enriched in Notch responsive region in DmD8 cells
2010-07-28 | GSE22650 | GEO
Project description:Cellular responses to signalling pathways are often highly dynamic, however most analyses of developmental signalling pathways focus on a single endpoint. We have analyzed the temporal changes in transcription following a short Notch activation treatment and related these to the recruitment of the Notch pathway transcription factor, CSL [Suppressor of Hairless, Su(H), in Drosophila], and to the state of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) binding. A total of 154 genes showed significant differential expression over time and their expression profiles stratified into 14 clusters based on temporal and quantitative differences in their responses. These differences were partially reflected in the profiles of Pol II and Su(H) binding. However, neither could fully account for the different response profiles. Furthermore, the timing of the different responses was unaffected by more prolonged Notch activation. Instead our data suggest that regulatory relationships between genes that segregate into different response clusters can partially account for the stratification. Thus, feed-forward repression, where products of early responding Enhancer of split bHLH genes (E(spl)bHLH) inhibit expression of endogenous repressors, is one mechanism that explains the profile of genes that exhibit delayed up-regulation. E(spl)bHLH genes may therefore be responsible for co-ordinating the Notch response of a wide spectrum of other targets, explaining their critical functions in many developmental and disease contexts.
2012-12-31 | GSE35719 | GEO
Project description:Cellular responses to signalling pathways are often highly dynamic, however most analyses of developmental signalling pathways focus on a single endpoint. We have analyzed the temporal changes in transcription following a short Notch activation treatment and related these to the recruitment of the Notch pathway transcription factor, CSL [Suppressor of Hairless, Su(H), in Drosophila], and to the state of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) binding. A total of 154 genes showed significant differential expression over time and their expression profiles stratified into 14 clusters based on temporal and quantitative differences in their responses. These differences were partially reflected in the profiles of Pol II and Su(H) binding. However, neither could fully account for the different response profiles. Furthermore, the timing of the different responses was unaffected by more prolonged Notch activation. Instead our data suggest that regulatory relationships between genes that segregate into different response clusters can partially account for the stratification. Thus, feed-forward repression, where products of early responding Enhancer of split bHLH genes (E(spl)bHLH) inhibit expression of endogenous repressors, is one mechanism that explains the profile of genes that exhibit delayed up-regulation. E(spl)bHLH genes may therefore be responsible for co-ordinating the Notch response of a wide spectrum of other targets, explaining their critical functions in many developmental and disease contexts. DmD8 cells were collected at 7 time points (0M-bM-^@M-^Y, 10M-bM-^@M-^Y, 20M-bM-^@M-^Y, 30M-bM-^@M-^Y, 40M-bM-^@M-^Y, 60M-bM-^@M-^Y and 100M-bM-^@M-^Y) after a 5 minute Notch stimulation as 3 independent replicates. Immunoprecipitation was performed with Su(H) antibody and compared to the total input DNA. Samples from replicates #1 and #2 were labelled with Cy5, and replicate #3 was labelled with Cy3 as a dye-swap. For time point 10M-bM-^@M-^Y, only 2 biological replicates were obtained.
2012-12-31 | E-GEOD-35719 | biostudies-arrayexpress