Effect of RNA concentration in cross-species hybridization
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens Marmota monax
PROVIDER: GSE437 | GEO | 2003/05/27
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA85015
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Total RNA from adult woodchuck liver was analyzed on human membrane arrays. The effect of RNA concentration on signal intensity was determined by using a series of RNA concentrations (0.1 to 10ug)
2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-437 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Woodchucks that were infected with WHC virus developed HCCs. HCCs and surrounding tissues were removed and RNA was extracted from microarray study. Human, rat and mouse arrays were used due to the lack of a woodchuck array. Same procedures and parameters were used to conduct this experiment. Keywords: comparative study
2008-05-01 | GSE11050 | GEO
Project description:The objective of this work was to determine the effectiveness of cross-hybridization of gDNA from five native soil nematodes to an Affymetrix Caenorhabditis elegans tiling array. Cross-hybridization experiments using C. briggsae, for which genome information is available, allowed hybridisation intensities to be correlated with known sequence differences. Initial analysis of data by conventional array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) techniques at the chip level lead to misleading results due to an artefact from the combination of scaling, bandwidth smoothing, and differential GC content in exon and intron regions. To circumvent this artefact, individual probes were instead normalized and centered by adjusting for probe-specific thermodynamic binding affinity. However, cross-hybridization of C. briggsae DNA revealed that the resultant probe intensities alone were still uncorrelated to sequence similarity below 90% identity. Below 90% similarity, all probes hybridize uniformly poorly, and above 90% similarity the hybridization differences are not large enough to detect over background, therefore, no 'threshold' ratio of hybridization intensity was successful at identifying probes with similarity to the heterologous genome. In light of the observations described here, we suggest that the criteria for replication and verification of gene expression profiles generated from cross-species microarray hybridizations be more stringent than typically adopted for con-specific hybridizations.
2010-08-18 | GSE23667 | GEO
Project description:The objective of this work was to determine the effectiveness of cross-hybridization of gDNA from five native soil nematodes to an Affymetrix Caenorhabditis elegans tiling array. Cross-hybridization experiments using C. briggsae, for which genome information is available, allowed hybridisation intensities to be correlated with known sequence differences. Initial analysis of data by conventional array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) techniques at the chip level lead to misleading results due to an artefact from the combination of scaling, bandwidth smoothing, and differential GC content in exon and intron regions. To circumvent this artefact, individual probes were instead normalized and centered by adjusting for probe-specific thermodynamic binding affinity. However, cross-hybridization of C. briggsae DNA revealed that the resultant probe intensities alone were still uncorrelated to sequence similarity below 90% identity. Below 90% similarity, all probes hybridize uniformly poorly, and above 90% similarity the hybridization differences are not large enough to detect over background, therefore, no 'threshold' ratio of hybridization intensity was successful at identifying probes with similarity to the heterologous genome. In light of the observations described here, we suggest that the criteria for replication and verification of gene expression profiles generated from cross-species microarray hybridizations be more stringent than typically adopted for con-specific hybridizations. Genomic DNA from Caenorhabditis elegans N2 (Bristol), C. elegans CB4856 (Hawaiian), C. briggsae AF16, Oscheius tipulae KS585, Oscheius FVV-2 KS555, Mesorhabditis sp. KS587, Acrobeloides sp. KS586, and Chiloplacus sp. KS584 were hybridized onto C. elegans Affymetrix tiling array (two replicate chips were performed for each species).
2010-08-17 | E-GEOD-23667 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC1482311 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Gene expression was examined in testis and brain tissue between two species (Xenopus laevis and Xenopus borealis) and their hybrid. Genomic DNA hybridizations of the microarray target and non-target species were used to select probes that are unbiased between species.
2008-09-03 | GSE12625 | GEO
Project description:Examination of molecular basis of malaria resistance. Spleens from malaria resistant AcB55 and AcB61strains compared with A/J mice. Animals were sacrificed and spleens were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and subsequently stored at 80oC. Tissues were mechanically homogenized with a polytron and total cellular RNA was extracted using a commercially available reagent (TMTRIzol; Invitrogen). The poly-(A)+ fraction of the RNA was isolated by chromatography with oligo d(T) cellulose beads. For cDNA labeling, either 25 mg of total RNA or 2.5 mg of poly-(A) RNA was converted into cDNA using reverse transcriptase (RT; Super Script II, Invitrogen) and alternatively Cy5 or Cy3-labeled dCTP (1mM, Perkin Elmer-Cetus/NEN, Boston) in a reaction mixture containing 1.5 mL oligo (dT) (100pmol/ mL), 3 mL dNTP-dCTP (6.67mM each), 1 mL dCTP (2mM), 4 mL DTT (100mM), 8 mL 5 X RT Buffer (Invitrogen, California). The reactions were carried out at 42¼C for 3 hrs, after which the RNA was degraded by the addition of 0.5 mL RNase A (1 mg/mL) and 1.5 mL RNaseH 5 units/mL). Labeled cDNA was separated from unincorporated nucleotides (Qiagen column) and further concentrated by evaporation under vacuum. The arrays were pre-hybridized for 1-2hrs with DIGEasy hybridization buffer (Roche) containing 10ug/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA, and 10ug/ml yeast tRNA. The Cy5 and Cy3 labelled cDNAs were combined and hybridized in the same medium and incubated with the arrays for 16-18hrs at 37Co. Finally, the arrays were washed 3 x 10 mins in 0.1 x SSC (20 X SSC is 3M sodium chloride, 0.3 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0), 0.1%SDS at 50Co, and 4 x 3min in 0.1 x SSC at room temperature, and dried by centrifugation. Fluorescent array images were collected for both Cy3 and Cy5 with a ScanArray fluorescent scanner and image intensity data were extracted and analyzed with QuantArray 3.0 analysis software. Quantification data was imported in GeneSpring (Silicon Genetics). The import format was modified to maintain information relevant to user-contributed flagging as well as QC parameter furnished by the array manufacturer. Dye swap and Intensity-based normalization (Lowess) were performed using the default settings. Keywords: other
2003-10-06 | GSE709 | GEO
Project description:high concentration sample Raw sequence reads
| PRJNA705525 | ENA
Project description:Total RNA from adult human and woodchuck liver was analyzed on human membrane arrays. Two human and two woodchuck liver samples were analyzed in duplicate. The samples were numbered H1a, H1b, H2a, H2b, WC1a, WC1b, WC2a, and WC2b. H, represents human liver; WC represents woodchuck liver. The numbers 1 and 2 were the two individual samples. The a and b represent replicates of the same RNA sample. Keywords = liver, adult, normal, human, woodchuck Keywords: other
2003-05-27 | GSE439 | GEO
Project description:To test gene expression changes of human cancer cells and mouse surrounding tissue cells during tumor progression, 4 different types of cancer cells (MDA-MB231Br3, PC14Br4, KM12M, A375SM) were injected into mouse brain, skin and orthotopic sites. RNAs containing human cancer cells and mouse surrounding tissue cells were extracted and hybridized into human and mouse arrays at the same times and it revealed the brain microenvironment induced complete reprogramming of metasized cancer cells, resulting in a gain of neuronal cell characteristic , mimicking neurogenesis during development.
2011-09-24 | GSE19184 | GEO