Molecular Profiling of Breast Cancer Cells after Gemcitabine exposure
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE4937 | GEO | 2007/05/29
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA95893
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Human breast cancer cell lines were exposed to IC50 gemcitabine (Gemzar) for 24 and 48 hours. RNA was extracted, amplified and hibridized onto Oncochip microarray slides. Human breast carcinoma cell lines MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 were cultured in DMEM with Glutamax-1, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin-streptomycin and 0.4% fungizone. Cells were grown and passaged by trypsinization.
2010-07-01 | E-GEOD-4937 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) often presents at late clinical stages, and most patients are managed solely through palliative chemotherapy. With no approved treatment modalities for patients who progress on broad-spectrum chemotherapy, we set to identify druggable targets to prevent or reverse resistance to the first line anti-neoplastic Gemcitabine. In our first experiment, we used the well-established Panc1 cell line as an in vitro model of PDAC. Panc1 cells were incubated with a tolerable dose of Gemcitabine in vitro, and examined alterations in gene expression via single cell RNA sequencing. In our subsequent studies, we incubated Panc1 cells with increasing doses of Gemcitabine for several passages, until viable in approximately 10x the known IC50 value. These cells were designated Panc1-GR. Based on our observations in the prior experiment, Panc1-GR cells were compared to those treated with wither the Calmodulin inhibitor W-7, Calcium chelator BAPTA-AM, or the calcium channel blocker Amlodipine. Through these efforts, we hope to better understand the mechanisms of Gemcitabine resistance in PDAC, as well as introduce new therapeutic strategies to reverse drug resistant phenotypes in the clinic.
2022-03-21 | GSE186960 | GEO
Project description:We generated gemcitabine resistant subclones from the human pancreatic cancer cell line BxPC3 using chronic low dose exposure to gemcitabine. Three gemcitabine resistant subclones (BxGR-80C, BxGR-120C and BxGR-360C) were sequenced in addition to BxPC3 cells.
2021-12-21 | E-MTAB-11186 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of Oncopig and human bladder cancer cell lines comparing control untreated cells to cell treated with gemcitabine for 48 hours. Goal was to compare similar transcriptional alterations in response to gemcitabine treatment across both species
2024-02-16 | GSE255187 | GEO
Project description:This phase II study examined the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety of two gemcitabine-based combinations administered sequentially in breast cancer. We also examined gene expression profiles from tumor biopsies to identify biomarkers predictive of response. Methods: Indian women with large or locally advanced breast cancer received 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 plus doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 (Gem+Dox), then 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 70 mg/m2 (Gem+Cis), and surgery. To examine dynamic changes in molecular profiles after one dose of therapy, we used three alternate sequences during cycle 1 (Gem d1, 8; Dox d2; Gem d1, 8; Dox d1; or Gem d2, 8; Dox d1). Results: Of 65 women (median age 46) treated, 13 (24.5% of 53 patients with surgery) had a pCR and 22 (33.8%) had a complete clinical response. Patients who received Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 in cycle 1 (20/65) reported more toxicities, with G3/4 neutropenic infection/febrile neutropenia (7/20) and vomiting (5/20) as the most common cycle 1 events. Four drug-related deaths occurred. 46/65 patients yielded successful pretreatment gene expression profiles. Ten-fold cross-validated supervised analyses identified gene expression patterns that predicted with >73% accuracy (1) clinical complete response after eight cycles, (2) overall clinical complete response, and (3) pCR. Conclusions: This neoadjuvant regimen showed strong activity. A subset of patients receiving Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 experienced unacceptable toxicity, whereas patients on other sequences had more manageable safety profiles. The predictive gene expression patterns may provide a method for selecting patients most likely to benefit from gemcitabine-containing neoadjuvant therapy. Key words: breast cancer, chemotherapy, gemcitabine, , gene expression, microarrays, neoadjuvant therapy Keywords: Dose response
2008-01-12 | GSE8465 | GEO
Project description:Purpose: Chemotherapy is pivotal in the multimodal treatment of pancreatic cancer patients. In recent years, technical advances have developed experimental methods that unveiled a high degree of inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity in pancreatic cancer. We hypothesized that intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) impacts response to gemcitabine treatment and demands specific targeting of resistant subclones. Experimental Design: We addressed the effect of ITH on response to gemcitabine treatment using single cell-derived cell lines (SCDCL) from the classical-like cell line BxPC3 and the basal-like cell line Panc-1 which were analyzed by mRNA-seq and mass spectrometry. Results: Individual SCDCLs of the parental tumor cell populations of BxPC3 and Panc-1 showed considerable heterogeneity in response to gemcitabine. Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) including the 1,000 most variably expressed genes showed a clustering of the SCDCLs according to their respective sensitivity to gemcitabine treatment for BxPC3, while this clustering was less clear for Panc-1. In BxPC3 SCDCLs, enriched signaling pathways EMT, TNF signaling via NfKB, and IL2STAT5 signaling correlated with more resistant behavior to gemcitabine. In Panc-1 SCDCLs MYC targets V1 and V2 as well as E2F targets were associated with stronger resistance to gemcitabine. Feature extraction of proteomes again identified less proteins whose expression was associated with the response of individual SCDCLs in Panc-1 compared to BxPC3. Based on molecular profiles, we could show that the gemcitabine-resistant SCDCLs of both BxPC3 and Panc-1 are more sensitive to the BET inhibitor JQ1 compared to the respective gemcitabine-sensitive SCDCLs. Conclusions: Our model system of SCDCLs identified gemcitabine-resistant subclones within a parental tumor population and provides evidence for the critical role of ITH for treatment response in pancreatic cancer. Through molecular profiling, we identified specific signaling pathways and protein signatures that might help to explain the differential response to treatment among clones. We exploited these molecular differences for an improved and more targeted therapy of resistant subclones of a heterogeneous tumor.
2023-09-19 | PXD042256 | Pride
Project description:Purpose: Chemotherapy is pivotal in the multimodal treatment of pancreatic cancer patients. In recent years, technical advances have developed experimental methods that unveiled a high degree of inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity in pancreatic cancer. We hypothesized that intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) impacts response to gemcitabine treatment and demands specific targeting of resistant subclones. Results: Individual SCDCLs of the parental tumor cell populations of BxPC3 and Panc-1 showed considerable heterogeneity in response to gemcitabine. Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) including the 1,000 most variably expressed genes showed a clustering of the SCDCLs according to their respective sensitivity to gemcitabine treatment for BxPC3, while this clustering was less clear for Panc-1. In BxPC3 SCDCLs, enriched signaling pathways EMT, TNF signaling via NfKB, and IL2STAT5 signaling correlated with more resistant behavior to gemcitabine. In Panc-1 SCDCLs MYC targets V1 and V2 as well as E2F targets were associated with stronger resistance to gemcitabine. Feature extraction of proteomes again identified less proteins whose expression was associated with the response of individual SCDCLs in Panc-1 compared to BxPC3. Based on molecular profiles, we could show that the gemcitabine-resistant SCDCLs of both BxPC3 and Panc-1 are more sensitive to the BET inhibitor JQ1 compared to the respective gemcitabine-sensitive SCDCLs. Conclusions: Our model system of SCDCLs identified gemcitabine-resistant subclones within a parental tumor population and provides evidence for the critical role of ITH for treatment response in pancreatic cancer. Through molecular profiling, we identified specific signaling pathways and protein signatures that might help to explain the differential response to treatment among clones. We exploited these molecular differences for an improved and more targeted therapy of resistant subclones of a heterogeneous tumor.
2023-05-20 | GSE232549 | GEO
Project description:transcriptomic data for T24 were generated to observe the process of acquiring Gemcitabine resistance in time-point changes.
2022-11-16 | GSE190636 | GEO
Project description:PURPOSE: This tumor response pharmacodynamic model aims to describe primary lesion shrinkage in non-small cell lung cancer over time and determine if concentration-based exposure metrics for gemcitabine or that of its metabolites,n2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine or gemcitabine triphosphate, are better than gemcitabine dose for prediction of individual response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Gemcitabine was given thrice weekly on days 1 and 8 in combination with carboplatin, which was given only on day 1 of every cycle. Gemcitabine amount in the body and area under the concentration-time curves of plasma gemcitabine, 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine, and intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate in white cells were compared to determine which best describes tumor shrinkage over time. Tumor growth kinetics were described using a Gompertz-like model.
RESULTS: The apparent half-life for the effect of gemcitabine was 7.67 weeks. The tumor turnover time constant was 21.8 week.cm. Baseline tumor size and gemcitabine amount in the body to attain 50% of tumor shrinkage were estimated to be 6.66 cm and 10,600 mg. There was no evidence of relapse during treatment.
2024-04-29 | BIOMD0000000234 | BioModels
Project description:HT-29 and HCT-116 cells were barcoded using the CloneTracker lentiviral barcode library and then dabrafenib and irinotecan resistant derivatives of these cell lines were established, respectively.10 million barcoded HT-29 and HCT-116 cells were seeded equally onto poly-HEMA coated 4xT75 flask (DMSO Control, Replica A, B, C for each drug). After seeding, cells were allowed to form spheroids and barcoded 3D-HT-29 spheroids were treated with dabrafenib at increasing doses starting from IC50/10 dose until IC50/2 dose with monthly doubling of the dosing (16 weeks), and barcoded 3D-HCT-116 cells were treated with irinotecan at increasing doses starting from IC50/4 dose until IC50 dose with weekly doubling of the dosing (4 weeks). Following the end points of treatment for each cell line, DNA was isolated from harvested cell lines and barcode sequencing and whole exome sequencing were carried out.
2023-09-01 | E-MTAB-13216 | biostudies-arrayexpress