Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE49712 | GEO | 2013/08/20
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA214799
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:A large number of computational methods have been recently developed for analyzing differential gene expression (DE) in RNA-seq data. We report on a comprehensive evaluation of the commonly used DE methods using the SEQC benchmark data set and data from ENCODE project. We evaluated a number of key features including: normalization, accuracy of DE detection and DE analysis when one condition has no detectable expression. We found significant differences among the methods. Furthermore, computational methods designed for DE detection from expression array data perform comparably to methods customized for RNA-seq. Most importantly, our results demonstrate that increasing the number of replicate samples significantly improves detection power over increased sequencing depth. The Sequencing Quality Control Consortium generated two datasets from two reference RNA samples in order to evaluate transcriptome profiling by next-generation sequencing technology. Each sample contains one of the reference RNA source and a set of synthetic RNAs from the External RNA Control Consortium (ERCC) at known concentrations. Group A contains 5 replicates of the Strategene Universal Human Reference RNA (UHRR), which is composed of total RNA from 10 human cell lines, with 2% by volume of ERCC mix 1. Group B includes 5 replicate samples of the Ambion Human Brain Reference RNA (HBRR) with 2% by volume of ERCC mix 2. The ERCC spike-in control is a mixture of 92 synthetic polyadenylated oligonucleotides of 250-2000 nucleotides long that are meant to resemble human transcripts.
2013-08-20 | E-GEOD-49712 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Data analysis is a critical part of quantitative proteomics studies in interpreting biological questions. Numerous computational tools including protein quantification, imputation, and differential expression (DE) analysis were generated in the past decade. However, searching optimized tools is still an unsolved issue. Moreover, due to the rapid development of RNA-Seq technology, a vast number of DE analysis methods are created. Applying these newly developed RNA-Seq-oriented tools to proteomics data is still a question that needs to be addressed. In order to benchmark these analysis methods, a proteomics dataset constituted the proteins derived from human, yeast, and drosophila with different ratios were generated. Based on this dataset, DE analysis tools (including array-based and RNA-Seq based), imputation algorithms, and protein quantification methods were compared and benchmarked. This study provided useful information on analyzing quantitative proteomics datasets. All the methods used in this study were integrated into Perseus which are available at https://www.maxquant.org/perseus.
2022-11-16 | PXD029891 | JPOST Repository
Project description:The advancement of Third-Generation Sequencing (TGS) techniques managed to increase the sequencing length to several kilobases, which leads to a bright future for completely reserving alternative splicing (AS) events and isoform expressions. In recent years, many computational methods for isoform detection from long-read sequencing data have been developed and published. However, there is no prior comparative study that systemically evaluates the performance of the software implemented with different algorithms. Here we benchmarked nine methods implemented in seven computational tools that can identify isoform structures from TGS RNA sequencing data and analyzed their performances from various aspects using both simulated datasets produced by an in-house simulator and previously published experimental data. Our results comprehensively demonstrate the relative effectiveness of the approaches and provide guidance as well as recommendations for future research on AS analysis and further improvement of the tools for isoform detection using TGS data.
2023-12-25 | GSE227911 | GEO
Project description:Improved methods for deamination-based m6A detection
| PRJNA804865 | ENA
Project description:Proteomics experiments commonly aim to estimate and detect differential abundance across all expressed proteins. Within this experimental design, some of the most challenging measurements are small fold changes for lower abundance proteins. While bottom-up proteomics methods are approaching comprehensive coverage of even complex eukaryotic proteomes, failing to reliably quantify lower abundance proteins can limit the precision and reach of experiments to much less than the identified -let alone total- proteome. Here we test the ability of two common methods, a tandem mass tagging (TMT) method and a label- free quantitation method (LFQ), to achieve comprehensive quantitative coverage by benchmarking their capacity to measure 3 different levels of change (3-, 2-, and 1.5-fold) across an entire dataset. Both methods achieved comparably accurate estimates for all three fold-changes. However, the TMT method detected changes that reached statistical significance three times more often due to higher precision and fewer missing values. These findings highlight the importance of refining proteome quantitation methods to bring the number of usefully quantified proteins into closer agreement with the number of total quantified proteins.
2018-04-05 | PXD007683 | Pride
Project description:Comparison of total RNA-seq and Affymetrix GeneChip(R) Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 analysis methods and Affymetrix GeneChip® WT PLUS Reagent and NuGEN Ovation® PICO WTA System V2 amplification methods for the detection of significant differentially expressed genes isolated from whole blood and brain RNA samples Affymetrix and NuGEN amplification methods are compared to determine which is most efficient, cost effective, and accurate in the detection of differentialy expressed transcript clusters on the HTA 2.0 microarray The optimum amplification microarray data is compared to total RNA-seq analysis of the same samples to determine which is the most efficient, cost effective, and accurate method of detecting differentially expressed genes
2020-09-30 | GSE120327 | GEO
Project description:We comprehensively investigating mutated peptide detection in HCT116 human cell line. We collected transcriptome and translatome data from HCT116, gather the sets of nsSNVs that are express in two different RNA level to construct two customized mutated protein libraries, in addition, a non-customized library was constructed utilizing nsSNVs downloaded from COSMIC database. MaxQuant was used to searched the libraries against shotgun MS data obtain from the same sample. Then, various characteristics of the detected mutated peptides were described, including identification number, identification overlap, and peptide quality.
2022-06-28 | PXD034951 | iProX
Project description:Proteomics experiments commonly aim to estimate and detect differential abundance across all expressed proteins. Within this experimental design, some of the most challenging measurements are small fold changes for lower abundance proteins. While bottom-up proteomics methods are approaching comprehensive coverage of even complex eukaryotic proteomes, failing to reliably quantify lower abundance proteins can limit the precision and reach of experiments to much less than the identified -let alone total- proteome. Here we test the ability of two common methods, a tandem mass tagging (TMT) method and a label- free quantitation method (LFQ), to achieve comprehensive quantitative coverage by benchmarking their capacity to measure 3 different levels of change (3-, 2-, and 1.5-fold) across an entire dataset. Both methods achieved comparably accurate estimates for all three fold-changes. However, the TMT method detected changes that reached statistical significance three times more often due to higher precision and fewer missing values. These findings highlight the importance of refining proteome quantitation methods to bring the number of usefully quantified proteins into closer agreement with the number of total quantified proteins.
2019-02-15 | MSV000083453 | MassIVE
Project description:A multitude of single-cell RNA sequencing methods have been developed in recent years, with dramatic advances in scale and power, and enabling major discoveries and large scale cell mapping efforts. However, these methods have not been systematically and comprehensively benchmarked. Here, we directly compare seven methods for single cell and/or single nucleus profiling from three types of samples – cell lines, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and brain tissue – generating 36 libraries in six separate experiments in a single center. To analyze these datasets, we developed and applied scumi, a flexible computational pipeline that can be used for any scRNA-seq method. We evaluated the methods for both basic performance and for their ability to recover known biological information in the samples. Our study will help guide experiments with the methods in this study as well as serve as a benchmark for future studies and for computational algorithm development.
2019-06-01 | GSE132044 | GEO
Project description:Current methods for detection of copy number aberrations (CNA) from whole-exome sequencing (WES) data are based on the read counts of the captured exons only. However, accurate CNA determination is complicated by the non-uniform read depth and uneven distribution of exons. Therefore, we developed ENCODER (ENhanced COpy number Detection from Exome Reads), which eludes these problems. By exploiting the ‘off-target’ sequence reads, it allows for creation of robust copy number profiles from WES. The accuracy of ENCODER compares to approaches specifically designed for copy number detection, and outperforms current exon-based WES methods, particularly in samples of low quality. Current methods for detection of copy number aberrations (CNA) from whole-exome sequencing (WES) data are based on the read counts of the captured exons only. However, accurate CNA determination is complicated by the non-uniform read depth and uneven distribution of exons. Therefore, we developed ENCODER (ENhanced COpy number Detection from Exome Reads), which eludes these problems. By exploiting the ‘off-target’ sequence reads, it allows for creation of robust copy number profiles from WES. The accuracy of ENCODER compares to approaches specifically designed for copy number detection, and outperforms current exon-based WES methods, particularly in samples of low quality. Current methods for detection of copy number aberrations (CNA) from whole-exome sequencing (WES) data are based on the read counts of the captured exons only. However, accurate CNA determination is complicated by the non-uniform read depth and uneven distribution of exons. Therefore, we developed ENCODER (ENhanced COpy number Detection from Exome Reads), which eludes these problems. By exploiting the ‘off-target’ sequence reads, it allows for creation of robust copy number profiles from WES. The accuracy of ENCODER compares to approaches specifically designed for copy number detection, and outperforms current exon-based WES methods, particularly in samples of low quality. DNA copy number profiles generated with a new tool, ENCODER, were compared to DNA copy number profiles from SNP6, NimbleGen and low-coverage Whole Genome Sequencing.
2014-08-12 | GSE60168 | GEO