Transcription and Imprinting Dynamics in Developing Postnatal Male Germline Stem Cells
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Mus musculus
PROVIDER: GSE62355 | GEO | 2015/11/09
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA264750
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Paternal imprinting initiates in primordial germ cells (PGCs), and is considered largely completed at birth. The resulting postnatal spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) thenself-renew and proliferate to populate the testicular niche, with sexual maturation enabling productive gametogenesis. mRNA profiles of neonatal wild type (WT) mice testis were generated by deep sequencing using Illumina HiSeq 2000 Examination of 2 different histone modifications in mouse spermatogonia Please note that ChIPSeq_Kitplus samples are samples isolated with MACS CD117 microbeads from Miltenyi and ChIPSeq_Kitminus are samples that were not positively selected for Kit.
2015-11-09 | E-GEOD-62355 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Spermatogonial stem cells are the foundation of spermatogenesis and as such can serve as a tool for the treatment of infertility in prepubertal cancer survivors. Spermatogonial stem cells are unique as they develop from primordial germ cells (PGCs), which colonize the developing tubules as immature SSC precursors. It has been controversial, when SSCs are maturing to an adult-like stem cell and recent research has found that prepubertal SSCs are actually metabolically distinct from adult SSCs until puberty. Sertoli cells picture a major part of the SSC niche and undergo drastic changes with puberty and polarize to compartmentalize the seminiferous epithelium with formation of tight junctions to a tight basal part where SSCs reside and an apical part with more differentiated stages of spermatogenesis. In the study were mapping the progression of Sertoli cells maturation events to the metabolic changes SSCs undergo during prepubertal development.
2023-02-24 | PXD037764 | Pride
Project description:We report the chromatin status in chicken Embryonic stem cells（ESCs）, Primordial germ cells (PGCs) and Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). H3K4me2 antibody was used to collect DNA sequences through CHIP experiments, and the DNA was analyzed by next-generation sequencing. We mapped the genome-wide chromatin maps of chicken ESCs, PGCs, and SSCs. We found that the entire genome of H3K4me2 in ESCs, PGCs, and SSCs was erased and then reconstructed. Most of the enriched genes were related to the cell lineage. It is mainly enriched in distal intergenic. H3K4me2 in the promoter first enriches in ESCs, then decreases in PGCs. The enrichment rebuilds in SSCs. This study provides a basis for analyzing the differences of chromatin status in ESCs, PGCs, and SSCs.
2020-03-21 | GSE147255 | GEO
Project description:Germ cells are unique in engendering totipotency, yet the mechanisms underlying this capacity remain elusive. Here, we perform comprehensive and in-depth nucleome analysis of mouse germ-cell development in vitro, encompassing pluripotent precursors, primordial germ cells (PGCs) before and after epigenetic reprogramming, and spermatogonia/spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). Although epigenetic reprogramming, including genome-wide DNA de-methylation, creates broadly open chromatin with abundant enhancer-like signatures, the augmented chromatin insulation safeguards transcriptional fidelity. These insulatory constraints are then erased en masse for spermatogonial development. Notably, despite distinguishing epigenetic programming, including global DNA re-methylation, the PGCs-to-spermatogonia/SSCs development entails further euchromatization. This accompanies substantial erasure of lamina-associated domains, generating spermatogonia/SSCs with a minimal peripheral attachment of chromatin except for pericentromeres—an architecture conserved in primates. Accordingly, faulty nucleome maturation, including persistent insulation and improper euchromatization, leads to impaired spermatogenic potential. Given that PGCs after epigenetic reprogramming serve as oogenic progenitors as well, our findings elucidate a principle for the nucleome programming that creates gametogenic progenitors in both sexes, defining a basis for nuclear totipotency.
2022-06-15 | GSE184129 | GEO
Project description:Germ cells are unique in engendering totipotency, yet the mechanisms underlying this capacity remain elusive. Here, we perform comprehensive and in-depth nucleome analysis of mouse germ-cell development in vitro, encompassing pluripotent precursors, primordial germ cells (PGCs) before and after epigenetic reprogramming, and spermatogonia/spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). Although epigenetic reprogramming, including genome-wide DNA de-methylation, creates broadly open chromatin with abundant enhancer-like signatures, the augmented chromatin insulation safeguards transcriptional fidelity. These insulatory constraints are then erased en masse for spermatogonial development. Notably, despite distinguishing epigenetic programming, including global DNA re-methylation, the PGCs-to-spermatogonia/SSCs development entails further euchromatization. This accompanies substantial erasure of lamina-associated domains, generating spermatogonia/SSCs with a minimal peripheral attachment of chromatin except for pericentromeres—an architecture conserved in primates. Accordingly, faulty nucleome maturation, including persistent insulation and improper euchromatization, leads to impaired spermatogenic potential. Given that PGCs after epigenetic reprogramming serve as oogenic progenitors as well, our findings elucidate a principle for the nucleome programming that creates gametogenic progenitors in both sexes, defining a basis for nuclear totipotency.
2022-06-15 | GSE183826 | GEO
Project description:Germ cells are unique in engendering totipotency, yet the mechanisms underlying this capacity remain elusive. Here, we perform comprehensive and in-depth nucleome analysis of mouse germ-cell development in vitro, encompassing pluripotent precursors, primordial germ cells (PGCs) before and after epigenetic reprogramming, and spermatogonia/spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). Although epigenetic reprogramming, including genome-wide DNA de-methylation, creates broadly open chromatin with abundant enhancer-like signatures, the augmented chromatin insulation safeguards transcriptional fidelity. These insulatory constraints are then erased en masse for spermatogonial development. Notably, despite distinguishing epigenetic programming, including global DNA re-methylation, the PGCs-to-spermatogonia/SSCs development entails further euchromatization. This accompanies substantial erasure of lamina-associated domains, generating spermatogonia/SSCs with a minimal peripheral attachment of chromatin except for pericentromeres—an architecture conserved in primates. Accordingly, faulty nucleome maturation, including persistent insulation and improper euchromatization, leads to impaired spermatogenic potential. Given that PGCs after epigenetic reprogramming serve as oogenic progenitors as well, our findings elucidate a principle for the nucleome programming that creates gametogenic progenitors in both sexes, defining a basis for nuclear totipotency.
2022-06-15 | GSE183807 | GEO
Project description:Germ cells are unique in engendering totipotency, yet the mechanisms underlying this capacity remain elusive. Here, we perform comprehensive and in-depth nucleome analysis of mouse germ-cell development in vitro, encompassing pluripotent precursors, primordial germ cells (PGCs) before and after epigenetic reprogramming, and spermatogonia/spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). Although epigenetic reprogramming, including genome-wide DNA de-methylation, creates broadly open chromatin with abundant enhancer-like signatures, the augmented chromatin insulation safeguards transcriptional fidelity. These insulatory constraints are then erased en masse for spermatogonial development. Notably, despite distinguishing epigenetic programming, including global DNA re-methylation, the PGCs-to-spermatogonia/SSCs development entails further euchromatization. This accompanies substantial erasure of lamina-associated domains, generating spermatogonia/SSCs with a minimal peripheral attachment of chromatin except for pericentromeres—an architecture conserved in primates. Accordingly, faulty nucleome maturation, including persistent insulation and improper euchromatization, leads to impaired spermatogenic potential. Given that PGCs after epigenetic reprogramming serve as oogenic progenitors as well, our findings elucidate a principle for the nucleome programming that creates gametogenic progenitors in both sexes, defining a basis for nuclear totipotency.
2022-06-15 | GSE183801 | GEO
Project description:Background: Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) sustain the process of steady-state spermatogenesis in the mammalian testis, which is critical to the ongoing production of sperm and male fertility. SSCs can both self-renew to perpetuate the SSC population, and give rise to progenitors to propel the spermatogenic differentiation pathway. SSCs are detectable as a small subpopulation of undifferentiated spermatogonia that demonstrate regenerative capacity in a transplantation assay, and can be selectively recovered on the basis of expression of an Id4-eGfp sortable marker transgene. Enriched populations of SSCs and progenitors display consistent differences in gene expression patterns suggesting they represent discrete spermatogonial subtypes. Results: Here we describe distinct spermatogonial subtype-specific epigenetic programming profiles associated with subtype-specific differential gene expression on the basis of genome-wide patterns of six different histone modifications, chromatin accessibility, and DNA methylation. We find that similarly expressed genes show no differences in epigenetic programming, whereas differentially expressed genes show distinct histone modification patterns as well as subtype-specific differences in patterns of distal intergenic low-methylated regions. Motif-enrichment analysis of differentially programmed elements predicts a set of transcription factors that may regulate this spermatogonial subtype-specific epigenetic programming, and gene-specific chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses confirm subtype-specific differences in binding of a subset of these factors to target genes. Conclusions: Taken together, these results indicate that SSCs and progenitors are discrete spermatogonial subtypes that appear to be differentially programmed to carry out mutually exclusive functions including self-renewal and maintenance of regenerative capacity in SSCs and lineage commitment and loss of regenerative capacity in progenitors.
2019-05-23 | GSE131656 | GEO
Project description:Background: Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) sustain the process of steady-state spermatogenesis in the mammalian testis, which is critical to the ongoing production of sperm and male fertility. SSCs can both self-renew to perpetuate the SSC population, and give rise to progenitors to propel the spermatogenic differentiation pathway. SSCs are detectable as a small subpopulation of undifferentiated spermatogonia that demonstrate regenerative capacity in a transplantation assay, and can be selectively recovered on the basis of expression of an Id4-eGfp sortable marker transgene. Enriched populations of SSCs and progenitors display consistent differences in gene expression patterns suggesting they represent discrete spermatogonial subtypes. Results: Here we describe distinct spermatogonial subtype-specific epigenetic programming profiles associated with subtype-specific differential gene expression on the basis of genome-wide patterns of six different histone modifications, chromatin accessibility, and DNA methylation. We find that similarly expressed genes show no differences in epigenetic programming, whereas differentially expressed genes show distinct histone modification patterns as well as subtype-specific differences in patterns of distal intergenic low-methylated regions. Motif-enrichment analysis of differentially programmed elements predicts a set of transcription factors that may regulate this spermatogonial subtype-specific epigenetic programming, and gene-specific chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses confirm subtype-specific differences in binding of a subset of these factors to target genes. Conclusions: Taken together, these results indicate that SSCs and progenitors are discrete spermatogonial subtypes that appear to be differentially programmed to carry out mutually exclusive functions including self-renewal and maintenance of regenerative capacity in SSCs and lineage commitment and loss of regenerative capacity in progenitors.
2019-05-23 | GSE131655 | GEO
Project description:Background: Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) sustain the process of steady-state spermatogenesis in the mammalian testis, which is critical to the ongoing production of sperm and male fertility. SSCs can both self-renew to perpetuate the SSC population, and give rise to progenitors to propel the spermatogenic differentiation pathway. SSCs are detectable as a small subpopulation of undifferentiated spermatogonia that demonstrate regenerative capacity in a transplantation assay, and can be selectively recovered on the basis of expression of an Id4-eGfp sortable marker transgene. Enriched populations of SSCs and progenitors display consistent differences in gene expression patterns suggesting they represent discrete spermatogonial subtypes. Results: Here we describe distinct spermatogonial subtype-specific epigenetic programming profiles associated with subtype-specific differential gene expression on the basis of genome-wide patterns of six different histone modifications, chromatin accessibility, and DNA methylation. We find that similarly expressed genes show no differences in epigenetic programming, whereas differentially expressed genes show distinct histone modification patterns as well as subtype-specific differences in patterns of distal intergenic low-methylated regions. Motif-enrichment analysis of differentially programmed elements predicts a set of transcription factors that may regulate this spermatogonial subtype-specific epigenetic programming, and gene-specific chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses confirm subtype-specific differences in binding of a subset of these factors to target genes. Conclusions: Taken together, these results indicate that SSCs and progenitors are discrete spermatogonial subtypes that appear to be differentially programmed to carry out mutually exclusive functions including self-renewal and maintenance of regenerative capacity in SSCs and lineage commitment and loss of regenerative capacity in progenitors.
2019-05-23 | GSE131654 | GEO