Delineating the Transcriptional Network of Prognostic Gene Signatures Refines Treatment Recommendations for Lymph Node-negative Breast Cancer Patients
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens
PROVIDER: GSE62425 | GEO | 2015/09/30
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA264075
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Recently, expression profiling of breast carcinomas has revealed gene signatures that predict clinical outcome, and discerned prognostically relevant breast cancer subtypes. Measurement of the degree of genomic instability provides a very similar stratification of prognostic groups. We therefore hypothesized that these features are linked. We used gene expression profiling of 48 breast cancer specimens that profoundly differed in their degree of genomic instability and identified a set of 12 genes that defines the two groups. The biological and prognostic significance of this gene set was established through survival prediction in published datasets from patients with breast cancer. Of note, the gene expression signatures that define specific prognostic subtypes in other breast cancer datasets predicted genomic instability in our samples. This remarkable congruence suggests a biological dependency of poor-prognosis gene signatures, breast cancer subtypes, genomic instability, and clinical outcome. Keywords: disease state analysis 44 samples
2009-11-30 | E-GEOD-11901 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Breast carcinoma (BC) have been extensively profiled by high-throughput technologies for over a decade, and broadly speaking, these studies can be grouped into those that seek to identify patient subtypes (studies of heterogeneity) or those that seek to identify gene signatures with prognostic or predictive capacity. The shear number of reported signatures has led to speculation that everything is prognostic in BC. Here we show that this ubiquity is an apparition caused by a poor understanding of the inter- relatedness between subtype and the molecular determinants of prognosis. Our approach constructively shows how to avoid confounding due to a patient's subtype, clinicopathological or treatment profile. The approach identifies patients who are predicted to have good outcome at time of diagnosis by all available clinical and molecular markers, but who experience a distant metastasis within five years. These inherently difficult patients (~7% of BC) are prioritized for investigations of intra-tumoral heterogeneity. 321 samples from breast cancer patients.
2014-10-08 | E-GEOD-58644 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Recently, expression profiling of breast carcinomas has revealed gene signatures that predict clinical outcome, and discerned prognostically relevant breast cancer subtypes. Measurement of the degree of genomic instability provides a very similar stratification of prognostic groups. We therefore hypothesized that these features are linked. We used gene expression profiling of 48 breast cancer specimens that profoundly differed in their degree of genomic instability and identified a set of 12 genes that defines the two groups. The biological and prognostic significance of this gene set was established through survival prediction in published datasets from patients with breast cancer. Of note, the gene expression signatures that define specific prognostic subtypes in other breast cancer datasets predicted genomic instability in our samples. This remarkable congruence suggests a biological dependency of poor-prognosis gene signatures, breast cancer subtypes, genomic instability, and clinical outcome. Keywords: disease state analysis
2009-12-01 | GSE11901 | GEO
Project description:Macrophages are frequently the most abundant immune cells in murine and human cancers. Studies in various transgenic mouse tumor models have revealed pro-tumor functions of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), but despite their association with poor clinical outcome in human patients, molecular signatures for the prediction of clinical outcome in humans are still missingbeen demonstrated. Here we generated molecular signatures from F4/80+CD11b+ TAMs from two transgenic breast cancer models: K14cre;Cdh1flox/flox;Trp53flox/flox (KEP), which resembles human invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and MMTV-NeuT (NeuT), which resembles HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. Determination of truly specific TAM transcriptome signatures in breast cancer required relationship analysis with healthy mammary gland tissue macrophages (MTMs), since comparison with macrophages from tissues overestimated TAM-specific gene expression. Furthermore, translation of the TAM signatures to outcome prediction in patients required consideration of the breast cancer subtype. TAM signatures derived from the KEP, but not the NeuT model reliably predicted outcome in ILC patients. Collectively, we show that a transgenic mouse tumor model can be utilized to derive a TAM-based signature for human breast cancer outcome prediction and provide a generalizable strategy for determining and applying specific molecular signatures of immune cells to, in principle, any cancer provided the murine model reflects the human disease.
2019-10-30 | GSE126268 | GEO
Project description:ChIP-seq on primary breast cancer tumor samples for Era, H3K4me3, H3K27me3. Patients had a poor or good outcome after aromatase inhibitor treatment. Differential binding patterns between good and poor outcome patients were identified for each marker, predicting response to treatment comparing ER, H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 patterns between two breast cancer patient populations
2013-12-05 | E-GEOD-40867 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Our aim is to identify the LSR-driven metabolomics profile of breast cancer cells in lean and obesogenic environments. Breast cancer cell models with high or undetectable levels of LSR, including drug resistance models, were cultured in lean and obesogenic environments and comprehensive metabolomics profiling, including lipidomics-focused sub-analyses were performed. The metabolomics analyses using both approaches will help us determine if LSR enhances aggressive breast cancer phenotypes via modulation of cellular bioenergetic metabolism, ultimately contributing to poor patient outcome.
2016-12-29 | ST000528 | MetabolomicsWorkbench
Project description:Our aim is to identify the LSR-driven metabolomics profile of breast cancer cells in lean and obesogenic environments. Breast cancer cell models with high or undetectable levels of LSR, including drug resistance models, were cultured in lean and obesogenic environments and comprehensive metabolomics profiling, including lipidomics-focused sub-analyses were performed. The metabolomics analyses using both approaches will help us determine if LSR enhances aggressive breast cancer phenotypes via modulation of cellular bioenergetic metabolism, ultimately contributing to poor patient outcome.
2016-12-30 | ST000529 | MetabolomicsWorkbench
Project description:Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the top-five cancer killers worldwide. Here, we describe our analysis of 20 gene signatures with reported prognostic value in a cohort of patients with early stage HCC treated with surgical resection. Methods: We performed gene-expression profiling of 164 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded HCC from three hepatology centers participating the HCC Genomic Consortium. We utilized IlluminaM-bM-^@M-^Ys whole-genome DASL assay measuring ~24,000 annotated human genes. We evaluated genomic concordance and prognostic performance of 20 already reported prognostic gene signatures. Additionally, since only the largest nodule was profiled, we also excluded patients with multiple tumors to avoid biases related to intra-individual genomic tumor heterogeneity. Results: Among the 20 signatures evaluated, 15 were able to confidently allocate patients (FDR<0.05) within their predicted poor-outcome subclass. Pairwise comparisons showed a significant overlap between almost all poor-outcome signatures derived from the tumor (P<0.001), except for the metastatic HCC signature. Interestingly, poor-outcome signatures from the tumor were not significantly associated with those obtained from non-tumor adjacent tissue in the same patient. The prognosis analysis for earliest stages (BCLC 0 or A) with single nodules revealed that the G3 signature reported by Boyault et al. Conclusions: We present a composite genomic model for prediction of tumor recurrence in early HCC. It will allow risk stratification, personalized surveillance, and eventually customized interventions in patients with early HCC candidates for resection. Samples with "used for prognostic prediction: yes" were included in the study. This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below. Refer to individual Series
2011-02-17 | E-GEOD-20140 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Blood mRNA expression signatures derived from unsupervised analyses identify prostate cancers with poor outcome
| PRJNA158559 | ENA
Project description:When making treatment decisions, oncologists often stratify breast cancers into a low-risk group (ER+, low grade); an intermediate-risk group (ER+, high grade); and a high-risk group that includes Her2+ and triple-negative (ER-/PR-/Her2-) tumors. None of the currently available gene signatures correlates to this clinical classification. We aimed to develop a test that is practical for the oncologists, that offers both molecular characterization of BCs, and improved prediction of prognosis and treatment response. We investigated the molecular basis of such clinical practice by grouping Her2+ and triple-negative breast cancers together during clustering analyses on the genome-wide gene expression profiles of our training cohort, mostly derived from fine needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) of 149 consecutive evaluable Breast cancers. The analyses consistently divided these tumors into a three-cluster pattern, similar to clinical risk-stratification groups, that was reproducible in published microarray databases (n=2487) annotated with clinical outcomes. The clinicopathologic parameters of each of these three molecular groups were also similar to clinical classification. The low-risk group had good outcomes and benefited from endocrine therapy. Both intermediate- and high-risk groups had poor outcomes and were resistant to endocrine therapy. The latter demonstrated the highest rate of complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy; the highest activities in MYC, E2F1, Ras, β-Catenin and IFN-γ pathways; and poor prognosis predicted by 14 independent prognostic signatures. Based on a multivariate analysis, this new gene signature, termed ClinicoMolecular Triad Classification, predicted recurrence and treatment response better than all pathologic parameters and other prognostic signatures. 149 invasive breast cancers from the 172 specimens contained 161 tumors were used in this study. Expression data of the 11 tumors with replicate was separately combined before analysis.
2011-09-28 | E-GEOD-16987 | biostudies-arrayexpress