Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Multi-platform assessment of transcriptional profiling technologies utilizing a precise probe mapping methodology (Illumina_HT12)

ABSTRACT: We present a more extensive and yet precise assessment to elucidate differences and similarities in performance at numerous aspects including signal range, sensitivity to fold-change, and fidelity with TaqMan qRT-PCR. There were three levels of data examined: entire data sets, data derived from gene name annotation oriented subset of 15442 RefSeq genes, and data derived from transcript pattern defined subset of 7034 RefSeq genes. Our results showed a fair degree of overall correlation between all 6 platforms evaluated; but, to varying degrees, two RNA-seq protocols outperformed three of the microarray platforms in most categories. Notably, a fourth microarray platform, Agilent, was comparable, or marginally superior, to the RNA-seq protocols within these same assessments. Furthermore, 3 platforms (Agilent and two RNA-seq methods) demonstrated over 80% concordance with the gold standard TaqMan assay in terms of fold-change accuracy. Our study suggests that the use of transcript patterns can enhance a number of the observed cross-platform correlations, indicating a potential usefulness for similar evaluations.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE66614 | GEO | 2015/09/28

SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA277480

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Multi-platform assessment of transcriptional profiling technologies utilizing a precise probe mapping methodology (Agilent_4x44K)

Project description:We present a more extensive and yet precise assessment to elucidate differences and similarities in performance at numerous aspects including signal range, sensitivity to fold-change, and fidelity with TaqMan qRT-PCR. There were three levels of data examined: entire data sets, data derived from gene name annotation oriented subset of 15442 RefSeq genes, and data derived from transcript pattern defined subset of 7034 RefSeq genes. Our results showed a fair degree of overall correlation between all 6 platforms evaluated; but, to varying degrees, two RNA-seq protocols outperformed three of the microarray platforms in most categories. Notably, a fourth microarray platform, Agilent, was comparable, or marginally superior, to the RNA-seq protocols within these same assessments. Furthermore, 3 platforms (Agilent and two RNA-seq methods) demonstrated over 80% concordance with the gold standard TaqMan assay in terms of fold-change accuracy. Our study suggests that the use of transcript patterns can enhance a number of the observed cross-platform correlations, indicating a potential usefulness for similar evaluations.

2015-09-28 | GSE66626 | GEO

Multi-platform assessment of transcriptional profiling technologies utilizing a precise probe mapping methodology (Affymetrix_HTA2.0)

2015-09-28 | GSE66648 | GEO

Multi-platform assessment of transcriptional profiling technologies utilizing a precise probe mapping methodology (RNA-seq_ClonTech)

2015-09-28 | GSE66592 | GEO

Multi-platform assessment of transcriptional profiling technologies utilizing a precise probe mapping methodology (RNA-seq_RiboZero)

2015-09-28 | GSE66590 | GEO

Multi-platform assessment of transcriptional profiling technologies utilizing a precise probe mapping methodology (Affymetrix_Gene1.0) (exon analysis)

2015-09-28 | GSE66628 | GEO

MOE430 whole mouse - mouse colon dilution series - RMA preprocessed

2005-06-30 | GSE2850 | GEO

Transcription profiling of whole adult mouse and adult mouse colon in different dilutions analysed in multiple centers

Project description:This data is part of a large-scale platform comparison experiment. Whole mouse and adult mouse colon RNA was mixed at different concentrations (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100) and distributed across multiple centers for analysis. Eight microarray platforms and RT-PCR were tested for different labeling protocols, amplification protocols, and data preprocessing approaches in order to maximize data intercomparability. The role of universal reference RNA was also examined. Probes of different platforms were matched using gene symbols and/or RefSeq/GenBank accession numbers. Several different normalization procedures were applied. Evaluation criteria included linearity, sensitivity/specificity, and reproducibility within and between platforms, labeling methods, and laboratories. Experiment Overall Design: Whole mouse (sacrificed on day 1, strain: C57BL/6) and adult mouse (8 weeks, strain: C57BL/6 ) colon RNA from multiple animals was pooled respectively. RNA was purified following the manufacturerâs recommendations and integrity was analyzed using an Agilent BioAnalyzer 2100 according to manufacturer instructions. Five RNA samples were created by mixing the two original samples at different concentrations (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100). The five master mix samples were then divided into duplicate sets of the five sample RNAs, distributed to individual laboratories, and hybridized to eight different microarray platforms at several different genome centers. The five samples included here were prepared from 10ng of total RNA using a T7 double amplification protocol as described in Schwab et al., 2003 and hybridized to Affymetrix MOE430 arrays as recommended by the manufacturer using the standard protocol. No replicates were produced.

2008-06-12 | E-GEOD-2850 | biostudies-arrayexpress

A Comparison of microarray and MPSS Technology Platforms for Expression Analysis of Arabidopsis

Project description:A comparison of microarray and MPSS technologies can help to establish the metrics for data comparisons across these technology platforms and determine some of the factors affecting the measurement of mRNA abundances using different platforms. Here, different Treatments/Conditions based on different Arabidopsis tissues were used for three different platforms include MPSS, Affymetrix and Agilent. Keywords: MPSS, Affymetrix, Agilent

2007-09-14 | GSE8994 | GEO

Repeatability and comparability of microRNA microarray

Project description:We compared repeatability and comparability of microRNA microarray using 5 different platforms. and compared microarray data generated from five different microRNA microarray platforms with quantitative RT-PCR. Our data suggested that the most accurate and repeatable methods for microRNA expression profiling are Agilent and Toray, and the numbers of detected microRNA at Toray are more than at Agilent. Keywords: repeatability, comparability, microRNA, microarray

2009-05-14 | GSE13860 | GEO