Organ-specific gene expression in single differentiating Drosophila embryos
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Drosophila melanogaster
PROVIDER: GSE77429 | GEO | 2017/02/01
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA310323
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:Comparisons between whole animal and epidermis with attached muscle, salivary gland, wing disc, midgut, and central nervous system tissues at approximately 18 hours before pupariation. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development Keywords: other
2003-07-23 | GSE541 | GEO
Project description:The definitive endoderm germ layer is the provenance of multiple internal organs, including the lungs, liver, pancreas and intestines. Molecular events driving initial endoderm germ layer specification and subsequent anterior-posterior patterning of endoderm into distinct organ primordia remain largely cryptic. Through microarray analyses, we captured genome-wide transcriptional dynamics driving successive stages of endoderm development with the intent of identifying novel regulatory genes or diagnostic markers that respectively drive or mark endoderm committment. HES3 human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) were differentiated into highly homogeneous endodermal progenitor populations, and microarray analyses were conducted of six different populations at different tiers of the endodermal lineage hierarchy: undifferentiated hESCs, anterior primitive streak (day 1 of in vitro differentiation), definitive endoderm (day 3) and anterior foregut, posterior foregut or midgut/hindgut patterned endoderm populations (day 7). Additionally, we compared hESCs differentiated using two alternative endoderm induction protocols, serum-based or AFBLy-based differentiation (both day 3 of differentiation).
2013-11-07 | E-GEOD-52158 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Samples at 18h before puparium formation were compared to samples at puparium formation for each the following tissues: epidermis with attached muscle, salivary gland, wing disc, midgut, and central nervous system. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development Keywords: other
2003-07-23 | GSE542 | GEO
Project description:Samples at 18h before puparium formation were compared to samples at puparium formation for each the following tissues: epidermis with attached muscle, salivary gland, wing disc, midgut, and central nervous system. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development
2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-542 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In addressing R. microplus - A. marginale interactions, we propose and test three linked hypotheses. The first is that the tick gene response is organ specific: the midgut gene regulation is unique during feeding and during acquisition of A. marginale as compared to the salivary gland. This distinction is relevant as the two organs serve very different roles in the transmission biology of A. marginale with early survival and replication within the midgut epithelium, composed of highly phagocytic cells, required for initial colonization while a second round of replication in the salivary gland acini, composed of highly secretory cells, is required for transmission of an infectious dose in the saliva. Importantly, both the midgut epithelium and salivary glands have been identified as separate and distinct barriers for transmission of A. marginale and thus represent two potential sites where transmission could be blocked. The second hypothesis to be tested is that the salivary gland transcriptome is temporally dynamic. Initiation of tick attachment and feeding involves secretion of a virtual pharmacopeia including lytic enzymes, anticoagulants, and inhibitors of the mammalian innate immune and nocioceptive systems. Concomitantly, the acini provide an environment where A. marginale replicates >100 fold and are secreted into the saliva. Prior studies show that duration of feeding is a critical component of transmission efficiency, with increased efficiency positively correlated with time of tick feeding. The third hypothesis to be tested is that A. marginale colonization does not significantly modulate the tick midgut and salivary gland transcriptome. This hypothesis is based on observations by ourselves and others that tick infection does not impart a significant fitness cost on the vector. This is in contrast to other bacterial and protozoal pathogens that have dramatic effects on success of tick attachment, engorgement, and survival. A. marginale, similar to other tick-borne pathogens in the Family Anaplasmataceeae, is believed to have evolved from an arthropod-specific bacterium with relatively late adaptation to specific niches in mammalian hosts. Consequently, we predict that A. marginale is well adapted to its tick vector and utilizes the normal signaling pathways of the feeding tick with few, if any, effects on the midgut and salivary gland transcriptome. In this manuscript, we report the testing of these three hypotheses and present the results in context of the vector-pathogen-mammalian host interaction at the time of transmission. A Roche NimbleGen high-density gene expression microarray was custom designed based on the expressed sequence tag (EST) database, B. microplus Gene Index Version 2 (BmiGI V2) for R. microplus. The expression level of 14,447 R. microplus genes was analyzed from total RNA extracted from 10 different tick tissue samples; 30 arrays were included since triplicates of each different sample were analyzed as follow: unfed (midgut and salivary glands), blood feeding (2 days midgut and 2, 6 and 9 days salivary glands), A. marginale-infected blood feeding (2 days midgut and 2, 6 and 9 days salivary glands).
2011-04-13 | E-GEOD-21690 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Comparisons between EcR mutant midgut and a reference control sample from mixed-stage normal midgut Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development Keywords: other
2003-07-23 | GSE540 | GEO
Project description:Determining how organs attain precise positioning within an organism is a crucial facet of developmental biology. The Fox family winged-helix transcription factors are known to play key roles in development of multiple organs. Drosophila FoxL1 (aka Fd64A) is dynamically expressed in embryos but its function is completely uncharacterized. FoxL1 is expressed in a single group of body wall - muscles in the 2nd and 3rd thoracic segments, in homologous abdominal muscles at earlier stages, and in the hindgut mesoderm from early through late embryogenesis. We show that FoxL1 expression in T2 and T3 is in VIS5, which is not a single muscle spanning the entire thorax, as previously published, but is, instead, three individual muscles, each spanning a single thoracic segment. We generate mutations in foxL1 and show that, surprisingly, none of the tissues that express FoxL1 are affected by its loss. Instead, loss of foxL1 results in defects in salivary gland positioning and morphology, as well as defects in the migration of hemocytes, germ cells and Malpighian tubules. We also show that FoxL1-dependent expression of secreted Sema2a in T3 VIS5 is required for normal salivary gland positioning. Altogether, these findings suggest that Drosophila FoxL1 functions like its mammalian counterpart in non-autonomously orchestrating the behaviors of surrounding tissues. We performed a microrarray analysis comparing gene expression changes between wild-type and foxL1 null embryos (foxL1del/foxL1cr). Total RNA was collected from embryos from stages 11-15, which correspondes with expression of foxL1 in the embryo.
2016-09-10 | GSE86626 | GEO
Project description:Comparisons between EcR mutant midgut and a reference control sample from mixed-stage normal midgut Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development
2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-540 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Comparisons between the salivary glands upon the RNAi of sage gene vs. the control. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development Keywords: other
2003-07-23 | GSE283 | GEO
Project description:Comparisons between the salivary glands upon the RNAi of sage gene vs. the control. Keywords = Drosophila, ecdysone, network, genomic, microarray, organogenesis, EcR, midgut, central nervous system, salivary gland, epidermis, imaginal disc, development
2010-06-05 | E-GEOD-283 | biostudies-arrayexpress