12plex_vitis_2011_02_24h-Défistim
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Vitis vinifera
PROVIDER: GSE97700 | GEO | 2017/04/17
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA382693
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:12plex_vitis_2011-02 - 12plex_vitis_2011_02_24h - Biological question (15 lines max): Identification of grape genes regulated in response to resistance inducer treatments. This transcriptomic analysis should provide insight in the mode of action of the compounds under study and yield generic data relevant to grape defense reaction.
2014-09-01 | GSE54346 | GEO
Project description:12plex_vitis_2011-02 - 12plex_vitis_2011_02_24h - Biological question (15 lines max): Identification of grape genes regulated in response to resistance inducer treatments. This transcriptomic analysis should provide insight in the mode of action of the compounds under study and yield generic data relevant to grape defense reaction. 17 dye-swap - normal vs disease comparison,treated vs untreated comparison
2014-09-01 | E-GEOD-54346 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:12plex_vitis_2011_02_48h - Biological question (15 lines max): Identification of grape genes regulated in response to resistance inducer treatments. This transcriptomic analysis should provide insight in the mode of action of the compounds under study and yield generic data relevant to grape defense reaction. The experiment took place in the greenhouse. Six week-herbaceous grape cutting (cv Marselan) were spray-treated with 5 resistance inducers, an adjuvant (used along with some inducers) and water as control. Plants were inoculated by Plasmopara viticola (downy midew) 24h post-treatment. We used 5 plants per treatment. Leaf samples were harvested 24h post-treatment and 48h post-inoculation. Three biological repetitions were done. Each hybridization experiment was performed in comparison with water. 18 dye-swap - normal vs disease comparison
2014-09-01 | E-GEOD-54345 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:12plex_vitis_2011_02_48h - Biological question (15 lines max): Identification of grape genes regulated in response to resistance inducer treatments. This transcriptomic analysis should provide insight in the mode of action of the compounds under study and yield generic data relevant to grape defense reaction. The experiment took place in the greenhouse. Six week-herbaceous grape cutting (cv Marselan) were spray-treated with 5 resistance inducers, an adjuvant (used along with some inducers) and water as control. Plants were inoculated by Plasmopara viticola (downy midew) 24h post-treatment. We used 5 plants per treatment. Leaf samples were harvested 24h post-treatment and 48h post-inoculation. Three biological repetitions were done. Each hybridization experiment was performed in comparison with water.
2014-09-01 | GSE54345 | GEO
Project description:12plex_vitis_2011-02 - 12plex_vitis_2011_02_48h - Biological question (15 lines max): Identification of grape genes regulated in response to resistance inducer treatments. This transcriptomic analysis should provide insight in the mode of action of the compounds under study and yield generic data relevant to grape defense reaction. - The experiment took place in the greenhouse. Six week-herbaceous grape cutting (cv Marselan) were spray-treated with 5 resistance inducers, an adjuvant (used along with some inducers) and water as control. Plants were inoculated by Plasmopara viticola (downy midew) 24 h post-treatment. We used 5 plants per treatment. Leaf samples were harvested 24 h post-treatment and 48 h post-inoculation. Three biological repetitions were done. Each hybridization experiment was performed in comparison with water.
2017-04-17 | GSE97699 | GEO
Project description:Neonicotinoid insecticides control crop pests based on their action as agonists at the insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor which accepts chloropyridinyl- and chlorothiazolyl- analogs almost equally well. In some cases, these compounds have also been reported to enhance plant vigor and (a)biotic stress tolerance, independent of their insecticidal function. However, this mode of action has not been specifically defined. Using Arabidopsis thaliana, we show that the neonicotinoid compounds, imidacloprid (IMI) and clothianidin (CLO), via their 6-chloropyridinyl-3-carboxylic acid and 2-chlorothiazolyl-5-carboxylic acid metabolites, respectively, induce salicylic acid (SA) – associated plant responses. SA is a phytohormone best known for its role in plant defense against pathogens and as an inducer of systemic acquired resistance; however, it can also modulate abiotic stress responses. These neonicotinoids effect a similar global transcriptional response to that of SA including genes involved in (a)biotic stress response. Furthermore, similar to SA, IMI and CLO induce systemic acquired resistance resulting in reduced growth of a powdery mildew pathogen. The action of CLO induces the endogenous synthesis of SA via the SA biosynthetic enzyme ICS1, with ICS1 required for CLO-induced accumulation of SA, expression of the SA marker PR1, and fully enhanced resistance to powdery mildew. In contrast, the action of IMI does not induce endogenous synthesis of SA. Instead, IMI is further bioactivated to 6-chloro-2-hydroxypyridinyl-3-carboxylic acid, which is shown here to be a potent inducer of PR1 and inhibitor of SA-sensitive enzymes. Thus, via different mechanisms, these chloropyridinyl- and chlorothiazolyl- neonicotinoids induce SA responses associated with enhanced stress tolerance. response to neonicotinoid insecticides
2010-09-13 | E-GEOD-20188 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The plant response may be triggered by various factors, including pathogens, non-pathogenic microbes, and natural or synthetic molecules, such as salicylic acid (SA), benzo(1,2,3)-Thiadiazole-7-Carbothioic Acid S-Methyl Ester (BTH) that are considered as plant resistance inducers. Resistance inducers mobilize the plant for the synthesis of defense compounds, but they are not directly toxic for the plant. The BTH is an analogue of SA, a molecule naturally synthesized in the plant during systemic acquired resistance (SAR). In this study, we hypothesized that challenging the plant with resistance inducer causes an increase in the level of proteins associated with defence response to external stimuli with primary metabolism and that the action of the choline derivative of the BTH (in the form of the ionic liquid) during induction of resistance in tomato plants is mediated by to some extent similar signaling pathways as it is in the case of unmodified BTH compound. Therefore, this study aimed to identify global proteome changes occurring in tomato plants exposed to resistance inducers as well as to identify common pathways associated with the plant's defense response to (+)ssRNA viruses induced upon both, viral infection and prior resistance inducer treatment. The effect of ionic liquids on changes in plant proteome is not described in the literature. The ionic character of compounds offers a great advantage of using them as the plant resistance inducer. The high chemical and thermal stability, as well as low volatility, guarantees safe application in fields. For that reason, comparing the action of the resistance inducer in the form of an ionic liquid with the core compound (BTH) will help to elucidate the mode of action of ionic liquid derivatives in plant resistance induction. To this end, two RNA-type viruses from different families were tested: tomato mosaic virus (ToMV, Virgaviridae) and potato virus Y (PVY, Potyviridae). The most affected processes presented in the results were: photosynthesis, regulation of oxidative stress, metabolism of glutathione and chitin, cell wall reorganization. The increased impact on the regulation of primary metabolism in inducer-treated plants (both for BTH and cholinium ionic liquid derivative). The response to ToMV and PVY was more intense when infected plants were pre-treated with inducers. The increased abundances of defense priming proteins with changes in cell wall organization may block virus transport from infected spots to other tissue of the host plant so that the losses caused by the disease will be lower.
2022-09-14 | PXD028672 | Pride
Project description:Neonicotinoid insecticides control crop pests based on their action as agonists at the insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor which accepts chloropyridinyl- and chlorothiazolyl- analogs almost equally well. In some cases, these compounds have also been reported to enhance plant vigor and (a)biotic stress tolerance, independent of their insecticidal function. However, this mode of action has not been specifically defined. Using Arabidopsis thaliana, we show that the neonicotinoid compounds, imidacloprid (IMI) and clothianidin (CLO), via their 6-chloropyridinyl-3-carboxylic acid and 2-chlorothiazolyl-5-carboxylic acid metabolites, respectively, induce salicylic acid (SA) – associated plant responses. SA is a phytohormone best known for its role in plant defense against pathogens and as an inducer of systemic acquired resistance; however, it can also modulate abiotic stress responses. These neonicotinoids effect a similar global transcriptional response to that of SA including genes involved in (a)biotic stress response. Furthermore, similar to SA, IMI and CLO induce systemic acquired resistance resulting in reduced growth of a powdery mildew pathogen. The action of CLO induces the endogenous synthesis of SA via the SA biosynthetic enzyme ICS1, with ICS1 required for CLO-induced accumulation of SA, expression of the SA marker PR1, and fully enhanced resistance to powdery mildew. In contrast, the action of IMI does not induce endogenous synthesis of SA. Instead, IMI is further bioactivated to 6-chloro-2-hydroxypyridinyl-3-carboxylic acid, which is shown here to be a potent inducer of PR1 and inhibitor of SA-sensitive enzymes. Thus, via different mechanisms, these chloropyridinyl- and chlorothiazolyl- neonicotinoids induce SA responses associated with enhanced stress tolerance.
2010-09-13 | GSE20188 | GEO
Project description:DCA (3,5-Dichloroanthranilic acid) is a newly identified synthetic defense elicitor. To perform a comparative analysis of defense responses triggered by DCA and the structurally related defense inducer INA (2,6-Dichloroisonicotinic acid) Affymetrix chip experiments were performed with Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings treated with one of these two compounds.
2009-03-20 | GSE13833 | GEO