Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

2 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

A Comparative Study of Human Testes and Epididymis through the Proteomics and RNA-seq Methods

ABSTRACT: A Comparative Study of Human Testes and Epididymis through the Proteomics and RNA-seq Methods

ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens

SUBMITTER: Pengyuan Yang

PROVIDER: PXD026440 | iProX | Thu Jun 03 00:00:00 BST 2021

REPOSITORIES: iProX

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

A Multi-Omics Study of Human Testis and Epididymis.

Zheng Weimin W Zhang Yang Y Sun Chuanyu C Ge Shengyang S Tan Yifan Y Shen Huali H Yang Pengyuan P

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 20210602 11

The human testis and epididymis play critical roles in male fertility, including the spermatogenesis process, sperm storage, and maturation. However, the unique functions of the two organs had not been systematically studied. Herein, we provide a systematic and comprehensive multi-omics study between testis and epididymis. RNA-Seq profiling detected and quantified 19,653 in the testis and 18,407 in the epididymis. Proteomic profiling resulted in the identification of a total of 11,024 and 10,386 ...[more]

PMID: 34199411

Similar Datasets

A Comparative Study of Human Testes and Epididymis through the Proteomics and RNA-seq Methods

Project description:A Comparative Study of Human Testes and Epididymis through the Proteomics and RNA-seq Methods <ul><li>Dataset imported into MassIVE from <a href="https://www.iprox.cn/page/project.html?id=IPX0003098000">https://www.iprox.cn/page/project.html?id=IPX0003098000</a> on 12/10/21</li></ul>

2021-12-13 | MSV000088554 | MassIVE

Systematic comparative analysis of single cell RNA-sequencing methods

Project description:Systematic comparative analysis of single cell RNA-sequencing methods

| PRJNA545730 | ENA

Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods

Project description:Strand-specific massively-parallel cDNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is a powerful tool for novel transcript discovery, genome annotation, and expression profiling. Despite multiple published methods for strand-specific RNA-Seq, no consensus exists as to how to choose between them. Here, we developed a comprehensive computational pipeline for the comparison of library quality metrics from any RNA-Seq method. Using the well-annotated Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptome as a benchmark, we compared seven library construction protocols, including both published and our own novel methods. We found marked differences in complexity, strand-specificity, evenness and continuity of coverage, agreement with known annotations, and accuracy for expression profiling. Weighing each method’s performance and ease, we identify the dUTP second strand marking and the Illumina RNA ligation methods as the leading protocols, with the former benefitting from the availability of paired-end sequencing. Our analysis provides a comprehensive benchmark, and our computational pipeline is applicable for assessment of future protocols in any organism. Examination of 11 different strand-specific RNA-Seq libraries from 7 distinct methods; also 2 control non-strand-specific RNA-Seq libraries. To assess the performance of each strand-specific library in digital expression profiling, we compared them to reference expression measurements estimated from expression profiles using competitive hybridization of a mid-log RNA sample vs. genomic DNA using Agilent arrays.

2010-08-15 | E-GEOD-21739 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing methods with and without sample multiplexing

Project description:Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has emerged as a powerful technique for investigating biological heterogeneity at the single-cell level in human systems and model organisms. Recent advances in scRNA-seq have enabled the pooling of cells from multiple samples into single libraries, thereby increasing sample throughput while reducing technical batch effects, library preparation time, and the overall cost. However, a comparative analysis of scRNA-seq methods with and without sample multiplexing is lacking. In this study, we benchmarked methods from two representative platforms: Parse Biosciences (Parse; with sample multiplexing) and 10X Genomics (10x; without sample multiplexing). By using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from two healthy individuals, we demonstrate that demultiplexed scRNA-seq data obtained from Parse showed similar cell type frequencies compared to 10X data where samples are not multiplexed. Despite a relatively lower library and cell capture efficiencies, Parse can detect rare cell types (e.g., plasmablasts and dendritic cells) which is likely due to its relatively higher sensitivity in gene detection. Moreover, comparative analysis of transcript quantification between the two platforms revealed platform-specific distributions of gene length and GC content. These results offer guidance for researchers in designing high-throughput scRNA-seq studies.

2024-03-24 | GSE246624 | GEO

Comparative evaluation of RNA-Seq library preparation methods for strand-specificity and low input

Project description:Comparative evaluation of RNA-Seq library preparation methods for strand-specificity and low input

| PRJNA510931 | ENA

Comprehensive comparative analysis of RNA sequencing methods for degraded or low input samples

Project description:RNA-Seq is an effective method to study the transcriptome, but can be difficult to apply to scarce or degraded RNA from fixed clinical samples, rare cell populations, or cadavers. Recent studies have proposed several methods for RNA-Seq of low quality and/or low quantity samples, but their relative merits have not been systematically analyzed. Here, we compare five such methods using a comprehensive set of metrics, relevant to applications such as transcriptome annotation, transcript discovery, and gene expression. Using a single human RNA sample, we constructed and deeply sequenced 10 libraries with these methods and two control libraries. We find that the RNase H method performed best for low quality RNA, and can even effectively replace oligo (dT) based methods for standard RNA-Seq. SMART and NuGEN had distinct strengths for low quantity RNA. Our analysis allows biologists to select the most suitable methods and provides a benchmark for future method development. Examination of 9 different RNA-Seq libraries starting from total RNA from 5 distinct methods; also 3 control RNA-Seq libraries

2013-05-15 | E-GEOD-40705 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Comprehensive comparative analysis of 5’ end RNA sequencing methods

Project description:RNA-Seq is an effective method to study the transcriptome, but specialized methods are required to identify 5’ ends of transcripts. Several published strategies exist for this specific purpose, but their relative merits have not been systematically analyzed. Here, we directly compare the performance of six such methods – testing five with cellular RNA as well as a novel spike-in RNA assay that helps address interpretation challenges that arise from uncertainties in annotation or RNA processing. Using a single human RNA sample, we constructed and sequenced 18 libraries with these methods and one standard, control RNA-Seq library. We find that the CAGE method performed best for mRNA and that most of its unannotated peaks are supported by evidence from other genomic methods. We then applied CAGE to eight brain-related samples and revealed sample-specific transcription start site (TSS) usage as well as a transcriptome-wide shift in TSS usage between fetal and adult brain.

2018-03-21 | GSE103486 | GEO

Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods

2010-08-15 | GSE21739 | GEO

Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing methods

Project description:Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) offers new possibilities to address biological and medical questions. However, systematic comparisons of the performance of diverse scRNA-seq protocols are lacking. We generated data from 583 mouse embryonic stem cells to evaluate six prominent scRNA-seq methods: CEL-seq2, Drop-seq, MARS-seq, SCRB-seq, Smart-seq and Smart-seq2. While Smart-seq2 detected the most genes per cell and across cells, CEL-seq2, Drop-seq, MARS-seq and SCRB-seq quantified mRNA levels with less amplification noise due to the use of unique molecular identifiers (UMIs). Power simulations at different sequencing depths showed that Drop-seq is more cost-efficient for transcriptome quantification of large numbers of cells, while MARS-seq, SCRB-seq and Smart-seq2 are more efficient when analyzing fewer cells. Our quantitative comparison offers the basis for an informed choice among six prominent scRNA-seq methods and provides a framework for benchmarking further improvements of scRNA-seq protocols.

2016-09-09 | GSE75790 | GEO

Sorghum RNA-seq data of comparative transcriptome study

Project description:Sorghum RNA-seq data of comparative transcriptome study

| PRJEB22168 | ENA