Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cc125 SEP
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii
SUBMITTER: 
Yao Sheng
PROVIDER: PXD033320 | iProX | Thu Apr 21 00:00:00 BST 2022
REPOSITORIES: iProX
Similar Datasets
Project description:Cells were washed with cold PBS twice and scraped from the plates, then centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min to pellet cells. Washed cells were lysed with 400 L of cell lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.15% NP-40 and proteinase inhibitor cocktail) and incubated on ice for 10 min. The suspension was carefully add at the top of sucrose buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 24% sucrose), and centrifuged at 3200g for 10 min to collect nuclear pellets. Pellets were resuspended in 250 L of Glycerol buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 75 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA pH8.0, 50% glycerol), then then immediately add 250 μl Nuclear lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 7.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA pH8.0, 1% NP-40, 1M urea). Mix by vortexing for 4 s and incubate on ice for 2 min. Centrifuge the lysate at 13,000 × g for 2 min to precipitate the chromatin–RNA complex. Briefly rinse the chromatin pellets with PBS-EDTA. RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent. RNA libraries were prepared according to manual of SMARTer smRNA-Seq Kit for Illumina (Clontech, 635031).
2019-10-15 | GSE134103 | GEO
Project description:Flag-YBX1 overexpressed T24 cells pellets were resuspended with 2 volume of lysis buffer (150 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5 mM DTT, 1:100 protease inhibitor cocktail, 400 U/ml RNase inhibitor), and incubated at 4 °C for 30 min with rotation. Then the lysate was centrifuged at 15 000 g for 20 min. Before incubating the lysate with Flag beads, 100ul were taken as input. The anti-Flag M2 magnetic beads (Sigma, 10 μl per mg lysate) were washed with NT2 buffer (200 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 2 mM EDTA, 0.05% NP-40, 0.5 mM DTT, 200 U/ml RNase inhibitor) four times. Cell lysate was mixed with M2 beads and incubated at 4 °C for 4 h with rotation. The beads were washed two times with 1 ml ice-cold NT2 buffer. Then the beads were subject to Micrococal nuclease (NEB) digestion (1:1 000 000 dilution) for 8 min at 37 °C. The beads were cooled on ice immediately for 5 min and washed two times with 1 ml ice-cold 1× PNK+EGTA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 20 mM EDTA, 0.05% NP-40, 200 U/ml RNase inhibitor) and two times with 1 ml ice-cold 1× PK buffer (50 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 0.2% SDS, 200 U/ml RNase inhibitor). Then the beads were digested with 200 μl pre-heated (20 min at 50 °C) Proteinase K and RNAs were extracted with an equal volume of Acid-Phenol: Chloroform, pH 4.5 (Ambion). The RNAs were subjected to rRNA removal and Bisseq. The libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq X-Ten platform at Novogene (Tianjin, CA) with paired-end 150 bp read length.The m5C sites were called using meRanCall from meRanTK (FDR < 0.01).
2019-07-02 | GSE133625 | GEO
Project description:Glioblastoma stem cells (TS-543) were harvested and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 mins at room temperature. The cells were lysed using SDS Lysis buffer for ChIP (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8). The lysate was then sonicated for 25 cycles at 30% amplitude (15 s ON and 45 s OFF). The sonicated samples were then diluted in ChIP dilution buffer (0.01% SDS, 1% Triton-X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 167 mM NaCl) and used for the immunoprecipitation with H3K27ac (Abcam, Ab4729), H2AZ (Active motive, cat#39113) and H3K27ac (Abcam cat#ab8580). After an over-night incubation with antibody, the bound DNA was washed sequentially with low salt wash buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X 100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl), high salt wash buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 500 mM NaCl), LiCl wash buffer (0.25 M LiCl, 1% NP40, 1%deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8) and TE wash buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 1 mM EDTA) to remove non-specific sequences and eluted in the elution buffer (84 mg NaHCO3, 1 ml 10% SDS, 9 ml H2O). Then the samples were reverse cross-linked using NaCl at 65°C overnight. The eluted DNA was purified and used for library preparation. Library preparation was performed as previously described as described in Bowman et al. BMC Genomics 2013. Briefly, end repair with NEBNext End Repair enzyme (NEB, E6050) and clean-up with 2.4x volume AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, A63880). A-tailing with Klenow Fragment (NEB, M0212) and purified with 2.4x volume AMPure XP beads. Adapter ligation reactions contained annealed universal adapter and T4 rapid ligase (NEB, B0202) and clean-up with 1.8x volume AMPure XP beads. Chromatin was amplified using KAPA Real-time Library Amplification Kit (KAPABIOSYSTEMS, KK2701) with universal primer and barcoded primer. Amplified chromatin was purified with QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced paired-end with Illumina NextSeq 500.
2021-09-05 | GSE152862 | GEO
Project description:Samples were purchased from Clontech as mRNA. Hybridization material was generated through a random-priming amplification procedure (RP-AMP) using primers with a random sequence at the 3' end and a fixed motif at the 5' end. shDNP256 (first strand synthesis): 5'- TAG ATG CTG TTG NNN NNN NNN -3' shT7N9 (second strand synthesis): 5'- ACT ATA GGG AGA NNN NNN NNN -3' 1.5 g of mRNA was reverse-transcribed with Superscript II and the DP256 random primer for 20 minutes at 42 C (10 mM DTT, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 5 U/ l Superscript II). The RNA was degraded with the addition of 20 l volume of 0.5N sodium hydroxide and 0.25 M EDTA for 20 minutes at 65 C. The single stranded cDNA was purified using a commercial kit (Qiagen Qiaquick). The resulting product of single stranded cDNA was placed in its entirety in a second strand reaction. Second strand synthesis reactions utilized shT7N9 random primer and the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase utilizing standard reaction conditions (37 C for 60 minutes, 0.2 mM DTT, 2.1 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.9, 2.1 mM MgCl2, 10.7 mM NaCl, 1.07 mM dNTPs, 0.1U/ l Klenow), followed by another Qiaquick purification. Multiple polymerase chain reactions were run using 0.15 g of double stranded DNA and standard reaction conditions. Amplification was achieved using 10 cycles of PCR with the DP256 and T7 primers (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.4, 50 mM KCl, 0.01 mM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01 U/ l Taq Polymerase) DP256: 5'- GTT CGA GAC CTC TAG ATG CTG TTG -3' T7: 5'- AA TTA ATA CGA CTC ACT ATA GGG AGA -3' followed by Qiaquick purification. Further amplification was achieved using in vitro transcription reactions with X0.5 g dsDNA and T7 RNA Polymerase (7.5 mM DTT, 40 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 14.25 mM MgCl2, 10 mM NaCl, 2 mM Spermidine, 125 U/ml RNAguard, 2.5 mM dNTPs, 15 U/ml IPPase, 25kU/ml T7 Polymerase) for 16 hours at 42 C. The cRNA was purified (RNeasy) and reverse transcribed using Superscript and random 9-mers and amino-allyl dUTP (42 C for 20 minutes, 10 mM DTT, 50mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 0.5 mM aa-dUTP, 5 U/ l Superscript II). The cDNA for each channel was covalently coupled separately with Cy5 and Cy3 monoreactive fluors, respectively, in 1M sodium bicarbonate, pH 9.0, followed by quenching with 4.0 M hydroxylamine. The Cy5 and Cy3 labelled cDNAs were purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit and the percentage dye incorporation and total cDNA yield was determined spectrophotometrically. Cy5 and Cy3 labelled cDNAs were combined and added to 2 mls 30% formamide with Herring Sperm DNA for hybridization to the microarray. Further details can be found in Castle et al., Genome Biol 2003;4(10):R66, http://genomebiology.com/2003/4/10/R66 , Roberts CJ et al., Science 2000, 287:873-880, and Schadt, Edwards, et al., unpublished. Normalization of single channel data is described in Ying, et al., "Identification of Chromosomal Regions Containing Transcribed Sequences Using Microarrays and Computational Methods" , 2003 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Biopharmaceutical Section [CD-ROM], Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 2003. Briefly, an invariant set of probes was selected based on their intensity ranks. Then, a LOESS regression model was fit for Cy5 vs. Cy3 intensities for all probes in the invariant set. Finally, for all probes on the array the Cy5 intensities were normalized to the corresponding Cy3 intensities using prediction values from the regression model. Note that the normalized intensity values given here were used for all analyses reported in the accompanying paper. The ratio values reported here were not used for the analysis described in the manuscript and are not calculated from the normalized intensity values given below. Keywords: other
2004-03-04 | GSE1097 | GEO
Project description:Glands were frozen at -80 ºC immediately after being retrieved and stored under this condition until initiating the proteomics analysis protocol. Glands were washed with cold PBS and immersed in 120 l of homogenization buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10 mM DTT, 4% (w/v) SDS). Glands were boiled for 5 min, incubated overnight at 4 ºC and centrifuged at 4 ºC and 13000 rpm for 10 min. The whole gland proteome of each gland was concentrated as described elsewhere (Bonzon-Kulichenko, F. Garcia-Marques, M. Trevisan-Herraz and J. Vazquez, Journal of Proteome Research, 2015, 14, 700-710 (DOI:10.1021/pr5007284).Briefly, samples were loaded into an SDS-PAGE gel (0.5 mm-thick, 4% stacking, and 10% resolving) and the electrophoresis process was stopped when the front entered 2 mm into the resolving gel. The unseparated protein bands were then visualized by Coomassie staining, excised and digested at 37 ºC overnight with 500 l of 25 g/l chymotrypsin (Promega) in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8 containing 10 mM CaCl2. The cleaved peptides were extracted by incubation for 2 h in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8 on shaking, acidized with 1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid, desalted onto C18 cartridges (Oasis, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA), and dried down.The analysis of the samples proceeded through liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using an Easy nLC 1000 nano-HPLC coupled to a Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Themo Scientific). Peptides were injected onto a C18 reverse-phase precolumn (Acclaim PepMap100, 75-m i.d., 3-m particle size, 2-cm length, Thermo Scientific), and a reverse-phase analytical column (Acclaim PepMap 100, 75-m, i.d., 3-m particle size, 50-cm length, Thermo Scientific) in buffer A [0.1% formic acid (v/v)] and eluted with a 60 min linear gradient of buffer B [90% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid (v/v)], at 200 nL/min. Mass spectrometry (MS) runs consisted of 70000 FT-resolution spectra in the 390-1200 m/z wide range, followed by data-dependent MS/MS spectra of the 15 most intense parent ions acquired along the chromatographic run. High-energy collisional (HCD) fragmentation was performed at 27% of normalized collision energy and the isolation window for the parent ion mass was established at 2 Da.
2022-12-07 | PXD023141 | Pride
Project description:10 µm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinized with xylene; homogenization was performed in lysis-buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 200 mM glycine, 200 mM DTT, 4% SDS)in an ultrasonic bath; samples were incubated under continuous agitation first at 99 °C for 30 min, then at 80 °C for 60 min, afterwards centrifuged at 12,000xg for 10 min. 50 µg of protein lysate were further processed according the GASP (Gel-assisted sample preparation) protocol; peptide identification (IDA, information dependent acquisition) and SWATH measurements by LC-MS/MS on TripleTOF5600 (AB Sciex)
2020-05-18 | PXD012317 | Pride
Project description:Samples were purchased from Clontech as mRNA. Hybridization material was generated through a random-priming amplification procedure (RP-AMP) using primers with a random sequence at the 3' end and a fixed motif at the 5' end. shDNP256 (first strand synthesis): 5'- TAG ATG CTG TTG NNN NNN NNN -3' shT7N9 (second strand synthesis): 5'- ACT ATA GGG AGA NNN NNN NNN -3' 1.5 g of mRNA was reverse-transcribed with Superscript II and the DP256 random primer for 20 minutes at 42 C (10 mM DTT, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 5 U/ l Superscript II). The RNA was degraded with the addition of 20 l volume of 0.5N sodium hydroxide and 0.25 M EDTA for 20 minutes at 65 C. The single stranded cDNA was purified using a commercial kit (Qiagen Qiaquick). The resulting product of single stranded cDNA was placed in its entirety in a second strand reaction. Second strand synthesis reactions utilized shT7N9 random primer and the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase utilizing standard reaction conditions (37 C for 60 minutes, 0.2 mM DTT, 2.1 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.9, 2.1 mM MgCl2, 10.7 mM NaCl, 1.07 mM dNTPs, 0.1U/ l Klenow), followed by another Qiaquick purification. Multiple polymerase chain reactions were run using 0.15 g of double stranded DNA and standard reaction conditions. Amplification was achieved using 10 cycles of PCR with the DP256 and T7 primers (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.4, 50 mM KCl, 0.01 mM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01 U/ l Taq Polymerase) DP256: 5'- GTT CGA GAC CTC TAG ATG CTG TTG -3' T7: 5'- AA TTA ATA CGA CTC ACT ATA GGG AGA -3' followed by Qiaquick purification. Further amplification was achieved using in vitro transcription reactions with X0.5 g dsDNA and T7 RNA Polymerase (7.5 mM DTT, 40 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 14.25 mM MgCl2, 10 mM NaCl, 2 mM Spermidine, 125 U/ml RNAguard, 2.5 mM dNTPs, 15 U/ml IPPase, 25kU/ml T7 Polymerase) for 16 hours at 42 C. The cRNA was purified (RNeasy) and reverse transcribed using Superscript and random 9-mers and amino-allyl dUTP (42 C for 20 minutes, 10 mM DTT, 50mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 0.5 mM aa-dUTP, 5 U/ l Superscript II). The cDNA for each channel was covalently coupled separately with Cy5 and Cy3 monoreactive fluors, respectively, in 1M sodium bicarbonate, pH 9.0, followed by quenching with 4.0 M hydroxylamine. The Cy5 and Cy3 labelled cDNAs were purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit and the percentage dye incorporation and total cDNA yield was determined spectrophotometrically. Cy5 and Cy3 labelled cDNAs were combined and added to 2 mls 30% formamide with Herring Sperm DNA for hybridization to the microarray. Further details can be found in Castle et al., Genome Biol 2003;4(10):R66, http://genomebiology.com/2003/4/10/R66 , Roberts CJ et al., Science 2000, 287:873-880, and Schadt, Edwards, et al., unpublished. Normalization of single channel data is described in Ying, et al., "Identification of Chromosomal Regions Containing Transcribed Sequences Using Microarrays and Computational Methods" , 2003 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Biopharmaceutical Section [CD-ROM], Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 2003. Briefly, an invariant set of probes was selected based on their intensity ranks. Then, a LOESS regression model was fit for Cy5 vs. Cy3 intensities for all probes in the invariant set. Finally, for all probes on the array the Cy5 intensities were normalized to the corresponding Cy3 intensities using prediction values from the regression model. Note that the normalized intensity values given here were used for all analyses reported in the accompanying paper. The ratio values reported here were not used for the analysis described in the manuscript and are not calculated from the normalized intensity values given below.
2004-03-03 | E-GEOD-1097 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Immunoaffinity Purifications of Human Argonaute Twelve hours after transfections with mock or with miR-124, we washed each 15-cm plate once with phosphate-buffered saline (usually two plates were used per IP), then added 1 ml of 4 C lysis buffer (150 mM KCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 5 mM Na-EDTA [pH 8.0], 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.5 mM DTT, 10 ul protease inhibitor cocktail [Pierce Cat# 78437], 100 U/ml SUPERaseIn [Ambion Cat# AM2694]). Following a 30-min incubation at 4 C, we scraped the plates, combined the lysates, and then spun them at 4 C for 30 min at 14,000 RPM in a microcentrifuge. We collected the supernatant and filtered it through a 0.45-um syringe filter. We froze an aliquot of lysate in liquid nitrogen for reference RNA isolation. We then added 0.22 mg/ml heparin to the lysate. We mixed the lysate with 2.5 mg of Dynal m-280 streptavidin beads (250 ul from original storage solution) coupled to biotinylated 4F9 ago antibody (~12.5 ug), which we equilibrated immediately prior to use by washing twice with 1 ml of lysis buffer. We incubated the beads with the lysate for 2 h at 4 C and then washed the beads twice with 1.25 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer for 5-min each. Five percent of the beads were frozen for SDS PAGE analysis after the second wash. RNA was extracted directly from the remaining beads using lysis buffer from Invitrogen's Micro-to-Midi kit (Invitrogen Cat# 12183-018). We purified RNA from the lysate and RNA extracted from the beads with the Micro-to-Midi kit as per vender's instructions, except that the percentage isopropanol used for binding to the column was 70%, instead of 33%, to promote the binding of small RNAs. RNA was amplified with ambion kit 1755. RNA from total cell lysate was labeled with cy3 and IPd RNA was labeled with cy5
2009-11-10 | GSE18834 | GEO
Project description:SILAC-labeled MRC-5 cells were seeded in 75-cm2 flasks 1 day before infection with CHIKV-LS3 [1] at MOI 5. One hour post infection (h p.i.), the inoculum was removed and replaced with SILAC DMEM containing 2% dialyzed FBS, 0.280 mM arginine, 0.384 mM lysine, 0.5 mM proline, 25 mM HEPES, 2 mM L-Glutamine and 1% NEAA. At 2, 8, and 12 h p.i., infected and mock-infected cells were harvested for phosphoproteomics analysis by lysis in 4% SDS, 0.1M Tris pH 7.6, followed by heating to 96°C for 10 min. At 12 h p.i,. protein lysates for western blot (WB) analysis were harvested in 4× Laemmli sample buffer (LSB) (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 40% glycerol, 8% SDS, 40 mM DTT, 0,04 mg/ml bromophenol blue) and cells grown on coverslips were fixed in 3% PFA in PBS . The experiment was performed in duplicate with a label swap.
2022-02-28 | PXD009381 | Pride
Project description:Immunoaffinity Purifications of Human Argonaute Twelve hours after transfections with mock or with miR-124, we washed each 15-cm plate once with phosphate-buffered saline (usually two plates were used per IP), then added 1 ml of 4 C lysis buffer (150 mM KCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 5 mM Na-EDTA [pH 8.0], 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.5 mM DTT, 10 ul protease inhibitor cocktail [Pierce Cat# 78437], 100 U/ml SUPERaseIn [Ambion Cat# AM2694]). Following a 30-min incubation at 4 C, we scraped the plates, combined the lysates, and then spun them at 4 C for 30 min at 14,000 RPM in a microcentrifuge. We collected the supernatant and filtered it through a 0.45-um syringe filter. We froze an aliquot of lysate in liquid nitrogen for reference RNA isolation. We then added 0.22 mg/ml heparin to the lysate. We mixed the lysate with 2.5 mg of Dynal m-280 streptavidin beads (250 ul from original storage solution) coupled to biotinylated 4F9 ago antibody (~12.5 ug), which we equilibrated immediately prior to use by washing twice with 1 ml of lysis buffer. We incubated the beads with the lysate for 2 h at 4 C and then washed the beads twice with 1.25 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer for 5-min each. Five percent of the beads were frozen for SDS PAGE analysis after the second wash. RNA was extracted directly from the remaining beads using lysis buffer from Invitrogen's Micro-to-Midi kit (Invitrogen Cat# 12183-018). We purified RNA from the lysate and RNA extracted from the beads with the Micro-to-Midi kit as per vender's instructions, except that the percentage isopropanol used for binding to the column was 70%, instead of 33%, to promote the binding of small RNAs. RNA was amplified with ambion kit 1755. RNA from total cell lysate was labeled with cy3 and IPd RNA was labeled with cy5 An all pairs experiment design type is where all labeled extracts are compared to every other labeled extract.
2010-06-20 | E-GEOD-18834 | biostudies-arrayexpress