Dataset Information

Sample complete submission with converted mzTab file

ABSTRACT: This dataset's mzTab file was generated by our own TSV to mzTab file conversion workflow. We expect all IDs to be easily traceable back to the included MGF file, and consequently fully visualizable in the dataset's result view.

INSTRUMENT(S): LTQ

ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (ncbitaxon:9606)

SUBMITTER: Jeremy Carver

PROVIDER: MSV000078886 | MassIVE | Mon Oct 06 10:45:00 BST 2014

REPOSITORIES: MassIVE

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionStudies of the delay between when companies file a New Drug Submission (NDS) and when drugs reach Canadian patients typically focus on the time in the regulatory review process and do not analyze the time between when approval is granted and the drug is available for purchase (company decision time). This study looks at the length of the two different time periods. Secondarily, it examines whether there is a difference in these time periods for drugs that received a standard review and those that received an expedited review.MethodsA list of all New Active Substances approved in Canada between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 was compiled and the dates when the companies applied for a NDS, the dates when the drugs received a market authorization (Notice of Compliance, NOC) and whether the drugs received a standard review or an expedited review were recorded. The date of original marketing comes from Health Canada's Drug Product Database. Times in days were calculated between NDS and NOC (review time), between NOC and the marketing date (company decision time) and between NDS and the marketing date (total time). The company decision time as a percent of the total time was calculated for all drugs. Times were compared between standard and expedited review drugs using a two-tailed t-test.ResultsOne hundred and fifty-seven drugs were analyzed, 98 had a standard review and 59 had a priority review. Over 18% of the total time was due to company decisions. All three times were significantly lower for expedited review drugs versus standard review drugs as was the percent of total time due to company decision- 14.4% (95% CI 11.0, 17.8) versus 21.2% (95% CI 17.6, 24.8), p = 0.0102 (t-test).ConclusionsOver 18% of the total time between when companies file for drug approval until the drug is available is due to decisions made by companies. Company decision times are shorter for drugs with expedited approvals compared to drugs with standard approvals.

Dataset Information

Sample complete submission with converted mzTab file

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets