Kraus and Zhang. Synovial Fluid vs Plasma Extracellular Vesicles in Knee Osteoarthritis
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): Orbitrap Fusion Lumos
ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (ncbitaxon:9606)
SUBMITTER: 
Virginia Kraus
PROVIDER: MSV000091457 | MassIVE | Thu Mar 09 16:46:00 GMT 2023
REPOSITORIES: MassIVE
Similar Datasets
Project description:Quantitative LC/MS/MS was performed on 2 uL using an MClass UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) equipped with a FAIMSPro device via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm x 180 um trapping column (5 ul/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 um Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 um x 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed for three difference compensation voltages (-40v, -60v, -80v). Within each CV, a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with a r 120,000 (m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 - 1500 with a target AGC value of 4e5 ions was performed. MS/MS scans were acquired in the ion trap in Rapid mode with a target AGC value of 1e4 and max fill time of 35 ms. The total cycle time for each CV was 0.66s, with total cycle times of 2 sec between like full MS scans. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each injection was approximately 2 hours.
2023-04-04 | MSV000091630 | MassIVE
Project description:Quantitative LC/MS/MS was performed on 2 uL using an MClass UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) equipped with a FAIMSPro device via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm x 180 um trapping column (5 ul/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 um Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 um x 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed for three difference compensation voltages (-40v, -60v, -80v). Within each CV, a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with a r 120,000 (m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 - 1500 with a target AGC value of 4e5 ions was performed. MS/MS scans were acquired in the ion trap in Rapid mode with a target AGC value of 1e4 and max fill time of 35 ms. The total cycle time for each CV was 0.66s, with total cycle times of 2 sec between like full MS scans. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each injection was approximately 2 hou
2023-03-03 | MSV000091407 | MassIVE
Project description:Quantitative LC/MS/MS was performed on 2 uL of each sample, using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) equipied with a FAIMS device via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm x 180 um trapping column (5 ul/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/ac etonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 um Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 um x 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed for three difference compensation voltages (-40, 60, 80). Within each CV, a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with a r=120,000 (@ m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375-1500 with a target AGC value of 4e5 ions was performed. MS/MS scans were acquired at Rapid scan rate (Ion Trap) with an AGC target of 1e4 ions and a max injection time of 100 ms. The total cycle time for each CV was 0.66s, with total cycle times of 2 sec between like MS scans. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each sample injection was approximately 2 hours.
2021-05-26 | MSV000087520 | MassIVE
Project description:Quantitative LC/MS/MS was performed on 2 uL (1 ug) of each sample, using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) equipped with a FAIMSPro device via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm x 180 um trapping column (5 ul/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 um Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 um x 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed for three difference compensation voltages (-40v, -60v, -80v). Within each CV, a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with a r 120,000 (m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 - 1500 with a target AGC value of 4e5 ions was performed. MS/MS scans were acquired in the Orbitrap at r 50,000 ( m/z 200) from m/z 100 with a target AGC value of 1e5 and max fill time of 35 ms. The total cycle time for each CV was 1s, with total cycle times of 3 sec between like full MS scans. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each sample injection was approximately 2 hours.
2023-11-27 | MSV000093511 | MassIVE
Project description:Quantitative LC-MS/MS was performed on 2.5 uL (6%) of each sample, using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) equipped with a FAIMSPro device via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm x 180 um trapping column (5 ul/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 um Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 um x 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed for three difference compensation voltages (40v, 60v, 80v). Within each CV, a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with a r=120,000 (m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 - 1500 with a target AGC value of 4e5 ions was performed. MS/MS scans were acquired in the Orbitrap at r=50,000 (m/z 200) from m/z 100 with a target AGC value of 1e5 and max fill time of 35 ms. The total cycle time for each CV was 1s, with total cycle times of 3 sec between like full MS scans. A 45s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each fraction injection was approximately 2 hours.
Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis. Next, data was imported into Proteome Discoverer 2.5 (Thermo Scientific Inc.) and all LC-MS/MS runs were aligned based on the accurate mass and retention time of detected ions (features) which contained MS/MS spectra using Minora Feature Detector algorithm in Proteome Discoverer. Relative peptide abundance was calculated based on area under the curve (AUC) of the selected ion chromatograms of the aligned features across all runs.
2021-08-19 | MSV000088005 | MassIVE
Project description:Quantitative LC-MS/MS was performed on 4 uL of each sample, using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm x 180 um trapping column (5 ul/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 um Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 um x 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 3 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed in a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with a r=120,000 (m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 - 1500 with a target AGC value of 2e5 ions. MS/MS scans were acquired at Rapid scan rate (Ion Trap) with an AGC target of 5e3 ions and a max injection time of 200 ms. The total cycle time for MS and MS/MS scans was 2 sec. A 20 sec dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each sample injection was approximately 2 hours.
2021-06-15 | MSV000087623 | MassIVE
Project description:Quantitative LC/MS/MS was performed on 2 uL of each sample, using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm x 180 um trapping column (5 ul/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 um Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 um x 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed in a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with a r=120,000 (m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 - 1500 with a target AGC value of 2e5 ions. MS/MS scans were acquired at Rapid scan rate (Ion Trap) with an AGC target of 5e3 ions and a max injection time of 100 ms. The total cycle time for MS and MS/MS scans was 2 sec. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each sample injection was approximately 2 hours.
2022-12-05 | MSV000090835 | MassIVE
Project description:Qualitative LC MS/MS was performed on 4 uL of each sample, using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Orbitrap Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm x 180 um trapping column (5 ul/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 um Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 um x 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 3 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed in a data dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with a r=120,000 (@ m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 to 1500 with a target AGC value of 2e5 ions. MS/MS scans were acquired at Rapid scan rate (Ion Trap) with an AGC target of 5e3 ions and a max injection time of 200 ms. The total cycle time for MS and MS/MS scans was 2 sec. A 20 sec dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each sample injection was approximately 2 hours.
2021-06-14 | MSV000087618 | MassIVE
Project description:Quantitative LC/MS/MS was performed on 3 uL of each sample, using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters Corp) coupled to a Thermo Fusion Lumos high resolution accurate mass tandem mass spectrometer (Thermo) via a nanoelectrospray ionization source. Briefly, the sample was first trapped on a Symmetry C18 20 mm x 180 um trapping column (5 ul/min at 99.9/0.1 v/v water/acetonitrile), after which the analytical separation was performed using a 1.8 um Acquity HSS T3 C18 75 um x 250 mm column (Waters Corp.) with a 90-min linear gradient of 5 to 30% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 400 nanoliters/minute (nL/min) with a column temperature of 55C. Data collection on the Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer was performed in a data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode of acquisition with an r=120,000 (@ m/z 200) full MS scan from m/z 375 - 1500 and a target AGC value of 2e5 ions with a 2 sec cycle time. Ion trap MS/MS scans were acquired with a Rapid scan rate, 100 ms max injection time, and a target AGC value of 5e3 ions. A 20s dynamic exclusion was employed to increase depth of coverage. The total analysis cycle time for each sample injection was approximately 2 hours.
Following 15 total UPLC-MS/MS analyses (excluding conditioning runs, but including 3 replicate QC injections; Table 1), data was imported into Proteome Discoverer 2.2 (Thermo Scientific Inc.), and analyses were aligned based on the accurate mass and retention time of detected ions (features) using Minora Feature Detector algorithm in Proteome Discoverer. Relative peptide abundance was calculated based on area-under-the-curve (AUC) of the selected ion chromatograms of the aligned features across all runs. The MS/MS data was searched against the TrEMBL D. rerio database (downloaded in May 2018) with additional proteins, including yeast ADH1, bovine serum albumin, as well as an equal number of reversed-sequence decoys) false discovery rate determination. Mascot Distiller and Mascot Server (v 2.5, Matrix Sciences) were utilized to produce fragment ion spectra and to perform the database searches. Database search parameters included fixed modification on Cys (carbamidomethyl) and variable modifications on Meth (oxidation) and Asn and Gln (deamidation). Peptide Validator and Protein FDR Validator nodes in Proteome Discoverer were used to annotate the data at a maximum 1% protein false discovery rate.
2021-03-10 | MSV000087028 | MassIVE
Project description:We generated two mouse models of Azin1 A-to-I editing. In the first model, the editing site is locked in the edited state (AGC serine to GGC glycine). In the second model, the editing site is disrupted while preserving the codon composition (AGC serine to TCC serine). Bulk total RNA-seq was performed on kidney tissues under basal conditions and 24 hours after 20 min bilateral renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.
2024-01-20 | GSE253286 | GEO