Wine metagenome
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Comparison between two commercial wine yeast strains (UCD522 and P29) differing in their production of H2S during wine fermentation.
2009-12-03 | GSE16215 | GEO
Project description:Comparative gene expression analysis of two wine yeast strains at three time points (days 2, 5 and 14) during fermentation of colombar must. In our study we conducted parallel fermentations with the VIN13 and BM45 wine yeast strains in two different media, namely MS300 (syntheticmust) and Colombar must. The intersection of transcriptome datasets from both MS300 (simulated wine must;GSE11651) and Colombar fermentations should help to delineate relevant and ‘noisy’ changes in gene expression in response to experimental factors such as fermentation stage and strain identity.
2009-05-01 | GSE13695 | GEO
Project description:The correct development of malolactic fermentation depends on the capacity of Oenococcus oeni to survive under harsh wine conditions. In this study it was characterized the transcriptomic response of O. oeni PSU-1 during the adaptation to wine-like medium (WLM). The period evaluated was from the inoculation into WLM (12% v/v pH 3.4) until the beginning of malolactic fermentation (8h after inoculation).
2017-02-12 | GSE85137 | GEO
Project description:Comparative gene expression analysis of two wine yeast strains at three time points (days 2, 5 and 14) during fermentation of colombar must. In our study we conducted parallel fermentations with the VIN13 and BM45 wine yeast strains in two different media, namely MS300 (syntheticmust) and Colombar must. The intersection of transcriptome datasets from both MS300 (simulated wine must;GSE11651) and Colombar fermentations should help to delineate relevant and ânoisyâ changes in gene expression in response to experimental factors such as fermentation stage and strain identity. Experiment Overall Design: Two industrial wine yeast strains (BM45 and VIN13) grown micro-aerobically in Colombar must. Microarray analysis was performed at three time points during fermentation (days 2, 5 and 14), representing the exponential, early and late stationary growth phases respectively.
2009-05-14 | E-GEOD-13695 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Goal was to identify yeast genes whose expression changed as a function of the presence/absence of lipid nutrients during fermentation of two S. cerevisiae wine strains characterized by a different fermentative behaviour.
2019-07-31 | GSE130016 | GEO
Project description:We performed here the transcriptomic profile of 44 segregants from a cross between S288c and 59A (a spore of EC1118 strain). The analysis was performed in wine fermentation condition in stationary phase during nitrogen starvation and in alcoholic stress. These data, associated with an individual genotyping by Affymetrix array allow us to highlight genetic variations involved in perturbation of regulatory network and fermentative behavior.
2013-10-21 | GSE41025 | GEO
Project description:Comparison between two commercial wine yeast strains (UCD522 and P29) differing in their production of H2S during wine fermentation. Due to the characteristics of the strains (commercial, non-standard wine strains), the experiment was duplicated using two completely different platforms and techniques (cDNA-based and in situ synthesized oligonucleotide-based). UCD522 and P29 wine microfermentations were performed in parallel and yeast samples were taken at the stage of fastest fermentation rate. Two biological replicates per yeast strain.
2010-05-18 | E-GEOD-16215 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:We used genome-wide expression analyses to study the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to stress throughout a 15-day wine fermentation. Forty percent of the yeast genome significantly changed expression levels to mediate long-term adaptation to an environment in which ethanol is both a stressor and a carbon source. Within this set, we identify a group of 223 genes, designated as the Fermentation Stress Response (FSR), that are dramatically and permanently induced; FSR genes exhibited changes ranging from four-to eighty-fold. The FSR is novel; 62% of the genes involved have not been implicated in global stress responses and 28% of the genes have no functional annotation. Genes involved in respiratory metabolism and gluconeogenesis were expressed during fermentation despite the presence of high concentrations of glucose. Ethanol, rather than nutrient depletion, was responsible for entry of yeast cells into stationary phase. Ethanol seems to regulate yeast metabolism through hitherto undiscovered regulatory networks during wine fermentation. Keywords: time course, stress response, fermentation
2008-04-17 | GSE8536 | GEO
Project description:Industrial wine yeast strains possess specific abilities to ferment under stressing conditions and give a suitable aromatic outcome. Although the fermentations properties of Saccharomyces cervisiae wine yeasts are well documented little is known on the genetic basis underlying the fermentation traits. Besides, although strain differences in gene expression has been reported, their relationships with gene expression variations and fermentation phenotypic variations is unknown. To both identify the genetic basis of fermentation traits and get insight on their relationships with gene expression variations, we combined fermentation traits QTL mapping and expression profiling in a segregating population from a cross between a wine yeast derivative and a laboratory strain.
2011-01-19 | GSE26437 | GEO
Project description:The yeast Dekkera bruxellensis is as ethanol tolerant as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and may be found in bottled wine. It causes the spoilage of wine, beer, cider and soft drinks. In wines, the metabolic products responsible for spoilage by Dekkera bruxellensis are mainly volatile phenols. These chemical compounds are responsible for the taints described as M-bM-^@M-^XM-bM-^@M-^XmedicinalM-bM-^@M-^YM-bM-^@M-^Y in white wines (due to vinyl phenols) and as M-bM-^@M-^XM-bM-^@M-^XleatherM-bM-^@M-^YM-bM-^@M-^Y, M-bM-^@M-^XM-bM-^@M-^Xhorse sweatM-bM-^@M-^YM-bM-^@M-^Y and M-bM-^@M-^XM-bM-^@M-^XstableM-bM-^@M-^YM-bM-^@M-^Y in red wines (due to ethyl phenols mainly 4-ethylphenol). Apart from the negative aroma nuances imparted by these yeasts, positive aromas such as M-bM-^@M-^XsmokyM-bM-^@M-^Y, M-bM-^@M-^XspicyM-bM-^@M-^Y and M-bM-^@M-^XtoffeeM-bM-^@M-^Y are also cited. Our goal was to identify the impact that the wine spoilage yeast Dekkera bruxellensis has on fermenting S. cerevisiae cells, especially on its gene expression level. To this end we co-inoculated both yeast species at the start of fermentation in a synthetic wine must, using S. cerevisiae-only fermentations without Dekkera bruxellensis as a control. All fermentations were employed in special membrane reactors (50 KDa pore size cut-off) physically separating Dekkera bruxellensis from wine yeast S. cerevisiae. Biomass separation with this membrane was done to abolish the possibility of hybridizing also D. bruxellensis probes on Agilent V2 (8x15K format) G4813 DNA microarrays designed just for S. cerevisiae ORF targets. The 50 KDa pore membrane separating both yeasts allowed the exchange of ethanol, metabolites and sugars during the fermentation. Fermentations were carried out in synthetic wine must in duplicate for both the control S. cerevisiae (strain Lalvin EC1118) and mixed fermentation. Sampling of yeast S. cerevisiae for RNA extractions were performed at 22 h of fermentation, during the exponential growth phase of S. cerevisiae, at 92 h and 144 h of fermentation, during its early and late stationary growth phase and at 187 h of fermentation, during its phase of growth decline.
2012-06-12 | E-GEOD-38582 | biostudies-arrayexpress