Project description:We analysed gene expression profiles in dental follicle cells after 7 days of osteogenic differentiation with different inducers. Total RNAs were isolated from dental follicle cells after 7 days of differentiation with dexamethasone, BMP2, IGF2 and for control with standard cell culture medium
Project description:We analysed the genexpression of dental follicle cells (DFCs) after 3 days osteogenic differentiation with BMP2 after transfection with a DLX3 plasmid (pDLX3) and after transfection with an empty plasmid (pEV) Total RNAs were isolated from dental follicle cells after transfection with pDLX3 and pEV and osteogenic induction with BMP2 at day 3
Project description:We analysed gene expression profiles in dental stem cells before and after osteogenic differentiation day 7. Total RNAs were isolated from dental stem cells at day 0 (before differentiation) and after 7 days of differentiation
Project description:We analysed gene expression profiles in dental follicle cells after seven days of ostoeogenic differentiation Total RNAs were isolated from dental stem cells at day 0 (before differentiation) and after 7 days of differentiation)
Project description:Dental follicle is a loose connective tissue that surrounds the developing tooth. Dental follicle cells (DFCs) have a promising potential for tissue engineering applications including periodontal and bone regeneration. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying osteogenic differentiation. In a previous study we detected that more than 35 % of genes that are regulated during osteogenic differentiation of DFCs have promoter binding sites for the transcription factors TP53 and SP1. However, the role of these transcription factors in dental stem cells is still unknown. We hypothesize that both factors influence the processes of cell proliferation and differentiation in dental stem cells. Therefore, we transiently transfected DFCs and dental pulp stem cells (SHED; Stem cells from human exfoliated decidiuous teeth) with expression vectors for these transcription factors. After overexpression of SP1 and TP53, SP1 influenced cell proliferation and TP53 osteogenic differentiation in both dental cell types. The effects on cell proliferation and differentiation were less pronounced after siRNA mediated silencing of TP53 and SP1. This indicates that the effects we observed after TP53 and SP1 overexpression are indirect and subject of complex regulation. Interestingly, upregulated biological processes in DFCs after TP53-overexpression resemble the downregulated biological processes in SHED after SP1-overexpression. Here, regulated processes are involved in cell motility, wound healing and programmed cell death. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that SP1 and TP53 influence cell proliferation and differentiation and similar biological processes in both SHED and DFCs. Total RNAs were isolated from dental follicle cells after 48 hours of transfection with a TP53 expressions plasmid, a SP1 expressions plasmid and for control with an empty vector.
Project description:We analysed the genexpression of dental follicle cells (DFCs) after 3 days osteogenic differentiation with BMP2 after transfection with a DLX3 plasmid (pDLX3) and after transfection with an empty plasmid (pEV)
Project description:Tooth pulp contains various types of cells such as endothelial cells, neurons, fibroblasts, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and odontoblasts. As well as cells that are called "postnatal dental pulp stem cells" (DPSCs). Also, four more types of dental MSC-like populations were identified and characterized: stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED), periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs), stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP) and population of dental follicle-derived progenitor cells called "dental follicle progenitor cells" (DFPCs). Most of them might be used in wide range of biomedical applications. Nevertheless, they have systematic differences in their physiology, e.g. differences in proliferative and differentiation potential. These differences are not clearly defined on molecular level yet; therefore, we performed proteomics comparison of DPSCs and PDLSCs in control and osteogenic differentiation. Donor matched DPSCs and PDLSCs were isolated from two donors by standard protocol. Then, DPSCs and PDLSCs at passage 3 were seeded into 90 mm Petri dishes (Eppendorf) and cultured in standard conditions with DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 37°C, 5% CO2. When cells reached 90-100% confluency, the medium was changed to osteogenic medium (DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin (HyClone), 50 mg/ml ascorbic acid (Sigma Aldrich), 0.1 mM dexamethasone (Sigma Aldrich) and 10 mM b–glycerophosphate (Sigma Aldrich).
