Project description:Knowledge of the genetic mechanisms underlying among-individual variation in response to environmental variables or treatment is important in many research areas; for example, acquaintance of the set of causal genetic variants for drug responses could revolutionize the field of personalized medicine. We used Drosophila melanogaster to investigate the genetic signature underlying variability in response to methylphenidate (MPH), a drug used in treatment of ADHD. We exposed a wild type D. melanogaster population to MPH or a control treatment and observed an increase in locomotor activity in individuals exposed to MPH. Whole-genome transcriptomic analyses revealed that the behavioral response to MPH was associated with abundant gene expression alterations. To confirm these patterns in a different genetic background, and to further advance knowledge on the genetic signature of drug response variability, we used a system of sequenced inbred lines, the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel. Utilizing an integrative genomic approach we incorporated the transcriptomic data as well as gene interactions into the genomic analyses, from which we identified putative candidate genes for drug response variability. We successfully validated 70% of the investigated putative candidate genes by gene expression knockdown. Furthermore, we showed that MPH has cross generational behavioral- and transcriptomic effects.
Project description:Genetic background effects contribute to the phenotypic consequences of mutations, and are pervasive across all domains of life that have been examined, yet little is known about how they modify genetic systems. In part this is due to the lack of tractable model systems that have been explicitly developed to study the genetic and evolutionary consequences of background effects. In this study we demonstrate that phenotypic expressivity of the scalloped[E3] mutation of Drosophila melanogaster is background dependent, and is the result of at least one major modifier segregating between two standard lab wild-type strains. Microarrays were used to examine the consequences of genetic background effects on the global transcriptome. Expression differences between wild-type strains were found to be as large or larger than the effects of mutations with substantial phenotypic effects, and expression differences between wild-type and mutant varied significantly between genetic backgrounds. Significantly, we demonstrate that the epistatic interaction between sd[E3] and an optomotor blind mutation is background dependent. The results are discussed within the context of developing a complex but more realistic view of the consequences of genetic background effects with respect to mutational analysis, and studies of epistasis and cryptic genetic variation segregating in natural populations Keywords: Mutant vs wild-type comparison
Project description:Genetic background effects contribute to the phenotypic consequences of mutations, and are pervasive across all domains of life that have been examined, yet little is known about how they modify genetic systems. In part this is due to the lack of tractable model systems that have been explicitly developed to study the genetic and evolutionary consequences of background effects. In this study we demonstrate that phenotypic expressivity of the scalloped[E3] mutation of Drosophila melanogaster is background dependent, and is the result of at least one major modifier segregating between two standard lab wild-type strains. Microarrays were used to examine the consequences of genetic background effects on the global transcriptome. Expression differences between wild-type strains were found to be as large or larger than the effects of mutations with substantial phenotypic effects, and expression differences between wild-type and mutant varied significantly between genetic backgrounds. Significantly, we demonstrate that the epistatic interaction between sd[E3] and an optomotor blind mutation is background dependent. The results are discussed within the context of developing a complex but more realistic view of the consequences of genetic background effects with respect to mutational analysis, and studies of epistasis and cryptic genetic variation segregating in natural populations Keywords: Mutant vs wild-type comparison 2 wild-type strains of D. melanogaster (Oregon-R and Samarkand, both marked with white) each with and without the scalloped[E3] mutation. Thus a 2x2 factorial design with a balanced incomplete block (block=slide) design in a full loop configuration with dye swapping.
Project description:The genomic causes of inbreeding depression are poorly known. Several studies have found widespread transcriptomic alterations in inbred organisms, but it remains unclear which of these alterations are causes of the depression and which are mere responses to the ensuing physiological stress. We made a c-DNA microarray analysis in Drosophila melanogaster attempting to differentiate causes from responses of inbreeding depression. The rationale of the experiment was that, while depression is a general phenomenon producing similar consequences in different inbred lines, its first genetic causes would be different for each inbred line, as they are expected to be caused by the fixation of rare deleterious genes. Many changes in expression were common to all sets, but fourteen genes, grouped in four expression clusters, showed strong set-specific changes, and were therefore candidates to be sources of the inbreeding depression observed.
Project description:The genomic causes of inbreeding depression are poorly known. Several studies have found widespread transcriptomic alterations in inbred organisms, but it remains unclear which of these alterations are causes of the depression and which are mere responses to the ensuing physiological stress. We made a c-DNA microarray analysis in Drosophila melanogaster attempting to differentiate causes from responses of inbreeding depression. The rationale of the experiment was that, while depression is a general phenomenon producing similar consequences in different inbred lines, its first genetic causes would be different for each inbred line, as they are expected to be caused by the fixation of rare deleterious genes. Many changes in expression were common to all sets, but fourteen genes, grouped in four expression clusters, showed strong set-specific changes, and were therefore candidates to be sources of the inbreeding depression observed. We took four sets of inbred sublines, each set descending from a different founding pair obtained from a large outbred stock, and compared the expression of the three most depressed sublines and the three least depressed sublines from each set.
Project description:Five different mitochondrial strains were introgressed in male and female fruit flies with identical (w1118) nuclear genetic background.
Project description:Space travel presents unlimited opportunities for exploration and discovery, but requires a more complete understanding of the immunological consequences of long-term exposure to the conditions of spaceflight. To understand these consequences better and to contribute to design of effective countermeasures, we used the Drosophila model to compare innate immune responses to bacteria and fungi in flies that were either raised on earth or in outer space aboard the NASA Space Shuttle Discovery (STS-121). Microarrays were used to characterize changes in gene expression that occur in response to infection by bacteria and fungus in drosophila that were either hatched and raised in outer space (microgravity) or on earth (normal gravity).