Project description:<p>The most successful treatment for aplastic anemia is bone marrow transplantation. However, few patients are eligible for this procedure. For others, treatment usually consists of immunosuppressive agents, such as antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine. Unfortunately, even with immunosuppressive therapy, relapse is common. New combinations of medications may offer alternative and more effective treatment options. Sirolimus and cyclosporine are two drugs routinely used to suppress the immune system and prevent rejection in patients who have received organ transplants. While cyclosporine has been proven effective for treating aplastic anemia, sirolimus has not been tested for this disease. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine for treating individuals with aplastic anemia that have not responded to other treatments.</p> <p>This study will last at least 6 months. Participants will first be screened to verify diagnosis of aplastic anemia. The screening will include a physical examination, blood test, bone marrow biopsy from the pelvic bone, and review of medications and medical history. Individuals who are eligible will then start the first treatment period. Participants will receive two medications: cyclosporine will be taken twice a day and sirolimus will be taken once a day. Depending on side effects, the dose of either drug may be temporarily stopped or lowered. On Day 1, blood will be drawn and females will undergo a pregnancy test. Subsequent study visits will occur weekly for the first month, every 2 weeks for 2 months, and then once a month for the remainder of the study. Each visit will include a physical examination, vital sign assessment, and review of side effects and medications. Blood tests will be performed weekly for the first 3 weeks, and then every 2 weeks.</p> <p>After 6 months of treatment, if a participant has shown improvements in disease status without major side effects, the treatment will continue. Over time the doses may be lowered. If a participant has not improved while on the study medication, treatment will stop at 6 months. Whenever treatment is discontinued, the participant will again undergo a physical examination, blood tests, and bone marrow biopsy.</p>
Project description:Background: Despite significant improvements in short-term kidney transplant survival, comparable increases in 5 and 10-year outcomes have not been achieved. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a major cause of late graft loss. Toxic nephropathy and inadequate long-term immunosuppression are possible factors. We performed a randomized prospective trial comparing calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free to CNI-based immunosuppression to determine the impact on renal function, structure, and gene expression. Methods: Sixty-one kidney recipients received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (P). Randomized patients received concentration-controlled sirolimus or cyclosporine. Two years post-transplant 55 patients underwent renal function studies, 48 (87%) underwent transplant biopsies; all classified by Banff scoring and 41 by DNA microarrays. Findings: Comparing sirolimus/MMF/P to cyclosporine/MMF/P at two years, there was a significantly lower serum creatinine (1.35 vs. 1.81 mg/dl; p=0.008), significantly higher Cockroft-Gault glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (80.4 vs. 63.4 cc/min; p=0.008), iothalamate GFR (60.6 vs. 49.2 cc/min; p= 0.018), and Banff 0 (normal) biopsies (66.6 vs. 20.8%; p=0.013). Regression analysis of calculated GFR’s from 1 to 36 months yielded a positive slope for sirolimus of 3.36 ml/min/year, and a negative slope for cyclosporine of –1.58 ml/min/year (p=0.008). Gene expression profiles of kidney biopsies with higher Banff CAN scores confirmed significant up regulation of genes responsible for immune/inflammation and fibrosis/tissue remodeling. Interpretation: At two years the sirolimus-treated patients have better renal transplant function, a diminished prevalence of CAN, and down regulated expression of genes responsible for the progression of CAN. All may provide for an alternative natural history with improved graft survival. Keywords = Cyclosporine Keywords = Sirolimus Keywords = Transplantation Keywords = DNA microarrays Keywords = calcineurin inhibitors Keywords: parallel sample. This dataset is part of the TransQST collection.
Project description:Background: Despite significant improvements in short-term kidney transplant survival, comparable increases in 5 and 10-year outcomes have not been achieved. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a major cause of late graft loss. Toxic nephropathy and inadequate long-term immunosuppression are possible factors. We performed a randomized prospective trial comparing calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free to CNI-based immunosuppression to determine the impact on renal function, structure, and gene expression. Methods: Sixty-one kidney recipients received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (P). Randomized patients received concentration-controlled sirolimus or cyclosporine. Two years post-transplant 55 patients underwent renal function studies, 48 (87%) underwent transplant biopsies; all classified by Banff scoring and 41 by DNA microarrays. Findings: Comparing sirolimus/MMF/P to cyclosporine/MMF/P at two years, there was a significantly lower serum creatinine (1.35 vs. 1.81 mg/dl; p=0.008), significantly higher Cockroft-Gault glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (80.4 vs. 63.4 cc/min; p=0.008), iothalamate GFR (60.6 vs. 49.2 cc/min; p= 0.018), and Banff 0 (normal) biopsies (66.6 vs. 20.8%; p=0.013). Regression analysis of calculated GFR’s from 1 to 36 months yielded a positive slope for sirolimus of 3.36 ml/min/year, and a negative slope for cyclosporine of –1.58 ml/min/year (p=0.008). Gene expression profiles of kidney biopsies with higher Banff CAN scores confirmed significant up regulation of genes responsible for immune/inflammation and fibrosis/tissue remodeling. Interpretation: At two years the sirolimus-treated patients have better renal transplant function, a diminished prevalence of CAN, and down regulated expression of genes responsible for the progression of CAN. All may provide for an alternative natural history with improved graft survival. Keywords = Cyclosporine Keywords = Sirolimus Keywords = Transplantation Keywords = DNA microarrays Keywords = calcineurin inhibitors Keywords: parallel sample
Project description:MicroRNA profiling was performed on baseline bloods using the NanoString nCounter platform in a serial liquid biopsies obtained at baseline in chemo-refractory mCRC patients treated with regorafenib in a phase II clinical trial (PROSPECT-R n=40; NCT03010722).
Project description:Bulk RNA-seq data of Lin-CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells derived from bone marrow of healthy donors and untreated aplastic anemia patients
Project description:Efficacy of a selective MEK (trametinib) and BRAFV600E (dabrafenib) inhibitors associated with radioactive iodine (RAI) for the treatment of refractory metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer with RAS or BRAFV600E mutation. To evaluate the objective response rate according to RECIST criteria in thyroid cancer patients with metastatic radioactive iodine (RAI) refractory disease, 6 months after a treatment combining in each arm of the phase II trial (patients with RAS mutation or patients with BRAFV600E mutation): - Arm A: 6 weeks of trametinib followed by RAI treatment (5.5 GBq following rhTSH) in patients with RAS mutation - Arm B: 6 weeks of trametinib plus dabrafenib followed by RAI treatment (5.5 GBq following rhTSH) in patients with BRAFV600E mutation
Project description:Efficacy of a selective MEK (trametinib) and BRAFV600E (dabrafenib) inhibitors associated with radioactive iodine (RAI) for the treatment of refractory metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer with RAS (current cohort) or BRAFV600E mutation. To evaluate the objective response rate according to RECIST criteria in thyroid cancer patients with metastatic radioactive iodine (RAI) refractory disease, 6 months after a treatment combining in each arm of the phase II trial (patients with RAS mutation or patients with BRAFV600E mutation): - Arm A: 6 weeks of trametinib followed by RAI treatment (5.5 GBq following rhTSH) in patients with RAS mutation - Arm B: 6 weeks of trametinib plus dabrafenib followed by RAI treatment (5.5 GBq following rhTSH) in patients with BRAFV600E mutation