Homo sapiens
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA262703 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:PGRN-RIKEN-CALGB 40101 - Genome-wide Pharmacogenomic Study of Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer
| PRJNA262702 | ENA
Project description:PGRN-RIKEN-CALGB 80303 - Genome-wide Pharmacogenomic Study of Gemcitabine and Bevacizumab in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
| PRJNA75655 | ENA
Project description:PGRN-RIKEN-CALGB 80303 - Genome-wide Pharmacogenomic Study of Gemcitabine and Bevacizumab in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
| PRJNA75653 | ENA
Project description:PGRN-RIKEN-CALGB 90401 - Genome-wide Pharmacogenomic Study of docetaxel and bevacizumab in Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer
| PRJNA298271 | ENA
Project description:PGRN-RIKEN-CALGB 90401 - Genome-wide Pharmacogenomic Study of docetaxel and bevacizumab in Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer
| PRJNA298270 | ENA
Project description:This randomized phase II trial studies how well paclitaxel with or without carboplatin and/or bevacizumab followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide works in treating patients with breast cancer that can be removed by surgery. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel, carboplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Bevacizumab may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Giving chemotherapy together with bevacizumab before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed.
2022-01-21 | GSE154524 | GEO
Project description:The human breast cancer (BR) data set (endpoints D and E) was contributed by the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC, Houston, TX, USA). Gene expression data from 230 stage I-III breast cancers were generated from fine needle aspiration specimens of newly diagnosed breast cancers before any therapy. The biopsy specimens were collected sequentially during a prospective pharmacogenomic marker discovery study between 2000 and 2008. These specimens represent 70-90% pure neoplastic cells with minimal stromal contamination. Patients received 6 months of preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy including paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin followed by surgical resection of the cancer. Response to preoperative chemotherapy was categorized as a pathological complete response (pCR = no residual invasive cancer in the breast or lymph nodes) or residual invasive cancer (RD), and used as endpoint D for prediction. Endpoint E is the clinical estrogen-receptor status as established by immunohistochemistry. RNA extraction and gene expression profiling were performed in multiple batches over time using Affymetrix U133A microarrays. Genomic analysis of a subset of this sequentially accrued patient population were reported previously. For each endpoint, the first 130 cases were used as a training set and the next 100 cases were used as an independent validation set. Gene expression data from 230 stage I-III breast cancers
2010-02-04 | E-GEOD-20194 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial (NCT00455533) enrolled previously untreated women with histologically-confirmed primary invasive breast adenocarcinoma (T2–3, N0–3, M0, tumor size ≥2.0 cm), regardless of hormone receptor or HER2 expression status. Patients received sequential neoadjuvant therapy starting with 4 cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 intravenously and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously) given every 3 weeks, followed by 1:1 randomization to either ixabepilone (40 mg/m2 3-hour infusion) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, or paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 1-hour infusion) weekly for 12 weeks. Fresh tumor biopsies at screening were a mandatory prerequisite for study entry for biomarker analyses. Gene expression profiling was performed by Affymetrix GeneChip to determine if pre-specified gene models could distinguish between the clinical activity of two microtubule stabilizing agents, ixabepilone and paclitaxel. Three core needle tumor tissue biopsies were obtained from all subjects before neoadjuvant therapy with AC and immediately combined in RNAlater® solution for subsequent RNA extraction, cRNA labeling and gene expression profiling. Pre-specified gene models were tested for their capacity to distinguish pathologic complete response rates between the AC followed by ixabepilone versus the AC followed by paclitaxel treatment regimens. All samples were collected prior to treatment. All subject received cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin (AC) prior to randomization to either Ixabepilone or Paclitaxel.
2013-01-01 | E-GEOD-41998 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:CALGB 40601 was activated as a 3-arm study (paclitaxel + trastuzumab + lapatinib [THL], paclitaxel + trastuzumab [TH] and paclitaxel + lapatinib [TL]). In December 2010, twoneoadjuvant studies were presented at the Cancer Therapy and Research Center-American Association for Cancer Research (CTRC-AACR) San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium that affected the scientific and practical enthusiasm for the TL arm. For this reason the CALGB 40601 has been amended to omit the TL treatment arm (arm 3). In the Geparquinto trial, patients with HER2-positive breast cancer received epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel combined either with trastuzumab (EC-DOC-H) or lapatinib (EC-DOC-L) neoadjuvantly, then trastuzumab for a total of 12 months adjuvantly [34]. Pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast and axilla was the primary endpoint. Among 620 patients randomized, there was a higher pCR rate (31% vs 22%) and lower toxicity with fewer discontinuations (10% vs 16%) among patients on the trastuzumab arm than the lapatinib arm. The first results of the NeoALTTO trial were similar [35]. Approximately 450 women with HER2-positive breast cancer received a lead-in phase of 6 weeks of biologic therapy withlapatinib (L), trastuzumab (H), or both, then paclitaxel was added for an additional 12 weeks prior to surgery. All drugs were given at doses similar to CALGB 40601. Postoperative adjuvant therapy included additional chemotherapy and biologic therapy, however, the presentation focused solely on the primary endpoint of pCR in the breast at surgery; no longterm outcomes were presented. There were more grade > 3 adverse events in the lapatinib arm compared with the trastuzumab arm, including diarrhea (23% vs 2%), hepatic abnormalities (13% vs 1%), and neutropenia (16% vs 3%). The only death occurred in the combined biologic (LH) arm. Failure to complete treatment as planned was higher in the L (34%) and LH arms (39%) that in the H arm (u%). PCR was highest with LH-paclitaxel (51%), followed by H-paclitaxel (30%), and L-paclitaxel (25%). Based on the inferior results and higher toxicity of the investigational lapatinib arms of these studies and in discussion with CTEP, in January 2011 it was decided to amend CALGB 40601 to omit Arm 3 (TL). Those patients on this arm will complete protocol therapy as perthe original study design. In CALGB 40601, it is recommended that all patients receive trastuzumab adjuvantly for 1 year, hence all of the patients including those previously randomized to the TL neoadjuvant arm, will be able to receive the known benefit of trastuzumab. After local IRB approval of Update #5, the remainder of the patients will be enrolled and randomized to Arm 1 (THL) and Arm 2 (TH) in a 2:1 fashion. Given that TH isthe standard regimen, and is also clearly the best tolerated, we will continue that arm of thestudy as the comparator, with THL as the only investigational arm.
2018-10-16 | GSE116335 | GEO