Gallus gallus
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA343651 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Chicken embryonic E16 scutate scale and feather samples
| PRJNA343951 | ENA
Project description:ChIP-seq for embryonic chicken feather and scale samples
| PRJNA343950 | ENA
Project description:Expression data from embryonic chicken feather and scale skins
| PRJNA265926 | ENA
Project description:ChIP-seq for embryonic chicken feather samples
| PRJNA503262 | ENA
Project description:Epithelial appendages are the product of epithelial – mesenchymal interactions. Tissue recombination experiments showed that in general, the dermis determines the phenotype of the epithelial appendage. Chicken dorsal skin epithelium interacts with its underlying mesenchyme to form feathers beginning at E7 (H&H stage 31), while metatarsal scale epithelium interacts with its mesenchyme to form scales beginning at E9 (H&H stage 35) which stabilize around E12 (H&H stage 38). We sought to evaluate the molecular differences of tissues with different competence and inductive abilities to form feathers and scales. Chicken embryos were selected to obtain competent E7 and non-competent at E9 feather forming skin from dorsal. The competent E9 and non-competent E11 meta-tarsal scale forming skin from metatarsal were selected for examing the differences in regional specificity. Epithelium and mesenchyme from each skin were prepared separately. Samples were prepared for RNA extraction and hybridization on Affymetrix microarrays. We gathered 8 sets of samples for the analysis: undifferentiated E7 feather skin epithelium (E7fe) and mesenchyme (E7fm); differentiated E9 feather skin epithelium (E9fe) and mesenchyme (E9fm); undifferentiated E9 scale skin epithelium (E9se) and mesenchyme (E9sm); and differentiated E11 scale skin epithelium (E11se) and mesenchyme (E11sm)
2015-07-01 | E-GEOD-62882 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Relative expression levels of mRNAs in chicken cecal epithelia experimentally infected with Eimeria tenella were measured at 4.5 days post-infection. Two weeks old chickens were uninfected (negative control) or were orally inoculated with sporulated oocysts of Eimeria tenella. Cecal epithelia samples were collected from >12 birds in infected or uninfected group at 4.5 d following infections, in which samples from 4 birds were pooled together to form a total 3 biological replicates in each group. Parasite merozoites were also collected from four infected chickens at 5 d after infections. Uninfected control samples, merozoites and infection group samples were selected for RNA extraction and hybridization on Affymetrix microarrays. We used Affymetrix GeneChip chicken genome arrays to detail the chicken cecal epithelia gene expression in the control and E. tenella-infected birds.
2012-12-10 | GSE39602 | GEO
Project description:RNA-Seq of chicken embryonic feather/scale recombination skin explants
| PRJNA435936 | ENA
Project description:Feather pecking is a major welfare problem in egg production. It may be caused by genetic, physiological and environmental factors. The main aim of this study was to uncover variability in gene expression between individuals from high (HFP) and for low feather pecking (LFP) line using Chicken Gene Expression Microarrays (Agilent Technologies). Samples were assorted to two groups, each containing 9 biological replicates from high feather pecking (HFP) and low feather pecking (LFP) line.
2012-03-17 | E-GEOD-36559 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Generation of genetically uniformed individuals from somatic cells is an effective approach for large-scale reproduction of elite varieties and a powerful tool for restoration of endangered species. However, this technique has never been realized in avian due to their oviparous reproduction pattern. In this study, we produced cloned-like chicken by allogeneic transplantation of somatic cells induced primordial germ cells (PGCs). Oct4, Sox2, Nanog and Lin28A (OSNL) factors were employed to reprogram primary chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF) to pluripotent stem cells (iPS), in which DNA demethylation and histone acetylation were found to increase the efficiency to 13.00%. The obtained iPS presented embryonic stem cell like characters and were further induced to PGCs by BMP4/BMP8b/EGF, in which histone acetylation and glycolysis inhibition elevated the induction rate to 17.30% and 16.41%, respectively. With the optimized system, we induced Black Langshan Chicken (Gallus domestiaus, black feather) donated CEF to PGCs and transplanted them into the Recessive White Chicken (white feather) embryos. The transplanted cells migrated into the genital ridges and produced functional sperm or oocytes. The sexual matured recipients were self-crossed, with 189/509 (37.13%) cloned-like chicken produced. Microsatellite analysis confirmed their DNA inheritance from the black donor chicken. Thus, we demonstrated, for the first time, the feasibility of avian cloning from somatic cells.
2021-03-16 | GSE159511 | GEO
Project description:Animals develop skin regional specificities to best adapt to their environments. Birds are excellent models in which to study the epigenetic mechanisms that facilitate these adaptions. Patients suffering from SATB2 mutations exhibit multiple defects including ectodermal dysplasia-like changes. The preferential expression of SATB2, a chromatin regulator, in feather-forming compared to scale-forming regions, suggests it functions in regional specification of chicken skin appendages by acting on either differentiation or morphogenesis. Retrovirus mediated SATB2 misexpression in developing feathers, beaks, and claws causes epidermal differentiation abnormalities (e.g. knobs, plaques) with few organ morphology alterations. Chicken β-keratins are encoded in 5 sub-clusters (Claw, Feather, Feather-like, Scale, and Keratinocyte) on Chromosome 25 and a large Feather keratin cluster on Chromosome 27. Type I and II α-keratin clusters are located on Chromosomes 27 and 33, respectively. Transcriptome analyses showed these keratins 1) are often tuned up or down collectively as a sub-cluster, and 2) these changes occur in a temporo-spatial specific manner. This cluster-level suppression is also seen in MMPs on Chromosome 1. SATB2 alters gene expression changes of most other transcripts without this cluster-level switching. These results suggest an organizing role of SATB2 in cluster-level gene co-regulation during skin regional specification.
2021-08-14 | GSE178651 | GEO