Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Identifying Ipr1 binding sites in RAW264.7 cells using ChIP-seq

ABSTRACT: Identifying Ipr1 binding sites in RAW264.7 cells using ChIP-seq

PROVIDER: PRJNA497739 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Identifying Ipr1 binding sites in RAW264.7 cells using ChIP-seq

Project description:It has been demonstrated that Ipr1 participate in gene expression regulation during Mycobatrium infection. To better understand whether Ipr1 can regulate gene expression by interacting with gene promoter directly or not, we performed ChIP-seq to identify interaction between Ipr1 and DNA fragments.

2018-10-22 | GSE121548 | GEO

Identifying SF3B1 binding sites across the transcriptome

Project description:Identifying SF3B1 binding sites across the transcriptome

| PRJNA674891 | ENA

Identifying Lsr2 binding sites in Streptomyces venezuelae

Project description:Identifying Lsr2 binding sites in Streptomyces venezuelae

| PRJNA475288 | ENA

Identifying SigG1 binding sites in Streptomyces tsukubaensis

Project description:Identifying SigG1 binding sites in Streptomyces tsukubaensis

| PRJNA605258 | ENA

Identifying SNRPA1 binding sites across the transcriptome

Project description:Identifying SNRPA1 binding sites across the transcriptome

| PRJNA674892 | ENA

Identifying LINC00899 binding sites in HeLa cells with CHART-seq

Project description:Identifying LINC00899 binding sites in HeLa cells with CHART-seq

| PRJEB29987 | ENA

A quantitative analysis of CLIP methods for identifying binding sites of RNA-binding proteins (CLIP)

Project description:Crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) is increasingly used to map transcriptome-wide binding sites of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). We developed a method for CLIP data analysis and applied it to compare 254 nm CLIP with PAR-CLIP, which involves crosslinking of photoreactive nucleotides with 365 nm UV light. We found small differences in the accuracy of these methods in identifying binding sites of HuR, a protein that binds low-complexity sequences and Argonaute 2, which has a complex binding specificity. We show that crosslink-induced mutations lead to single-nucleotide resolution for both PAR-CLIP and CLIP. Our results confirm the expectation from original CLIP publications that RNA-binding proteins do not protect sufficiently their sites under the denaturing conditions used during the CLIP procedure, and we show that extensive digestion with sequence-specific ribonucleases strongly biases the set of recovered binding sites. We finally show that this bias can be substantially reduced by milder nuclease digestion conditions. We performed duplicate experiments for each variant of the CLIP protocol (CLIP, PAR-CLIP), each protein (HuR, Ago2), and enzymatic digestion (complete T1 digestion, mild MNase digestion). In addition, we performed a single PAR-CLIP experiment with mild T1 digestion.

2011-05-15 | E-GEOD-28859 | biostudies-arrayexpress

A quantitative analysis of CLIP methods for identifying binding sites of RNA-binding proteins (CLIP)

2011-05-15 | GSE28859 | GEO

A quantitative analysis of CLIP methods for identifying binding sites of RNA-binding proteins (mRNA-seq)

2011-05-15 | GSE28864 | GEO

A quantitative analysis of CLIP methods for identifying binding sites of RNA-binding proteins (mRNA-seq)

Project description:Crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) is increasingly used to map transcriptome-wide binding sites of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). We developed a method for CLIP data analysis and applied it to compare 254 nm CLIP with PAR-CLIP, which involves crosslinking of photoreactive nucleotides with 365 nm UV light. We found small differences in the accuracy of these methods in identifying binding sites of HuR, a protein that binds low-complexity sequences and Argonaute 2, which has a complex binding specificity. We show that crosslink-induced mutations lead to single-nucleotide resolution for both PAR-CLIP and CLIP. Our results confirm the expectation from original CLIP publications that RNA-binding proteins do not protect sufficiently their sites under the denaturing conditions used during the CLIP procedure, and we show that extensive digestion with sequence-specific ribonucleases strongly biases the set of recovered binding sites. We finally show that this bias can be substantially reduced by milder nuclease digestion conditions. We performed duplicate mRNA-Seq experiments for cells grown in the presence of modified nucleotides or in normal medium, and following crosslinking at 365nm, 254nm or without crosslinking. In addition, we performed single mRNA-Seq experiments of cells transfected with anti-GFP or anti-HuR siRNA.

2011-05-15 | E-GEOD-28864 | biostudies-arrayexpress

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data