Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA541046 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Targetted metabolomics in U2OS PRDX1 WT and PRDX1-/- While cellular metabolism impacts the DNA damage response, a systematic understanding of the metabolic requirements that are crucial for DNA damage repair has yet to be achieved. Here, we investigate the metabolic enzymes and processes that are essential when cells are exposed to DNA damage. By integrating functional genomics with chromatin proteomics and metabolomics, we provide a detailed description of the interplay between cellular metabolism and the DNA damage response. Subsequent analysis identified Peroxiredoxin 1, PRDX1, as fundamental for DNA damage repair. During the DNA damage response, PRDX1 translocates to the nucleus where it is required to reduce DNA damage-induced nuclear reactive oxygen species levels. Moreover, PRDX1 controls aspartate availability, which is required for the DNA damage repair-induced upregulation of de novo nucleotide synthesis. Loss of PRDX1 leads to an impairment in the clearance of γΗ2ΑΧ nuclear foci, accumulation of replicative stress and cell proliferation defects, thus revealing a crucial role for PRDX1 as a DNA damage surveillance factor.
2022-07-19 | ST002234 | MetabolomicsWorkbench
Project description:Upon DNA damage, numerous proteins are targeted for ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation. We show that phosphorylation of Rpn10/PSMD4 (ubiquitin receptor of the proteasome) at Ser266, is required for DNA repair. Here, we performed TurboID proximity labeling for capturing the proteasome substrates under DNA damage. Numerous proteins which involve in DNA damage response, chromosome reorganization cell cycle and histone modification were identified as the potential pronuteasome substrates. We find that DNA damage reduced the overall affinity between substrates and wild-type Rpn10 compared to Rpn10-Ser266 mutant cells. Combining TMT quantitative proteomic studies, we observed the dynamics of more than 2,000 nuclear proteins upon DNA damage and time course release. Most proteins were accumulated in wild-type cells in the time course release, while the Rpn10-Ser266 mutant cells show almost no changes in protein level. These findings reveal an inherent self-limiting mechanism of the proteasome that, by controlling substrate recognition through Rpn10 phosphorylation, fine-tunes protein degradation for optimal responses under stress.
2023-11-28 | PXD047298 | iProX
Project description:DNA Damage Response in Elephant Cells
| PRJNA419061 | ENA
Project description:RasV12 blocks DNA synthesis and DNA damage response
| PRJNA524372 | ENA
Project description:Proteins which act as histone chaperones ensure genomic integrity during routine processes such as DNA replication and transcription as well as DNA repair upon damage. Herein, we identify a nuclear J domain protein, Dnj4, which interacts with histones 3 and 4 as well as Hsp71 as demonstrated in an AP-MS experiment suggesting that it integrates the heat shock chaperone machinery into histone chaperoning. In support of this, a deletion mutant lacking DNJ4 had higher levels of DNA damage than the wild type or complemented strains and was hypersensitive to DNA damaging agents. The transcriptional response to DNA damage in a mutant lacking DNJ4 was impaired. Genes related to DNA damage and iron homeostasis functions were up-regulated in the wild type strain in response to hydroxyurea treatment, however their up-regulation was either absent or reduced in a dnj4∆ mutant. Accordingly, excess iron rescued the mutant’s growth in response to hydroxyurea treatment. Iron homeostasis is crucial for virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans, however Dnj4 was found to be dispensable for virulence in a mouse model of cryptococcosis. Finally, we confirmed a conserved role of Dnj4 in histone chaperoning by expressing it in S. cerevisiae and showing that it disrupted endogenous histone chaperoning. Altogether, this study highlights the importance of a JDP co-chaperone in histone chaperoning in C. neoformans.
2021-12-15 | PXD028087 | Pride
Project description:The DNA damage checkpoint senses the presence of DNA lesions and controls the cellular response thereto. A crucial DNA damage signal is single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), which is frequently found at sites of DNA damage and recruits the sensor checkpoint kinase Mec1-Ddc2. However, how this signal – and therefore the cells’ DNA damage load – is quantified, is poorly understood. Here, we use genetic manipulation of DNA end resection at a site-specific DNA double-strand break (DSB) in budding yeast to generate quantitatively different DNA damage (ssDNA) signals. Interestingly, two major targets of the Mec1-Ddc2 kinase – Rad53 and γH2A – differ in their response to the ssDNA signal, indicating distinct signalling circuits within the checkpoint. The local checkpoint signalling circuit leading to γH2A phosphorylation is non-quantitative and unresponsive to increased amounts of damage-associated Mec1-Ddc2 kinase. In contrast, the global checkpoint signalling circuit, which triggers Rad53 activation, integrates the ssDNA signal quantitatively. We find that not only Mec1-Ddc2 association, but also loading of the 9-1-1 co-sensor complex is enhanced during ongoing resection. Moreover, we can uncouple global checkpoint activation from the amount of Mec1-Ddc2 kinase at the lesion by using mutant conditions that hyper-activate the 9-1-1 signalling axis and at the same time show reduced amounts of damage-associated Mec1-Ddc2 kinase. We therefore propose that a key function of the 9-1-1 complex and the downstream checkpoint mediators is to generate a checkpoint response, which is quantitative and proportional to the cellular DNA damage load. The DNA damage checkpoint senses the presence of DNA lesions and controls the cellular response thereto. A crucial DNA damage signal is single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), which is frequently found at sites of DNA damage and recruits the sensor checkpoint kinase Mec1-Ddc2. However, how this signal – and therefore the cells’ DNA damage load – is quantified, is poorly understood. Here, we use genetic manipulation of DNA end resection at a site-specific DNA double-strand break (DSB) in budding yeast to generate quantitatively different DNA damage (ssDNA) signals. Interestingly, two major targets of the Mec1-Ddc2 kinase – Rad53 and γH2A – differ in their response to the ssDNA signal, indicating distinct signalling circuits within the checkpoint. The local checkpoint signalling circuit leading to γH2A phosphorylation is non-quantitative and unresponsive to increased amounts of damage-associated Mec1-Ddc2 kinase. In contrast, the global checkpoint signalling circuit, which triggers Rad53 activation, integrates the ssDNA signal quantitatively. We find that not only Mec1-Ddc2 association, but also loading of the 9-1-1 co-sensor complex is enhanced during ongoing resection. Moreover, we can uncouple global checkpoint activation from the amount of Mec1-Ddc2 kinase at the lesion by using mutant conditions that hyper-activate the 9-1-1 signalling axis and at the same time show reduced amounts of damage-associated Mec1-Ddc2 kinase. We therefore propose that a key function of the 9-1-1 complex and the downstream checkpoint mediators is to generate a checkpoint response, which is quantitative and proportional to the cellular DNA damage load.
2019-01-12 | GSE124948 | GEO
Project description:Heldt2018 - Proliferation-quiescence decision
in response to DNA damage
This model is described in the article:
A comprehensive model for
the proliferation-quiescence decision in response to endogenous
DNA damage in human cells.
Heldt FS, Barr AR, Cooper S, Bakal
C, Novák B.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2018 Feb;
:
Abstract:
Human cells that suffer mild DNA damage can enter a
reversible state of growth arrest known as quiescence. This
decision to temporarily exit the cell cycle is essential to
prevent the propagation of mutations, and most cancer cells
harbor defects in the underlying control system. Here we
present a mechanistic mathematical model to study the
proliferation-quiescence decision in nontransformed human
cells. We show that two bistable switches, the restriction
point (RP) and the G1/S transition, mediate this decision by
integrating DNA damage and mitogen signals. In particular, our
data suggest that the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21
(Cip1/Waf1), which is expressed in response to DNA damage,
promotes quiescence by blocking positive feedback loops that
facilitate G1 progression downstream of serum stimulation.
Intriguingly, cells exploit bistability in the RP to convert
graded p21 and mitogen signals into an all-or-nothing
cell-cycle response. The same mechanism creates a window of
opportunity where G1 cells that have passed the RP can revert
to quiescence if exposed to DNA damage. We present experimental
evidence that cells gradually lose this ability to revert to
quiescence as they progress through G1 and that the onset of
rapid p21 degradation at the G1/S transition prevents this
response altogether, insulating S phase from mild, endogenous
DNA damage. Thus, two bistable switches conspire in the early
cell cycle to provide both sensitivity and robustness to
external stimuli.
This model is hosted on
BioModels Database
and identified by:
MODEL1703030000.
To cite BioModels Database, please use:
Chelliah V et al. BioModels: ten-year
anniversary. Nucl. Acids Res. 2015, 43(Database
issue):D542-8.
To the extent possible under law, all copyright and related or
neighbouring rights to this encoded model have been dedicated to
the public domain worldwide. Please refer to
CC0
Public Domain Dedication for more information.
2017-03-01 | BIOMD0000000700 | BioModels
Project description:Compartmentalization of DNA damage response between heterochromatin and euchromatin is mediated by distinct H2A histone variants
| PRJNA377526 | ENA