Systematic comparative analysis of strand-specific, cost-effective, RNA-seq library preparation methods for low input samples
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA704106 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:Despite the precipitous decline in the cost of genome sequencing over the last few years, library preparation for RNA-seq is still laborious and expensive for high throughput screening for drug discovery. Limited availability of RNA generated by some experimental workflows poses an additional challenge and typically adds to the cost of RNA library preparation. In a search for low cost, automation-compatible RNA library preparation kits that also maintain strand specificity and are amenable to low input RNA quantities, we systematically tested two recent commercial technologies – Swift and Swift Rapid – using the Illumina TruSeq stranded mRNA, the de facto standard workflow for bulk transcriptomics, as our reference. We used the Universal Human Reference RNA (UHRR) (composed of equal quantities of total RNA from 10 human cancer cell lines) to benchmark differential gene expression in these kits, at input quantities ranging between 10 ng to 500 ng. Read quality and alignment metrics revealed high mapping efficiency and uniform read coverage through genes for all samples across all three kits. Normalized read counts between all treatment groups were in high agreement, with pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients >0.97. Compared to the Illumina TruSeq stranded mRNA kit, both Swift RNA library kits are cost effective and offer shorter workflow times enabled by their patented Adaptase technology. Furthermore, the Swift RNA kit allows for a relatively broader (and lower) input range, producing consistent results across diverse samples. The Swift Rapid RNA method is the fastest and most cost effective NGS workflow that is best suited for higher RNA yields, with the exact same RNA input range as the Illumina TruSeq kit. We also found the Swift RNA kit to produce the fewest number of differentially expressed genes and pathways attributable to input mRNA concentration.
2021-02-23 | GSE167300 | GEO
Project description:Library preparation is a key step in gene expression quantification. There are considerable advantages to both strand specific sequencing and the ability to sequence samples with very small amounts of starting material. Until recently there was no kit available that allowed both simultaneously. The standard Illumina-TruSeq stranded mRNA Sample Preparation kit requires abundant starting quantity while the Takara Bio-SMART-Seq® v4 Ultra® Low Input RNA kit allows for ultra low starting quantities but sacrifices strand specificity. Recently a kit that can do both, SMARTer® Stranded Total RNA-Seq Kit v2 - Pico Input Mammalian by Takara Bio, has become available. Evaluating the performance and effects of these sample preparation kits is a critical determinant for selecting the appropriate sequencing protocol, but a comprehensive comparison is currently missing. To address this we performed a detailed comparative analysis of sequencing libraries prepared with the three kits. We prepared a set of samples representing two experimental conditions with each kit, allowing for comparison of the kits in a standard realistic differential expression analysis. We find substantial differences in the levels of alignment and differential gene expression. Using differential expression analysis we show that using Pico results in identifying 55% less differentially expressed genes than TruSeq. Nevertheless, using gene pathway enrichment analysis we find similar results for all three kits, indicating that ultimately comparable functional results can be reached.
2019-09-17 | GSE124167 | GEO
Project description:Comparison of library preparation methods using Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii
| PRJEB7411 | ENA
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6748930 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Library preparation for whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) is challenging due to side effects of the bisulphite treatment, which leads to extensive DNA damage. Recently, a new generation of methods for bisulphite sequencing library preparation have been devised. They are based on initial bisulphite treatment of the DNA, followed by adaptor tagging of single stranded DNA fragments, and enable WGBS using low quantities of input DNA. In this study, we present a novel approach for quick and cost effective WGBS library preparation that is based on splinted adaptor tagging (SPLAT) of bisulphite-converted single-stranded DNA. Moreover, we validate SPLAT against three commercially available WGBS library preparation techniques, two of which are based on bisulphite treatment prior to adaptor tagging and one is a conventional WGBS method.
2016-10-27 | GSE89213 | GEO
Project description:A Cost-effective Method of Mate-pair Library Construction with Controlled Polymerization
| PRJEB28073 | ENA
Project description:Comparative evaluation of RNA-Seq library preparation methods for strand-specificity and low input
| PRJNA510931 | ENA
Project description:RNA sequencing is a powerful approach to quantify the genome-wide distribution of mRNA molecules in a population to gain deeper understanding of cellular functions and phenotypes. However, unlike eukaryotic cells, mRNA sequencing of bacterial samples is more challenging due to the absence of a poly-A tail that typically enables efficient capture and enrichment of mRNA from the abundant rRNA molecules in a cell. Moreover, bacterial cells frequently contain 100-fold lower quantities of RNA compared to mammalian cells, which further complicates mRNA sequencing from non-cultivable and non-model bacterial species which are often present in low abundance. To overcome these limitations, we report EMBR-seq (Enrichment of mRNA by Blocked rRNA), a method that efficiently depletes 5S, 16S and 23S rRNA using blocking primers to prevent their amplification. EMBR-seq results in greater than 80% of the sequenced RNA molecules deriving from mRNA. We demonstrate that this increased efficiency provides a deeper view of the transcriptome without introducing technical amplification-induced biases. Moreover, compared to recent methods that employ a large array of oligonucleotides to deplete rRNA, EMBR-seq employs a single oligonucleotide per rRNA, thereby making this new technology significantly more cost-effective, especially when applied to varied bacterial species. Finally, compared to existing commercial kits, we show that EMBR-seq can be used to successfully quantify the transcriptome from more than 500-fold lower starting total RNA. Thus, EMBR-seq provides an efficient and cost-effective approach to quantify global gene expression profiles from low input bacterial samples.
2020-10-22 | GSE149666 | GEO
Project description:A generic, cost-effective and scalable cell lineage analysis platform
| PRJEB13000 | ENA
Project description:Advances in single-cell genomics enable commensurate improvements in methods for uncovering lineage relations among individual cells. Current sequencing based methods for cell lineage analysis depend on low resolution bulk analysis or rely on extensive single cell sequencing which is not scalable and could be biased by functional dependencies. Here we show an integrated biochemical-computational platform for generic single-cell lineage analysis that is retrospective, cost-effective and scalable. It consists of a biochemical-computational pipeline that inputs individual cells, produces targeted single-cell sequencing data and uses it to generate a lineage tree of the input cells. We validated the platform by applying it to cells sampled from an ex vivo grown tree and analyzed its feasibility landscape by computer simulations. We conclude that the platform may serve as a generic tool for lineage analysis and thus pave the way towards large-scale human cell lineage discovery.
2016-04-18 | E-MTAB-4553 | biostudies-arrayexpress