Proteomics

Dataset Information

0

Identifying proteins altered during Methyl methanesulfonate treatment


ABSTRACT: Humans are exposed to a wide range of exogenous and endogenous alkylating agents, including agents frequently used as cytostatic drugs in cancer treatment (Drablos, Feyzi et al. 2004). Alkylating agents are mutagenic and cytotoxic and the major body of research has focused on their effects upon DNA. Less is known about the cellular consequences of alkylation to RNA, proteins and lipids, although such damage is likely quantitatively dominating due to the mere abundance of these macromolecules. DNA and RNA can be alkylated by SN1 and SN2 alkylating agents and alkylation occurs at nucleophilic O and N-atoms in the nucleosides as well as at O atoms in the phosphodiester bonds (Shooter, Howse et al. 1974, Sedgwick 2004). While alkylation at the O atoms in the nucleobases (O6G, O4T and O2C) are not affected by their hydrogen bonding, N1A and N3C contain an electron pair involved in hydrogen bonding. Alkylation at these nitrogens are thus more frequent in RNA and single-stranded DNA than in double stranded DNA (Bodell and Singer 1979). To cope with genomic damage inflicted by alkylating agents, a set of complex signal transduction pathways and DNA repair enzymes, collectively called the DNA damage response (DDR) is essential. The DDR senses the DNA damage and starts a highly choreographed response in order to resolve DNA damage or -replication issues (Ciccia and Elledge 2010). Specific repair mechanisms also exist to repair alkylated RNA (Aas, Otterlei et al. 2003, Wurtmann and Wolin 2009), although the biological significance of such repair yet remains elusive. Nevertheless, alkylation damage has been shown to alter the base-pairing properties of RNA bases and can interfere with tRNA-rRNA (Yoshizawa, Fourmy et al. 1999) as well as mRNA-tRNA (Ougland, Zhang et al. 2004){Hudson, 2015 #259}. Likely, other RNA functions that relies on base pairing might also be affected by alkylation damage, e.g. the correct folding of tRNAs and the function of miRNAs. Alkylation of mRNA may also affect translation indirectly by affecting binding affinities to RNA binding proteins (RBPs), as recently demonstrated for 6-meA. This enzymatically induced modification promotes binding of the 6-maA reader proteins YTHDF1 and 2 . While YTHDF2 reduces the stability of 6-maA modified transcripts (Wang, Lu et al. 2014), YTHDF1 actively promotes protein synthesis by interacting with the translation machinery (Wang, Zhao et al. 2015). To what degree alkylation damage to mRNA may promote similar effects by modulating translation remains, however, to be investigated. Interestingly, several studies have identified RBPs as important players in the DDR (Beli, Lukashchuk et al. 2012, Jungmichel, Rosenthal et al. 2013). Here, RBPs appear to have three major roles: 1) regulate gene expression at both the transcriptional- and post-transcriptional level (Keene and Tenenbaum 2002, Glisovic, Bachorik et al. 2008, Rinn and Chang 2012), 2) prevent formation of R-loops (Skourti-Stathaki and Proudfoot 2014), and 3) participate directly in DNA repair (Montecucco and Biamonti 2013, Dutertre, Lambert et al. 2014, Naro, Bielli et al. 2015). Two large-scale mass spectrometry (MS) based studies of RBPs in human cancer cell lines together identified more than 1100 RBPs (Baltz, Munschauer et al. 2012, Castello, Fischer et al. 2012) and more recently the “RBPomes” of mouse embryonic stem cells (Kwon, Yi et al. 2013) and yeast (Mitchell, Jain et al. 2013) have been published. However, functional studies describing how these complex protein networks are affected during genotoxic cell stress are still largely missing. One previous study has monitored changes in the RBPome of mouse embryonic fibroblasts subsequent to treatment with the topoisomerase inhibitor etoposide {Boucas, 2015 #112}. To our knowledge, however, no such studies have attempted to monitor altered global protein:RNA binding subsequent to treatment with alkylating agents. This could be particularly interesting since base methylation constitutes an important functional modification of RNA. In the present study we aimed at investigating this in more detail by SILAC-based quantitation of proteins differentially binding to poly(A)-RNA in HeLa cells at different time points after treatment with the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate.

INSTRUMENT(S): LTQ Orbitrap Elite

ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (human)

TISSUE(S): Cell Culture, Epithelial Cell Of Cervix

DISEASE(S): Cervix Carcinoma

SUBMITTER: Animesh Sharma  

LAB HEAD: Geir Slupphaug

PROVIDER: PXD003549 | Pride | 2021-08-30

REPOSITORIES: Pride

altmetric image

Publications

ALKBH3 partner ASCC3 mediates P-body formation and selective clearance of MMS-induced 1-methyladenosine and 3-methylcytosine from mRNA.

Wollen Kristian Lied KL   Hagen Lars L   Vågbø Cathrine B CB   Rabe Renana R   Iveland Tobias S TS   Aas Per Arne PA   Sharma Animesh A   Sporsheim Bjørnar B   Erlandsen Hilde O HO   Palibrk Vuk V   Bjørås Magnar M   Fonseca Davi M DM   Mosammaparast Nima N   Slupphaug Geir G  

Journal of translational medicine 20210703 1


<h4>Background</h4>Reversible enzymatic methylation of mammalian mRNA is widespread and serves crucial regulatory functions, but little is known to what degree chemical alkylators mediate overlapping modifications and whether cells distinguish aberrant from canonical methylations.<h4>Methods</h4>Here we use quantitative mass spectrometry to determine the fate of chemically induced methylbases in the mRNA of human cells. Concomitant alteration in the mRNA binding proteome was analyzed by SILAC ma  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2009-08-25 | GSE16565 | GEO
2010-09-09 | E-GEOD-16565 | biostudies-arrayexpress
2020-10-28 | PXD013973 | Pride
2024-02-14 | PXD015889 | Pride
2017-02-14 | GSE57788 | GEO
2020-05-06 | GSE57161 | GEO
2017-02-14 | GSE57789 | GEO
2021-12-14 | GSE174841 | GEO
2019-11-07 | PXD013834 | Pride
2022-08-31 | GSE171053 | GEO