TMT-based quantitative analysis of brain whole proteome of miR-137 mouse models
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): Q Exactive
ORGANISM(S): Mus Musculus (mouse)
TISSUE(S): Brain
DISEASE(S): Residual Chronic Schizophrenia
SUBMITTER: 
xusheng wang
LAB HEAD: Junmin Peng
PROVIDER: PXD003874 | Pride | 2018-10-17
REPOSITORIES: Pride
Similar Datasets
Project description:We used mass spectrometry-based proteomics to perform a phosphoproteomics analysis of selinexor-treated ex vivo AML patient samples (n=20) and 4 AML cell lines (PL-21, NOMO-1, GDM-1 and MV4-11). For quantitative phosphoproteomics, we used a tandem mass tag (TMT)-based approach. Conditions for the TMT 11-plex (Ex vivo samples) and TMT 8-plex (AML cell lines) setups are specified below. Cells were treated with 1 M selinexor (also known as KPT-330) or 0.1% DMSO for 6 hours. The experimental treatment conditions and TMT11-plex (ex vivo samples) and TMT8-plex (cell lines) labeling schemes are specified below: TMT-11-plex TMT channel Patient no Treatment Set 1 126 Ex_24 DMSO Set 1 127N Ex_24 Selinexor Set 1 127C Ex_25 DMSO Set 1 128N Ex_25 Selinexor Set 1 128C Ex_34 DMSO Set 1 129N Ex_34 Selinexor Set 1 129C Ex_41 DMSO Set 1 130N Ex_41 Selinexor Set 1 130C Ex_44 DMSO Set 1 131N Ex_44 Selinexor Set 1 131C Mix pool Mix pool Set 2 126 Ex_9 DMSO Set 2 127N Ex_9 Selinexor Set 2 127C Ex_18 DMSO Set 2 128N Ex_18 Selinexor Set 2 128C Ex_27 DMSO Set 2 129N Ex_27 Selinexor Set 2 129C Ex_29 DMSO Set 2 130N Ex_29 Selinexor Set 2 130C Ex_36 DMSO Set 2 131N Ex_36 Selinexor Set 2 131C Mix pool Mix pool Set 3 126 Ex_8 DMSO Set 3 127N Ex_8 Selinexor Set 3 127C Ex_13 DMSO Set 3 128N Ex_13 Selinexor Set 3 128C Ex_14 DMSO Set 3 129N Ex_14 Selinexor Set 3 129C Ex_19 DMSO Set 3 130N Ex_19 Selinexor Set 3 130C Ex_40 DMSO Set 3 131N Ex_40 Selinexor Set 3 131C Mix pool Mix pool Set 4 126 Ex_6 DMSO Set 4 127N Ex_6 Selinexor Set 4 127C Ex_15 DMSO Set 4 128N Ex_15 Selinexor Set 4 128C Ex_28 DMSO Set 4 129N Ex_28 Selinexor Set 4 129C Ex_39 DMSO Set 4 130N Ex_39 Selinexor Set 4 130C Ex_42 DMSO Set 4 131N Ex_42 Selinexor Set 4 131C Mix pool Mix pool AML cell lines: TMT-8-plex TMT channel Treatment Replicate GDM-1 126 DMSO 1 GDM-1 127N DMSO 2 GDM-1 127C DMSO 3 GDM-1 128N DMSO 4 GDM-1 128C Selinexor 1 GDM-1 129N Selinexor 2 GDM-1 129C Selinexor 3 GDM-1 130N Selinexor 4 MV4-11 126 DMSO 1 MV4-11 127N DMSO 2 MV4-11 127C DMSO 3 MV4-11 128N DMSO 4 MV4-11 128C Selinexor 1 MV4-11 129N Selinexor 2 MV4-11 129C Selinexor 3 MV4-11 130N Selinexor 4 NOMO-1 126 DMSO 1 NOMO-1 127N DMSO 2 NOMO-1 127C DMSO 3 NOMO-1 128N DMSO 4 NOMO-1 128C Selinexor 1 NOMO-1 129N Selinexor 2 NOMO-1 129C Selinexor 3 NOMO-1 130N Selinexor 4 PL-21 126 DMSO 1 PL-21 127N DMSO 2 PL-21 127C DMSO 3 PL-21 128N DMSO 4 PL-21 128C Selinexor 1 PL-21 129N Selinexor 2 PL-21 129C Selinexor 3 PL-21 130N Selinexor 4
2022-08-07 | PXD017660 | Pride
Project description:Proteome maps of biochemically enriched synaptic tissue from human Alzheimers Disease (AD) and control angular gyrus samples to highlight the synapse as a site of integration for pathophysiological processes active in AD. The samples were combined into eleven TMTpools (01 to 11). Samples pools were fractionated using basic pH reversed-phase chromatography (bRPLC) and at least 12 fractions were analyzed by LC-MS2/MS3 per pool.
The RAW files are:
Carlyle_TMTpool_01_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_01_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_02_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_02_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_03_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_03_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_04_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_04_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_05_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_05_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_06_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_06_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_07_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_07_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_08, Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_09A, Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_09B, Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_10 to Carlyle_TMTpool_08_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_09_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_09_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_10_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_10_fraction_12
Carlyle_TMTpool_11_fraction_01 to Carlyle_TMTpool_11_fraction_12
The labeling scheme is:
TMTpool_01: RUSH_0592 (126), RUSH_0034 (127n), RUSH_0755 (127c), RUSH_0143 (128n), RUSH_1442 (128c), RUSH_0570 (129n), Pooled_sample (129c), Pooled_sample (130n), RUSH_0992 (130c), RUSH_0857 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_02: RUSH_0974 (126), RUSH_1440 (127n), RUSH_0240 (127c), RUSH_0032 (128n), RUSH_0406 (128c), RUSH_0065 (129n), RUSH_1376 (129c), RUSH_0684 (130n), RUSH_0269 (130c), RUSH_1159 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_03: RUSH_0136 (126), Pooled_sample (127n), RUSH_0537 (127c), RUSH_1250 (128n), RUSH_0795 (128c), RUSH_0001 (129n), RUSH_0404 (129c), RUSH_0606 (130n), RUSH_0229 (130c), RUSH_0465 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_04: RUSH_0734 (126), RUSH_0873 (127n), RUSH_0743 (127c), Pooled_sample (128n), RUSH_0712 (128c), RUSH_0751 (129n), RUSH_0302 (129c), RUSH_0499 (130n), RUSH_1218 (130c), RUSH_1421 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_05: RUSH_1392 (126), RUSH_0890 (127n), RUSH_1006 (127c), RUSH_1063 (128n), RUSH_0128 (128c), RUSH_0590 (129n), RUSH_0674 (129c), RUSH_0572 (130n), RUSH_0413 (130c), RUSH_1288 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_06: RUSH_1487 (126), RUSH_1348 (127n), RUSH_0007 (127c), RUSH_1323 (128n), RUSH_1498 (128c), RUSH_0976 (129n), RUSH_0859 (129c), RUSH_0544 (130n), RUSH_0067 (130c), RUSH_1384 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_07: RUSH_0212 (126), RUSH_1474 (127n), Pooled_sample (127c), RUSH_0010 (128n), RUSH_0931 (128c), RUSH_1205 (129n), RUSH_1200 (129c), RUSH_0206 (130n), RUSH_0376 (130c), RUSH_0460 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_08: RUSH_0927 (126), RUSH_0963 (127n), RUSH_0055 (127c), RUSH_0085 (128n), RUSH_0780 (128c), RUSH_0327 (129n), RUSH_0354 (129c), RUSH_0123 (130n), RUSH_1358 (130c), RUSH_1424 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_09: RUSH_1334 (126), RUSH_0921 (127n), Pooled_sample (127c), RUSH_1093 (128n), RUSH_1499 (128c), RUSH_1419 (129n), Pooled_sample (129c), RUSH_0555 (130n), RUSH_0618 (130c), RUSH_0732 (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_10: RUSH_1176 (126), Pooled_sample (127n), RUSH_0958 (127c), RUSH_0447 (128n), RUSH_1485 (128c), RUSH_0158 (129n), RUSH_0252 (129c), RUSH_0078 (130n), RUSH_0415 (130c), Pooled_sample (131n), bridge (131c).
TMTpool_11: RUSH_1313 (126), RUSH_0989 (127n), RUSH_0295 (127c), RUSH_0177 (128n), RUSH_0064 (128c), RUSH_0919 (129n), RUSH_0847 (129c), RUSH_0266 (130n), RUSH_0933 (130c), Pooled_sample (131n), bridge (131c).
2020-02-17 | MSV000084959 | MassIVE
Project description:We aimed to identify the response mechanism to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition. A431 cells were transfected with mock siRNA or BCL6 siRNA. Cells were then treated with gefitinib. Harvesting was done at 0h, at 24h and at 48h. Two TMT10plex sets were organized as follows: TMT set1: mock 0h (3x, channels 126, 127N and 127C), mock 24h (3x, 128N, 128C and 129N), mock 48h (3x, 129C, 130N, 130C) and internal pooled standard (131) composed from equal aliquots of all samples (mock siRNA and BCL6 siRNA). TMT set2: siBCL6 0h (3x, channels 126, 127N and 127C), siBCL6 24h (3x, 128N, 128C and 129N), siBCL6 48h (3x, 129C, 130N, 130C) and the same internal pooled standard (131) as for set 1.
2020-12-09 | PXD016605 | Pride
Project description:High Resolution Isoelectric Focusing (HiRIEF) LC-MS was used to analyze samples from the human A431 cell line and also samples of histologically normal tissues. The high analytical depth afforded by HiRIEF permitted proteogenomics on these two sample sets (A431 cells and normal tissues). The A431 data was obtained from a time course experiment upon Gefitinib treatment (EGFR inhibition) of A431 cells with harvests at 2h, 6h and 24h after treatment as well of untreated cells. Isobaric tag labelling of peptide samples with TMT10plex was used. Biological triplicate controls (TMT channels 126, 127N, 127C), duplicate 2h (128N, 128C), duplicate 6h (129N, 129C) and triplicate 24h (130N, 130C, 131) samples were employed. The normal tissues data was obtained from two separate TMT10plex sets. TMT set1 was composed of 9 samples, all from different individuals, including three placenta samples (126, 127N, 127C) two liver samples (128N, 128C), two kidney samples (129N, 129C), two tonsil samples (130N, 130C), plus an internal pooled standard (131). TMT set2 was composed of 8 samples, all from different individuals, including one tonsil sample (126), two liver samples (127C, 128N), two kidney samples (128C, 129N), three testis samples (129C, 130N, 130C), plus an internal pooled standard (131). The internal pooled standard was made by combining equal aliquots of the tryptic peptide mixtures from each of the 17 tissue samples.
2018-01-19 | PXD006291 | Pride
Project description:Mass spectrometry-based proteomics was applied to unravel Erk signaling in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs). A previously described engineered ESCs system for Erk induction via a drug-inducible cRAF-ErT2 fusion (Hamilton, W. B. & Brickman, J. M., Cell Rep 2014) was used in two different setups measuring the phosphoproteome in an 11-plex tandem mass tag (TMT)-based approach as described below. Fgf4 stimulation and MEK inhibition: ESCs were stimulated with Fgf4 (40 nM, recombinant, mouse, 5 minutes) following pretreatment (30 minutes) with either DMSO (1:10000) or MEK inhibition (MEKi: 1 microM PD0325901): The experimental treatment conditions and TMT11-plex labeling are specified below: 126: DMSO, unstimulated control replicate 1 127N: DMSO, unstimulated control replicate 2 127C: DMSO, unstimulated control replicate 3 128N: DMSO + Fgf4 replicate 1 128C: DMSO + Fgf4 replicate 2 129N: DMSO + Fgf4 replicate 3 129C: MEKi + Fgf4 replicate 1 130N: MEKi + Fgf4 replicate 2 130C: MEKi + Fgf4 replicate 3 131N: MEKi replicate 1 131C: MEKi replicate 2 Analog sensitive Erk2 setup: In the ESC system the ERK2-/- ESCs (Hamilton et al., PloS ONE, 2013) were engineered to stably express an inducible cRAF-ErT2 fusion protein expressed from the same transgene as a FLAG-tagged analogue sensitive Erk2Q103A. Erk1 was subsequently removed by CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis using sgRNAs flanking exon 2. Cells were pre-treated for 30 minutes with either the ATP-mimetic compound 1-NM-PP1 (2 microM) (Endo et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006), the Mek1 inhibitor PD0325901 (1 microM), or DMSO (0.01%), followed by induction or not of the cRAF-ErT2 fusion by (Z)-4-Hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT) (250 nM) for 2 hours as indicated. The experimental treatment conditions and TMT11-plex labeling are specified below: 126: DMSO pretreatment, non-induced control, replicate 1 127N: DMSO pretreatment, non-induced control, replicate 2 127C: DMSO pretreatment, non-induced control, replicate 3 128N: DMSO pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 1 128C: DMSO pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 2 129N: DMSO pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 3 129C: PP1 pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 1 130N: PP1 pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 2 130C: PP1 pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 3 131N: MEKi pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 1 131C: MEKi pretreatment, 4OHT-induction, replicate 2
2019-08-12 | PXD012573 | Pride
Project description:The small molecule YC-1 was identified as identified as a selectively active agent against subsets of the two major live cancer subtypes, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Response to YC-1 is dependent on the expression of the sulfotransferase SULT1A1, which activates YC-1 through sulfonation. The contributions of mass spectrometry to the study were: (i) identifying SULT1A1 as the key player in YC-1 response through observing the protein in a cell line with acquired resistance to the small molecule treatment, (ii) corroborating the role of SULT1A1 in the YC-1 activity by correlating protein expression profiles and drug responses across 37 biliary cancer cell lines, (iii) showing that SULT1A1 expression was associated with IDH mutations, FGFR2 fusion, and BAP1 loss in vivo studying patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, and (iv) identifying protein targets in a protein enrichment experiment with an immobilized drug.
(i) and (ii): Cell line samples from datasets (i) and (ii) were analyzed together in a set of 12 TMT sets (ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT1 to TMT12) using TMT11-barcoding. The samples were analyzed on an Orbitrap Lumos mass spectrometer using the SPS-MS3 method. Prior to analysis, samples were fractionated offline using high pH reversed chromatography (12 fractions per TMT set). Across all TMT sets, channel 131c was used as the bridge channel (pooled digests of all samples). Samples were labeled as follows (rep = replicate:
(i) Cell lines samples with acquired resistance to YC-1 treatment:
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT1: RBE_rep_1 (126), RBE YC1 Resistant 6_rep_1 (129c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT2: RBE YC1 Resistant 3_rep_1 (129n), RBE YC1 Resistant 1_rep_1 (130n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT3: RBE YC1 Resistant 2_rep_1 (126), RBE YC1 Resistant 5_rep_1 (130c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT4: RBE YC1 Resistant 4_rep_1 (126).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT5: RBE YC1 Resistant 1_rep_2 (127n), RBE YC1 Resistant 4_rep_2 (128c), RBE YC1 Resistant 3_rep_2 (130c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT6: RBE YC1 Resistant 2_rep_2 (126), RBE YC1 Resistant 6_rep_2 (127c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT7: RBE_rep_2 (128n), RBE YC1 Resistant 5_rep_2 (130n).
(ii) Proteomes of untreated biliary cell lines (baseline):
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT1: RBE_rep_1 (126), GB2_rep_1 (127n), HuCCT1_rep_1 (127c), ECC3_rep_1 (128n), ICC10_rep_1 (128c), KMCH-1_rep_1 (129n), SNU-1196_rep_1 (130n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT2: ICC13-7_rep_1 (126), ICC8_rep_1 (127n), ICC9_rep_1 (127c), SNU-478_rep_1 (128n), CC-SW-1_rep_1 (128c), CC-LP-1_rep_1 (129c), SSP-25_rep_1 (130c), ICC10-8_rep_1 (131n)
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT3: SNU-1079_rep_1 (127n), ICC5_rep_1 (127c), ICC7_rep_1 (128c), COR-L105_rep_1 (129n), ICC17_rep_1 (129c), GBC1_rep_1 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT4: ICC3_rep_1 (127n), ICC2_rep_1 (127c), ICC106_rep_1 (128n), ICC11_rep_1 (128c), HKGZ-CC_rep_1 (129n), SNU-869_rep_1 (129c), HuH28_rep_1 (130n), ICC12_rep_1 (130c), SNU-308_rep_1 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT5: ICC2_rep_2 (126), ECC3_rep_2 (127c), GB2_rep_2 (128n), ICC11_rep_2 (129n), ICC7_rep_2 (129c), SNU-869_rep_2 (130n), SSP-25_rep_2 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT6: CC-LP-1_rep_2 (127n), COR-L105_rep_2 (128n), HuCCT1_rep_2 (129n), ICC12_rep_2 (129c), ICC3_rep_2 (131n), ICC5_rep_2 (130n), SNU-478_rep_2 (130c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT7: ICC10_rep_2 (126), ICC10-6_rep_2 (127n), ICC10-8_rep_2 (127c), RBE_rep_2 (128n), ICC9_rep_2 (128c), ICC17_rep_2 (129n), ICC8_rep_2 (129c), CC-SW-1_rep_2 (130c), GBC1_rep_2 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT8: ICC13-7_rep_2 (127c), HuH28_rep_2 (128n), HKGZ-CC_rep_2 (128c), SNU-1079_rep_2 (129n), KMCH-1_rep_2 (129c), SNU-1196_rep_2 (130n), SNU-308_rep_2 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT9: SG231_rep_1 (126), KKU-100_rep_1 (127n), YSCCC_rep_1 (127c), ICC4_rep_1 (128n), TKKK_rep_1 (128c), ECC2_rep_1 (129n), KKU-M213/M214 (129c).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT10: YSCCC_rep_2 (126), KKU-M213/M214_rep_2 (127n), SG231_rep_2 (127c), TKKK_rep_2 (129n), ECC2_rep_2 (129c), ICC4_rep_2 (130n), KKU-100_rep_2 (131n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT11: ICC13-7_rep_1 (129n).
ShiBardeesy_CellLines_TMT12: ICC13-7_rep2 (131n)
2022-11-29 | MSV000090805 | MassIVE
Project description:We used mass spectrometry-based proteomics to unravel anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) signaling in the ALK and MYCN amplified neuroblastoma cell line, NB1. We specifically measured the ALK phosphoproteome upon siRNA depletion of ALK and upon ALK inhibition using the ALK-targeting small-molecule inhibitor lorlatinib. For quantitative phosphoproteomics we used a tandem mass tag (TMT)-based approach. Conditions for the TMT 11-plex setup is specified below. For each siRNA depletion experiment, NB1 cells were treated with siRNA (80 nM; as specified below) for 48 hours prior to stimulation with 0.1% DMSO for 30 minutes. For inhibitor treatment, NB1 cells were treated for 30 minutes with either 10 microM or 10 nM lorlatinib. The experimental treatment conditions and TMT11-plex labeling are specified below: 126: siControl replicate 1, 0.1% DMSO 127N: siControl replicate 2, 0.1% DMSO 127C: siControl replicate 3, 0.1% DMSO 128N: siALK sequence 1, 0.1% DMSO 128C: siALK sequence 2, 0.1% DMSO 129N: siALK mix of sequence 1 and 2, 0.1% DMSO 129C: 10 microM lorlatinib replicate 1 130N: 10 microM lorlatinib replicate 2 130C: 10 microM lorlatinib replicate 3 131N: 10 nM lorlatinib replicate 1 131C: 10 nM lorlatinib replicate 2
2018-11-21 | PXD009477 | Pride
Project description:Two glioblastoma stem cell lines, GBM8 and BT07, were either treated with OBT for 20 hours (triplicate measurements) or studied untreated (duplicates). Proteomes were mapped using TMT10 on an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer using the SPS-MS3 method. TMT labeling was done as follows: GBM8_CTRL_1 (130n), GBM8_CTRL_2 (131n), GBM8_OBT_1 (126), GBM8_OBT_2 (127c), GBM8_OBT_3 (127n), BT07_CTRL_1 (129n), BT07_CTRL_2 (130c), BT07_OBT_1 (128c), BT07_OBT_2 (128n), BT07_OBT_3 (129c).
2019-12-02 | MSV000084647 | MassIVE
Project description:Subcellular proteomics analysis of human T-cells in response to T-cell receptor stimulation. High Resolution Isoelectric Focusing (HiRIEF) LC-MS/MS and relative quantification by TMT 10-plex was used to analyze subcellular fractions (Cytosol, Nuclear and Mitochondria-Small Organelle-Membrane) of Human T-cells from 3 separate donors stimulated with T-cell receptor stimulation for 0, 15 minutes or 60 minutes. The data was obtained from 3 separate TMT10 plex sets which included: 126 – Cytosol, unstimulated; 127N – Cyto, 15 min; 127C – Cyto, 60 min; 128N – Mitochondrion-Small Organelle-Membrane, unstimulated; 128C – Mito-SmO-Mem, 15 min; 129N – Mito-SmO-Mem, 60 min; 129C – Nuclear, unstimulated; 130N – Nuc, 15 min; 130C– Nuc, 60 min; 131 – pooled internal control of all samples.
2019-11-13 | PXD013284 | Pride
Project description:HEK293T cells proteome comparison with or without NUFIP1 deletion. TMT channels 128n, 128c, 130c, 131n and 131c were not used for this analysis.
2020-04-30 | PXD017858 | Pride