Three protein extraction methods for mass spectrometry proteomics of fresh frozen mouse tissue
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): Q Exactive
ORGANISM(S): Mus Musculus (mouse)
TISSUE(S): Heart
SUBMITTER: 
Alex Kentsis
LAB HEAD: Alex Kentsis
PROVIDER: PXD020256 | Pride | 2020-07-30
REPOSITORIES: Pride
Similar Datasets
Project description:We evaluated different in-solution and FASP-based sample preparation strategies for absolute protein quantification. Label-free quantification (LFQ) was employed to compare different sample preparation strategies in the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK) and noted organismal specific differences in general performance and enrichment of specific protein classes. The original FASP protocol globally enriched for most proteins on the bacterial sample whereas the Sodium deoxycholate in-solution strategy was more efficient on HEK cells. Although detergents were found highly suited for global proteome analysis higher intensities were obtained for high abundant nucleic acid associated protein complexes, like the ribosome and histone proteins using guanidine hydrochloride. Importantly, we show for the first time that the observable total proteome mass of a sample strongly depends on the sample preparation protocol with some protocols resulting in significant underestimation of protein mass due to incomplete protein extraction of biased protein groups
2015-10-06 | PXD001511 | Pride
Project description:Comparison of in-solution and single-pot, solid-phase-enchanced sample preparation (SP3) sample processing workflows on HeLa cell samples, using different lysis buffers based on SDS and guanidine hydrochloride, for optimal analysis by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS)
2022-08-12 | PXD031918 | Pride
Project description:All cell lines were cultured according to the specifications outlined by ATCC. Cell lines were grown to 80% confluence, then serum-deprived in 0.5% FBS for 24 hours before harvesting. Cells were washed twice with Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California) and drained. 1 mL of SDS extraction buffer (0.1M NaCl, 20 mM Trizma base, 25 mM EDTA, 0.5% w/v SDS) was added directly to the plate to lyse the cells. Cellular lysate was scraped off the plates, pipetted into a cryovial, and stored at 80C until DNA extraction. Lysates were treated with 200 ug/ml ProteinaseK at 50C overnight. DNA was precipitated with one volume of Isopropanol and dissolved in TE4 buffer. Cell lines were lysed in Phenol followed by a Phenol/Chloroform extraction. The aqueous layer was added to 70% ethanol and further purified by loading the RNA/Ethanol mix into an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) column. Purification was continued and finalized as described in the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) Manual. We measured transcript levels in the 27 primary ovarian tumors and 15 cell lines using the HEEBO [16] oligonucleotide microarrays, containing 44,544 70-mer probes and printed at the Stanford Functional Genomics Facility. Detailed information on the HEEBO arrays is available at the Stanford Functional Genomics Facility website. Experimental methods. Microarray experiments were performed as described at the Brown lab website. Briefly, 500 ug of total RNA from each of the ovarian tumors were amplified using Amino Allyl Message Amp II aRNA Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). The aRNAs were labeled with Cy5 and co-hybridized with Cy3 labeled Stratagene reference aRNA. For some samples, the mRNA was amplified and hybridized in duplicate or triplicate. The samples were then hybridized to HEEBO microarrays. The arrays were scanned in a low-ozone environment using a GenePix 4000A microarray scanner and images were analyzed with Genepix 5.0 (Axon instruments, Union City, CA).
2011-02-12 | GSE27225 | GEO
Project description:LK cells of each mouse genotype were fixed with 1% formaldehyde for 15 min and quenched with 0.125 M glycine. Chromatin was isolated by the addition of lysis buffer, followed by shearing with Bioruptor Pico with water cooler (Diagenode, Seraing, Belgium). The DNA was sheared to an average length of 300-500 bp. Genomic DNA regions of interest were isolated using antibodies against H3K27ac (Diagenode, C15410196), H3K4me1 (C15410194), and H3K4me2 (Abcam, ab32356). Complexes were washed, eluted from the beads with SDS buffer, and subjected to RNase and proteinase K treatment. Crosslinks were reversed by incubation overnight at 65°C, and ChIP DNA was purified by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. After the measurement of DNA concentration with Qubit3.0, the libraries were prepared and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500.
2018-03-08 | GSE97020 | GEO
Project description:Glioblastoma stem cells (TS-543) were harvested and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 mins at room temperature. The cells were lysed using SDS Lysis buffer for ChIP (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8). The lysate was then sonicated for 25 cycles at 30% amplitude (15 s ON and 45 s OFF). The sonicated samples were then diluted in ChIP dilution buffer (0.01% SDS, 1% Triton-X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 167 mM NaCl) and used for the immunoprecipitation with H3K27ac (Abcam, Ab4729), H2AZ (Active motive, cat#39113) and H3K27ac (Abcam cat#ab8580). After an over-night incubation with antibody, the bound DNA was washed sequentially with low salt wash buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X 100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl), high salt wash buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 500 mM NaCl), LiCl wash buffer (0.25 M LiCl, 1% NP40, 1%deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8) and TE wash buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 1 mM EDTA) to remove non-specific sequences and eluted in the elution buffer (84 mg NaHCO3, 1 ml 10% SDS, 9 ml H2O). Then the samples were reverse cross-linked using NaCl at 65°C overnight. The eluted DNA was purified and used for library preparation. Library preparation was performed as previously described as described in Bowman et al. BMC Genomics 2013. Briefly, end repair with NEBNext End Repair enzyme (NEB, E6050) and clean-up with 2.4x volume AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, A63880). A-tailing with Klenow Fragment (NEB, M0212) and purified with 2.4x volume AMPure XP beads. Adapter ligation reactions contained annealed universal adapter and T4 rapid ligase (NEB, B0202) and clean-up with 1.8x volume AMPure XP beads. Chromatin was amplified using KAPA Real-time Library Amplification Kit (KAPABIOSYSTEMS, KK2701) with universal primer and barcoded primer. Amplified chromatin was purified with QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced paired-end with Illumina NextSeq 500.
2021-09-05 | GSE152862 | GEO
Project description:Proteomics offers vast potential to study the molecular regulation of the human brain. Formalin fixation is a common method for preserving human tissue, however, presents challenges for proteomic analysis. In this study we compared the efficiency of two different protein extraction buffers on three post-mortem, formalin-fixed human brains. Equal amounts of extracted proteins were subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Protein, peptide sequence and peptide group identifications, protein abundance and gene ontology pathways were analyzed. Protein extraction was superior using lysis buffer containing Tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane hydrochloride, sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium deoxycholate, and Triton X-100 (TrisHCl, SDS, SDC, Triton X-100), which was then used for inter-regional analysis. Pre-frontal, motor, temporal, and occipital cortex tissue was analyzed by label free quantification (LFQ) proteomics, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and PANTHERdb. Inter-regional analysis of the human brain revealed differential enrichment of proteins. We found similarly activated cellular signaling pathways, suggesting commonalities in the molecular regulation of neuroanatomically-linked brain functions. Overall, we developed an optimized, robust, and efficient method for protein extraction from formalin-fixed, human brain tissue for in-depth LFQ proteomics. We further demonstrate that this method is suitable for quick analysis of molecular signaling pathways in the human brain.
2023-02-22 | PXD039808 | Pride
Project description:gDNA was estracted and digested with cocktail of restrict enzymes MseI, DdeI, AluI, MboI, incubated at 37°C for 6 h. After purified by phenol/chloroform extraction, fragmented DNA was resuspended by TE, and quantified by Qubit 3.0 (Invitrogen). For each sample, 20 μg input DNA was immunoprecipitated overnight at 4°C in a shaker, with 1× DRIP binding buffer (10 mM NaPO4 pH 7.0, 140 mM NaCl, 0.05% Triton X-100) and 10 μg S9.6 antibody (ATCC, HB-8730). After adding 50 μl Dynabeads Protein G (Invitrogen, 10004D) and incubated for 4 h, the beads with antibody were washed by 1× DRIP binding buffer for 4 times at room temperature, each wash takes 10 min. Added 250 μl elution buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS) and 5 U Proteinase K to beads/antibody complexes, incubated for 40 min in an Eppendorf ThermoMixer at 55°C, 1,000 rpm. Purified by phenol/chloroform extraction, and moved supernatant to a new tube, followed by adding 1/10 volume 3 M NaAc, 1 μl GlycoBlue (Invitrogen) and 1 volume isopropanol, precipitated at -20°C for 3 h and then centrifuged. After washed by 70% ethanol and dried, the DRIPed DNA pellet was resuspended by 75 μl low EDTA TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl 8.0, 0.1 mM EDTA). NGS libraries were constructed using Accel-NGS® 1S Plus DNA Library Kit (Swift Biosciences).
2019-10-15 | GSE134101 | GEO
Project description:In this study, we evaluated three well-established sample preparation methods for shotgun proteomics, named: i) UREA; ii) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS); and iii) filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) protocols. We focused our analysis on protein extraction and digestion from heart left ventricle (LV) tissue.The three methods were compared by relative quantification using dimethyl labeling.
2019-05-21 | PXD012591 | Pride
Project description:Medicinal cannabis is used to relieve the symptoms of certain medical conditions, such as epilepsy. Cannabis is a controlled substance and until recently was illegal in many jurisdictions. Consequently, the study of this plant has been restricted. Proteomics studies on Cannabis sativa reported so far have been primarily based on plant organs and tissues other than buds, such as roots, hypocotyl, leaves, hempseeds, and flour. As far as our knowledge, no optimisation of protein extraction from cannabis reproductive tissues was attempted. Therefore, we set out to assess different protein extraction methods followed by mass spectrometry-based proteomics to recover, separate and identify the proteins of the reproductive organs of medicinal cannabis, apical buds and isolated trichomes. Database search following shotgun proteomics was limited to C. sativa protein sequences available from UniprotKB. Our results demonstrate that a buffer containing the chaotrope reagent guanidine-hydrochloride recovers many more proteins than a urea-based buffer. In combination with a precipitation with trichloroacetic acid, such buffer proved optimum to identify proteins using a trypsin digestion followed by nLC-MS/MS analyses. This is validated by focusing on enzymes involved in the cannabinoid pathway. doi:10.3390/molecules24040659
2018-12-06 | MSV000083191 | MassIVE
Project description:Human stool samples were collected, microbial cells were harvested and subjected to protein extraction using different protocols for metaproteomics analyses. The protein extraction methods differ from the usage of different lysis buffer (SDS, urea and commercially available B-Per reagent), bead beating, ultrasonication and heating. The impacts of different protein extraction methods on metaproteomics results were evaluated with multiple criteria including protein yields, peptide identifications, taxonomic compositions and functional compositions.
2017-07-17 | PXD005969 | Pride