Dataset Information

Unbiased proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis identifies response signatures and novel susceptibilities after combined MEK and mTOR inhibition in BRAFV600E mutant glioma

ABSTRACT: The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is one of the most altered pathways in cancer. It is involved in the control of cell proliferation, invasion, metabolism, and resistance to therapy. A number of aggressive malignancies, including melanoma, colon cancer and glioma, are driven by an activating missense mutation (V600E) in one component of the pathway, BRAF. BRAF V600E mutated cancers may respond initially to MEK inhibition, but may develop resistance mediated by increased reliance on mTOR signaling. We have previously demonstrated that the combination of the MEK inhibitor trametinib with the dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor TAK228 improved survival and decreased vascularization in a BRAFV600E mutant glioma model. To elucidate the mechanism of action of, and the changes in response to, MEK and mTOR inhibition, we performed comprehensive unbiased proteomic and phosphoproteomic characterization of BRAFV600E mutant glioma xenografts after short-course treatment with trametinib and TAK228, alone and in combination. We identified distinct response signatures for each monotherapy and combination therapy and validated that combination treatment inhibited activation of the MAPK and mTOR pathways, increased apoptotic signaling and suppressed angiogenesis signaling. Furthermore, we found that trametinib and TAK228 combination treatment broadly suppressed the activity of the cyclin-dependent kinases and increased the levels of proteins (and their activating phosphorylations) involved in glycolysis, the TCA cycle, nucleotide biosynthesis and DNA replication. We also demonstrated activation of both receptor tyrosine kinase and histone deacetylase proteins. This study reports a detailed (phospho)proteomic analysis of the response of BRAFV600E mutant glioma to combined MEK and mTOR pathway inhibition and identifies a number of targetable upregulated proteins and pathways, providing new avenues for the development of additional rational combination therapies for aggressive BRAF-driven tumors.

INSTRUMENT(S): Orbitrap Fusion Lumos

ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (human) Mus Musculus (mouse)

TISSUE(S): Brain, Epithelial Cell

DISEASE(S): Brain Cancer

SUBMITTER: Micah Maxwell

LAB HEAD: Micah Joel Maxwell

PROVIDER: PXD022329 | Pride | 2021-07-30

REPOSITORIES: Pride

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Unbiased Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Analysis Identifies Response Signatures and Novel Susceptibilities After Combined MEK and mTOR Inhibition in BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> Mutant Glioma.

Maxwell Micah J MJ Arnold Antje A Sweeney Heather H Chen Lijun L Lih Tung-Shing M TM Schnaubelt Michael M Eberhart Charles G CG Rubens Jeffrey A JA Zhang Hui H Clark David J DJ Raabe Eric H EH

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP 20210721

The mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is one of the most frequently altered pathways in cancer. It is involved in the control of cell proliferation, invasion, and metabolism, and can cause resistance to therapy. A number of aggressive malignancies, including melanoma, colon cancer, and glioma, are driven by a constitutively activating missense mutation (V600E) in the v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) component of the pathway. Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK ...[more]

PMID: 34298159

Similar Datasets

Project description:The first clinical trial testing the combination of targeted therapy with a BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and immunotherapy with a CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab was terminated early due to significant liver toxicities, possibly due to paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway by BRAF inhibitors in tumors with wild type BRAF. MEK inhibitors can potentiate the MAPK inhibition in tumor, while potentially alleviating the unwanted paradoxical MAPK activation. With a mouse model of syngeneic BRAFV600E driven melanoma (SM1), we tested whether the addition of the MEK inhibitor trametinib would enhance the immunosensitization effects of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. Combination of dabrafenib and trametinib with pmel-1 adoptive cell transfer (ACT) showed complete tumor regression. Bioluminescent imaging and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) phenotyping showed increased effector infiltration to tumors with dabrafenib, trametinib or dabrafenib plus trametinib with pmel-1 ACT combination. Intracellular IFN gamma staining of the TILs and in vivo cytotoxicity studies showed trametinib was not detrimental to the effector functions in vivo. Dabrafenib increased tumor associated macrophages and T regulatory cells (Tregs) in the tumors, which can be overcome by addition of trametinib. Microarray analysis revealed increased melanoma antigen, MHC expression, and global immune-related gene upregulation with the triple combination therapy. Given the up-regulation of PD-L1 seen with dabrafenib and/or trametinib combined with antigen specific ACT, we tested the triple combination of dabrafenib, trametinib with anti-PD1 therapy, and observed superior anti-tumor effect to SM1 tumors. Our findings support the testing of these combinations in patients with BRAFV600E mutant metastatic melanoma. SM1 tumors were implanted into C57BL/6 mice. Mice were treated by ACT of pmel-1 splenocytes or C57BL/6 splenocytes as control. Pmel-1 treated mice were additionally treated with either vehicle, dabrafenib, trametinib, or combination of both drugs and control mice were treated with vehicle or combination of both drugs.

Project description:PURPOSE: To assess the role of Apollon in melanoma resistance to intrinsic and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis and to identify strategies to reduce its expression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression of Apollon was assessed in melanoma cell lines and in surgical specimens.Gene expression profiling, mitochondrial depolarization, caspases activation and apoptosis assays were used to test the effect of Apollon silencing, by siRNA, on melanoma response to different anti-tumor agents. Levels of expression of Apollon and melanoma apoptosis were assessed after tumor treatment with the combination of MEK- and mTOR- inhibitors, or of anti-HLA class II mAbs and anti-tumor agents. RESULTS: Melanoma cells constitutively expressed Apollon, in-vitro and in-vivo. Extent of melanoma apoptosis correlated significantly with Apollon downmodulation upon treatment with a MEK inhibitor, a BRAFV600E-specific inhibitor or the nitrosourea fotemustine. Apollon silencing enhanced melanoma apoptosis in response to the cytotoxic drugs camptothecin, celecoxib, fotemustine and temozolomide, to MEK- and BRAFV600E-specific inhibitors, and to soluble or membrane-bound TRAIL. Mechanistically, Apollon silencing in melanoma cells promoted mitochondrial depolarization, caspase-2, -8, -9 and -3 activation and alteration in the expression of genes related to different cellular functions in response to different anti-tumor agents. Treatment of melanoma cells with combination of MEK and of mTOR inhibitors, or of HLA class II antigen-specific mAb and anti-tumor agents, promoted Apollon downmodulation, associated with enhanced apoptotic responses. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that Apollon is a relevant molecule in melanoma resistance to apoptosis, and that strategies aimed at downmodulating Apollon protein may improve melanoma cell death in response to anti-tumor agents that trigger the intrinsic or the extrinsic apoptosis pathways. The human melanoma cell line Me23682 was established in our laboratory from a surgical specimen. Cells were routinely maintained in RPMI medium 1640 (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) supplemented with 10% FBS (Lonza) and 2 mM glutamine (Lonza). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a water-saturated atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. 3x106 cells were seeded in 10 cm dishes; after 24 hours, cells were transfected with Apollon-specific siRNA or its unrelated control (Stealth RNAi siRNA, Invitrogen Life Technologies, Camarillo, CA) at a final concentration of 75 nmol/L and then left untreated or treated with fotemustine (Muphoran, Italfarmaco, Milan, Italy) at 150 umol/L for 6 hours, or with the BRAFV600E-specific inhibitor PLX4720 (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX) at 500 nmol/L for 8 hours, or with the MEK inhibitor PD0325901 (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI) at 5 nmol/L for 8 hours. Each treatment or combination was performed in triplicate. At the end of treatment, cells were collected and RNA extracted.

Dataset Information

Unbiased proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis identifies response signatures and novel susceptibilities after combined MEK and mTOR inhibition in BRAFV600E mutant glioma

Publications

Unbiased Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Analysis Identifies Response Signatures and Novel Susceptibilities After Combined MEK and mTOR Inhibition in BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> Mutant Glioma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure