Dataset Information

Secretome Processing for Proteomics: A Methods Comparison

ABSTRACT: The cancer cell secretome comprises a treasure-trove for biomarkers since it reflects cross-talk between tumor cells and their surrounding environment. In this study, we evaluated six secretome sample processing workflows coupled to single-shot mass spectrometry: 1. Protein concentration by ultrafiltration with a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) filter and sample preparation through in-gel digestion (IGD); 2. Acetone protein precipitation coupled to IGD; 3. MWCO filter-based protein concentration followed by to in-solution digestion (ISD); 4. Acetone protein precipitation coupled to ISD; 5. Direct ISD; 6. Secretome lyophilization and ISD. To this end, we assessed workflow triplicates in terms of total number of protein identifications, unique identifications, reproducibility of protein identification and quantification and detectability of small proteins with important functions in cancer biology such as cytokines, chemokines and growth factors.

INSTRUMENT(S): Q Exactive

ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (human)

TISSUE(S): Cell Culture

SUBMITTER: Thang Pham

LAB HEAD: Connie Jimenez

PROVIDER: PXD043014 | Pride | 2024-02-12

REPOSITORIES: Pride

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Secretome processing for proteomics: A methods comparison.

Almeida-Marques Catarina C Rolfs Frank F Piersma Sander R SR Bijnsdorp Irene V IV Pham Thang V TV Knol Jaco C JC Jimenez Connie R CR

Proteomics 20240114 7

The cancer cell secretome comprises a treasure-trove for biomarkers since it reflects cross-talk between tumor cells and their surrounding environment with high detectability in biofluids. In this study, we evaluated six secretome sample processing workflows coupled to single-shot mass spectrometry: (1) Protein concentration by ultrafiltration with a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) filter and sample preparation through in-gel digestion (IGD); (2) Acetone protein precipitation coupled to IGD; (3) ...[more]

PMID: 38221716

Similar Datasets

Project description:Prostate cancer (PCa) remains the malignancy with the highest morbidity in men (1). Although early-stage PCa usually causes no symptoms, cancer cells in prostate glands readily metastasize to bones, lymph nodes, lungs, and liver during PCa progression (2). Common strategies, including surgery, radiation therapy, and androgen-deprivation therapy, are promising treatments for early-stage PCa. However, advanced PCa still lacks effective therapeutic strategies (3-5). Thus, researchers are currently focused on inhibiting tumor progression to explore effective therapeutic strategies for PCa treatment (6, 7). Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), stromal cells derived from normal fibroblasts or epithelia, are one of the major cellular components in the tumor microenvironment (8, 9). Compared with normal fibroblasts, CAFs are activated with increased expression of key protein markers, such as α-SMA, FAP, vimentin and S100A4 protein (10, 11). In the tumor microenvironment, CAFs secrete various growth effectors or cytokines to the extracellular matrix and thereby promote tumor progression by directly enhancing cancer cell growth, angiogenic induction, the extracellular matrix modification, and tumor-promoting inflammatory mediation (11-14). Notably, CAFs could act as an immunosuppressive mediator for the formation of an immunosuppressive tumor environment by recruiting and activating multiple immune cells (15). As such, CAFs might be a potential target in anti-tumor immunotherapy (16, 17). Currently, increased research has focused on inhibiting the immunosuppressive function of prostate cancer-associated fibroblasts (prostate CAFs), which may suggest therapeutic strategies for PCa (18, 19). Polysaccharides from Lentinus edodes are known to exhibit potent anti-tumor and immunomodulatory functions. The anti-tumor mechanisms of L. edodes polysaccharides include regulating the innate immune system by mediating CAF function, preventing tumorigenesis, or directly killing tumor cells via cell cycle regulation or apoptotic induction (20-22). Our previous studies isolated a novel polysaccharide component (MPSSS) from L. edodes. We found the secretome of prostate CAFs treated with MPSSS could inhibit the proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, which suggested that MPSSS could prevent the immunosuppressive function of prostate CAFs (22). However, although the secretome of MPSSS-treated prostate CAFs inhibit the proliferation of T cells, how the secretome of MPSSS-treated prostate CAFs affect PCa progression is still unclear. The secretome defines as all proteins secreted by the organism or living cells into the extracellular space, which consists of soluble proteins and extracellular vesicles (EVs) (23). The secretome of prostate CAFs pays vital roles in PCa tumor origination, progression (24, 25). Since EVs contains various molecules (proteins, RNA, DNA and lipid) (26), we speculate that soluble proteins and EVs of prostate CAFs might have the different influence on PCa cells. In this study, the secretome of prostate CAFs untreated/treated with MPSSS were separated into the high molecular weight secretome (>100 kD) and the low molecular weight secretome (3-100 kD) using 100 kD and 3kD MWCO memberane filtration to narrow down the range of active components. The high molecular weight secretome contained extracellular vesicles (EVs) and large soluble proteins, while the low molecular weight secretome contained the small soluble proteins. The secretome of prostate CAFs untreated/treated with MPSSS were used to explore the underlying function and molecular mechanism using quantitative proteomics and multiple biochemical approaches.

Project description:Various environmental bacteria were adapted to the presence of toxic and recalcitrant organic solvents. Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34, a β-proteobacterium that was found in industrial environments is known as a bacterial model to study heavy metal resistance. Interestingly, genome screening of CH34 also reveals the existence of genes involved in the degradation of recalcitrant organic solvents, such acetone and aromatic compounds. Here, we showed that this bacterium could resist a large variety of organic solvents, and was also able to metabolize some of them. In particular, investigations were focused on acetone and isopropanol catabolism. Integrative studies based on transcriptomic (DNA microarrays), proteomic (2D-DIGE and Isotope-Coded Protein Label technology) and biochemical analyses (enzyme purification and characterization) showed a similar catabolic pathway for both molecules which involved the AcxABC acetone carboxylase. First, isopropanol is oxidized into acetone by the Adh alcohol dehydrogenase. Acetoacetate production from acetone is then catalyzed by the acetone carboxylase. The generated acetoacetate molecules are then transformed by the PacIJ 3-oxoacid CoA-transferase, to acetoacetyl-CoA and succinate. Finally, an acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase catalyses the hydrolysis of acetoacetyl-CoA into 2 acetyl-CoA that are introduced into the glyoxylate cycle. As demonstrated, key enzymes of the acetone/isopropanol catabolism (encoded by acx and ald genes) are under the control of a σ54-dependent RNA polymerase. Moreover, the catabolic pathway involved in acetone and isopropanol consumption was repressed when gluconate was given as alternative carbon substrate, displaying a new example of diauxie. The results presented here provide a comprehensive picture of acetone and isopropanol biodegradation in Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34 and strongly support the fact that CH34 can be considered as a solvent tolerant bacterium. Two-condition experiments. Comparing samples after induction with acetone versus non-induced samples. Biological triplicate. Each array contains 3 technical replicates.

Dataset Information

Secretome Processing for Proteomics: A Methods Comparison

Publications

Secretome processing for proteomics: A methods comparison.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure