MAFG proximity proteomic analysis in melanoma cells
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S):
ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (human)
TISSUE(S): Malignant Cell, Cell Culture
DISEASE(S): Skin Melanoma
SUBMITTER: 
Ilah Bok
LAB HEAD: Ben Major
PROVIDER: PXD055213 | Pride | 2026-02-19
REPOSITORIES: Pride
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL001_NLS_1.raw | Raw | |||
| FL002_NLS_2.raw | Raw | |||
| FL003_NLS_3.raw | Raw | |||
| FL007_MAFG_1.raw | Raw | |||
| FL008_MAFG_2.raw | Raw |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 7 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:ChIP-chip of Mes-4, H3K36me3 and H3K27me3 in N2 C. elegans early embryo EXPERIMENT TYPE: CHIP-chip. BIOLOGICAL SOURCE: Strain: N2; Developmental Stage: Early Embryo; Genotype: N2; Sex: population predominantly Hermaphrodites perhaps with some Males; NUMBER OF REPLICATES: 2 or 3; EXPERIMENTAL FACTORS: temperature 20
2012-05-29 | E-GEOD-38180 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the following subset Series: GSE38158: mes-2, mes-4 or mes-2; mes-4 mutants vs. wild type GSE38159: Strome MES-4, H3K36me3 and H3K27me3 in mes-4 RNAi EEMB GSE38180: Strome Mes-4, H3K36me3 and H3K27me3 in N2 EEMB Refer to individual Series
2012-05-29 | E-GEOD-38160 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:ChIP-seq analysis of elements that specify nucleosome positioning and occupancy, control domains of gene expression, induce repression of the X chromosome, guide mitotic segregation and genome duplication, govern homolog pairing and recombination during meiosis, and organize chromosome positioning within the nucleus. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODEDataReleasePolicyFinal2008.pdf ChIP-seq against TAG-315 in L3 stage N2 worms.
2011-05-02 | E-GEOD-28772 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:ChIP-seq analysis of elements that specify nucleosome positioning and occupancy, control domains of gene expression, induce repression of the X chromosome, guide mitotic segregation and genome duplication, govern homolog pairing and recombination during meiosis, and organize chromosome positioning within the nucleus. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODEDataReleasePolicyFinal2008.pdf ChIP-seq against SFC-1 in L3 stage N2 worms.
2011-05-02 | E-GEOD-28773 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:ChIP-seq analysis of elements that specify nucleosome positioning and occupancy, control domains of gene expression, induce repression of the X chromosome, guide mitotic segregation and genome duplication, govern homolog pairing and recombination during meiosis, and organize chromosome positioning within the nucleus. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODEDataReleasePolicyFinal2008.pdf ChIP-seq against H3K4me3 in L3 stage N2 worms.
2011-05-02 | E-GEOD-28775 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:ChIP-seq analysis of elements that specify nucleosome positioning and occupancy, control domains of gene expression, induce repression of the X chromosome, guide mitotic segregation and genome duplication, govern homolog pairing and recombination during meiosis, and organize chromosome positioning within the nucleus. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODEDataReleasePolicyFinal2008.pdf ChIP-seq against RPC-1 in L3 stage N2 worms.
2011-05-02 | E-GEOD-28774 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Throughout Metazoa, developmental processes are controlled by a surprisingly limited number of conserved signaling pathways. Precisely how these signaling cassettes were assembled in early animal evolution remains poorly understood, as do the molecular transitions that potentiated the acquisition of their myriad developmental functions. Here we analyze the molecular evolution of the proto-oncogene YAP/Yorkie, a key effector of the Hippo signaling pathway that controls organ size in both Drosophila and mammals. Based on heterologous functional analysis of evolutionarily distant Yap/Yorkie orthologs, we demonstrate that a structurally distinct interaction interface between Yap/Yorkie and its partner TEAD/Scalloped became fixed in the eumetazoan common ancestor. We then combine transcriptional profiling of tissues expressing phylogenetically diverse forms of Yap/Yorkie with ChIP-seq validation in order to identify a common downstream gene expression program underlying the control of tissue growth in Drosophila. Intriguingly, a subset of the newly-identified Yorkie target genes are also induced by Yap in mammalian tissues, thus revealing a conserved Yap-dependent gene expression signature likely to mediate organ size control throughout bilaterian animals. Combined, these experiments provide new mechanistic insights while revealing the ancient evolutionary history of Hippo signaling. We sought to determine Yki and Sd target genes in Drosophila by immunoprecipitation of Yki, sd and RNA polymerase II. Chromatin immunoprecipitation of Yki, sd, and RNA polymerase II from eye disks was performed.
2014-03-01 | E-GEOD-54601 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:modENCODE_submission_2969 This submission comes from a modENCODE project of Jason Lieb. For full list of modENCODE projects, see http://www.genome.gov/26524648 Project Goal: The focus of our analysis will be elements that specify nucleosome positioning and occupancy, control domains of gene expression, induce repression of the X chromosome, guide mitotic segregation and genome duplication, govern homolog pairing and recombination during meiosis, and organize chromosome positioning within the nucleus. Our 126 strategically selected targets include RNA polymerase II isoforms, dosage-compensation proteins, centromere components, homolog-pairing facilitators, recombination markers, and nuclear-envelope constituents. We will integrate information generated with existing knowledge on the biology of the targets and perform ChIP-chip analysis on mutant and RNAi extracts lacking selected target proteins. For data usage terms and conditions, please refer to http://www.genome.gov/27528022 and http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ENCODE/ENCODEDataReleasePolicyFinal2008.pdf Keywords: CHIP-chip EXPERIMENT TYPE: CHIP-chip. BIOLOGICAL SOURCE: Strain: N2; Developmental Stage: Mixed Embryo; Genotype: wild type; Sex: mixed Male and Hermaphrodite population; NUMBER OF REPLICATES: 3; EXPERIMENTAL FACTORS: Developmental Stage Mixed Embryo; temp (temperature) 20 degree celsius; Antibody JL00006 ZFP1 (target is ZFP-1); Strain N2
2011-03-09 | E-GEOD-27727 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Chromatin immunoprecipitation of Sir3 applied with tilling array chip ( ChIP on chip of Sir3) analysis demonstrated that Changes of conventional and dynamical Genome-wide localization of Sir3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during different growth stages comparison the genome-wide localization of Sir3 of logarithmic phase younger cells vs of stationary phase older cells
2013-07-01 | E-GEOD-39437 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:O-acetyl-ADP-ribose (AAR) is a small metabolic molecule that is generated during NAD-dependent deacetylation by Sir2. Sir2 regulates gene expression, DNA repair, and genome stability. chromatin affinity-precipitation (ChAP) method was used to detect the chromatin fragments at which small molecules interact with binding partners. Chromatin immunoprecipitation of Sir3 and of Sir2, respectively, applied with tilling array chip (ChIP on chip of Sir3 and of Sir2, respectively) and Chromatin affinity-precipitation of AAR applied with tilling array chip (ChAP on chip of AAR ) analysis demonstrated that an extended spreading of Sir3 and of AAR, but not Sir2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ysa1 deleted cells compared with those in wild type cells Comparison the distributions of Sir3, of Sir2 and of AAR on silent heterochromatin of Ysa1 deletion cells vs those of wild type cells
2015-12-31 | E-GEOD-65672 | biostudies-arrayexpress