Characterization of Transcriptionally Active Clock Complexes in Time and Space Using Quantitative Proteomics
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S):
ORGANISM(S): Mus Musculus (mouse)
TISSUE(S): Lung, Liver, Kidney
SUBMITTER: 
Fatih Aygenli
LAB HEAD: Maria Robles
PROVIDER: PXD062751 | Pride | 2026-06-24
REPOSITORIES: Pride
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20210220_FA_QC_LungZT4_Bmal11.raw | Raw | |||
| 20210220_FA_QC_LungZT4_Bmal12.raw | Raw | |||
| 20210220_FA_QC_LungZT4_Bmal13.raw | Raw | |||
| 20210220_FA_QC_LungZT4_Bmal14.raw | Raw | |||
| 20210220_FA_QC_LungZT4_Clock1.raw | Raw |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 185 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Circadian gene expression in mammals relies on the oscillatory activity of the BMAL1/CLOCK transcription factor complex, rhythmically binds to DNA. Despite the conserved presence of BMAL1/CLOCK in all tissues, circadian transcriptional outputs minimally overlap between tissues. Revision for the project PXD062751
2026-06-24 | PXD077567 | Pride
Project description:The timing and quality of sleep is regulated by circadian- and sleep–wake-driven processes. The core clock gene Bmal1 not only affects the circadian timing of sleep, but also the response to sleep deprivation (SD), which, in turn, causes long-term changes in cortical Bmal1 expression. We aimed at separating the circadian- and sleep–wake-driven contributions to BMAL1 binding to its target genes in the cerebral cortex by scheduling 6 SDs at 4 h intervals across the daily 12 h light/12 h dark cycle. We show that BMAL1 rhythmically bound its tissue-specific targets with tissue-specific dynamics, reaching peak binding 2 to 4 h later in the cortex than in the liver, while trough times did not differ. The SDs affected BMAL1 binding most significantly in the cortex, causing 80% of rhythmically bound regions to lose rhythmicity, suggesting BMAL1 binding has a prominent sleep–wake-driven component in this tissue. Analyses of the promoters of other core clock-genes indicate that BMAL1 binding to Bhlhe41 and Nr2d1 have a strong sleep–wake-driven component, while for Per2 two binding regions were identified one with circadian- and the other with sleep–wake-driven binding dynamics. Our results attest to a nonadditive interaction of time-of-day and time-spent-awake affecting the core molecular circadian circuitry. It further highlights that rhythms in gene expression in peripheral tissues are an emergent property of molecular interactions beyond that of the core molecular clock circuitry.
2025-11-27 | GSE299933 | GEO
Project description:Over the past decade, genome-wide assays have underscored the broad sweep of circadian gene expression. A substantial fraction of the transcriptome undergoes oscillations in many organisms and tissues, which governs the many biochemical, physiological and behavioral functions under circadian control. Based predominantly on the transcription feedback loops important for core circadian timekeeping, it is commonly assumed that this widespread mRNA cycling reflects circadian transcriptional cycling. To address this issue, we directly measured dynamic changes in mouse liver transcription using Nascent-Seq. Many genes are rhythmically transcribed over the 24h day, which include precursors of several non-coding RNAs as well as the expected set of core clock genes. Surprisingly however, nascent RNA rhythms overlap poorly with mRNA abundance rhythms assayed by RNA-seq. This is because most mouse liver genes with rhythmic mRNA expression manifest poor transcriptional rhythms, indicating a prominent role of post-transcriptional regulation in setting mRNA cycling amplitude. To gain further insight into circadian transcriptional regulation, we also characterized the rhythmic transcription of liver genes targeted by the transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1; they directly target other core clock genes and sit at the top of the molecular circadian clock hierarchy in mammals. CLK:BMAL1 rhythmically bind at the same discrete phase of the circadian cycle to all target genes, which not surprisingly have a much higher percentage of rhythmic transcription than the genome as a whole. However, there is a surprisingly heterogeneous set of cycling transcription phases of direct target genes, which even include core clock genes. This indicates a disconnect between rhythmic DNA binding and the peak of transcription, which is likely due to other transcription factors that collaborate with CLK:BMAL1. In summary, the application of Nascent-Seq to a mammalian tissue provides surprising insights into the rhythmic control of gene expression and should have broad applications beyond the analysis of circadian rhythms. CLK and BMAL1 DNA binding profile in the mouse liver at ZT8, sequenced along an Input sample using GAII (ChIP-Seq) Supplementary file ChIPSeq_Mouse_Liver_Processed_data_Table1.txt represents annotated CLK and BMAL1 peaks.
2012-11-10 | E-GEOD-36874 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Over the past decade, genome-wide assays have underscored the broad sweep of circadian gene expression. A substantial fraction of the transcriptome undergoes oscillations in many organisms and tissues, which governs the many biochemical, physiological and behavioral functions under circadian control. Based predominantly on the transcription feedback loops important for core circadian timekeeping, it is commonly assumed that this widespread mRNA cycling reflects circadian transcriptional cycling. To address this issue, we directly measured dynamic changes in mouse liver transcription using Nascent-Seq. Many genes are rhythmically transcribed over the 24h day, which include precursors of several non-coding RNAs as well as the expected set of core clock genes. Surprisingly however, nascent RNA rhythms overlap poorly with mRNA abundance rhythms assayed by RNA-seq. This is because most mouse liver genes with rhythmic mRNA expression manifest poor transcriptional rhythms, indicating a prominent role of post-transcriptional regulation in setting mRNA cycling amplitude. To gain further insight into circadian transcriptional regulation, we also characterized the rhythmic transcription of liver genes targeted by the transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1; they directly target other core clock genes and sit at the top of the molecular circadian clock hierarchy in mammals. CLK:BMAL1 rhythmically bind at the same discrete phase of the circadian cycle to all target genes, which not surprisingly have a much higher percentage of rhythmic transcription than the genome as a whole. However, there is a surprisingly heterogeneous set of cycling transcription phases of direct target genes, which even include core clock genes. This indicates a disconnect between rhythmic DNA binding and the peak of transcription, which is likely due to other transcription factors that collaborate with CLK:BMAL1. In summary, the application of Nascent-Seq to a mammalian tissue provides surprising insights into the rhythmic control of gene expression and should have broad applications beyond the analysis of circadian rhythms. Mouse liver nascent RNA profile over 6 time points of the 24h light:dark cycle, in duplicate, sequenced using Ilumina GAII (Nascent-Seq); Mouse liver mRNA profile over 6 time points of the 24h light:dark cycle, in duplicate, sequenced using Ilumina HiSeq2000 (RNA-Seq); CLK and BMAL1 DNA binding profile in the mouse liver at ZT8, sequenced along an Input sample using GAII (ChIP-Seq); Mouse liver strand-specific nascent RNA profile over 6 time points of the 24h light:dark cycle, in duplicate, sequenced using Ilumina HiSeq2000 (Strand-specific Nascent-Seq);
2012-11-10 | E-GEOD-36873 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The mammalian circadian clock relies on the transcription factor CLOCK:BMAL1 to coordinate the rhythmic expression of thousands of genes and enable biological functions to anticipate the daily environmental variations. Consistent with the wide range of biological functions under clock control, rhythmic gene expression is tissue-specific, and this even if the clockwork mechanism is identical in every cell. Here we show that BMAL1 DNA binding is largely tissue-specific, through mechanisms involving differences in chromatin accessibility between tissues as well as co-binding of tissue-specific transcription factors. Our results also indicate that the ability of BMAL1 to drive tissue-specific rhythmic transcription not only relies on the activity of BMAL1 cis-regulatory elements (CREs), but also on the activity of neighboring CREs. Characterization of the physical interactions between BMAL1 CREs and other CREs by RNA Polymerase II ChIA-PET in the mouse liver reveals that most interactions are stable over the course of the day, and suggests that BMAL1-mediated rhythmic transcription relies on its ability to regulate the transcriptional activity of other CREs. Our data therefore suggest that much of BMAL1 target gene transcription depends on BMAL1 capacity at rhythmically regulating a network of enhancers.
2018-05-08 | GSE110602 | GEO
Project description:The mammalian circadian clock relies on the transcription factor CLOCK:BMAL1 to coordinate the rhythmic expression of thousands of genes and enable biological functions to anticipate the daily environmental variations. Consistent with the wide range of biological functions under clock control, rhythmic gene expression is tissue-specific, and this even if the clockwork mechanism is identical in every cell. Here we show that BMAL1 DNA binding is largely tissue-specific, through mechanisms involving differences in chromatin accessibility between tissues as well as co-binding of tissue-specific transcription factors. Our results also indicate that the ability of BMAL1 to drive tissue-specific rhythmic transcription not only relies on the activity of BMAL1 cis-regulatory elements (CREs), but also on the activity of neighboring CREs. Characterization of the physical interactions between BMAL1 CREs and other CREs by RNA Polymerase II ChIA-PET in the mouse liver reveals that most interactions are stable over the course of the day, and suggests that BMAL1-mediated rhythmic transcription relies on its ability to regulate the transcriptional activity of other CREs. Our data therefore suggest that much of BMAL1 target gene transcription depends on BMAL1 capacity at rhythmically regulating a network of enhancers.
2018-05-08 | GSE110603 | GEO
Project description:Over the past decade, genome-wide assays have underscored the broad sweep of circadian gene expression. A substantial fraction of the transcriptome undergoes oscillations in many organisms and tissues, which governs the many biochemical, physiological and behavioral functions under circadian control. Based predominantly on the transcription feedback loops important for core circadian timekeeping, it is commonly assumed that this widespread mRNA cycling reflects circadian transcriptional cycling. To address this issue, we directly measured dynamic changes in mouse liver transcription using Nascent-Seq. Many genes are rhythmically transcribed over the 24h day, which include precursors of several non-coding RNAs as well as the expected set of core clock genes. Surprisingly however, nascent RNA rhythms overlap poorly with mRNA abundance rhythms assayed by RNA-seq. This is because most mouse liver genes with rhythmic mRNA expression manifest poor transcriptional rhythms, indicating a prominent role of post-transcriptional regulation in setting mRNA cycling amplitude. To gain further insight into circadian transcriptional regulation, we also characterized the rhythmic transcription of liver genes targeted by the transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1; they directly target other core clock genes and sit at the top of the molecular circadian clock hierarchy in mammals. CLK:BMAL1 rhythmically bind at the same discrete phase of the circadian cycle to all target genes, which not surprisingly have a much higher percentage of rhythmic transcription than the genome as a whole. However, there is a surprisingly heterogeneous set of cycling transcription phases of direct target genes, which even include core clock genes. This indicates a disconnect between rhythmic DNA binding and the peak of transcription, which is likely due to other transcription factors that collaborate with CLK:BMAL1. In summary, the application of Nascent-Seq to a mammalian tissue provides surprising insights into the rhythmic control of gene expression and should have broad applications beyond the analysis of circadian rhythms. Mouse liver nascent RNA profile over 6 time points of the 24h light:dark cycle, in duplicate, sequenced using Ilumina GAII (Nascent-Seq); Mouse liver mRNA profile over 6 time points of the 24h light:dark cycle, in duplicate, sequenced using Ilumina HiSeq2000 (RNA-Seq); CLK and BMAL1 DNA binding profile in the mouse liver at ZT8, sequenced along an Input sample using GAII (ChIP-Seq); Mouse liver strand-specific nascent RNA profile over 6 time points of the 24h light:dark cycle, in duplicate, sequenced using Ilumina HiSeq2000 (Strand-specific Nascent-Seq); Supplementary file NascentSeq_Mouse_Liver_NormalizedGeneSignal.txt represents Nascent RNA abundance (reads per base pair) for each sample.
2012-11-10 | E-GEOD-36872 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Over the past decade, genome-wide assays have underscored the broad sweep of circadian gene expression. A substantial fraction of the transcriptome undergoes oscillations in many organisms and tissues, which governs the many biochemical, physiological and behavioral functions under circadian control. Based predominantly on the transcription feedback loops important for core circadian timekeeping, it is commonly assumed that this widespread mRNA cycling reflects circadian transcriptional cycling. To address this issue, we directly measured dynamic changes in mouse liver transcription using Nascent-Seq. Many genes are rhythmically transcribed over the 24h day, which include precursors of several non-coding RNAs as well as the expected set of core clock genes. Surprisingly however, nascent RNA rhythms overlap poorly with mRNA abundance rhythms assayed by RNA-seq. This is because most mouse liver genes with rhythmic mRNA expression manifest poor transcriptional rhythms, indicating a prominent role of post-transcriptional regulation in setting mRNA cycling amplitude. To gain further insight into circadian transcriptional regulation, we also characterized the rhythmic transcription of liver genes targeted by the transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1; they directly target other core clock genes and sit at the top of the molecular circadian clock hierarchy in mammals. CLK:BMAL1 rhythmically bind at the same discrete phase of the circadian cycle to all target genes, which not surprisingly have a much higher percentage of rhythmic transcription than the genome as a whole. However, there is a surprisingly heterogeneous set of cycling transcription phases of direct target genes, which even include core clock genes. This indicates a disconnect between rhythmic DNA binding and the peak of transcription, which is likely due to other transcription factors that collaborate with CLK:BMAL1. In summary, the application of Nascent-Seq to a mammalian tissue provides surprising insights into the rhythmic control of gene expression and should have broad applications beyond the analysis of circadian rhythms. Mouse liver nascent RNA profile over 6 time points of the 24h light:dark cycle, in duplicate, sequenced using Ilumina GAII (Nascent-Seq); Mouse liver mRNA profile over 6 time points of the 24h light:dark cycle, in duplicate, sequenced using Ilumina HiSeq2000 (RNA-Seq); CLK and BMAL1 DNA binding profile in the mouse liver at ZT8, sequenced along an Input sample using GAII (ChIP-Seq); Mouse liver strand-specific nascent RNA profile over 6 time points of the 24h light:dark cycle, in duplicate, sequenced using Ilumina HiSeq2000 (Strand-specific Nascent-Seq); Supplementary file RNASeq_Mouse_Liver_NormalizedGeneSignal.txt represents mRNA abundance (reads per base pair) for each sample.
2012-11-10 | E-GEOD-36871 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Circadian rhythms in gene expression are coincident with 24hr dynamics in the recruitment of the core-clock transcription factor heterodimer CLOCK-BMAL1 to chromatin. In the liver, circadian chromatin is characterized by rhythmic histone modifications and the deposition of histone variant H2A.Z. However, other histone variants and the remodelers that work in conjunction with CLOCK-BMAL1 on variant chromatin remain poorly understood. Here, we reveal that H3.3 variant histone deposition peaks during the daytime in liver chromatin and that CLOCK-BMAL1 is recruited to H3.3 nucleosomes. Moreover, H3.3:CLOCK-BMAL1 associates with PBAF and BRG1/cBAF complexes - members of the SWI/SNF remodeler family - only during the active phase of the circadian cycle. In clock-disrupted Per1-/-; Per2-/- livers, we observe a depletion in ARID2, the central cog in the molecular assembly of the PBAF complex, accompanied by an increase in H3.3 incorporation. Remarkably, a disassembly of PBAF complex and the concurrent reduction in BRG1 triggers a remodeler reorganization in Per knockout livers, where BRM/cBAF now targets BMAL1 at readily-accessible genomic sites. An abundance of fragile acetylated H3.3 nucleosomes and a remodeler reorganization provide a mechanistic basis for BMAL1 activity in the absence of PER-mediated negative feedback.
2025-08-22 | PXD061974 | Pride
Project description:Peripheral circadian clocks regulate many aspects of physiology. In this study we deleted the core circadian clock component Bmal1 specifically in mouse adipocytes in order to study the role of the adipocyte clock in energy homeostasis and body weight. We used microarrays to indentify changes in gene expression in the adipose tissue of mice lacking a functional adipocyte circadian clock and identified a small number of up- and down- regulated genes. Adipose tissues were isolated from inguinal adipose fat pads at four different times of the diurnal cycle under constant darkness (circadian time, CT) for RNA extraction and hybridization on Affymetrix microarrays. Adipocyte-specific Bmal1 KO (Ad-Bmal1-/-) and control mice were used for isolation of tissues at CT0, CT6, CT12, CT18 where CT0 the beginning of the subjective day.
2012-10-21 | E-GEOD-35026 | biostudies-arrayexpress