Proteomics

Dataset Information

0

Comparative Evaluation of Solid-Phase and Membrane Mimetic Strategies in Membrane Proteome Coverage and Disease-State Analysis


ABSTRACT: Membrane proteins (MPs) are vital to cellular signaling, metabolism, and disease pathology, yet remain underrepresented in proteomics. To address this, several independent workflows have been developed to enable the profiling of the membrane proteome, however the relative advantages and limitations of each method remains poorly defined. Here, we systematically compare four classical solid-phase membrane proteomic workflows (SP3, SP4, FASP, S-Trap) and three membrane mimetic strategies (Peptidisc, nanodisc, and SMALP copolymer) for mass spectrometry-based membrane proteome profiling, using healthy (LFD) and obese (HFD) mouse liver tissue. We found that the solid-phase methods yield higher total protein identifications, while the membrane mimetic systems enrich MPs. SMALP copolymer displays intermediate characteristics between the solid-phase and membrane mimetic workflows. Peptidisc and nanodisc stand out for their enrichment of MPs, although Peptidisc shows better enrichment of plasma membrane integral MPs, particularly those with 11+ transmembrane segments. In the context of HFD-induced liver proteome remodeling, the Peptidisc workflow outperformed the other six methods by capturing the highest number of differentially expressed MPs and demonstrating the lowest standard deviation of MP-level dysregulation. Collectively, this comparative analysis highlights the trade-offs between depth of proteome coverage and MP enrichment across workflows, underscoring the importance of method selection based on total protein counts, MP enrichment, and the accurate detection of MP-level dysregulation.

INSTRUMENT(S):

ORGANISM(S): Mus Musculus (mouse)

TISSUE(S): Liver

DISEASE(S): Obesity

SUBMITTER: Ashim Bhattacharya  

LAB HEAD: Dr. Franck Duong

PROVIDER: PXD070243 | Pride | 2026-01-01

REPOSITORIES: Pride

Dataset's files

Source:
Action DRS
FP-PDV.db Other
HA241003OE2BO3004PepLFD1.raw Raw
HA241003OE2BO3004PepLFD1_uncalibrated.mzML Mzml
HA241003OE2BO3005PepLFD2.raw Raw
HA241003OE2BO3005PepLFD2_uncalibrated.mzML Mzml
Items per page:
1 - 5 of 101
altmetric image

Publications

Comparative Evaluation of Solid-Phase and Membrane Mimetic Strategies in Membrane Proteome Coverage and Disease-State Analysis.

Antony Frank F   Bhattacharya Ashim A   Aoki Hiroyuki H   Jandu Rupinder S RS   Abdualkader Abdualrahman M AM   Al Batran Rami R   Babu Mohan M   Duong van Hoa Franck F  

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP 20251219


Membrane proteins (MPs) are vital to cellular signaling, metabolism, and disease pathology, yet remain underrepresented in proteomics. To address this, several independent workflows have been developed to enable the profiling of the membrane proteome, however the relative advantages and limitations of each method remain poorly defined. Here, we systematically compare four classical solid-phase membrane proteomic workflows (SP3, SP4, FASP, S-Trap) and three membrane mimetic strategies (Peptidisc,  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2025-03-18 | GSE291904 | GEO
2019-12-05 | GSE110013 | GEO
2025-01-23 | GSE245069 | GEO
2023-10-24 | PXD039990 | Pride
2023-10-24 | PXD041913 | Pride
2024-08-23 | PXD052184 | Pride
2023-03-22 | PXD018866 | Pride
2025-11-17 | PXD068828 | Pride
2022-06-09 | PXD032315 | Pride
2025-10-01 | GSE306246 | GEO