Project description:The mucosal penetration area formed by implant placement is critical problems of dental implant treatment, because epithelial barrier is broken and it can become a source of inflammation. To clarify the influence and risk caused by dental implant treatment in peri-implant soft tissue, we compared gene expression profile of peri-implant soft tissue and oral mucosal tissue with microarray analysis.
Project description:The mucosal penetration area formed by implant placement is critical problems of dental implant treatment, because epithelial barrier is broken and it can become a source of inflammation. To clarify the influence and risk caused by dental implant treatment in peri-implant soft tissue, we compared to gene expression profile of peri-implant soft tissue and oral mucosal tissue with microarray analysis.
Project description:The mucosal penetration area formed by implant placement is critical problems of dental implant treatment, because epithelial barrier is broken and it can become a source of inflammation. To clarify the influence and risk caused by dental implant treatment in peri-implant soft tissue, we compared to gene expression profile of peri-implant soft tissue and oral mucosal tissue with microarray analysis. Both side upper first molars of 4 week-old rat were extracted, and titanium alloy implants were placed only in the left extraction socket. Four weeks after surgery, samples were harvested from left side of peri-implant soft tissue and right side of oral mucosal tissue.
Project description:In this study we want to ascertain the differences and similarities of infected and inflammated peri implant tissue versus healthy peri implant tissue at the mRNA level. Six of the patients where affected by periimplantitis. In situ dental implants where explanted because of inflammation and non-integration. From two patients, implants were explanted because of wrong placement. They where classified as implants with healthy periimplant tissue.
Project description:Rationale:Poor peri-implant osseointegration of dental implants in patients with type II diabetes has become a major clinical challenge in recent years. MSC (Mesenchymal stem cell)-derived exosomes may play an important role in peri-implant osseointegration, but the mechanism remains unclear. Enhancing the therapeutic effect of MSC-derived exosomes and exploring the potential mechanism can help provide a new therapeutic strategy to improve the clinical outcome of dental implant restorations in patients with type II diabetes. Methods:The exosomes derived from hypoxia (Hypo-exos) or normoxia (Nor-exos) preconditioned bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were co-cultured with BMSCs and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The effect of exosomes on BMSCs cell proliferation was detected by CCK-8 assay and EdU assay, and the effect on angiogenesis ability of HUVECs was detected by wound healing assay, transwell migration assay, tube formation assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blot. A diabetic rat dental implant model was also established and the effect of exosomes on implant osseointegration was evaluated through micro-CT scanning and histological analysis. The differentially expressed miRNAs between Hypo-exos and Nor-exos were identified by high-throughput miRNA sequencing. Subsequently, the target genes and their roles in regulating angiogenesis were predicted and analyzed by bioinformatics analysis and dual luciferase reporter assay. Results:In vitro experiments indicated that hypoxia preconditioning could elevate exosome production and promote cell proliferation of BMSCs and angiogenesis of HUVECs. Moreover, Hypo-exos promoted peri-implant osteogenesis in rats with diabetes. Further investigation revealed the vital involvement of the miR-106b-5p/HIF-1α axis in promoting peri-implant osseointegration. Conclusion: Exosomes derived from hypoxia-preconditioned BMSCs could improve the peri-implant osseointegration in rats with diabetes by promoting cell proliferation and angiogenesis, and the miR-106b-5p/ HIF-1α axis could be the underlying mechanism.
Project description:Type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)patients are a concern for dentists due to the lower success rate of healing period implant treatment. Here, we firstly calculated the success rate of in the healing period of diabetic and non-diabetic patients in the implant center of our hospital.Then we investigated the potential risk factors by proteomics analysis of 5 T2DM implant faliure patients in our implant center and compared the difference between high glucose induction study model and mesenchymal stem cell model from diabetic patients. The results suggested that the significantly higher implant failure rates in the T2DM group and the cell models derived from patients can be more comprehensive and accurate in reflecting the exact situation of BMSCs in patients with diabetes.
Project description:Peri-implant fibrosis is one of the most common reasons for implant failure and surgical revision after prosthetic joint replacement. This type of surgical revisionis associated with substantial additional morbidity and healthcare costs. However, the cellular and molecular mediators of peri-implant fibrosis remain unclear. Here, we show that peri-implant fibrotic tissue in mice and humans is largely composed of a specific population of leptin receptor-expressing(LEPR+) cells and that these LEPR+cells are necessary and sufficient to both generate and maintain peri-implant fibrotic tissue. Genetic ablation of LEPR+cells prevents peri-implant fibrosis, and implantation of LEPR+cells from peri-implant fibrotic tissue is sufficient to induce fibrosis in secondary hosts. We further identify adhesion G protein-coupled receptorF5 (ADGRF5) as a crucial mediator of the fibrotic response by LEPR+cells, as conditional deletion of ADGRF5 in LEPR+cells attenuates peri-implant fibrosis while augmenting peri-implant bone formation. Finally, we demonstrate that inhibition of ADGRF5 by intra articular or systemic administration of neutralizing anti-ADGRF5prevents and reverses peri-implant fibrosis. Thus, pharmaceutical agents that inhibit the ADGRF5 pathway inLEPR+cells may represent a new approach to prevent and treat peri-implant fibrosis.
Project description:In this study we want to ascertain the differences and similarities of infected and inflammated peri implant tissue versus healthy peri implant tissue at the mRNA level.