Project description:Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and Enamel Matrix Derivatives (EMD) can support the local regenerative events in periodontal defects. There is reason to suggest that PRF and EMD exert part of their activity by targeting the blood-derived cells accumulating in the early wound healing blastema. However, the impact of PRF and EMD on blood cell response remains to be discovered. To this aim, we have exposed human peripheral blood mononucleated cells (PBMCs) to PRF lysates and EMD, followed by bulk RNA sequencing. A total of 111 and 8 genes are up- and down-regulated by PRF under the premise of an at least log2 two-fold change and a minus log10 significance level of two, respectively. Representative is a characteristic IFN response indicated by various human leukocyte antigens (HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQA2, HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DRB5), gamma Fc receptors (FCGR1A, FCGR1B, FCGR3B), chemokines (CXCL9-11), and calprotectin (S100A8/9 and S100A12), complement (C1QA/B, C2) and interferon-induced guanylate-binding proteins (GBP1, GBP5). With EMD, 67 and 29 genes are up- and down-regulated, respectively. Characteristics of the upregulated genes are tensins (TNS1 and TNS3). Among the genes downregulated by EMD were epsilon Fc receptors (FCER1A; FCER2) and Fc receptor-like proteins (FCRL1, FCRL3) and CX3CR1. Genes commonly upregulated by PRF and EMD were most noticeably NXPH4 and MN1, but also FN1, MMP14, MERTK, and AXL. Our findings suggest that PRF provokes an inflammatory response, while EMD dampens IgE signaling in peripheral mononucleated blood cells.
Project description:Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is prepared from the coagulated plasma of fractionated blood. When squeezing between two plates, PRF is separated into the solid PRF membranes and a liquid exudate, the PRF serum. The question arises regarding the extent to which the overall PRF activity remains in the membranes and what is lost in the serum. To this aim, we have exposed gingival fibroblasts to lysates prepared from PRF membranes and PRF serum, followed by bulk RNA sequencing. A total of 268 up- and 136 down-regulated genes in gingival fibroblasts exposed to PRF lysates are significantly regulated under the premise of a minimum log2 2.5-fold change and a minus log10 significance level of two, respectively. PRF serum caused 62 up- and 32 down-regulated genes when gingival fibroblasts were exposed to PRF serum, respectively. Among the 61 genes commonly up-regulated by PRF lysate and serum were CXCL1, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL8, IL33, and IL6 and PTGS2, STC1. PRF lysate further increased the chemokines CCL2, CCL7, CXCL2, CXCL3, and the IL1R1, IL1RL1, and IL1RN – as well as the paracrine factors IL11, LIF, IGF1, BMP2, BMP6, FGF2, CCN2/CTGF and HAS1, HAS2, HAS3. The 16 up-regulated genes by PRF serum included DKK1. Among the 122 down-regulated genes by PRF lysate were IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, OSR1, OSR2. Among the 32 down-regulated genes by PRF serum were FGF18 and GDF15. Taken together, PRF lysates, compared to PRF serum, cause a more complex response of gingival fibroblasts with a chemokine with an obvious increase in chemokine expression and spectrum of paracrine factors.
Project description:Extended platelet-rich fibrin (e-PRF) combines the prolonged resorption properties of heat-coagulated platelet-poor plasma (PPP), becoming an albumin gel (Alb-gel) that is mixed back with the respective native cell-rich buffy coat layer (BC), the concentrated PRF (C-PRF). E-PRF or Alb-PRF is utilized as a barrier membrane in various clinical applications, such as guided tissue regeneration. Heating of PPP might lower its biological activity, but testing this hypothesis is necessary. To this end, we exposed gingival fibroblasts to lysates of regular PPP, heated PPP (hPPP), and BC, followed by bulk RNA sequencing. Gingival fibroblasts respond to PPP lysates with a total of 153 up- and 71 down-regulated genes when considering a minimum 3.0-fold log2 expression change and a significance level 2.0 log-10. In sharp contrast, the response to hPPP was characterized by only five up-regulated and five down-regulated genes, clearly indicating that heating almost completely abolished the biological activity of PPP. As expected, BC was more potent than PPP and broadened the spectrum of regulated genes. RT-PCR and immunoassays confirmed the heat sensitivity of PPP as exemplified by IL11 and other genes. Moreover, PPP, but not hPPP, drives the phosphorylation of p65, representing NF-κB signaling. Taken together, these findings extend previous observations that PPP causes a robust response in gingival fibroblasts and also strengthen the hypothesis that this response is heat-sensitive. These operations support the clinical concept of e-PRF by mixing back the heated inactive PPP with the bioactive buffy coat C-PRF layer.
Project description:Therapeutic angiogenesis in inflammatory microenvironments is constrained by mitochondrial dysfunction in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). This study demonstrates that platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) serves as a mitochondrial reservoir that transfers functional mitochondria to dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) via extracellular vesicle-dependent mechanisms. Multi-omics analyses revealed that PRF-derived mitochondria activated the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in DPSCs, driving concurrent fatty acid biosynthesis and JAK2/STAT4-mTOR pathway activation. This metabolic-signaling integration enhanced VEGF secretion and cell migration under inflammatory conditions. PRF’s fibrin matrix further sustained mitochondrial release while providing topological guidance for DPSC recruitment. In vivo, PRF-DPSC composites significantly accelerated wound closure and neovascularization compared to controls, supported by histomorphometric and molecular analyses. Beyond cytokine delivery, this work establishes PRF as a mitochondrial-augmented biomaterial to reverse MSC metabolic insufficiency, offering a translatable strategy for vascular regeneration in hostile microenvironments.
Project description:Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is prepared by spontaneous coagulation of fractionated blood. When squeezed between two plates, PRF is separated into solid PRF membranes and a liquid exudate, the PRF serum. The question arises regarding how much the overall activity remains in the PRF membranes and what is discarded into the PRF serum. To this end, we have exposed gingival fibroblasts to lysates prepared from PRF membranes and PRF serum, followed by bulk RNA sequencing. A total of 268 up- and 136 down-regulated genes in gingival fibroblasts exposed to PRF membrane lysates were significantly regulated under the premise of a minimum log2 with 2.5-fold change and a minus log10 significance level of two, respectively. PRF serum only caused 62 up- and 32 down-regulated genes under these conditions. Among the 46 commonly up-regulated genes were CXCL1, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL8, IL33, IL6, and PTGS2/COX2, stanniocalcin-1-all linked to an inflammatory response. PRF membrane lysates further increased chemokines CCL2, CCL7, CXCL2, CXCL3, and IL1R1, IL1RL1, and IL1RN, as well as the paracrine factors IL11, LIF, IGF1, BMP2, BMP6, FGF2, and CCN2/CTGF, and all hyaluronan synthases. On the other hand, PRF serum increased DKK1. The genes commonly down-regulated by PRF membrane lysates and PRF serum included interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats (IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3) and odd-skipped-related transcription factors (OSR1 and OSR2), as well as FGF18 and GDF15, respectively. Taken together, PRF membrane lysates, compared to PRF serum, cause a more complex response in gingival fibroblasts, but each increased chemokine expression in gingival fibroblasts.
Project description:In order to determine genes that are differentially expressed during angiogenesis, Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) were cultured as 3D cultures undergoing tubulogenesis in a 3D fibrin matrix, or cultured as monolayers on top of a 3D fibrin matrix. RNA was then collected, reverse transcribed to cDNA and hybridized to glass slide oligo arrays containing 19k human genes. Differentially expressed genes in HUVECs undergoing tubulogenesis were then determined by comparing 2D to 3D culture samples.