Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Sediment eDNA metabarcoding in Black Sea in the framework of the BRIDGE-BS project

ABSTRACT: Sediment eDNA metabarcoding in Black Sea

PROVIDER: PRJEB83641 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR14077000_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR14077000_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR14077001_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR14077001_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR14077002_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 80

Similar Datasets

Black Sea Project

Project description:Black Sea Project Metagenome

| PRJNA666064 | ENA

eDNA metabarcoding study in the Irish Sea

Project description:eDNA metabarcoding study in the Irish Sea

| PRJEB45030 | ENA

Groundwater eDNA metabarcoding

Project description:Groundwater eDNA metabarcoding Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA905821 | ENA

Metabarcoding diets of juvenile Black Sea Bass

Project description:Metabarcoding diets of juvenile Black Sea Bass Targeted loci environmental

| PRJNA1101022 | ENA

GdpS contributes to Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation by regulation of eDNA release

Project description:In Staphylococcus aureus, the role of the GGDEF domain containing protein GdpS remains poorly understood. Previous studies reported that gdpS mutant strains had decreased biofilm formation due to changes in icaADBC expression that were independent of cyclic-di-GMP levels. We deleted gdpS in three unrelated S. aureus isolates, and analyzed the resultant mutants for alterations in biofilm formation, metabolism and transcription. Dynamic imaging during biofilm development showed that GdpS inhibited early biofilm formation in only two out of the three strains examined, without affecting bacterial survival. However, quantification of biofilm formation using crystal violet staining revealed that inactivation of gdpS affected biofilm formation in all three studied strains. Extraction of metabolites from S. aureus cells confirmed the absence of cyclic-di-GMP, suggesting that biofilm formation in this species differs from that in other Gram-positive organisms. In addition, targeted mutagenesis demonstrated that the GGDEF domain was not required for GdpS activity. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that the vast majority of GGDEF-regulated genes were involved in virulence, metabolism, cell wall biogenesis and eDNA release. Finally, expression of lrgAB or deletion of cidABC in a strain lacking gdpS confirmed the role of GdpS on regulation of eDNA production that occurred without an increase in cell autolysis. In summary, S. aureus GdpS contributes to cell-to-cell interactions during early biofilm formation by influencing expression of lrgAB and cidABC mediated eDNA release. We conclude that GdpS acts as a negative regulator of eDNA release.

2014-06-30 | GSE48656 | GEO

Sediment and Water eDNA metabarcoding: WH429 research cruise North Sea

Project description:eDNA metabarcoding using Mifish primers at the North Sea

| PRJEB86796 | ENA

Black Sea Magnetococcus

Project description:Magnetococcus sequences from the Black Sea

| PRJEB23128 | ENA

Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes.

Project description:The deep ocean is the largest biome on Earth and faces increasing anthropogenic pressures from climate change and commercial fisheries. Our ability to sustainably manage this expansive habitat is impeded by our poor understanding of its inhabitants and by the difficulties in surveying and monitoring these areas. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has great potential to improve our understanding of this region and to facilitate monitoring across a broad range of taxa. Here, we evaluate two eDNA sampling protocols and seven primer sets for elucidating fish diversity from deep sea water samples. We found that deep sea water samples (> 1400 m depth) had significantly lower DNA concentrations than surface or mid-depth samples necessitating a refined protocol with a larger sampling volume. We recovered significantly more DNA in large volume water samples (1.5 L) filtered at sea compared to small volume samples (250 mL) held for lab filtration. Furthermore, the number of unique sequences (exact sequence variants; ESVs) recovered per sample was higher in large volume samples. Since the number of ESVs recovered from large volume samples was less variable and consistently high, we recommend the larger volumes when sampling water from the deep ocean. We also identified three primer sets which detected the most fish taxa but recommend using multiple markers due the variability in detection probabilities and taxonomic resolution among fishes for each primer set. Overall, fish diversity results obtained from metabarcoding were comparable to conventional survey methods. While eDNA sampling and processing need be optimized for this unique environment, the results of this study demonstrate that eDNA metabarcoding can facilitate biodiversity surveys in the deep ocean, require less dedicated survey effort per unit identification, and are capable of simultaneously providing valuable information on other taxonomic groups.

| S-EPMC7641347 | biostudies-literature

Padarn eDNA: annual time series with eDNA metabarcoding.

Project description:Biodiversity monitoring of a lake ecosystem through eDNA metabarcoding

| PRJEB13009 | ENA

fish eDNA metabarcoding bycatch

Project description:Beyond fish eDNA metabarcoding: Field replicates disproportionately improve the detection of stream associated vertebrate species

| PRJEB45400 | ENA

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data