Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Membrane fouling mechanisms for aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors

ABSTRACT: Characterization of biofoulants illustrates different membrane fouling mechanisms for aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors

PROVIDER: PRJEB9458 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR904482.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR904483.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR904484.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR904485.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR904486.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 18

Similar Datasets

Reduced membrane fouling in an anaerobic electrochemical membrane bioreactors using graphene-coated hollow fiber membranes as the cathode

Project description:Reduced membrane fouling in an anaerobic electrochemical membrane bioreactors using graphene-coated hollow fiber membranes as the cathode

| PRJEB9642 | ENA

Slduge from Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors

Project description:Slduge from Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors Raw sequence reads

| PRJNA429520 | ENA

Desulfurization wastewater and RO membrane fouling layer

Project description:Desulfurization wastewater and RO membrane fouling layer

| PRJNA1059484 | ENA

UV and Bacteriophages against anaerobic membrane biofouling

Project description:UV and bacteriophages treatment: chemicals-free approach to reduce fouling in anaerobic membrane bioreactors

| PRJEB38595 | ENA

Attached-growth configuration outperforms continuously stirred tank anaerobic membrane bioreactors in alleviating membrane biofouling

Project description:Attached-growth configuration outperforms continuously stirred tank anaerobic membrane bioreactors in alleviating membrane biofouling

| PRJEB43099 | ENA

OMPs in Aerobic and Anaerobic MBRs

Project description:Organic micropollutants in aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors (MBR): changes in microbial communities and gene expression

| PRJEB12338 | ENA

Comparison of activated sludge and virus interactions in aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors.

Project description:Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) are effective sewage treatment technologies, yet the differences in virus removal efficiency between aerobic (AeMBR) and anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR), remain inadequately understood. This study compared the virus removal efficiency of AeMBR and AnMBR, focusing on the interactions between aerobic (AeS) and anaerobic (AnS) activated sludge and viruses in the sewage treatment process. Results showed average log removal values (LRVs) for MS2 of 2.53 ± 0.54 in AeMBR and 1.64 ± 0.90 in AnMBR due to the higher virus inactivation in the aerobic mixed liquor. The virus concentration in AnS was greater than in AeS, consistent with the predictions from the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Soluble extracellular polymeric substances (S-EPS) were key to virus adsorption in AeS, while tightly bound EPS (TB-EPS) were significant in AnS. Additionally, more fluorescent substances in AnS contributed to virus adsorption, while more functional groups in AeS offered adsorption sites.

| S-EPMC11681883 | biostudies-literature

Sludge from anaerobic bioreactors

Project description:Sludge from anaerobic bioreactors Metagenome

| PRJNA814683 | ENA

Membrane filtration device for studying compression of fouling layers in membrane bioreactors.

Project description:A filtration devise was developed to assess compressibility of fouling layers in membrane bioreactors. The system consists of a flat sheet membrane with air scouring operated at constant transmembrane pressure to assess the influence of pressure on resistance of fouling layers. By fitting a mathematical model, three model parameters were obtained; a back transport parameter describing the kinetics of fouling layer formation, a specific fouling layer resistance, and a compressibility parameter. This stands out from other on-site filterability tests as model parameters to simulate filtration performance are obtained together with a characterization of compressibility. Tests on membrane bioreactor sludge showed high reproducibility. The methodology's ability to assess compressibility was tested by filtrations of sludges from membrane bioreactors and conventional activated sludge wastewater treatment plants from three different sites. These proved that membrane bioreactor sludge showed higher compressibility than conventional activated sludge. In addition, detailed information on the underlying mechanisms of the difference in fouling propensity were obtained, as conventional activated sludge showed slower fouling formation, lower specific resistance and lower compressibility of fouling layers, which is explained by a higher degree of flocculation.

| S-EPMC5531554 | biostudies-literature

Impact of in–situ bioelectric field on biogas production, membrane fouling and microbial community in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor under sulfadiazine stress

Project description:Impact of in–situ bioelectric field on biogas production, membrane fouling and microbial community in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor under sulfadiazine stress

| PRJEB83963 | ENA

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data